Windows 7 blocking 3rd-party codecs?


Recommended Posts

New rumblings about Windows 7 codec support

Following up on my previous report on integrated Windows 7 codec support, I saw today from Volker Zota at heise that some new developments in the Windows 7 betas have come to light. According to the investigative work of an ffdshow developer, as reported to Dan ?BetaBoy? Marlin of CoreCodec, the latest beta of Windows 7 blocks the usage of third party video decoders from Windows Media Player and MCE.

As previously reported, Windows 7 differs from earlier versions of Windows in that it will ship with a number of popular video codecs already integrated, including most notably h.264. There are some very notable caveats to the information as it stands right now: this is after all just a beta and might not be in the final released version of Windows 7, there will likely be work arounds, especially for other player software applications (like VLC and Media Player Classic), and because Windows 7 will come with h.264 already installed, many users will never need third-party decoders anyway.

Nonetheless, this move by Microsoft is still somewhat disturbing for it seems to be a big step backwards from what appeared to be Redmond?s increasing openness to third party solutions in the video world. There remains a very active competitive landscape among codec developers and media software creators, outside of the (somewhat) closed garden that Microsoft would prefer Windows users to remain within, and such a move would definitely tilt things in the Microsft direction. This isn?t IE versus Netscape, but it does reflect that kind of outdated thinking we all hoped Microsoft was moving away from finally. I?m sure much more technical details will emerge in the next few days, but right now the blocking takes place at very deep levels of the OSSource: urce: Digitalwerks via Gizmodo

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/751484-windows-7-blocking-3rd-party-codecs/
Share on other sites

So far unfortunate but why would you want to replace h.264 and MPEG-4 codecs. Surely the Microsoft ones would do the business and I don't think this means you can't install and use other codecs through WMP so even less of an issue. For casual users probably a good thing, for power users, annoying.

Sounds like they're saying for codecs the OS includes the OS version is preferred over third-party ones by WMP. This doesn't really surprise me, the third-party ones are notoriously unreliable. However, if I'm reading that right, a codec for a format not supported by the OS won't be affected.

Further, it doesn't sound like they're basing this on any documentation or discussion with anyone from MS or the WMP team in particular. It may simply be that the registration model has changed in some way.

This doesn't really surprise me, the third-party ones are notoriously unreliable.

I would actually say that about the first-party ones (on Vista), especially the MS MPEG-2 Video Decoder. It tends to bork where third-party codecs work just fine.

So just how does Media Foundation actually work?

What happens when you get it to automatically build a graph (or whatever the MF equivalent is)? How does it pick which transforms to use? Does it have any sort of merit system like DirectShow that third parties can freely manipulate, or is the idea that it always uses Microsoft codecs unless you manually build the graph to include the third-party ones you want, in an attempt to make sure it will always work?

I'd rather not have my build in codecs replaced anyway, they're specifically designed to work seemlessly with the OS, and this, IMO is a good move. As long as I can still use my other 3rd party codecs to playback video not supported natively I have no concerns over this system. In fact having native video support out of the box is one thing less to screw about with.

Anyone who thinks this is a good move (aside from Microsoft employees who are probably obligated by contract to post positive on anything Microsoft :rolleyes:) have no clue in video editing, video encoding and frankly, even in video watching. The simplest example: Subtitles. Another: Aspect ratio correction. More: Audio mixing. Even more: Low-frequency crossover. Had enough? :rolleyes: And these are only from daily stuff used for watching.

If dumb monkey can harm his PC from installing bullsh`t codecs, great, give him an option to stay with the build in. But don't lock me out ffs. This will seriously hold me from upgrading to 7 until it is hacked/circumvented.

BTW, this problem was also available to a much smaller extent in Vista with MP3, and it was due to stupid DRM. Won't be surprised if it isn't for the same reason now. :rolleyes:

Well the more time people have to examine this, I'm quite sure there will be a patch issued. I don't think this effects media players with built in codecs in them. I could be wrong though. And for your average end users this is a smart move. The reason why its catching hell here is because we aren't the average end user.

I have had no issues at all in Vista encoding, editing, or playing MP3 files. Despite what a few Microsoft haters will tell you, Vista does not actively force DRM into non-DRMed files.

