Firefox 3.1 Beta 3 Coming on March 10


Recommended Posts

Yesterday Mozilla updated its release schedule to include Firefox 3.1 Beta 3, set to go live on March 10th at 2pm PST. Whether or not it actually lands in the hands of public end-users is another question.

Believe it or not, Firefox 3.1 hasn't seen a major upgrade since June 2008, however hopeful users seeking new features and improvements of the Internet browser can expect to see Beta 3 to go live on March 10. This is, of course, will only happen if the current version actually went into code freeze last night, and Mozilla kicks off the QA testing later today as originally scheduled.

So what's taking the new beta so long? According to this blog post by Mozilla's vice president of engineering Mike Shaver, the "upvar" patch and a handful of other JavaScript patches have held up its release. "That patch is getting close, but the continuing and great work on fixing other final-release blockers means that we're accumulating a lot of changes on the 1.9.1 stream that would benefit from wider feedback from our beta testers," he wrote in the post last week. "To that end, we're going to wrap up beta 3 in the next week regardless of upvar status."

Last week, Shaver also mentioned that the team decided to release a fourth beta, scheduled to hit the public six weeks after Beta 3's release. This fourth beta will serve as testing grounds for Mozilla's new TraceMonkey JavaScript engine, video, Places and "other eagerly-awaited improvements as well as feedback from Beta 3." This announcement also confirmed Shaver's statement from weeks ago, saying that bugs in the TraceMonkey engine were slowing things down, and that the developers were considering a fourth beta.

But as of Monday night, Mozilla had not completely resolved the TraceMonkey issue, thus consumers will see Beta 4 addressing those issues when released in April. Progress of Firefox 3.1 has been fragmented since its original 2008 launch date, held back by various bugs and the development of TraceMonkey. Just this year alone, Beta 3 experienced two major setbacks, first in mid-January and then again a week later. However, several Firefox developers felt that Beta 3's development process was taking too long, especially in light of TraceMonkey.

"Without Tracemonkey, we probably could have shipped 3.1 (final) by now (or, if not now, within the next month), since other areas would have been under more pressure to finish sooner," said David Baron back on February, "and since some of the things we've been adding to the blocker list lately (in Layout, anyway) feel a lot more like 3.1.0.2 blockers than 3.1 blockers."

Hopefully Mozilla will stay true to the schedule and release Beta 3 on March 10. However, more delays will only keep Firefox from gaining ground once Microsoft releases Internet Explorer later this month; Apple's Safari 4 went into public beta last week.

Source: tom's hardware

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/742800-firefox-31-beta-3-coming-on-march-10/
Share on other sites

IE8 is actually already finalized on Win7 Build 7048, so the RTM could likely be just days away. But I do think that 3.1 will go final before Safari 4.

Not at this rate, i think safari 4 will have another beta before going final and SF 4 willl be released before Firefox 3.5 goes final. the third beta has been pushed back to March 12. and Firefox will now go from 3.1 to 3.5. beta 3 will still use the 3.1 number. and they will be a beta 4. Here's the Status on all this.

If they continue like this, then Opera 10 final will come out before FF 3.1 final :p

I wouldn't be surprised by it, see my above post.

A first test build of Firefox 3.1 beta 3 is now available:

http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/fir...didates/build1/

Also, according to the notes from the last Firefox status meeting will be released as version 3.5 rather than 3.1 'to indicate increased scope'.

A first test build of Firefox 3.1 beta 3 is now available:

http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/fir...didates/build1/

Also, according to the notes from the last Firefox status meeting will be released as version 3.5 rather than 3.1 'to indicate increased scope'.

Thanks, and it's about time.

Also, according to the notes from the last Firefox status meeting will be released as version 3.5 rather than 3.1 'to indicate increased scope'.
No, the notes clearly indicate that they are just considering it at this point. No confirmation anywhere.

I tried out the new tab add-on, and it seems to have some promise. Problem is, it doesn't appear to play nice with other extensions, such as the always needed TabMixPlus, and one of my favorites, Fast Dial. It would be pretty cool if there's a way to get them all working together. Anyone know of a way? Perhaps an updated TabMixPlus that plays well with this new tab add-on.

Let me know! In the meantime, I'm going to mess around with it in hopes of figuring something out.

The build 2 that u mentioned, does it work with the most commonly used extensions? Such as TabMixPlus and Fast Dial. There's no point in downloading that if Beta 3 is coming out on March 12th, right? Does it have the new tab behavior built in?

I don't know, I tend use IE more than I fo Fx; and anyways a Extensions compatibility checker will popup if the extension does not work...and I don't know how to check if the new tab stuff is in it or not...you may have to look at the stuff in about:config.

The build 2 that u mentioned, does it work with the most commonly used extensions? Such as TabMixPlus and Fast Dial. There's no point in downloading that if Beta 3 is coming out on March 12th, right? Does it have the new tab behavior built in?

Fast Dial is compatible, and they'res a Tab Mix Plus development build that's also compatible.

The Nightly Tester Tools extension can make most extensions work with beta 3.

Thanks for posting that, Binary! It seems TabMixPlus auto-updated to the newest version. Now I'm just trying to decide if it's worth it to update to 3.1 beta 3 pre-release, or just wait til beta 3 is officially released? That's supposedly gonna be on March 12th. Might just wait if there's no big reason for me to update.

