Neowin No Ad Version


Recommended Posts

So Neowin makes more then $10 per person a year in Ad revenue? - What if you never click any of the Ads (It's very rare that an Ad is actually advertising something I want). Do you still get Money just by having viewers see them?

Keep in mind that I'm not involved in the money side of things so that was just a supposition in my part. I'm not sure how things work (in terms of viewing or clicking or how Neowin collects their ad money) but I have whitelisted Neowin on my copy of Firefox out of respect for the Admins. I don't find them intrusive at all.

Now Neowin may very well release an ad-free version at a select subscriber level but it would be ironic if we settle on a price that is less than what we would receive with advertisements. Thus a flood of new subscribers could end up costing us money.

Again, however, you'd need to hear it from an Admin to claim any amount of truth in that statement.

In what way are they annoying? I'm curious because I can't think of a difference between a Google ad on this site and a news post. The IntelliTXT are a whole different ballgame, but Google? I challenge you to find a less obtrusive advertiser.

Google's ads are the least obtrusive for sure. If they were all there was I could live with them a lot easier than I can with the other ads (like IntelliTXT as those things are just over the top annoying), but I'd prefer not to see any of them at all.

The best way of explaining is it sometimes I just want a bit of peace. The ability to absorb information without being constantly barraged with someone peddling their wares on me.

At the root of it for me, I guess, if the ad being there is annoying enough for me, but like I said Google is less annoying than the others.

I'm still a bit surprised that this really hasn't always existed on NeoWin. Being realistic it probably takes almost (meaning very little) no code to add a new subscriber level which is basically an ad-free template. The only issue NeoWin realistically has to figure out is how much in ad-revenue is generated per quarter for each visitor and charge that amount. If it becomes a popular benefit then NeoWin gains the benefit of not being beholden to advertisers and if it isn't the minority (it seems) who want no ads can have that too....

I think it is a far better measure for a community to be measuring itself in how many people believe the community is valuable enough to actually spend money to keep around. The ads are annoying to me, but they also prevent the community from knowing its true value.

For me, I've found my solution to the ad problem... NeoWin loaded on my HTC Touch Pro doesn't have ads so, for now, I'll just slow or stop my visits to Neowin on the desktop and browse it on my cell phone.

Jot me down as another person that would pay for a subscription tier higher than what's currently offered to be rid of advertising. I don't like ads on the web and I don't have any problem paying to get rid of them. As far as I know MVC members are given all of the subscriber benefits for free, but I pay the $10/year just as a way to say thanks.

An advertising-free version of the forums already exists in the mobile skin. I prefer this layout to the current theme but using it with desktop browsers doesn't work very well. It also has some minor display issues (quotes, images, and lists).

For what it's worth: I've found browsing with flash and javascript disabled makes the web a much better place. It cuts out the most annoying advertising and leaves you with at worst animated gifs (which I've prevented from animating) and in most cases you'll get plain images or text instead.

Google seems like the only company using flash and javascript for good (gmail, youtube, maps) so it's definitely worth the trade off to have those technologies disabled by default and then turn them on when you actually need them.

Very good news! Thanks!

I'm glad to see the admins here still care about us users, even if we're a minority. Now I can subscribe and go back to lurking and enjoying NeoWin's content :D

Very good news! Thanks!

I'm glad to see the admins here still care about us users, even if we're a minority. Now I can subscribe and go back to lurking and enjoying NeoWin's content :D

No problem :) I linked the thread as I thought this would please you ;)

I still think you should not be shy to post in the forums more though :) Our community is very friendly most of the time and we have just added more moderators to deal with 'problem posts' quicker :)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • IBM reveals sub-1nm chip technology, production expected in another 5 years by Pradeep Viswanathan TSMC is now leading the chip manufacturing industry with its 2nm-class process node called N2. Samsung Foundry also has a 2nm-class process node called SF2. TSMC says N2 entered volume production in Q4 2025. Samsung says SF2 started mass production in 2025. Today, IBM announced the world’s first sub-1-nanometer chip technology, marking another major semiconductor research milestone. The new technology is based on a 0.7nm, or 7-angstrom, node and uses a new transistor architecture called “nanostack.” The new design vertically stacks and staggers nanosheet-based transistors so that more components can fit into the same chip area while also improving performance and power efficiency. IBM claims that this new sub-1nm chip can pack nearly 100 billion transistors onto a chip the size of a fingernail. This offers almost twice the density, up to 50 percent higher performance, or 70 percent better energy efficiency when compared to IBM's 2nm node design announced back in 2021. Also, IBM mentioned that this new architecture can deliver 40 percent SRAM scaling. It is important to consider that this announcement from IBM is a research milestone rather than a near-term process node launch. Back in 2021, IBM unveiled the world’s first 2nm chip design, claiming 50 billion transistors on a fingernail-sized chip and major performance and efficiency gains. Five years later, IBM’s 2nm technology has still not entered mainstream commercial production. That is because IBM is no longer a major commercial chip manufacturer. It sold its chip manufacturing business to GlobalFoundries years ago and has since then focused only on semiconductor research, IP development, and partnerships. To productize its 2-nm chip technology, IBM partnered with Japan’s Rapidus, but it has not resulted in anything shipping at scale. IBM says that its new sub-1nm technology can reach production as early as within the next five years. If that happens, it will likely depend on manufacturing partners, advanced EUV tooling, and years of yield improvements.
    • It's funny when thieves accuse other thieves of stealing. Ai companies just blatantly siphoned all the knowledge of the internet without consent and are now selling it with their service... so excuse me if I find this a bit ironic.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 27 is out.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Meta Plast earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      135
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!