Neowin No Ad Version


Recommended Posts

The only ads that annoy me in any way at all are the pop up ons on the main page.

But other than that, I barely notice any of the others anyway.

Though any sort of higher paid subscriber badge would would only be taken into consideration by me dependant on the colour of the badge provided. :p

We have a pink badge lying around we've wanted to use for something. That intrigue you?

Are our ads that obtrusive?

The money you pay for a subscription goes towards better features for you and supports the site.. It is purposely very low to subscribe but it in no way covers for the ad revenue on an annual basis!

As mentioned earlier, I don't like ADs. Especially with Neowin having them embedded in the text which has constantly made me wonder if I should leave the site. I'm not asking them to do this for free (I understand it costs money to run a site) and I don't really want to resort to robbing them (using an AD Blocker). I'm willing to PAY a reasonble rate to get rid of the ADs. Allowing me to support one of my top websites and to not have ADs.

Then the staff at Neowin can get a real measure of their value, the number of paid subscribers. IMHO AD support as a primary driving force for a site devalues it in a number of ways. It not only distorts the number of people who value the site it also (can) devalue the site's content in a hope to garner more page views (as higher page views translate into higher ad revenue) at the expense of long term subscribers...

At any rate, this isn't an attempt to ask for anything free. I'm just making a valid suggestion to Neowin and allowing others to share their support (or lack thereof) for the admins to take it all into account.

I read it and im replying :p

I dont thing the ad's are obtrusive... if you let them dictate weather you go on a site or not, then you ahve issues.

Are our ads that obtrusive?

The money you pay for a subscription goes towards better features for you and supports the site.. It is purposely very low to subscribe but it in no way covers for the ad revenue on an annual basis!

Not at all. I don't even notice it, 99% of the time.

Are our ads that obtrusive?

The money you pay for a subscription goes towards better features for you and supports the site.. It is purposely very low to subscribe but it in no way covers for the ad revenue on an annual basis!

Yea I understand that. $13USD per year isn't much to cover ad revenue, and I realistically don't expect it to. I pay over $100 per year for access to WSJ.com to remove ads (though that is another story). So I'm wondering about another subscription level where no ads is a feature. Maybe the discussion could be pointed toward how much (roughly) revenue Neowin gets per sit visitor annually from ADs. That way we would talk about a realistic price to someone who wants to forgoe those ADs without destroying Neowin revenue.

Also, for me any ad is obtrusive. Especially with the latest news article being that Google will soon use them to track my web viewing intensely. I'm big on privacy and I'm sure I'll end up installing an Ad Blocker as a result. But I would prefer to NOT steal from one of my favorite sites.

I read it and im replying :p

I dont thing the ad's are obtrusive... if you let them dictate weather you go on a site or not, then you ahve issues.

How would I have issues? You choose where you go, be it online or in the birck and mortar world, based on a variety of factors. If you walkd into your favorite movie theater and it had the greatest seats and the best sound and picture quality in the area, but all through the movie some guy would sit next to you trying to sell you something I'm sure you'd stop going too. You'd probably also tell management to, at least, offer a VIP section where the tickets cost more, but those guys aren't allowed... Any reason I have to choosing where to visit or not visit is a valid reason simply because those are my reasons. They might not be the same for you, but that is the way it should be as we're not the same person.

What a horrible badge! I mean, there's no olive green in it or anything... :whistle:

Totally understandable, I believe and know Green to be the best colour around.

Apparently friends think its an obsession, I just think its an awesome colour for everything. :p

IIRC, Neowin gets paid on a page load basis, so even if you don't click any they'll get some $$$.

Totally agree though, the intellitext and flash ones are beyond annoying. I can only really stand the google ads as they blend nicely with the website. Anything more and they're all gone.

Well since this thread has failed to start any reasonable discussion I guess I'll just resort to doing what every other person who dislikes ADs has resorted to doing. If Neowin decides to do an AD-Free subscriber level I'll consider it :D

Well since this thread has failed to start any reasonable discussion I guess I'll just resort to doing what every other person who dislikes ADs has resorted to doing. If Neowin decides to do an AD-Free subscriber level I'll consider it :D

That's not very nice, if you plan on doing what I think your going to do.

