Apple Releases Smaller 4GB iPod Shuffle with 'VoiceOver'


Recommended Posts

Good stuff, IMO Apple has done it again with their marketing. They make it smaller, add playlists and voice over and woop another good product, even though it costs them almost nothing to make it.

Does what again? Convince their consumers to enter a trapped eco-system or hope(know) they're just clueless?

New iPod shuffle requires EXTRA Adapter for third-party headphones

non-Apple headphones will require a special dongle that includes the new three-button controller, and Apple says it's "working" with third parties to bring other compatible 'phones to market. Yes, Apple's cheapest iPod is now the most needlessly complex, and far from cost-effective if you want to use your own cans: assuming the adapter will cost between $20 and $30 like most other Apple accessories, you're looking at minimum $100 outlay for the new shuffle, and at that point you might as well pick up a $150 iPod nano, which is also VoiceOver-enabled in addition to having twice the storage, dongle-less controls, a screen, and numerous other features.

It looks ok, I'll give them that. But I don't need a smaller ipod than my existing shuffle and I don't need more space. Can you imagine filling up 4GB of music without an interface to browse it? I rarely fill up my existing shuffle, I open it up nearly every day to add a new playlist or album just so I don't risk hitting the next button and getting a song I don't really like that much. And at $A129 it's nearly double the price of the existing entry-level shuffle...no thanks! 10 points for effort though!

Good stuff, IMO Apple has done it again with their marketing. They make it smaller, add playlists and voice over and woop another good product, even though it costs them almost nothing to make it.

Yea, done it again for releasing a product that costs way to much for what it does. Look at Sandisks MP3 players as well as Creatives. Playlists are OLD NEWS and the voice over is useless. The only reason they added a vocie over option is because there is no screen and Apple knew that people would bitch about that. So they added the voice feature to shut some people up...but not those of us who know better.

//////////WOW!\\\\\\\\\ I just had this thought, since these earphones have now I mic, would it now be possible to turn an iPod touch into a phone type of thing.

Welcome to last year :laugh:

http://lifehacker.com/378511/turn-your-ipo...-into-an-iphone

Sandisk makes a MP3 player called the FUZE. It is a 2-8gb MP3 player with an SD card expansion slot for about $70. So you can expand the memory with a 32gb card and have a 32+gb mp3 player for $70. It also has a screen and plays great. Got one of my young nieces this at xmas since she is young and I didnt want to get her something overly expensive since she will break it. This also got great reviews...oh, it plays Video as well.

So yea, $80 for the new shuffle...or $70 and you get lots more...u decide. Would be different if the shuffle was cheaper than it is...but it isnt.

Wait. What? No.

Just no.

$70 for the machine. then however fuch for a 32gb SD card, which i bet isn't cheap...

For those complaining about the controls...

Do keep in mind what kind of market Apple is trying to capture. The shuffle is used when people are at the gym, on a run etc. Chances of them using a pair of 300 dollar earphones are slim. They don't really care what bitrate their music is at as long as its there. The controls that you can use without looking down and fumbling with the player itself is what Apple was going for. Think about it, you clip it on your clothing and start running, no worry about unclipping it to change a song or anything else, the controls are right up where your ears are. Its a good design. As long as you fall into Apple's design target...

And my thoughts on this personally...

"Its just another small thing I'm gonna lose." Seriously. The thing is about what? 1/6 the size of a playing card.

"Imagine your music player talking to you, telling you your song titles, artists and playlist names," said Greg Joswiak, Apple's vice president of iPod and iPhone? Product Marketing. "The amazingly small new iPod shuffle takes a revolutionary approach to how you listen to your music by talking to you, also making it the first iPod shuffle with playlists."

Bahahaa. Because the good old system of reading it yourself just isn't enoug:rofl:l: Revolutionary my ass.

I don't want to be buying another pair. I already have a ?90 set... lol

Yeah my earphones cost $220AU and any headphones I have at home or work even more.

Not only does this require new earphones OR an external "control", the control itself IMHO completely defeats the point of having the actual unit itself smaller given that the control unit just adds extra weight and bulk to the connection between the player and phones. It seems a bit rediculous to talk up it's small form factor when to actually use it you need an external box.

For those complaining about the controls...

Do keep in mind what kind of market Apple is trying to capture. The shuffle is used when people are at the gym, on a run etc. Chances of them using a pair of 300 dollar earphones are slim. They don't really care what bitrate their music is at as long as its there. The controls that you can use without looking down and fumbling with the player itself is what Apple was going for. Think about it, you clip it on your clothing and start running, no worry about unclipping it to change a song or anything else, the controls are right up where your ears are. Its a good design. As long as you fall into Apple's design target...

