Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows (Film)


Recommended Posts

I'm going on Monday, but I'm not expecting much - I haven't liked any of the films, except Prisoner of Azkaban, which I liked as a film, but HATED as an adaptation. Since then, I've realised that even if they get brilliant directors [which Yates most definitely isn't], they're still at the Mercy of Steve Kloves, whose adaptations have generally been awful.

Oh, and I'll be 'completing the journey', in 2D.

Just got back from the screening. The movie was good, but the ending was as I feared. The climax of the movie was almost entirely different than the book, and it completely ruined it. The rest of the movie did a great job of stuffing details from the book into the the plot, but the ending just sucked.

Do you really think they should have kept the book's version of

the final duel

? it would have been so anticlimatic. Those who haven't read the book would be furious.

Edited by Anaron

Do you really think they should have kept the book's version of

the final duel

? it would have been so anticlimatic. Those who haven't read the book would be furious.

I don't think Harry's speech followed by each casting their signature spell would be anticlimatic.

Edited by Anaron

Do you really think they should have kept the book's version of

the final duel

? it would have been so anticlimatic. Those who haven't read the book would be furious.

I havent read the book in a long time, but if I recall correctly,

harry explained to voldermort why he couldn't master the elder wand?

And I think that they should've actually SAID the spellls. the whole avada kedavra vs. expelliarmus is special in both the books and earlier moves (they kept it on GoF). also I wished you saw molly say it as well

Edited by Anaron

I did NOT like the next to last scene with the Elder Wand. They should have kept it the same

Obviously at a midnight showing theres alot of fans. I could hear just peoples reactions to that scene and knew instantly that it must have been different from the book. I myself have not read the books. I should...

Edited by Anaron

Obviously at a midnight showing theres alot of fans. I could hear just peoples reactions to that scene and knew instantly that it must have been different from the book. I myself have not read the books. I should...

I went with some friends that hadn't read the book, and I told them what actually happened to

the elder wand

in the books and they were like: well that makes a lot more sense!

But meh, the purpose was the same anyway

Edited by Anaron

did they change the ending? i don't remember the ending like that in the book especially voldemort and nagina specially as well as Nevill's final action in the movie

they re-arranged things a bit. neville's sword thingy was supposed to happen earlier and not like that. in the book, neville kills the snake while harry is still presumed dead (but is casting spells behind the invisibility cloak I think). then voldemort is fought by minerva, slughorn and shacklebolt, while ron, hermione and ginny are fighting off bellatrix (until molly steps in). at some point harry shows himself, gives volvemort a speech on where he failed and they cast 'expelliarmus' and 'aveda kedavra' at the same time.

Edited by Anaron

WTF is going on with this thread? There should be a TON of spoiler tags that no one is using!!!

I have not read the books, but I enjoy the movies and planned on going to see it tomorrow for a matinee, and thanks for no one using spoiler tags the movie was possibly ruined for me.

Thanks alot. :angry:

I've added spoiler tags to most of the recent posts in this thread. In the future, please use them when you mention details about the movie or book.

If you're unaware of the spoiler tags, use this as a reference:

[spoiler]text[/spoiler]

I havent read the book in a long time, but if I recall correctly,

harry explained to voldermort why he couldn't master the elder wand?

And I think that they should've actually SAID the spellls. the whole avada kedavra vs. expelliarmus is special in both the books and earlier moves (they kept it on GoF). also I wished you saw molly say it as well

So why couldn't voldermort master the elder wand?

So why couldn't voldermort master the elder wand?

Draco mastered Dumbledor (6th book) and then later Harry mastered Draco (7th book part 1). Voldemort tough that to be the master of the wand you had to kill the person who owns it. But you only need to master/disarm like Draco did against Dumbledor. Snape killed him but did not disarm him.

Voldemort would need to disarm Harry in order to master the wand. He killed Snape instead.

WTF is going on with this thread? There should be a TON of spoiler tags that no one is using!!!

I have not read the books, but I enjoy the movies and planned on going to see it tomorrow for a matinee, and thanks for no one using spoiler tags the movie was possibly ruined for me.

Thanks alot. :angry:

To be fair, why would you come in this thread if you knew they were talking about the movie?

Nothing said ruined the movie, just comparing the differences between the book and movie. Just don't go visit IMBD's website...

Draco mastered Dumbledor (6th book) and then later Harry mastered Draco (7th book part 1). Voldemort tough that to be the master of the wand you had to kill the person who owns it. But you only need to master/disarm like Draco did against Dumbledor. Snape killed him but did not disarm him.

