dead.cell Posted January 23, 2009 Share Posted January 23, 2009 Maybe not, but it should perform on par with WinXP. And (Duh!) much faster than Vista. lol, I remember when people were saying,"Vista is a new OS. Of course it will require higher system specs!" :p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ViperAFK Posted January 23, 2009 Share Posted January 23, 2009 lol, I remember when people were saying,"Vista is a new OS. Of course it will require higher system specs!" :p that's generally true, and consider the large amount of time between vista and xp as well. Windows 7 is a much smaller release with much less under the hood changes. The major changes were made with vista. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warboy Posted January 24, 2009 Share Posted January 24, 2009 how was the performance? what was the CPU and memory usage with only WMP running and at idle? It runs great, It was on a friend's laptop. So I can't give you detailed specs. But now my friend is in love because he says it runs faster then XP/Vista ever did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rustix Posted January 24, 2009 Share Posted January 24, 2009 It runs great, It was on a friend's laptop. So I can't give you detailed specs. But now my friend is in love because he says it runs faster then XP/Vista ever did. :o maybe i should give it another try afterall :blink: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Denis W. Veteran Posted January 24, 2009 Veteran Share Posted January 24, 2009 With all these reports about good performance, maybe I'll give Windows 7 another shot on my Northwood P4 Vaio. The leaked 6956 didn't play nicely. My Radeon 9200 doesn't have compatible Vista drivers, but it might eventually since it's one of the tested hardware devices as reported in the Engineering 7 blog. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eilegz Posted May 18, 2009 Author Share Posted May 18, 2009 well i revive this topic, im testing windows 7 rc1 right now on the same specs that before, i can say that the startup did felt a little bit slower compared to beta 1, but overall it feels more stable, Video bug on a non WDDM driver do not freeze anymore like previous beta 1, which its a good news, As before the Audio driver its missing from the DVD but windows update got the driver. NOD32 2.70.39 works very well and some old emulators and games that required a DIRECT 3d device worked on my geforce 4 72.30 xp driver. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ambroos Posted May 18, 2009 Share Posted May 18, 2009 If your GeForce 4 doesn't work properly now I highly doubt it will change towards the launch of Windows 7. Windows 7 has an Aero-Capable graphics card with WDDM1.0 drivers available as a minimum requirement, so technically there is no reason for nVidia to develop a driver since there shouldn't be any Windows 7 running with a Geforce 4. Even though it would be nice since Windows 7 is a great OS for slightly slower PC's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eilegz Posted May 18, 2009 Author Share Posted May 18, 2009 well the legendary XP nvidia driver 72.30 do work on windows 7 for those pre geforce 6 video cards, bring some direct 3d and its better than standard VGA driver that microsoft ship by default. Of course there wont be AERO glass or any aero features but do run aero basic very well. Issues so far its slower startup and shutdown compared to Beta 1 and System rating could not be rated. Also WMP seems to be unfriendly with CCCP or any codec packs, by default WMP can play now xvid or divx but not MKV files so a codec its needed but it seems to conflict each other. KMplayer and CoreAVC do work very well and im impressed that i could run h.264 files on this legacy machine (sure a little bit slowdown but almost not noticeable). I think that Windows 7 will be netbook friendly as microsoft said since a netbook should be faster than my old machine, Very stable so far not a single BSOD or crash. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gregrocker Posted May 18, 2009 Share Posted May 18, 2009 I've been running it since 7022 on an old HP laptop 510 business computer, 1.2gh, 528 ram. No need to vlite due to service triggers, it runs just as well with full program. But I turn off Offline Files, edit fading, sliding and any other unnecessary graphics, turn off indexing and turn off extra features in Programs & Features. Without gadgets I can run Avast and it idles around 228mb, giving me enough ram left for light multi-tasking. I will up the ram when it needs it but since it is one of 5 computers around our small house, I doubt I'll need it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eevo Posted May 19, 2009 Share Posted May 19, 2009 my old machine is 4.5 years old with some upgraded parts athlon 3000 3gigs ram x1950pro 512mB i enjoy win7. only issues i have are not supported drivers for the gfx