Recommended Posts

I just tried to understand but if you don't mind, any chance for a video on youtube ? :p

I'll see if I can do this later on today, and yes memory usage has been greatly reduced in this build.

Ah right, thanks. I think I'll skip it then until a build leaks thats definitely the RC, or just get the RC. Now the main question is whether to go 32 or 64bit.

64bit if your pc can handle it! I've been running it with 2 gigs of ram for aaaages and I've yet to experience any problems (except one old game that didn't want to install copy protection driver).

64bit if your pc can handle it! I've been running it with 2 gigs of ram for aaaages and I've yet to experience any problems (except one old game that didn't want to install copy protection driver).

I think I'll give it a go. All the drivers are available and I'd get to use an extra 3MBs of RAM. Woo!

Will I notice speed improvements in things, specifically stuff like Photoshop and video editing?

Here's an example bug report on Connect.

Type Bug ID 421723

Status Active Access Restriction Public

Opened By portos Blocking Issue No

Opened 3/8/2009 Submission Language English

Description

Fantastic! Excellent work, i love!

The new icon, the new design is very good!

Continuation of a Great job!

Comments

Repro Steps

No Bugs!

Regression

Frequency

Customer Area

Color Management

Platform

amd64

SKU

Ultimate

Open Build

7048

UI Language

English

File Upload Status

In Process

Open Revision#

File Attachments listed below do not include those sent with the feedback tool. When they have been processed successfully the File Upload Status status (listed above) will show "Completed". There is no need to attach them again.

Here's an example bug report on Connect.

Type Bug ID 421723

Status Active Access Restriction Public

Opened By portos Blocking Issue No

Opened 3/8/2009 Submission Language English

Description

Fantastic! Excellent work, i love!

The new icon, the new design is very good!

Continuation of a Great job!

Comments

Repro Steps

No Bugs!

Regression

Frequency

Customer Area

Color Management

Platform

amd64

SKU

Ultimate

Open Build

7048

UI Language

English

File Upload Status

In Process

Open Revision#

File Attachments listed below do not include those sent with the feedback tool. When they have been processed successfully the File Upload Status status (listed above) will show "Completed". There is no need to attach them again.

Yes, very good - well done. But I didn't say they would be ignored, I said people from Microsoft have said it's a waste of time, so I'm not sure what you're trying to show.

I'm not trying to prove anything. Just FYI, no reflection on your post. :)

However, I agree that MSFT is not paying much attention to bug reports from 7000 now. Because they are close to RC now. Build 7048 feedback is probably getting their attention though, regardless of the fact that it is a leaked build. :)

I'm not trying to prove anything. Just FYI, no reflection on your post. :)

However, I agree that MSFT is not paying much attention to bug reports from 7000 now. Because they are close to RC now. Build 7048 feedback is probably getting their attention though, regardless of the fact that it is a leaked build. :)

I'm sure they're pleased people are so keen to get involved, but like I said I'm just repeating what people in the know have said. I'm open to correction though, because obviously I'm just repeating them.

Also, I frankly wouldn't want to publish the fact too much that I've downloaded a leaked copy without the owner's permission. ;)

I'm sure they're pleased people are so keen to get involved, but like I said I'm just repeating what people in the know have said. I'm open to correction though, because obviously I'm just repeating them.

Also, I frankly wouldn't want to publish the fact too much that I've downloaded a leaked copy without the owner's permission. ;)

Buddy, 7048 is the latest build released to testers because they WANT feedback, so suffice it to say they are listening to feedback from 7048.

I sure hope we see a cleaned up RC, because personally, it seems like 7048 has had more bugs than did 7022 or 7000. I have a few problems with both my physical and virtual PCs. (Yes, I understand it is an internal build...) But hopefully, things don't go backwards...

Now my point is clear. Argumentative. If I am correct, you didn't even install the build.

No, it means I don't want to carry this on because you obviously lack the ability to follow a simple discussion. I don't even know why you think me installing the build has got anything to do with it, seeing as though I've just repeated the words of other people. That's all I've done, but obviously your sense of self-importance in telling people to send feedback, then deciding that you apparently speak for everybody, is obviously causing issues.

So, for the benefit of my point, I'll sum it up:

It's been said by some people that sending feedback is counter-productive. I've made no assertions about the feedback being ignored and have said I'm open to correction, albeit by people that actually know what they're talking about.

Edited by Examinus
No, it means I don't want to carry this on because you obviously lack the ability to follow a simple discussion. I don't even know why you think me installing the build has got anything to do with it, seeing as though I've just repeated the words of other people. That's all I've done, but obviously your sense of self-importance in telling people to send feedback, then deciding that you apparently speak for everybody, is obviously causing issues.

So, for the benefit of my point, I'll sum it up:

It's been said by some people that sending feedback is counter-productive. I've made no assertions about the feedback being ignored and have said I'm open to correction, albeit by people that actually know what they're talking about.

RIGHT, they put in the abiltiy to Send Feedback for the fun of it to make people think they are helping.

It's funny you actually believe they would put in a feature to make things purposely "counter productive". You seem to misunderstood what the person you quoted said. He said what was counter productive is the reporting of bugs on old builds, use 7000 for example, that are now known or fixed. Reporting bugs on older builds is indeed counter productive. But 7048 isn't an old build. It is newly released for testers.

You seem to misunderstood what the person you quoted said. He said what was counter productive is the reporting of bugs on old builds, use 7000 for example, that are now known or fixed. Reporting bugs on older builds is indeed counter productive. But 7048 isn't an old build. It is newly released for testers.

What? No. It was a post made in a thread about interim builds, with specific reference to those leaked, just like the one being discussed here. As I understand it, and has been explained in this thread, 7048 is a leaked interim build after Beta 1 but before RC1. It's completely applicable.

I also believe the Send Feedback feature is included in all builds, public or not, and doesn't discriminate between a leaked or legitimate copy. See build 6956 that was obviously not meant for public usage, but still had the Send Feedback option: http://www.mydigitallife.info/wp-content/u...ows-7-69561.jpg

Ultimately I think we both have the same goal. We want to help make Win7 as good as can be and give our feedback, but my point was sending feedback may not always be as productive as you think. That assertion is based on what I've read from people that work at Microsoft, and as I've said a number of times I'm open to correction.

Edited by Examinus

?Define with Encarta?

ef50f784-fb7e-43ff-8b9b-be8e7999e83c_gm.jpg

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-16"?><WinSAT><ProgramInfo><Name>WinSAT</Name><Version>V6.1 Build-7048.0</Version><WinEIVersionWindows7-RC-0.1</WinEIVersion><Title>Windows System Assessment Tool</Title><ModulePath>C:\Windows\system32\winsat.exe</ModulePath><CmdLine...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      581
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!