Voldemort would need to disarm Harry in order to master the wand. He killed Snape instead.

The only plot hole is that he did kill harry.

To be fair, why would you come in this thread if you knew they were talking about the movie?

Nothing said ruined the movie, just comparing the differences between the book and movie. Just don't go visit IMBD's website...

To be fair, ????

:rolleyes: Seriously, are you kidding me with that question?

Let me spell it out for you as simply as possible.

I came into the thread for the same exact reason I go into any threads about any other form of media, such as video games for example, that I am looking forward to. I expect to read news, maybe see some screens, start see reviews coming it, and then once it has been released get GENERAL impressions.

So to be fair, to say I should not have come into this thread is literally when of the stupidest things I have ever read on this site, and I have read a whole lot of stupid things said.

And I beg to differ, I know nothing of the books, so to speak about major plot aspects of the books indeed can and very well may have ruined the movie for me.

Do you really think they should have kept the book's version of

the final duel

? it would have been so anticlimatic. Those who haven't read the book would be furious.

The movie cut out or down-played HUGE plot points from the Hogwarts battle.

The deaths of Fred, Lupin, and Tonks weren't given any screen time and they were just kind of passed over in less than a minute. The attack of the House Elves, lead by Kreacher against Voldemort was completely left out. Neville's badass scene that completes his character's arc in a supremely awesome way (where, in front of everyone, he stands up to Voldemort, gets tortured, and STILL kills Nagini) was changed for the worse. The entire scene about the fate of the Elder wand after Voldemort's death was completely changed, and completely ruined the meaning of it.

In the book the final duel between Harry and Voldemort happens in front of everyone in the Great Hall. The Death Eaters are being overrun or driven out of the castle, but everyone stops to watch the duel. Intensely silent. Voldemort and Harry circle each other. With wands drawn and staring each other down, they have an intense conversation as to why none of Voldemort's spells can hurt anyone. How Harry's sacrifice earlier in the forest permanently protects everyone from Voldemort. How he STILL doesn't understand why those who know love will always be more powerful than he. Voldemort's disposition goes from confident to angry and scared as he finally realizes. They both cast their signature spells and Voldemort is killed by his own, rebounding spell. Everyone sees his death. And in that moment there is a huge uproar of happiness and excitement.

In the movie, some of the things mentioned above are correct. But, on the whole, the movie completely missed what made all of those scenes great.You asked if the book version would have been anticlimactic, and I say that the book's ending was far and away the better of the two.

WTF is going on with this thread? There should be a TON of spoiler tags that no one is using!!!

I have not read the books, but I enjoy the movies and planned on going to see it tomorrow for a matinee, and thanks for no one using spoiler tags the movie was possibly ruined for me.

Thanks alot. :angry:

Sorry Larry. I intentionally left my post vague on the specifics for that very reason. I apologize if it still ruined it for you.

To be fair, ????

:rolleyes: Seriously, are you kidding me with that question?

Let me spell it out for you as simply as possible.

I came into the thread for the same exact reason I go into any threads about any other form of media, such as video games for example, that I am looking forward to. I expect to read news, maybe see some screens, start see reviews coming it, and then once it has been released get GENERAL impressions.

So to be fair, to say I should not have come into this thread is literally when of the stupidest things I have ever read on this site, and I have read a whole lot of stupid things said

I don't think it's that stupid. You should know most people don't know about spoiler tags. You don't want the movie spoiled then you shouldn't be looking for info before you watch it. :pinch: What do you think people are going to be talking about after the release? :blink:

To be fair, why would you come in this thread if you knew they were talking about the movie?

Nothing said ruined the movie, just comparing the differences between the book and movie. Just don't go visit IMBD's website...

The only plot hole is that he did kill harry.

Voldemort did not kill Harry. Voldemort killed the piece of his own soul that was attached to Harry.