I would have thought the old "clip" design would have been more suitable to joggers and practically anyone else to be honest. If they needed to make it smaller, just make the clip mechanism removable. As it is you now have not only the player itself but an intermediate control in the cord. It's just another thing to either attach somewhere or leave flapping about as you run. So yes, I think even for the market you mentioned this is a backwards step.

Edited by Smigit

I have a laptop, it has a keyboard, it would be thinner without the keyboard, but I like buttons. What are they doing, really, what :|

People use shuffles at the gym, they can only use apple earphones which fall out of your ear, and if they dont already, they will when youre fiddling with the control attached to them.

OK, seriously, who the hell was sleeping on his job when they released a 4 GB player (with ~1000 songs) without a screen?? I mean if this was a small-sized $20 uber-cheap player, then I would praise the voiceover as a clever idea, but come on, this is just stupid.

Edited by backdrifter

"Having a Max Headroom-like voice slowly tell me what song I'm listening to instead of just playing the *&%#( song" was right between "added cough drop taste" and "dipped in AIDS" on my list of iPod Shuffle features I was hoping for.

"Having a Max Headroom-like voice slowly tell me what song I'm listening to instead of just playing the *&%#( song" was right between "added cough drop taste" and "dipped in AIDS" on my list of iPod Shuffle features I was hoping for.

It only plays back the song info when you ask it to.

and at that point you might as well pick up a $150 iPod nano, which is also VoiceOver-enabled in addition to having twice the storage, dongle-less controls, a screen, and numerous other features.

um no?

since when does the new nanos have voice over? i think this is highly inaccurate if im not mistaken?

It won't be long before third parties release compatible headphones.

For a premium. Why spend $80 on a Shuffle, and then another (possibly) $40 on replacement headphones when you can get a similar small MP3 player like the one from Sandisk for $80 (without DRM) and you can use any headphones with them?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Ummmm that is what is it supposed to do. Just turn if off in settings if you do not want it analyzing your open tabs. Chrome does the same thing with Gemini. Sarfari will do the samething after Apple's AI and even more so with the release of their 27 versions that is now powered by Googles LLM/ML models. Understanding why it is doing it and how it can help you vs jumping to some conspiracy theroy is a much better approach. As long as it can be turned off, all is good. Yes the default should be off but the a lot of people would never discover these features.
    • Just another reason (aside from many others) not to use Edge. Firefox 153.0b5 DEx64 has a similar feature added recently in prior builds that I will turn off at some point when I get around to it. It's the new "Something looks suspicious" page that pops up here and there. It cleverly hides itself between web pages that I've actually visited; as a result, you know, of selecting a web page and telling the browser where to go. The interesting thing is that it does not produce these warnings from pages that I, as the only intelligent user of the browser in my system, have ever directed the browser to open! What seems to be happening is that the browser looks at all the goofy ad links on a web page I do actually open and selects one that "looks suspicious" and then creates the "something looks suspicious" web page, which is neatly inserted, as mentioned, between web pages my RB ("real brain") has directed the browser to load in a session. The thing is, I usually look at links I am considering to follow before I ask the browser to load them, and in cases I have noticed where the link does indeed look suspicious, most of the time I will choose to not follow the link at all. Doesn't everyone do this or something similar? I am picky about what I voluntarily load... (I don't like links that start off fine, with a site designaiton that seems normal enough but then is followed by indecipherable alphanumeric strings many, many lines long, etc. I tend to reject those because they look suspicious. They may not be, but I don't care... I'll stay with Firefox, of course, if for no other reason than they usually let you turn off the junk you don't like. And because it isn't Edge... But at some point Microsoft will come to realize that putting your bookmarks on the left side is a Good Thing for a lot of people, just as Microsoft discovered when it had the bright idea of nailing the Windows taskbar to the bottom of the screen, when for decades Microsoft browsers had left that placement up to the user. They have finally reversed the obscenity of that decision. Finally.
    • Google was using the old CATPCHAs data to train their LLMs. What is the say they won't use this camera data of users to train their LLM? these companies need some strict regulations!
    • Depends on what you need. Might be a bit clearer on what you plan to do with it. Sort of a waste if you get the newest and greatest, but don't know how to use it.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
    • First Post
      carols23 earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      Tom Willson earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      258
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      94
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!