As for video watching, from my experience it works in 7 precisely the way I expected it to... Which is perfectly well. As for editing and conversion support, I don't see how you can point the finger and say it will make those things any worse with no factual information to go on whatsoever. As for aspect ratio correction, that is not usually done by the codec, but by the program which renders the actual frame onto the screen.

BTW, this problem was also available to a much smaller extent in Vista with MP3, and it was due to stupid DRM. Won't be surprised if it isn't for the same reason now. :rolleyes:

Well that's just a bunch of FUD. The OS makes no determination about which codecs you install or use for any format.

Try playing an MP3 file with ffdshow as the audio decoder. Bunch of FUD indeed. It's not the OS that makes the determination, but Windows Media Player and consequently, Windows Media Center, not using anything else than the Media Foundation Protected Media Pipeline codec for MP3, WMV and WMA. You can check for yourself by running an MP3 file in WMP and seeing the mfpmp.exe process running in the background. It is nearly impossible to manage to get WMP and WMC play MP3, WMV and WMA through other codecs (hard on Vista 32bit, impossible on Vista 64bit from my experience).

Stop posting "a bunch of FUD," you make your company look even worse. :rolleyes:

Edited by Leo Natan

mfpmp.exe enables the playback of DRM protected content, without it you'd be unable to play any DRM protected files in any of Microsoft's media playback programs if it wasn't there. I really don't see why you seem to have some kind of burning desire to play MP3 files with FFDshow anyway, it really doesn't make a shred of difference what you play them back with.

What you base your ignorant assessment that MS are forcing everyone into DRM on I don't pretend to know, but if the DRM engine where to be removed from Windows it would sure as hell pee off a lot of people with DRM protected music.

Actually mfpmp.exe is just an optional out-of-proc surrogate host for codecs implemented as DLLs (similar to "dllhost.exe"), with some special protections to prevent attacks against or reverse engineering of the code being run. It actually has basically nothing to do with DRM, the MP3 codec does not support any form of DRM but it runs in mfpmp.exe to insulate the host application from crashes, security vulnerabilities in the codec, etc.

I'm also confused about your statements that it is "hard on Vista 32-bit, impossible on Vista 64-bit." Are you referring to trying to run a 32-bit codec in a 64-bit process? Or vice versa?

WMP does not provide any UI to allow you to choose the preferred decoder. If you want that, use one of the other players that offers such an option. Otherwise, you'll need to use a tool or installer that can register the codec as the default for WMP.

Thanks for the clarification on that, but I was still right on the point that it is not a process that harms conversion / playback xD

Seems to me the media has had so much to say about Vista that people really are eating into every negativity they can. Shame really because since SP1 was introduced, it is a very capable OS. Still at the end of the day there will be no way to convince the doubters that they are wrong, but I am not going to go back to XP (only forward to 7).

Also, I think he was referring to using FFDshow to decode MP3 files in the 64 bit version of WMP, obviously he doesn't realise that Vista 64 actually uses the x86 version of WMP by default. Point is, if he installed an X64 version of FFD it would probably work

Obviously you are jumping to conclusions. I am using the 64bit version of WMP with ffdshow64. WMC is always 64bit iirc. Please don't assume things about me, it makes you look like an idiot.

Small example why I would want to decode MP3 files (or WMA for that matter): Stereo expansion. I have a surround system, and want to expand the stereo file to more than two channels. Here is my filters list for other examples:

igdsao.png

So while you might not see the point, but that is your problem, not mine. My problem here with Vista is, why am I forced to use the MS codec? I have no DRM protected MP3s, WMAs or WMPs. I want to use what I see best, and you two, with your silly "This is just the best for the majority" or (even sillier) "I don't see the point" comments, just seem like blind Microsoft fanboi monkeys. I get why it might get this attitude from Brandon, but from others, well, it's just a mystery to me.

Obviously you are jumping to conclusions. I am using the 64bit version of WMP with ffdshow64. WMC is always 64bit iirc. Please don't assume things about me, it makes you look like an idiot.