card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eilegz Posted May 21, 2009 Author Share Posted May 21, 2009 try catalyst 9.3 it works for legacy cards Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Livin in a box Posted May 21, 2009 Share Posted May 21, 2009 I've got a desktop running 7127 with these specs: Intel Celeron D 2.80GHz 1GB DDR1 RAM 74.50GB HDD Intel 865G Graphics controller (onboard standard crappy one) SoundMAX Audio Device And it's running faster than XP with Aero basic. Pretty impressed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arh2o Posted May 21, 2009 Share Posted May 21, 2009 If you have less than 1 GB of RAM and a PIII or early P4 you probably shouldn't be running Windows 7. Windows 2000 or Windows XP would be best suited for the needs of such an old computer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Authentic X Posted May 21, 2009 Share Posted May 21, 2009 my junky old AMD 64 3000+ with 1.5 gigs ddr and a crapy ATI 9500 pro runs great with win7,and yes I can actually use all the aero effects.Boot time is far superior to XP or Vista,and no blue screens. I think microsoft got this one right for once. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Wizard Posted May 21, 2009 Share Posted May 21, 2009 I tried to install 7 this morning on my 10 year old Compaq Presario but it wouldn't let me since I only had 320MB of RAM, lol. And to think it had already been upgraded. It used to only have 128. I've still got an old computer that only has 128MB RAM, it was the family computer and we only got a new one earlier this year lol. The leaked 6956 didn't play nicely. My Radeon 9200 doesn't have compatible Vista drivers, but it might eventually since it's one of the tested hardware devices as reported in the Engineering 7 blog. That's one of the main reasons I haven't tried 7 again since the first beta, it doesn't support my graphics card so I can't even try to run any games (solitaire made it crash :( ). Also the wireless was a pain to get working 'cause I couldn't find x64 drivers for ages. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anarkhy Posted May 21, 2009 Share Posted May 21, 2009 Pentium 4 2.26 GHZ Northwood That's not really old. If was something below 1 ghz then ok... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abecedarian paradoxious Posted May 22, 2009 Share Posted May 22, 2009 I'm running Win7 7100 on an Athlon XP 2000+ (1665 MHz) with 1GB ram and FX5200 video on an MSI KM400 based mobo and it runs perfectly fine. Aero works and the system is quite responsive even across RDP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Denis W. Veteran Posted May 22, 2009 Veteran Share Posted May 22, 2009 Pentium 4 2.26 GHZ NorthwoodThat's not really old. If was something below 1 ghz then ok... Northwoods date back 7 years... that's quite old already. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qdave Posted May 22, 2009 Share Posted May 22, 2009 mine works fine too on amd athlon 64 3200(2.2ghz), 1gb ram, and big hdd :p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eevo Posted May 22, 2009 Share Posted May 22, 2009 try catalyst 9.3 it works for legacy cards 9.3 and 9.2 dont work on my card on win7. refuses to install. and 9.1 the driver randomonly stops responding Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angel Blue01 Posted May 22, 2009 Share Posted May 22, 2009 I still plan on trying 7 (at least RC1) on my Athlon-64 3500+ Venice at 2.25 GHz, 1 GB PC3200 RAM, NVIDIA 6600 video card which is due for a hard drive upgrade anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stezo2k Posted May 22, 2009 Share Posted May 22, 2009 I still plan on trying 7 (at least RC1) on my Athlon-64 3500+ Venice at 2.25 GHz, 1 GB PC3200 RAM, NVIDIA 6600 video card which is due for a hard drive upgrade anyway. i recon that would run pretty well actually, up the ram and im sure that will work quite smooth Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KeeperOfThePizza Posted May 22, 2009 Share Posted May 22, 2009 i recon that would run pretty well actually, up the ram and im sure that will work quite smooth I'm running a AMD64 3200+ Venice/2GB of Ram/ATI x1950 Pro/250gb hd 7200rpm... runs beautiful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Camlann Posted May 22, 2009 Share Posted May 22, 2009 Today i installed 7 (7100) on this machine: Intel Centrino 1.6 Ghz 1GB Ram 80GB Hdd ATI Mobility Radeon 9700 It run's smooth, even aero works :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thunderbuck Posted May 22, 2009 Share Posted May 22, 2009 actually i'm quite satisfied with RAM usage.. it's just the CPU usage.. presently i've reverted back to windows XP and i do wish to reinstall windows 7 one more time.. i just need to find an easier way to backup and restore my document and specific folders without having to manually copy and paste them.. Windows Easy Transfer FTW! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts