Recommended Posts

@ShortFuse: You're running a Intel 945 which explains the limitation (its got a 32-bit memory controller) but has the additional limitation of reserving 1GB of ram for resource mappings) which gives you only 3GB to play with, and thats before video card ram is taken into account.. I feel your pain (my laptops the same) but unfortunately I don't think there is anything that can be done.

M.F.D.K. from what I can tell has a 32-bit memory controller. As such 256MB is probably taken away for the integrated video card (regardless of whether its enabled or not) although it may be possible to unmap the video card. But I don't know where the other 512MB ram are going (it shouldn't be the dedicated video card)

You can always try removing the discrete card, and running off the integrated one just to see what memory Windows then reports.

The one thing both the problems have in common is they aren't Windows 7 issues. The only reason they're cropping up now is Windows Vista SP1 reports installed RAM to appease manufacturers (SP0 did it accurately though)

After I saw the model of your motherboard I looked it up and downloaded the manual. It says it can support a maximum of 4GB of RAM but maybe the northbridge (P4M900 from VIA I think) is only addressing at a 32 bit level. Windows 7 is showing you the same amount of memory available as if you were running a 32 bit OS (I did see you are running the 64 bit version). From the pictures they had posted in the manual I don't see many optioins for memory. I am not sure if there is anything you can end up changing to get the full 4GB to show up.

I'm curious as to why (in the attached image) it's saying you only have 4 megs of L2 cache.

Intel Core 2 Duo / Core 2 Quad do not have a unified L2 Cache Architecture so its 4MB of L2 cache per core.

AMD's newer Dual and Quad Core Processors have a unified cache, and Intel's i7 has a weird combo of 256KB L2 cache per core and 8M L3 cache shared across all cores

Edited by Ames
Intel Core 2 Duo / Core 2 Quad do not have a unified L2 Cache Architecture so its 4MB of L2 cache per core.

AMD's Dual and Quad Core Processors have a unified cache, and Intel's i7 has a weird combo of 256KB L2 cache per core and 8M L3 cache shared across all cores

If it was showing the amount of cache per core, it would be showing 2 megs.

Intel Core 2 Duo / Core 2 Quad do not have a unified L2 Cache Architecture so its 4MB of L2 cache per core.

The Q6600 has 2x 4MB L2 cache. I just thought it was weird it's only showing half of the amount, that's all.

Sorry, probably should've worded that better. Its probably showing the amount of cache available to each core

Because 2 cores share a cache, each core can access 4MB of L2 cache.

Just my guess though

I'm back chaps, thanks for all your input. Its not important but nevertheless it should not be ignored and of course its not Windows 7 problem. I will try switching to Integrated GPU and see what I get, but as some of you have read the manual its pretty clear its the motherboard problem.

Here is a CPU-z screenshot

post-65695-1236198224.png

I'm back chaps, thanks for all your input. Its not important but nevertheless it should not be ignored and of course its not Windows 7 problem. I will try switching to Integrated GPU and see what I get, but as some of you have read the manual its pretty clear its the motherboard problem.

Here is a CPU-z screenshot

Thanks. Like I said, I was just curious. :blush:

Thanks. Like I said, I was just curious. :blush:

No worries mate

:cool:

Here is a screen shot running on integrate graphics, 64MB video on board, basically the numbers have gone from 3.25GB to 3.43GB

post-65695-1236200277.png

Edited by M.F.D.K
  • 4 weeks later...

Hi guys

I was trying to solve this same problem myself over the last few days and managed to fix it on my system so thought I'd suggest my fix to you.

Mine happened after I installed new Ram. When I had previously had 4x1gb 800mhz sticks it had picked it up as 4gb ok. I then switched to 2x2gb 1066mhz and it said only 3.25 usable. I found that the problem had been that while I'd been using my old ram I'd gone into msconfig and gone to the boot tab and clicked advanced. In there I'd set the maximum available memory to 4096. This had worked fine with the old ram but with the new max available memory was showing as 0. To correct the problem I went back the general tab on msconfig and selected Normal startup and rebooted. When the system came back on all 4gb was usable again.

I dont know if yours will be the same issue but I thought I'd suggest this fix since I dont seem to be the only one with this problem.

:)

  • 6 months later...
Hi guys

I was trying to solve this same problem myself over the last few days and managed to fix it on my system so thought I'd suggest my fix to you.

Mine happened after I installed new Ram. When I had previously had 4x1gb 800mhz sticks it had picked it up as 4gb ok. I then switched to 2x2gb 1066mhz and it said only 3.25 usable. I found that the problem had been that while I'd been using my old ram I'd gone into msconfig and gone to the boot tab and clicked advanced. In there I'd set the maximum available memory to 4096. This had worked fine with the old ram but with the new max available memory was showing as 0. To correct the problem I went back the general tab on msconfig and selected Normal startup and rebooted. When the system came back on all 4gb was usable again.

I dont know if yours will be the same issue but I thought I'd suggest this fix since I dont seem to be the only one with this problem.

:)

Sorry for gravedigging this, but I registered just to say thank you for this solution. I had messed with this setting awhile back in msconfig while troubleshooting some stability issues with a Phenom 9600 and Windows 7 64 bit. Basically I was getting random bluescreens. Manually setting maximum RAM to 4095mb and underclocking the 9600 to about 2.1ghz did the trick. However, that was not an acceptable solution for me, so I bought a PhenomII 920 to replace the 9600. After I installed it Windows 7 wanted to reassess my experience score, which is when I realized I was being short-shrifted on my RAM. I did some searching, found this thread, and was able to resolve my problem. Thank you so much!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I am not a fan of haptic feedback touchpads. I've owned a Surface Laptop 7 (Snapdragon) with one and a Lenovo Slim (Intel), and I hated both to the point where I purchased different laptops. It's not that they don't work most of the time; it's that they don't work 100% of the time, and there is no advantage from a user's perspective over a good mechanical trackpad like what's on a ThinkPad X1 or a Yoga 9i. I do not believe that I'll buy another haptic feedback touchpad laptop again in the near future.
    • Works fine here too. About this build, I don't like to download any kind of Windows, from any site except Microsoft. The mod might work, but I don't know what it's inside. Can contain malware, backdoors... Long time ago I've used something like this but reversed - it was 98se with the look and some functionality  of XP. Or, later XP with Vista look. But I made it myself. Not downloaded from obscure sites.
    • Rockstar gives last-gen GTA V players free upgrades tomorrow by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe Rockstar is preparing to launch Grand Theft Auto VI later this year, but ahead of that, the company has revealed a new offer for some Grand Theft Auto V owners. It today announced that Xbox One and PlayStation 4 version owners of the 2013-released title will soon be receiving a free upgrade to the current generation version. The studio released the Xbox Series X|S and PlayStation 5 version of Grand Theft Auto V back in 2022, bringing significant upgrades to the original console editions. This included 60 FPS gameplay at up to 4K resolution, as well as major upgrades to textures, draw distance, and audio. Faster load times, ray tracing elements, and HDR support were also added with it. While this new and enhanced version needed a new purchase of the game to jump in, now Rockstar has decided to make it a free upgrade, dropping the $40 price tag entirely on consoles. "Beginning tomorrow, those who own any PS4 version or the digital Xbox One version of Grand Theft Auto V will be able to upgrade to the PS5 or Xbox Series X|S versions at no additional cost, and experience the best versions of GTA V and GTA Online," said the company in an official blog post. The free upgrade offer will be released tomorrow, June 18, for all Xbox One and PlayStation 4 owners of Grand Theft Auto V. Players who will be jumping in on the offer will want to check how to migrate their GTA Online profile from last-generation to current-generation consoles by heading over here. The offer lands ahead of The Kortz Center Heist hitting Grand Theft Auto Online, where players and crews will be tasked with stealing priceless international art from a prestigious gallery in Pacific Bluffs. It doesn't look like Rockstar plans to stop updating its previous game even with Grand Theft Auto VI being on the horizon. The latest title is slated to launch on November 19, 2026, across Xbox Series X|S and PlayStation 5.
    • Now comes with a money back guarantee instead of a replacement! Hah
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Vincian earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      510
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      89
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      76
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!