Small example why I would want to decode MP3 files (or WMA for that matter): Stereo expansion. I have a surround system, and want to expand the stereo file to more than two channels. Here is my filters list for other examples:

So while you might not see the point, but that is your problem, not mine. My problem here with Vista is, why am I forced to use the MS codec? I have no DRM protected MP3s, WMAs or WMPs. I want to use what I see best, and you two, with your silly "This is just the best for the majority" or (even sillier) "I don't see the point" comments, just seem like blind Microsoft fanboi monkeys. I get why it might get this attitude from Brandon, but from others, well, it's just a mystery to me.

Wonderfully childish response there Leo, but I will rebuff your argument that you can only use stereo expansion in FFDshow with one simple screenshot. I have a 5.1 surround system and can get music coming out of all my speakers without decoding my audio in FFDshow, using nothing more than the default MP3 codec built into Windows. And no I am not a "blind Microsoft fanboi monkey" but thanks for the lame attempt at an insult it gave me a chuckle if nothing else.

post-286512-1238214292_thumb.jpg

So just how does Media Foundation actually work?

What happens when you get it to automatically build a graph (or whatever the MF equivalent is)? How does it pick which transforms to use? Does it have any sort of merit system like DirectShow that third parties can freely manipulate, or is the idea that it always uses Microsoft codecs unless you manually build the graph to include the third-party ones you want, in an attempt to make sure it will always work?

I honestly hope it is the latter.

DirectShow's merit system was/is a disaster.

Wonderfully childish response there Leo, but I will rebuff your argument that you can only use stereo expansion in FFDshow with one simple screenshot. I have a 5.1 surround system and can get music coming out of all my speakers without decoding my audio in FFDshow, using nothing more than the default MP3 codec built into Windows. And no I am not a "blind Microsoft fanboi monkey" but thanks for the lame attempt at an insult it gave me a chuckle if nothing else.

At what point did I say it only possible in ffdshow? I can do that in my X-Fi's control panel as well. However, ffdshow (and similar, like AC3Filter) allow for much more precise control over the stereo expansion (not that you'd know something on the topic :rolleyes:). Also, stereo expansion was only one of the filters I have selected in ffdshow. Where is your "here, you can do this much much worse as well from my control panel with the defaul MP3 decoder" explanation for them?

At what point did I say it only possible in ffdshow? I can do that in my X-Fi's control panel as well. However, ffdshow (and similar, like AC3Filter) allow for much more precise control over the stereo expansion (not that you'd know something on the topic :rolleyes:). Also, stereo expansion was only one of the filters I have selected in ffdshow. Where is your "here, you can do this much much worse as well from my control panel with the defaul MP3 decoder" explanation for them?

Seeing as I have no idea what you have enabled, I don't know or care.

If you really want to carry on down your delusional Anti-Microsoft rant path feel free. Although I haven't tried it because I really don't care I am sure there ways to change Windows over to use the FFD decoder.

Although I haven't tried it because I really don't care I am sure there ways to change Windows over to use the FFD decoder.

This is where "hard on Vista 32bit, impossible on Vista 64bit" comes into play, but enough of this crap anyway. You have your opinion and I have mine.

Obviously you are jumping to conclusions. I am using the 64bit version of WMP with ffdshow64. WMC is always 64bit iirc. Please don't assume things about me, it makes you look like an idiot.

Small example why I would want to decode MP3 files (or WMA for that matter): Stereo expansion. I have a surround system, and want to expand the stereo file to more than two channels. Here is my filters list for other examples:

igdsao.png

So while you might not see the point, but that is your problem, not mine. My problem here with Vista is, why am I forced to use the MS codec? I have no DRM protected MP3s, WMAs or WMPs. I want to use what I see best, and you two, with your silly "This is just the best for the majority" or (even sillier) "I don't see the point" comments, just seem like blind Microsoft fanboi monkeys. I get why it might get this attitude from Brandon, but from others, well, it's just a mystery to me.

i'm with you on allowing for the choice of codec... but is there a reason that you are using WMP/MCE instead of MPC,KMplayer/ MediaPortal ?

Default ms codecs are just awful in terms of picture quality - they add way too much deblocking so everything looks blurry as... blur. No options on filters - subtitles, post processing etc. And on top of it all it seems they somehow manage to cause videos to play out of sync (in terms of milliseconds thou).