I don't think it's that stupid. You should know most people don't know about spoiler tags. You don't want the movie spoiled then you shouldn't be looking for info before you watch it. :pinch: What do you think people are going to be talking about after the release? :blink:

Again, reviews from critics, and other members GENERAL impressions. liked it, hated it, effects were awesome, it was way to long, way to short, etc. etc. etc. Screen shots. The same things that are discussed in countless other threads about movies and video games that have never ruined a movie for me or anyone else in the past, but now all of a sudden this is some new foreign concept and I am the idiot for being in the thread??? :rolleyes:

Whatever, I am done with this thread. Especially if the people participating in it find it SO damn confusing why spoiler tags have always been used on this site and cannot grasp the fact why I came into the thread if I have not seen the movie yet.

spacer... thank you for the info. Now I know what to expect. I was really hoping they would stick to the books more but I guess not. Oh well :angry:

DirtyLarry, well in my case, If I don't want to be spoiled I avoid talking or reading anything about it. You never know who's going to spoil it for you! :laugh:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Google Meet brings Gemini note-taking to AI Pro and Ultra subscribers by Karthik Mudaliar Google's Gemini-powered "Take notes for me" feature inside Google Meet is now available to Google AI Pro and Ultra subscribers. The features work on Google Meet for web as well as on mobile, and Google says that subscribers can use it for meetings they host in many supported languages. As the name suggests, "Take notes for me" allows Gemini to listen to a meeting, generate a summary, identify action items, and save the notes as a Google Doc in the user’s Drive. After the meeting, the organizer receives an email recap with the summary and action items, while the notes can also be attached to the related Calendar event depending on the meeting setup and sharing settings. The feature isn't automatically turned on for everyone, though. Google says that all meeting participants are notified when note-taking is turned on, and users can start it from the pencil icon in Meet or enable it for future calls through Meet’s meeting records settings. For work or school accounts, administrators can also control whether the feature is available and may require explicit participant consent for note-taking, recording, or transcription features. The feature first launched back in 2024, when it was available just for selected Workspace users. Over the years, Google added refinements and more options, including the ability to enable it when scheduling meetings via Google Calendar. Google's support docs say that the feature currently supports English, French, German, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Portuguese, and Spanish, but only one language at a time. Meetings with multiple spoken languages are not currently supported, and Google recommends using the tool for meetings between 15 minutes and eight hours. The new feature makes Google Meet closer to its rivals that have AI tools already built in. Microsoft Teams has recently started offering Copilot and intelligent recap features that summarize meetings, surface highlights, and help with follow-ups, while Zoom’s AI Companion can also generate meeting summaries from desktop and mobile meetings.
    • GnuCash 5.16 by Razvan Serea GnuCash is a personal and small business finance application, freely licensed under the GNU GPL and available for GNU/Linux, BSD, Solaris, Mac OS X and Microsoft Windows. It’s designed to be easy to use, yet powerful and flexible. GnuCash allows you to track your income and expenses, reconcile bank accounts, monitor stock portfolios and manage your small business finances. It is based on professional accounting principles to ensure balanced books and accurate reports. GnuCash can keep track of your personal finances in as much detail as you prefer. If you are just starting out, use GnuCash to keep track of your checkbook. You may then decide to track cash as well as credit card purchases to better determine where your money is being spent. When you start investing, you can use GnuCash to help monitor your portfolio. Buying a vehicle or a home? GnuCash will help you plan the investment and track loan payments. If your financial records span the globe, GnuCash provides all the multiple-currency support you need. Between 5.15 and 5.16, the following bugfixes were accomplished: Bug 421610 - RFE: Include logical dates for View->Filter by "date range"The Select Range section of the Date tab of the register's Filter By dialog box is changed to provide relative, specific date, or days ago options for the start and end of the filter range. The Show number of days item label is changed to Show from days ago to better reflect what it does. Bug 436105 - esc key not working as expected in register: Enable the escape key to cancel a field edit. Bug 797384 - Gnucash doesn't handle commodity prices with big numerator/denominator properly. Bug 798004 - Next gen UI for stock transactions Bug 799314 - Add "enter now" option in scheduled transaction editor. tab to allow users to select the scheduled transactions to be included in a “Since Last Run…” window. If there are no instances of a selected transaction triggered by today’s date, the next instance is triggered. Bug 799751 - autocomplete crash Bug 799759 - Users can't Enable entries via Checkboxes on Scheduled Transactions PageAllow the Enabled box in the list of scheduled transactions to be operated instead of having to open the transaction editor dialog and change the Enabled checkbox. Also added use of the Name column as the secondary column sort for all the other columns. Bug 799762 - Poor handling of cases where hidden/placeholder