Apple Releases Smaller 4GB iPod Shuffle with 'VoiceOver'


Recommended Posts

Good stuff, IMO Apple has done it again with their marketing. They make it smaller, add playlists and voice over and woop another good product, even though it costs them almost nothing to make it.

Does what again? Convince their consumers to enter a trapped eco-system or hope(know) they're just clueless?

New iPod shuffle requires EXTRA Adapter for third-party headphones

non-Apple headphones will require a special dongle that includes the new three-button controller, and Apple says it's "working" with third parties to bring other compatible 'phones to market. Yes, Apple's cheapest iPod is now the most needlessly complex, and far from cost-effective if you want to use your own cans: assuming the adapter will cost between $20 and $30 like most other Apple accessories, you're looking at minimum $100 outlay for the new shuffle, and at that point you might as well pick up a $150 iPod nano, which is also VoiceOver-enabled in addition to having twice the storage, dongle-less controls, a screen, and numerous other features.

It looks ok, I'll give them that. But I don't need a smaller ipod than my existing shuffle and I don't need more space. Can you imagine filling up 4GB of music without an interface to browse it? I rarely fill up my existing shuffle, I open it up nearly every day to add a new playlist or album just so I don't risk hitting the next button and getting a song I don't really like that much. And at $A129 it's nearly double the price of the existing entry-level shuffle...no thanks! 10 points for effort though!

Good stuff, IMO Apple has done it again with their marketing. They make it smaller, add playlists and voice over and woop another good product, even though it costs them almost nothing to make it.

Yea, done it again for releasing a product that costs way to much for what it does. Look at Sandisks MP3 players as well as Creatives. Playlists are OLD NEWS and the voice over is useless. The only reason they added a vocie over option is because there is no screen and Apple knew that people would bitch about that. So they added the voice feature to shut some people up...but not those of us who know better.

//////////WOW!\\\\\\\\\ I just had this thought, since these earphones have now I mic, would it now be possible to turn an iPod touch into a phone type of thing.

Welcome to last year :laugh:

http://lifehacker.com/378511/turn-your-ipo...-into-an-iphone

Sandisk makes a MP3 player called the FUZE. It is a 2-8gb MP3 player with an SD card expansion slot for about $70. So you can expand the memory with a 32gb card and have a 32+gb mp3 player for $70. It also has a screen and plays great. Got one of my young nieces this at xmas since she is young and I didnt want to get her something overly expensive since she will break it. This also got great reviews...oh, it plays Video as well.

So yea, $80 for the new shuffle...or $70 and you get lots more...u decide. Would be different if the shuffle was cheaper than it is...but it isnt.

Wait. What? No.

Just no.

$70 for the machine. then however fuch for a 32gb SD card, which i bet isn't cheap...

For those complaining about the controls...

Do keep in mind what kind of market Apple is trying to capture. The shuffle is used when people are at the gym, on a run etc. Chances of them using a pair of 300 dollar earphones are slim. They don't really care what bitrate their music is at as long as its there. The controls that you can use without looking down and fumbling with the player itself is what Apple was going for. Think about it, you clip it on your clothing and start running, no worry about unclipping it to change a song or anything else, the controls are right up where your ears are. Its a good design. As long as you fall into Apple's design target...

And my thoughts on this personally...

"Its just another small thing I'm gonna lose." Seriously. The thing is about what? 1/6 the size of a playing card.

"Imagine your music player talking to you, telling you your song titles, artists and playlist names," said Greg Joswiak, Apple's vice president of iPod and iPhone? Product Marketing. "The amazingly small new iPod shuffle takes a revolutionary approach to how you listen to your music by talking to you, also making it the first iPod shuffle with playlists."

Bahahaa. Because the good old system of reading it yourself just isn't enoug:rofl:l: Revolutionary my ass.

I don't want to be buying another pair. I already have a ?90 set... lol

Yeah my earphones cost $220AU and any headphones I have at home or work even more.

Not only does this require new earphones OR an external "control", the control itself IMHO completely defeats the point of having the actual unit itself smaller given that the control unit just adds extra weight and bulk to the connection between the player and phones. It seems a bit rediculous to talk up it's small form factor when to actually use it you need an external box.

For those complaining about the controls...

Do keep in mind what kind of market Apple is trying to capture. The shuffle is used when people are at the gym, on a run etc. Chances of them using a pair of 300 dollar earphones are slim. They don't really care what bitrate their music is at as long as its there. The controls that you can use without looking down and fumbling with the player itself is what Apple was going for. Think about it, you clip it on your clothing and start running, no worry about unclipping it to change a song or anything else, the controls are right up where your ears are. Its a good design. As long as you fall into Apple's design target...

I would have thought the old "clip" design would have been more suitable to joggers and practically anyone else to be honest. If they needed to make it smaller, just make the clip mechanism removable. As it is you now have not only the player itself but an intermediate control in the cord. It's just another thing to either attach somewhere or leave flapping about as you run. So yes, I think even for the market you mentioned this is a backwards step.

Edited by Smigit

I have a laptop, it has a keyboard, it would be thinner without the keyboard, but I like buttons. What are they doing, really, what :|

People use shuffles at the gym, they can only use apple earphones which fall out of your ear, and if they dont already, they will when youre fiddling with the control attached to them.

OK, seriously, who the hell was sleeping on his job when they released a 4 GB player (with ~1000 songs) without a screen?? I mean if this was a small-sized $20 uber-cheap player, then I would praise the voiceover as a clever idea, but come on, this is just stupid.

Edited by backdrifter

"Having a Max Headroom-like voice slowly tell me what song I'm listening to instead of just playing the *&%#( song" was right between "added cough drop taste" and "dipped in AIDS" on my list of iPod Shuffle features I was hoping for.

"Having a Max Headroom-like voice slowly tell me what song I'm listening to instead of just playing the *&%#( song" was right between "added cough drop taste" and "dipped in AIDS" on my list of iPod Shuffle features I was hoping for.

It only plays back the song info when you ask it to.

and at that point you might as well pick up a $150 iPod nano, which is also VoiceOver-enabled in addition to having twice the storage, dongle-less controls, a screen, and numerous other features.

um no?

since when does the new nanos have voice over? i think this is highly inaccurate if im not mistaken?

It won't be long before third parties release compatible headphones.

For a premium. Why spend $80 on a Shuffle, and then another (possibly) $40 on replacement headphones when you can get a similar small MP3 player like the one from Sandisk for $80 (without DRM) and you can use any headphones with them?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
    • Cheers everyone for the replies. It's been very useful. 👍
    • Compared to the 7735HS it is around 25-30% slower in multi-threaded tasks (according to Google search) I did a review of the 7735HS Beelink SER6 Max in 2023, but thinking about it, it's not comparable to the 7730U. For the example you gave about how it will be used, the 7730U is actually an excellent choice for its power and battery efficiency.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      194
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      71
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!