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Trailer park trash “sport “, fits the current White House
    • KataLib 5.3.0.0 by Razvan Serea KataLib is more than just a music player — it's a complete audio suite designed for music lovers and creators alike. It combines a powerful audio player, a flexible metadata editor, a capable audio converter, and a music library manager into one streamlined application. Core Features: Audio Player Enjoy seamless playback of virtually any audio format or even streaming video files. DJ Mode lets you mix tracks with manual or automatic crossfades. You can also load and save WinAmp-style playlists for quick access to your favorite sets. Audio Converter Convert between a wide range of audio formats effortlessly. Trim or normalize your output automatically, and even extract audio from streaming video sources. Ideal for preparing files for different devices or platforms. Metadata Editor View and edit ID3v2 tags and other metadata. Batch edit multiple files at once, and fetch missing information directly from the MusicBrainz database. You can also apply or update album art with ease. Music Library Manager Organize your entire audio collection, search across tracks instantly, and download cover images from the internet — or use your own custom artwork. KataLib makes it easy to keep your library tidy and enriched with useful info. Supported Formats: KataLib supports a wide range of both lossy and lossless audio formats: Input: OPUS, AAC, FLAC, M4A, MP3, MP4, MPC, APE, AIF, MKV, AVI, MOV, FLV, WEBM, Ogg Vorbis, WAV, WAVPack, WMA, AC3, OGA, MP2, MPGA, MPEG, DTS, M4B, DSD (DFS) Output: OPUS, FLAC, M4A, MP3, Ogg Vorbis, WAV Under the hood, KataLib uses the trusted FFmpeg engine for audio conversion and media playback, ensuring compatibility with virtually all mainstream media formats. KataLib 5.3.0.0 changelog: Added Option to select the Zoom level of the Oscilloscope visualizer. The taskbar button of the app now displays the progress of its processing tasks. The metadata text of the Visualization Video can now be aligned by the user. We can now reorder the order of the Visualizers and Metadata, in the Visualization Video Setup dialog, by removing any item and adding it again. It will be added at the end. Changed The font size of the Visualization Video can now be more than 30 points. Updated yt-dlp library to version 2026... Fixed Opening the Visualization Video Setup dialog could fail if the settings were wrong. Sometimes there were false duplicates in the Rename Tracks dialog. Tracks without metadata appeared without title in the Recent menu. Download: KataLib 5.3.0.0 | 90.0 MB (Open Source) Links: KataLib Home Page | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • EA Sports UFC 6 review: Brutal, satisfying, and surprisingly accessible to newcomers by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe EA’s UFC series of fighting games has been putting out games for over 10 years now, but it’s a series I have never spent any time with. As a PC guy, the series being console-exclusive is the primary reason for that. The latest entry to the series, EA Sports UFC 6, is still not coming to PC, but I have an Xbox now. When EA reached out to see if I could have a crack at the game and give my opinion about it, I finally got the chance to see what this franchise is about. I have spent about a week playing UFC 6 on the Xbox Series X. Despite my lackluster skill with fighting games, I still have fun with entries like Street Fighter and Tekken. I quickly came to realize this is a different kind of fighting game, not the arcade titles I am usually dabbling with. Most of the week that I spent playing UFC 6 was in the career mode, trying not to get knocked out while slowly improving my combos and reactions. The review below will be from the perspective of a newcomer to the series and an amateur fighting game fan, so please forgive any mistyped lingo or series-staple mechanics I am not comprehending. In the Ring Getting a solid hit in UFC 6 is satisfying. It’s probably the most satisfying impact reaction I have seen in a fighting game. The ripples in the muscles, the spray of sweat (and blood), the meaty sound, and the subsequent stumble all carry a lot of weight. If I miss a heavy swing like that, though, I already know that I'm in for a world of hurt from the incoming counters. The fighting is a real treat. The actions aren’t as snappy as arcade titles, so a miss feels like a much bigger mistake here. This slowness did take some getting used to, but I felt the improvement in my abilities even after a few drills with basic punch and kick combos. If I’m not deliberate with my actions in the ring, whether it be a hasty retreat or a flying punch, the possibility of getting instantly knocked out is always there. The head, chest, and legs all come with their own health bars, so guarding just one area is just asking for trouble. A few hits to the head, and it's game over. Meanwhile, you won’t even be able to stay on your feet if they get damaged enough, drastically lowering the total amount of stamina available for the rest of the match. I was also encountering a large range of fighting styles to customize my own fighter with. There are a huge number of real-life superstars here from multiple eras. It’s not as exaggerated as Street Fighter or Tekken, but the way they move, evade, throw punches, or