Recommended Posts

click start, run, type: gpedit.msc, select Computer Configuration, Administrative Templates, Network, and double click QoS Packet Scheduler. In the right hand window you will see "Limit reservable bandwidth, double click on it, check "Enabled", then set bandwidth limit to zero - Done!!

it doesn't turn out too well tho

click start, run, type: gpedit.msc, select Computer Configuration, Administrative Templates, Network, and double click QoS Packet Scheduler. In the right hand window you will see "Limit reservable bandwidth, double click on it, check "Enabled", then set bandwidth limit to zero - Done!!

That's is a myth for noobs... :p

That reserved bandwidth is ONLY used if you (or your service provider) are using some device or software QoS aware (QoS = Quality of Service)... :cool:

It's not an issue with QoS, since it cannot limit that much bandwidth.

Seeing as the connection wasn't effected by XP Pro and only Server 2k3, it sounds like a services problem.

Did you set your server to have a 'role' yet? If you did, try removing that and see if there is still a problem.

In your NIC cards settings, make sure that your TCP/IP isn't filtering any ports... this could also have a dramatic effect on speed.

Hope that helps. :D

Alright, I have already done all the Qos stuff yesterday, removed it plus set it to 0, even if it was enabled, it wouldnt make too much of a difference since it sets aside 20%, and I have a 3.5meg max, and still only getting 250k, there is a lot missing out of that.

Hadnt given it a role yet either, also last night made sure that there wasnt one set. And there are no tcp filterings set up either.

hmm I'm having the same problem with my 2k3 server I run, I only get around 1.9 megabits per second (190kB/sec), while on my other pc (the one I'm posting from now) I get my full speed of 3.5 megabits per second (350kB/sec)

:blink:

Well I have a 2k3 Server and it seems to be fine. Its my firewall/gateway and fileserver. On my lan from others pc's I am getting 10MB a second, which is a bit less than a 100mbps lan allows (i made all the cables myself so that could be a factor there). I also have gigabit and from that I get about 25MB a second (limited by my the raid array's hard drives). My internet connection seems to fine also, I have Att Broadband and I get about 180k a second from their servers. So it seems as if 2k3 is working fine for me, and its not the os.

Well for hardware comparison to others out there, I am running an amd 2100+, soyo kt333 dragon ultra mb, 512ddr ram, radeon 9k card, 2 40gig hd's one wd and one maxtor. I have tried the ethernet using the onboard generic realtek, as well as my dlink pci card.

Oh well, it has been too long, so Ive decided to go back to xp for now anyway, cant stand losing that much bandwidth for no reason, really need it. Maybe ill go back to 2k3 once i can buy it.

Why not do a dual boot for awhile? Partition the hard drive give each OS a piece. Then go to xyz.com and see how fast a file downloads in xp, then you can boot up into 2k3 and do the same thing. This would rule out the o.s. You allready ruled out the ethernet card. Maybe check the cable but I doubt thats it. It also could be that your ISP is under alot of stress and they are going really slow.

Alright, just finished going back to xp, and now the connection seems to be even faster than it was before, most likely cause i switched to the pci nic instead of the onboard. But it is quite apparent now that it was 2k3 that was causing the missing bandwidth, while downloading drivers in 2k3, most sites i would get a max of 330k/sec, when back in xp 2.5megs/sec

Alright, just finished going back to xp, and now the connection seems to be even faster than it was before, most likely cause i switched to the pci nic instead of the onboard.  But it is quite apparent now that it was 2k3 that was causing the missing bandwidth, while downloading drivers in 2k3, most sites i would get a max of 330k/sec, when back in xp 2.5megs/sec

I don't believe it :-)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • UK funds £60M AI labs to challenge US tech dominance with open-source models by Paul Hill The UK government has awarded £60 million to Oxford University and University College London to help keep the country in the AI race by focusing on open-source, low-hardware alternatives. This is in stark contrast to the expensive, closed-source, and high-hardware-requirement models being created in the United States and elsewhere. The money will be shared among two new academic research labs over six years to help them redesign the fundamental mathematics and architectures of AI to help the UK reduce its reliance on a handful of US tech firms. Commenting on the development, AI Minister Kanishka Narayan said: Initially, the government planned to fund just one lab with a £40 million investment, but with this update, two labs will now get access to a larger pool of funds. The labs are expected to invest in the top AI researchers at every career stage, with £2 million per lab being set aside for hiring at least ten doctoral students. The government hopes that this will grow the UK’s talent in the field of AI. The labs are also expected to work closely with the leaders in British AI research, such as the Alan Turing Institute and UKRI’s AI research hubs. This will allow the various teams to collaborate and create new solutions faster than they could alone. This development is pretty interesting for a number of reasons, chiefly that it could create a long-term challenge for US tech firms if these labs successfully scale these open-source architectures that bypass the proprietary ecosystems. It could also give British businesses and public sector organizations access to AI features without paying high licensing fees to foreign providers or needing to invest in specialized server infrastructure.
    • If I were them, I'm gonna hold out until the prices of these semiconductor parts normalize. $1,049 for a ~5 year old hardware is DoA, more so for gamers. On a deeper note, if Steam Machine is priced like this, we are soo effed up for the next gen Xbox console and PS6. With great AAA titles releasing at the end of the year, this just creates more demand...and more tears for me. Lol.
    • I suspect one reason its hard to justify subsidising is that it's not a locked down device like a traditional console is. In this climate sadly if it was a "good deal" you'd get people hoarding them for anything but gaming. The Lenovo Legion Go 2 with the Ryzen Z2 Extreme is £1300 here ($1720) for some context on how other SteamOS like devices are now priced. I got the older Z1 Extreme model for £300 with a dock, just shows how insane prices have got recently.
    • If you have an account with any of Meta's services, you technically have an account with all of their services. You may not use it, but it exists.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      462
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      185
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      94
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      87
    5. 5
      neufuse
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!