Recommended Posts

I'm sure you'll blame the MSM

Sorry but... :rofl:

Site is ok here and was ok for the last few weeks...

Stop downloading porn/torrent and it will be ok...

What's MSM? Google found: methyl sulfonyl methane :p

MSM = mainstream media.

But on topic: I can't say I'm noticing slowdown at all from Neowin within the past few weeks, and I browse this site on a daily basis. Really now, if it's fast for some and slow for some, then it's down to your ISP or your DNS servers. If it's slow for everyone, then it's a script in the forum software gone haywire (for instance, this one idiot slowed the entire site down by posting lots of <div> tags), the site got Dugg or Slashdotted, or hardware fault on the servers end (highly unlikely though).

Even if there would be 100 complains, that don't mean that Neowin the site itself have problems you know.

That can mean that there is few persons that download like crazy, few persons that have trouble with their PC (Malwares), few person that have trouble with their ISPs, that few problems have occurred between their ISP and the ISP that give IP to the Host that host Neowin, that could mean that the server could have got too many request at that time, and there many other reasons that could happens and that is impossible to fix for Neowin, since they are not from them.

You act like EVERY TIME there is a bug, and someone complain, it's the fault of Neowin.

Sorry, but this is not the case... I would says that 90% of slowdowns and bugs on a site are not actually happening on the site's server.

If I visit 10 to 15 forums a day and this is the ONLY one that is slow at times, logic would tell me that the problem is with Neowin. I understand that this forum has a great deal of traffic, but we were told that the last upgrade would make the forum faster. I have posted that it is intermittent. When it is slow loading, I notice that the Latest Activity Section is not loading, there is just a round orb looking thing spinning. Now for the record it is not the fact that Neowin is slow loading at times, it is the fact that after 40 posts no one from the staff even bothered to to reply.

If the DEV's or other staff are not going to bother looking at this section, then it should be closed and Members could just PM a problem. To completely ignore a complaint, is not a good business practice.

You've had 4 staff / mods reply in this thread.

These aren't the staff you're looking for *waves hand*

The 12th and 18th posts were both by staff members saying they saw the problem, the only way you could say staff were ignoring the thread was if you were ignoring the staff responses to the thread.

These aren't the staff you're looking for *waves hand*

The 12th and 18th posts were both by staff members saying they saw the problem, the only way you could say staff were ignoring the thread was if you were ignoring the staff responses to the thread.

What good is a post from a News Reporter. The mod that posted was posting a problem. The only staff that can actually do anything are the DEV's. "waves Hand" :D

Those aren't the staff I'm looking for :|

Ouch :wacko:

Yes a News Reporter can write a story about it while a Developer can actually say if there is a problem or not. Now this is not a discussion topic, so I am done responding to anyone but a DEV.

The only staff that can actually do anything are the DEV's. "waves Hand" :D

*Waves back*

The problem is, slowness connecting to the site isn't the type of issue that shows up in log files. What you can do to help us is take a traceroute to our servers at the time you're experiencing a slowdown in getting connected, maybe it's taking a slightly different route to get to us than normal? We can't know unless we see it ourselves or have that kind of data from a bunch of you guys.

The IPS Driver issues are totally unrelated to the site being slow to connect to, so don't bother with a trace when you're seeing those. Looking at the logs (those ones do get recorded) they are pretty rare.

What good is a post from a News Reporter. The mod that posted was posting a problem. The only staff that can actually do anything are the DEV's. "waves Hand" :D

Wow, that was dry. :rolleyes:

*Waves back*

The problem is, slowness connecting to the site isn't the type of issue that shows up in log files. What you can do to help us is take a traceroute to our servers at the time you're experiencing a slowdown in getting connected, maybe it's taking a slightly different route to get to us than normal? We can't know unless we see it ourselves or have that kind of data from a bunch of you guys.

The IPS Driver issues are totally unrelated to the site being slow to connect to, so don't bother with a trace when you're seeing those. Looking at the logs (those ones do get recorded) they are pretty rare.

Will Do.

What good is a post from a News Reporter. The mod that posted was posting a problem. The only staff that can actually do anything are the DEV's. "waves Hand" :D

Actually, he is an IRC Moderator, not a News Reporter ;)

Just had some problems such as recent forum activity never loading and buttons not being represented graphically so ran the trace route.

Tracing route to neowin.net [209.124.63.215] over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 192.168.1.1

2 10 ms 7 ms 7 ms 10.5.148.1

3 8 ms 7 ms 7 ms osr01live-ge234.network.virginmedia.net [81.97.114.33]

4 11 ms 11 ms 12 ms osr01know-tenge84.network.virginmedia.net [81.97.112.73]

5 11 ms 11 ms 9 ms lee-bb-a-ge-320-0.network.virginmedia.net [195.182.178.145]

6 28 ms 16 ms 20 ms nth-bb-b-as2-0.network.virginmedia.net [62.253.185.101]

7 16 ms 15 ms 17 ms tele-ic-1-as0-0.network.virginmedia.net [62.253.184.2]

8 188 ms 25 ms 206 ms te4-3.mpd01.lon02.atlas.cogentco.com [130.117.14.141]

9 18 ms 18 ms 20 ms te2-3.mpd02.lon01.atlas.cogentco.com [130.117.0.253]

10 90 ms 91 ms 91 ms te4-4.ccr02.bos01.atlas.cogentco.com [130.117.0.46]

11 90 ms 86 ms 85 ms gi11-0-0.core01.bos01.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.5.21]

12 104 ms 105 ms 105 ms po6-0.core01.tol01.atlas.cogentco.com [66.28.4.158]

13 104 ms 105 ms 105 ms po6-0.core01.dtw04.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.25.110]

14 107 ms 106 ms 105 ms vl3801.na31.b020673-1.dtw04.atlas.cogentco.com [38.112.37.86]

15 106 ms 105 ms 105 ms 38.104.38.10

16 107 ms 109 ms 120 ms 216-234-104-162.static.123.net [216.234.104.162]

17 130 ms 103 ms 106 ms server4.neowin.net [209.124.63.215]

18 105 ms 107 ms 104 ms server4.neowin.net [209.124.63.215]

Trace complete.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • If you don't care to read what I said, then you prove my point. Maybe written media is beyond your attention span. Titles are not summaries my friend.
    • Nobody asked... in fact, I said "I don't care about political leanings"  
    • TLDR. Here is a far better title (just a basic example): Windows 11 26H2 to allow disabling Web search results
    • Restore will get my vote, only if to see if things are any different, doubt it though but Labour and Conservatives too out of touch and same thing over and over and over…, Lib Dem who?
    • There is nothing wrong with this title. You have completely missed the plot when it comes to "clickbait." The issue was never that a title tries to entice you to click, that is how titles have worked for over 100 years. The issue is when the title subverts expectations, getting you to click expecting something that isn't there. The classic clickbait example is "Boyfriend caught cheating, what happens next will shock you," then what happened next is the girlfriend was upset...which is probably the least shocking outcome imaginable. If sounds like what you want is for the titles to be a collection of 10-word summaries that you can skim, get the just of the story, and only click if you want more details. That is not, never has been, and never will be what titles are. You can go all the way back to print newspapers during the great depression and see the same thing. The newspaper was locked in a vending machine, all you can see is the headline, you choose to put in 5¢ to buy the paper and read the rest if you want. Those headlines were written in a way to sell the paper, not just to provide a summery. Here are two actual headlines from that time, "Wall Street Lays an Egg," or "Stocks Hit Bottom?" Maybe you'd say something like "it was wrong then and it's still wrong now." Okay, fine opinion to have, but it isn't like Neowin is doing something unjurnalistic, they are just following the age-old standards for written media.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      mnsgroup earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      525
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      199
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      94
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      82
    5. 5
      neufuse
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!