Honestly dude, the ads are so small and hardly noticeable they do not bother me one bit. Blocking or removing the advertisements using a third party program doesn't help change the overall look and could possibly break some of the code on the web site, causing errors and making things look distorted.

Blocking or removing the advertisements using a third party program doesn't help change the overall look and could possibly break some of the code on the web site, causing errors and making things look distorted.

What if he uses a browser with ad blocking built in? Camino has an option to block web ads. It wouldn't be third party then. :shiftyninja:

What if he uses a browser with ad blocking built in? Camino has an option to block web ads. It wouldn't be third party then. :shiftyninja:

In cases like that, there will definitely be ways you can whitelist sites. If you would like Neowin to be able to stay running, we appreciate if you whitelist us. After all, it will benefit you because Neowin needs the revenue that adverts generate to stay up and running.

Totally understandable, I believe and know Green to be the best colour around.

Apparently friends think its an obsession, I just think its an awesome colour for everything. :p

(Y) :) *looks at own badge and admires* ;)

Just kidding :D Green is a very nice colour though :)

That's not very nice, if you plan on doing what I think your going to do.

Honestly dude, the ads are so small and hardly noticeable they do not bother me one bit. Blocking or removing the advertisements using a third party program doesn't help change the overall look and could possibly break some of the code on the web site, causing errors and making things look distorted.

That is not my desire, but by and large I have been told that is what I should do. I asked to pay for no ads and got met largely with two replies.

1. The ads are not annoying (so i am now told what annoys me)

2. Use ad blocking software.

Very few have chimed in support or other positive thoughts. The only admin to reply essentially reiterated the first line.

So it seems I am being told the suggestion is pointless. I can spend my money elsewhere.

That is not my desire, but by and large I have been told that is what I should do. I asked to pay for no ads and got met largely with two replies.

1. The ads are not annoying (so i am now told what annoys me)

2. Use ad blocking software.

Very few have chimed in support or other positive thoughts. The only admin to reply essentially reiterated the first line.

So it seems I am being told the suggestion is pointless. I can spend my money elsewhere.

Frazell, nobody has said Neowin will never have an ad-free option. I just thought I'd point that out :)

Your suggestion is very valid. A lot of members seem to desire to pay for the removal of adverts. Like I said - no one has said it will never happen (likewise, no one has said it will happen).

Thank you for not blocking the adverts and for being mature about this issue, discussing it with the community.

What is it about Neowin's adverts that you find obtrusive?

Edited by Calum

Well the intellitxt ads are the worst. I don't mind the other ads so much, I hate the intellitxt with a passion though. I've taken the step of adding their domain to my hosts list routed to home. No longer an issue. I'd gladly pay more for an ads free version of Neowin though

Frazell, nobody has said Neowin will never have an ad-free option. I just thought I'd point that out :)

Your suggestion is very valid. A lot of members seem to desire to pay for the removal of adverts. Like I said - no one has said it will never happen (likewise, no one has said it will happen).

Thank you for not blocking the adverts and for being mature about this issue, discussing it with the community.

What is it about Neowin's adverts that you find obtrusive?

His point is not that the ads are obtrusive (they're not). His point is that if there were an ad-free Neowin available in combination with a more expensive type of subscription, he'd buy that.

The administration was thinking out loud about it once, I remember as much.

His point is not that the ads are obtrusive (they're not). His point is that if there were an ad-free Neowin available in combination with a more expensive type of subscription, he'd buy that.

The administration was thinking out loud about it once, I remember as much.

Thank you for your point, Mephistopheles; whilst I already understand completely what Frazell Thomas' point is, he has also stated that he finds the adverts obtrusive. I am just interested to know what about Neowin's adverts he finds obtrusive? :)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Pretty nice tool, thanks
    • Indeed. But note that this has Wifi7, HDMI 2.1, BlueTooth 5.4, and 5G Ethernet, so even in the additional features list this bundle blows the Steam Machine away. And, with the money saved, one could improve this dramatically.
    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      83
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!