Windows 7 Build 7032/Build 7048 64bit leaked?

[Digitalx]

If 7054 change long i posted just before is any substance to it actually being real or anything changing folder colours and stuff built in and that will be handy.

[pasty2k2]

If this is real, thats bloody fast movement on the W7 front. I hope it is. If anyone has it downloaded, please post proof that its legit, otherwise it looks to be a long night of slow downloading, only to probably find out its fake all along lol.

[atleeit]

7048 got compiled on 19th Jan i think, so it's possible they are upto 7054. Even further internally TAP program.

[rakeshishere]

:woot:

Sounds great :D

But it just made Rafael Rivera jobless :)

[pasty2k2]

Not sure about the 19th, I swear someone here got in touch with a chap working for MS who said that a previously reported 7048 (I think) release couldnt exist, as they were only compiling 7047 right there and then. That was less than a week ago.

I may have my facts mixed up though, anyone care to elaborate?

[atleeit]

Not sure about the 19th, I swear someone here got in touch with a chap working for MS who said that a previously reported 7048 (I think) release couldnt exist, as they were only compiling 7047 right there and then. That was less than a week ago.

I may have my facts mixed up though, anyone care to elaborate?

you are 100% on this, after ms employee i think it was Brian said 7048 didn't exist and 7047 was being compiled that was all a lie, MS will deny everything.

Now look what build we have installed lol :D

Also i just made an ISO of Build 7000 x64, it cannot be this build as this is 3.19GB

[pasty2k2]

Very true. Hype is high though!

Also i just made an ISO of Build 7000 x64, it cannot be this build as this is 3.19GB

New sound schemes added though.

[Another Canuck]

Very true. Hype is high though!

New sound schemes added though.

The new sound schemes, wallpapers, pictures, videos, etc. only take up about 100MB.

[pasty2k2]

Hm. Who knows, though it is a pretty large jump in size from only 6 builds ahead. Id assume 7048 was practically feature complete, if 7054 is the real RC1, it may have more? I dunno. seems a bit fishy though admittedly.

[Mannlich]

I'll be interested to see if they change a lot of the icons in the RC. If you go by past RCs, it should have all of the updated icons.

[pasty2k2]

Still no seeds, and still not even a byte downloaded. Methinks this is fake, or it would have surfaced elsewhere by now - its been out for 7 hours apparantely.

[RageOfFury]

Build 7048 was released to TAP on Sunday. How can they release build 7054 just 4 days after? Me thinks 7054 is fake. Don't waste your time.

Here are some screenshots of setup.exe from build 7048 :

[Mannlich]

How is anyone lending any credibility to the same guy that previously tried to release a fake?

[pasty2k2]

Im giving up. This is a fake, unless anyone prooves me wrong.

[Mannlich]

7048 got compiled on 19th Jan i think, so it's possible they are upto 7054. Even further internally TAP program.

I don't think 7048 was the 19th of Jan -- but rather 19th of Feb. 090219-1845.

[atleeit]

Build 7048 was released to TAP on Sunday. How can they release build 7054 just 4 days after? Me thinks 7054 is fake. Don't waste your time.

Here are some screenshots of setup.exe from build 7048 :

RC was going to TAP people end of feb not 7048 as 7048 is Pre-RC

I don't think 7048 was the 19th of Jan -- but rather 19th of Feb. 090219-1845.

Lol early in morning, month error, yes i meant Feb.

[+Tyranade Subscriber²]

I think Build 7048 comes with IE8 RTM.

[atleeit]

I think Build 7048 comes with IE8 RTM.

Version number will be different :)

[pasty2k2]

Maybe so, but its possible that IE8 RTM isnt done for W7 yet - they could have shifted focus on completing it for Vista and XP. Seeing as they have a couple of months before 7 is released and sold, they may as well do it that way around - its transparent to us consumers, and means we all get IE8 RTM quicker in comparison.

[djp2]

I still get very frequent taskbar flickering/disappearing with 7048 (no change from build 7000). Any idea what's causing this? Is it my display drivers, or a problem with Windows 7? You'd think if it were the latter they would have addressed that bug by now...?

Other than that, I haven't noticed any performance differences with this build. There are a few slight cosmetic changes (new icons, wallpapers, etc.) but nothing much else seems to have changed, which I suppose is good (aside from the flickering bug!) I'm now even more eager to try out the RC...hoping things will be 100% smoothed out by then. I get the feeling this build is not particularly polished (hence why it was never meant to be released for public testing). Anybody else feel the same?

[Another Canuck]

Heh... if the IE8 included in 7048 was RTM, people would be switching to Firefox, Chrome, Safari (yatta yatta...) in drones.

It is probably the most bug ridden build of IE8 to date.

[atleeit]

Heh... if the IE8 included in 7048 was RTM, people would be switching to Firefox, Chrome, Safari (yatta yatta...) in drones.

It is probably the most bug ridden build of IE8 to date.

7048 build of IE8 is good, best from all builds.

[Inctye]

7048 build of IE8 is good, best from all builds.

Best IE version yet. But still light years behind Firefox and Chrome.

[Pharos]

I have a problem that has been a bug in all builds I have tested.

Whenever I open or close a window or program, the animation is kinda quirky and laggy.

It feels like it hangs, just for some milliseconds, before it closes or opens. In builds prior to 7048 this also happened whenever I max\minimized the windows\programs.

I know it's not my rig, I have a quad core q9400, geforce gtx260 with 4gb ram, and Vista runs fluidly.

Anyone else having the same problems?

I feel like I'm the only one since I have never heard anyone else with that annoying bug.

I have the exact same problem. I thought it was a "by-design" thing and learned to live with it. :( (8800GTS/E6750 here)

[wguimb]

I have the exact same problem. I thought it was a "by-design" thing and learned to live with it. :( (8800GTS/E6750 here)

I believe it is "by design". You can change it to be faster though in regedit.

HKEY_CURRENT_USER --> Control Panel--> Mouse --> MouseHoverTime

change 400 to 50 or less, restart.