Windows 7 build 7057 Leaked!

[SoapyHamHocks Member]

Wow the new login screen looks amazing. :woot:

[fix-this!]

Look

yeah i just saw that, makes no sense unless we really aren't getting seven until 2010 now.

[djdanster]

Some screenshots.

[kinetix63 Veteran]

A reminder to EVERYONE that we do NOT allow the distribution of torrent files via our PM system, nor do we allow links to torrent sites that contain the download.

Feel free to discuss this version as much as you like, but do not post download links. Doing so will earn you a warning.

[djp2]

yeah i just saw that, makes no sense unless we really aren't getting seven until 2010 now.

That's what I'm starting to wonder...

Also: what's with the weird startup bug people are getting with this build? Microsoft's fault, or some kind of trojan/hack? And is there any chance this is actually the RC?

[fix-this!]

That's what I'm starting to wonder...

Also: what's with the weird startup bug people are getting with this build? Microsoft's fault, or some kind of trojan/hack? And is there any chance this is actually the RC?

can't be the rc this soon. i mean if we really are not getting the final until next year, why release the rc build so soon?

[ToneKnee]

That's what I'm starting to wonder...

Also: what's with the weird startup bug people are getting with this build? Microsoft's fault, or some kind of trojan/hack? And is there any chance this is actually the RC?

Just a bug, you can get rid of that popping up by deleting the desktop.ini file.

[fhpuqrgrpgvirzhpujbj]

I'm at 47% I'll look around for anything new if this ever finishes >.>

[fix-this!]

I'm at 47% I'll look around for anything new if this ever finishes >.>

jesus im going nuts here. do we have a x64 build yet?

is this RC?

whats with the 2010 date?

[david]

[andy_rose]

Just a bug, you can get rid of that popping up by deleting the desktop.ini file.

That did not work for me.

[Lord Ba'al]

Torrent File : from other sites

http://pic.ipicture.ru/uploads/090311/CFbUu4fTmI.jpg

Looks real as People have posted good screenshots, including a new startup/shutdown picture in the background. Will post once I get permission from the owner of the screenshots.

32bit

1. Proof of intact digital signature please, otherwise I'll declare it fake.

2. 32-bit only? :x

[fix-this!]

1. Proof of intact digital signature please, otherwise I'll declare it fake.

2. 32-bit only? :x

+1 on both

im gonna wait a few days and see if this is legit and for a x64 build.

[SoLoR1]

That did not work for me.

you need to delete it twice, for user and default user and one copy is marked as system so you might not see it :)

[Pharos]

1. Proof of intact digital signature please, otherwise I'll declare it fake.

2. 32-bit only? :x

1. Your loss

2. I'm sorry, but what's wrong with the 32-bit? I have 4Gb of RAM yet I don't mind it, this build is only for enthusiasts, who are not looking forward to using this for more than 1 or 2 months, just to check out what Microsoft has been up to and what changes have been made.

Besides, this is LEAKED software, what are you expecting? And I'm sure there will be a x64 version VERY soon for you extremely picky people :p .

Ugh :rolleyes:

Edited March 12, 2009 by Pharos

[andy_rose]

Yeah on my desktop there was 2 desktop.ini files. I deleted them both, but to no avail.

[david]

People find it for yourself. Thats what I did

[SkyyPunk Veteran]

Regarding the date...if this is real, that could still be fine... Vista betas didnt expire for a while after the final build was released (if i am remembering correctly...all my searching takes me to sp1 :p)

[djdanster]

1. Your loss

2. I'm sorry, but what's wrong with the 32-bit? I have 4Gb of RAM yet I don't mind it, this build is only for enthusiasts, who are not looking forward to using this for more than 1 or 2 months, just to check out what Microsoft has been up to and what changes have been made.

Besides, this is LEAKED software, what are you expecting? And I'm sure there will be a x64 version VERY soon for you extremely picky people :p .

Ugh :rolleyes:

+1

[fix-this!]

+1

32 bit sucks, ill wait for x64 as well. i want to utilize all of my ram.

[Pharos]

32 bit sucks, ill wait for x64 as well. i want to utilize all of my ram.

...Because?

I don't know what you do on your computer, but the 3.2Gb detected by the 32-bit version is more than sufficient for everybody, unless you work with 90+ Megapixels images on Photoshop or render computer-animated movies, but then again it wouldn't be very smart to do those things on a pre-release, leaked software, would it? :p

[djdanster]

32 bit sucks, ill wait for x64 as well. i want to utilize all of my ram.

Well tbh I have no problem with either, Ive got 2gb ram and I'm using 64bit without any issues, 32bit worked fine aswell. I just made the switch :D I dont have any issues with either.

[hoosier28]

...Because?

I don't know what you do on your computer, but the 3.2Gb detected by the 32-bit version is more than sufficient for everybody, unless you work with 90+ Megapixels images on Photoshop or render computer-animated movies, but then again it wouldn't be very smart to do those things on a pre-release, leaked software, would it? :p

I agree. These 64-bitters are a little annoying sometimes...

[djdanster]

...Because?

I don't know what you do on your computer, but the 3.2Gb detected by the 32-bit version is more than sufficient for everybody, unless you work with 90+ Megapixels images on Photoshop or render computer-animated movies, but then again it wouldn't be very smart to do those things on a pre-release, leaked software, would it? :p

Lol you said it! would be kinda dumb to be doing that on a prerelease, even with the stability of windows 7 at this stage.

[Unimatrix Xero]

think i'll wait for the x64