The releases of Beta 3 are just nightly releases. It has not been officially released as Firefox 3.X Beta 3 yet.

https://developer.mozilla.org/devnews/index...ome-firefox-35/

The much awaited launch of Fx3.1 Beta 3 is now in the hands of QA for testing. We are working hard to target ship by 3/12 now, pending any blockers found. BetaTesters, we'd love your extra help on these beta 3 candidates! Please download a beta 3 candidate and give it a testrun. All bugs found should be investigated for dupes first, and then filed under bugzilla. Note that these are not official, until QA has signed off on them, and the announcement is made on Mozilla Developer News.

http://quality.mozilla.org/events/2009/jan...31-beta-3-ships

What was the point in posting that when I just said above that it's coming out March 12th? You made it seem like you were correcting someone. We already knew that.

I did not mean to. I would not however bet any money on it being out on March 12th. It has been delayed so many times there is no tellin when it will be out. They even had to rename their numbering release scheme due to the delays. On the site that I quoted, it said it would be out late Feb, then it was delayed until March 2nd, and then it was posted that it would be out March 17th. Now it is March 12th. Maybe someone should start a poll and give out a prize to whoever guesses the correct release date of Firefox 3.5 Beta 3. :)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Ladybird Browser is no longer accepting outside contributions thanks to AI by David Uzondu The Ladybird Browser Project has announced it will no longer accept public pull requests and will limit changes to those made by its maintainers as it works towards its first alpha release. According to Ladybird's creator Andreas Kling, this is "not a change we make lightly," but the rapid shift in AI capabilities forced their hand. Previously, a massive PR implied that the person behind it put a lot of care into the code and is ready to "answer for the consequences." Now with AI, anyone can generate a PR without even understanding the bug fix or feature they want merged. The blog post goes on to say that the team is closing all open public pull requests immediately, and that maintainers will not treat external forks as a review queue for upstream Ladybird. Instead, the team wants outside contributors to focus on reporting bugs and running tests. Kling started Ladybird back in 2019 as LibHTML, a simple HTML viewer for his hobby operating system, SerenityOS, but by September 2022, it had turned into a full-fledged browser project. What sets Ladybird apart from the likes of Google Chrome, Apple Safari, or Mozilla Firefox is its totally independent engine, which does not rely on pre-existing codebases. The project maintains a strict policy against default search engine deals or user data monetization, keeping development funded entirely by donations and sponsorships. Generative AI is forcing open source project maintainers to rethink how they handle public code contributions (and the whole open-source thing in general). One month ago, a leak about the National Health Service (NHS) suggested the organization was planning to take all of its public repositories private ahead of a May 11 deadline, thanks to Mythos (an AI model that Anthropic believes is too dangerous to be released to the public) and its ability to find and write exploits for zero-day vulnerabilities. Thankfully, the Government Digital Service (GDS) issued a counter-report titled "AI, open code and vulnerability risk in the public sector" that stopped the shutdown by pointing out that hiding code does not improve security.
    • Kalmuri 4.2.4 by Razvan Serea Kalmuri is your all-in-one, portable screen capture and recording solution designed for speed, simplicity, and flexibility. Whether you need a full-screen snapshot, a custom area, a scrolling webpage, or smooth video recording, Kalmuri delivers with ease. Capture text instantly from images with built-in OCR, keep floating images on top for quick reference, and use the precise color picker for perfect design matching. Customize hotkeys to work your way and share results instantly with built-in upload options. Kalmuri runs without installation, making it ideal for USB use, and offers an intuitive interface that’s easy to learn. Kalmuri key features: Video recording support (designation of whole screen and area) Whole screen, active program, window control, area application Extract text from images using optical character recognition (OCR). Support for PNG, JPG, WEBP, BMP, GIF file formats MP4 video recording powered by FFmpeg for high-quality results Full web page capture Share the captured image on the web Color extraction function Printer output Hotkey settings Adjustable via keyboard for area capture (Arrow key, Ctrl+Arrow key, Shift+Arrow key) File name format (sequential, datetime) Free to use it at work, at home, in government offices, at school, etc. Using Kalmuri portable for video recording Kalmuri’s portable version doesn’t include FFmpeg, which is required for video recording. Without it, you’ll get an “error FFmpeg.exe not found” message. To fix this, download FFmpeg from the provided link, extract it, and place FFmpeg.exe in Kalmuri’s folder. Kalmuri will then recognize it automatically, allowing you to start recording in high quality instantly. Kalmuri 4.2.4 changelog: Fixed an issue where color picking could occasionally freeze Improved capture stability Resolved a possible unexpected app shutdown in certain cases Refined internal handling for a smoother experience Download: Kalmuri 4.2.4 | 24.2 MB (Freeware) Download: Kalmuri Portable 4.2.4 | 2.1 MB View: Kalmuri Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • I like the show more options. The only problem with it is that it's not always in a consistent spot in the menu. If the copy/paste/cut, happens to show on top, then more option is the last in the menu. But if copy/paste/cut happens to show on the bottom, then more options is before the copy/paste/cut. But I do like the more options because it hides the stuff that I rarely use. But I would like to choose what it is or isn't hiding. That would make it better.
    • I wonder if "put it back the way it was for decades" ever crossed their minds? 🤣
    • Rescind the stupid "Show more options" in context menus and just give us the full menu instead of adding more steps to get to what we want. The "simpler by default" makes me think they'll go in the opposite direction. Every context menu should have a configure button so you can pick and choose what options should be shown, I know you can do that with some registry fu but that shouldn't be required.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      I2D earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Dr Jared Dental Studio earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      RG INVESTMENT GROUP earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Very Popular
      The Norwegian Drone Pilot earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Very Popular
      s0nic69 earned a badge
      Very Popular
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      474
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      250
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      81
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      64
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      62
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!