even take steps is based on their real-life counterparts. I can see this being a big draw for any mixed martial arts fan. One feature I was surprised to see here was the 'Flow State' ability. As rounds progress, a power-up meter can give a temporary boost to the unique fighting style of the selected fighter, essentially boosting what they are good at. There is an entire visual effect that kicks in when activating this, too. The surprising part was seeing something like this in a game that feels like it’s aiming to be more of a simulator than an arcade fighter. My skill level is too low to use this exactly how the game wants me to, so I ended up triggering it whenever the opponent did it as well. Streamlined vs Authentic When I first started it up, UFC 6 asked me about my experience with the series. Being genuinely new, I took its advice and opted for a lowered difficulty level and 'Streamlined' controls. Quickly, I realized that this wasn’t for me. My chosen fighters were throwing random attacks, no matter what combination the game was trying to teach me. Win streaks were happening, and I was already getting bored out of my mind just a few matches in. Turning off this mode and switching to 'Authentic' controls fixed everything right up. I was now able to control my fighter with more precision than I expected. I could control each arm and leg, which body part my attacks would aim at, and the fully customizable controls for setting up unorthodox moves were a cherry on top. None of these made me an expert at the game, but at least I was being beaten up fairly. This is not a point against UFC 6, though. Giving the option for anyone to enjoy the game is always a good thing in my eyes. There is a lot of customizability in the difficulty, with everything from slow-motion reactions to specific assists being offered as toggles. If I had a friend coming over and wanted to try a quick 1v1, the streamlined controls option is one I’d consider to make it a light and fun fight. The one part of the fighting that did not click with me was the grappling. Being taken to the ground brings in an entirely new control mechanism involving mounts and submissions that feel more like quick-time events than the heavy, tactical fighting I had seen so far while standing. The game wants me to hold sticks in certain directions to change the position or pull off submissions, trying to do the opposite actions of the opponent. Even though I tried to get used to this gameplay, it just felt like a momentum killer, and I eventually just wanted to get back on my feet to get back into the action. Legacy and Career It was UFC 6’s career mode that I wanted to play the most when I started it up. I grew up with EA Sports games, and taking my team from the ground to the top has always been my favorite task. UFC 6 has that same option but also offers a more cinematic entrance to the career experience than I expected with ‘The Legacy’ mode. This mini-campaign follows an up-and-coming fighter, Chris Carter, who is attempting to reach the heights his father had reached in the sport. Starting with a small-time gym and coach, the story follows both his growth in the space as well as the growing rivalry with a friend and fighter, Danny Lopez. The fights in this mode are very good at introducing a newcomer like me to the sport and its varying techniques. Cinematics land between the major fights, showing the growing tension between the two fighters as the years go by, feeling the pressure to not miss out on the hard-earned chances. The dialogue can be a little corny at times, especially when the bar fights kick off, but I largely enjoyed the storyline. At the end of it, I was pretty much familiar with all the mechanics of the career mode, unlocking new skills and moves, and how I needed to approach fights, both outside and inside the ring. This story mode isn’t a very lengthy one, so don’t expect an hour-long campaign. Once the conclusion is reached, Carter’s journey continues as if it’s a normal career playthrough, though I decided to start over from scratch now that I have some know-how about the basics. The career mode is very streamlined, which is to be expected considering there isn’t a team to manage like in other EA Sports games. It’s the journey of one fighter. When a fight comes up in the calendar, I could choose how many weeks I dedicate to preparing for it at the gym. A longer prep time gives the opportunity to get my fighter’s fitness up (giving a bonus during fights), earn more money and points for unlocking new skills, and gain more fans to fast-track the rise to stardom. While that sounds like a lot of things to manage, it’s more like a few clicks. There is a social media menu that sometimes pops up with canned replies I can send to fans, and the sponsors are once again a single click away from being assigned as finished. It’s the training aspect that adds a gameplay angle. Using the money from winnings and sponsorships, I was hiring different types of trainers and learning fancier moves to use in the ring. One small thing I appreciated was that it was possible to injure each other during these training sessions. If a trainer goes down in a bad way while sparring, they won’t be available for the remainder of training. If my fighter is injured, it takes valuable time and resources to heal and recuperate. Just like in real life, it makes sense not to go so hard during training sessions and save that energy for the main event. Every training or sponsorship activity I took part in used up the days and weeks I had before the next fight, bringing a balancing element to the whole ordeal. There were times I simulated most of these to just get to the next fight, but the grind for gaining even the slightest bit of advantage while trying not to overdo it is an enjoyable one. Outside of quick fights and career modes, UFC 6 also introduces an almost museum-like mode to explore a trio of fighters considered to be legends of the sport: Max Holloway, Alex Pereira, and Zhang Weili. The aptly named Hall of Legends mode is unlike everything else seen in the game. Each of these fighters has entire levels dedicated to them that I could walk around in and explore their journey into the UFC. This includes footage from real-life fights and interviews about their original inspirations and training methods. Each of these spaces is almost like an interactive documentary. Once the highlights are done, the mode offers the opportunity to take over a deciding fight from the superstars. It’s an impressive transition. Going from the real-life televised event with crowds and commentary to immediately taking over in the game has some real hype behind it. Performance and visuals It’s clear to see that UFC 6 is going for a photo-realism look with its visuals compared to any other fighting game. The fighters don’t look great in selection screens. But inside the arenas, under the flood lights, surrounded by crowds, and facing an opponent, the visuals are more than impressive. As ghastly as it is to witness, things like blood spraying into the mat and muscles reddening as they get pummeled keep improving the immersion. The fluid animations help sell the illusion even further. A missed kick carries the momentum to require a corrective step. Hard punches that glance off blocks give off the air of a hit that still took some wind off the opponent’s guard. The special moves with flips and spins look mega awkward when missing, just as they do in real life. Suffice to say, the Frostbite Engine powering this game is one of the biggest strengths of EA development studios. Playing on the Xbox Series X, the 60 FPS gameplay did not miss the mark or cause any slowdowns that I could detect. I still wish this series were on PC to see just how far the developer can push the engine. One area I continue to have issues with, surprisingly enough, is the menus. The game has fast loading screens, but almost every menu I click through has a large amount of noticeable lag before it registers. This is immensely painful in the career mode, since I have to go through multiple menus between fights to train and do sponsorships, and having a 3-second pause when selecting a simple move between pages is the only time that made me quit the game. Thanks to Xbox’s quick resume, though, I was able to instantly jump back in the next day to the same point (and wade through more laggy menus). Conclusion My primary mission going into this EA Sports UFC 6 review as a newcomer to the series was to find out if this is a good jumping-in point for someone like me. Suffice it to say, the game passed that test with flying colors. Despite the high skill ceiling, the legacy mode introduction campaign, multiple types of accessible controls, and streamlined career had me picking up the basics and fighting styles much faster than I expected. I wish I had gotten to try out competitive multiplayer during my time with the game, too, but the lack of players in the pre-release version prevented this. The impressive visuals and animations, coupled with the impact physics that let me feel every punch and kick easily, made this the most immersive fighting game I have played. The only part that gave me pause was the grappling gameplay, which killed the momentum in most fights. The Flow State amplifying system didn’t hamper the experience, but I also felt like it made more sense for an arcade fighter, not this. Easily the most annoying thing about UFC 6 was its laggy menus, which I hope get some sort of fix later. Returning series veterans might have a completely different experience from me. But for a new fan like me looking to climb ranks and see fighters get floored in spectacular ways, UFC 6 doesn’t miss a step. EA Sports UFC 6 is releasing on June 19 across Xbox Series X|S and PlayStation 5 for $69.99. Ultimate Edition owners can already jump in via advanced access. This review was conducted on the Xbox Series X version of the game provided by EA.
    • No, Microsoft is obviously just spending money on maintaining a product with 0 users.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      ssd21345 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Contributor
      MarkHughes4096 went up a rank
      Contributor
    • Dedicated
      jordanspringer earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Rookie
      Rimplesnort went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Markus94287 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      486
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      173
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      138
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      94
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      79
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!