accounts are used in the account register Bug 799766 - Double line preference not respected in search register Bug 799767 - POST /accounts in bindings/python/example_scripts/rest-api is broken Bug 799777 - `xaccSplitSetParent`: reparenting a committed split silently drops its KVP slots (online_id, cap-gains links) Other changes & improvements: Numeric values may now be selected to copy in the Accounts page. Add new Finance::Quote source Finnhub.io: Free API key (personal/non-professional use) available at https://finnhub.io. Set FINNHUB_API_KEY environment variable to API key to use this source. As of June 2026, free tier API limit is 60 API calls/minute. The Investment Lots report has new optional columns for Computed Annual Growth Rate. Python Bindings: Improved translation of primary object (Account, Transaction, Split, etc.) so that they can be treated as normal Python objects. This is accomplished with SWIG magic so no existing code is obsoleted. Python Bindings: Better conversion of GLists to Python lists. Python Bindings: Destroy the QofSession in the Python Session dtor to prevent leaving the database locked. [engine] Add first-class online_id accessors for Split and Account and make them available to Python bindings, removing the unused Transaction online_id property. Improve C++ implementation of QofBook. Correct the Doxygen doc for qof_instance_get/set_kvp. [gnc-log-replay.cpp] fix incorrect guid dump Add some Boost library requirements needed by libgnucash-guile to CMakeLists.txt so that missing feature will fail at configure time. Use Compile-time Regular Expressions instead of std::regex in gnc-filepath-utils.cpp and instead of boost::regex in the CSV importer, with the CTRE v3.11.1 header added to borrowed [gnc-filepath-utils.cpp] null check char* arguments Add ChartJS licenses. Removed AEX from list of commodities. euronext.com is now using JS based anti-webscraping. [report-core] always offer options summary in reports. This is useful to debug reports. The Add options summary option is removed because it's no longer optional. Remove remaining obsolete IMContext from sheet Fix blurry text in HiDPI offscreen-rendered widgets Add port field to database connection dialog: The convention of appending the port number after the host isn't obvious. When editing a split in the register treat the account as being changed only if it isn't the one selected before editing instead of if the user performed an edit Return immediately from qof_book_destroy if hash_of_collections is null. If qof_book_destroy is called on a QofBook* freshly created with qof_book_new (usually because it was used to create a session that now must be destroyed) it would try to empty the non-existent hash tables, crashing. Clean up Flathub metadata to solve warnings at flatpak build time. Be consistent in naming GncPluginPage and GncPluginPageRegister HTML: Remove unimplemented function declarations. [gnc-html.cpp] remove unused buggy string conversion functions Convert libgnc-html to C++ Apply -Wall -Werr -Wmissing-prototypes to C++ compilation on Windows and fix the resulting errors. New and Updated Translations: Arabic, Croatian, Danish, Dutch, German, Finnish, Hungarian, Korean, Norwegian-Bokmal, Spanish Download: GnuCash 5.16 | 176.0 MB (Open Source) Links: GnuCash Home page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Microsoft finally launches WSL Containers in public preview by David Uzondu Microsoft has announced that WSL containers, a feature that allows developers to run Linux containers natively inside Windows without the need for Docker Desktop, is now available in public preview several weeks after Microsoft previewed it at Build 2026. To use the new container feature, you first have to install the latest pre-release version of the Windows Subsystem for Linux by running a quick update command in your terminal: wsl --update --pre-release After installing, you'd get access to the new Linux container CLI (wslc.exe) and the programmable API. Microsoft said that the CLI has a "familiar format" that matches the toolsets developers already use every day. If you know standard Docker commands, your muscle memory will translate directly to wslc.exe, which even features a built-in alias called container.exe. You can quickly run a full Ubuntu KDE desktop container by exposing ports, or pass your graphics card straight into a machine learning environment to run PyTorch workloads. Passing the --gpus all flag inside the run command instantly links your hardware. Image via Microsoft As for the API, developers can now embed Linux container operations directly inside native Windows applications without exposing the command line to users. The team integrated the API directly into MSBuild and CMake, so developers can define container steps directly in project files. Apart from bringing the CLI and API into public preview, Microsoft also said that it's working on a new default file system called virtiofs to speed up file transfer rates between Windows and Linux. Microsoft also introduced an experimental networking mode named consomme, which resolves compatibility issues with corporate VPNs by routing Linux network traffic straight through Windows. One thing to note about WSL containers is that they don't run in your standard WSL distributions; instead, every application and CLI session spawns its own lightweight Hyper-V utility VM in the background. This basically reduces the chances of one app snooping on the container of another app.
    • Google reportedly limited Meta's Gemini access over limited AI compute by Karthik Mudaliar Google is reportedly limiting Meta's use of its Gemini AI models after Meta tried buying more computing capacity than even Google could supply. According to the Financial Times, Google told Meta in March that it could not provide the full Gemini capacity that Meta had requested. This shortfall even disrupted and delayed some of Meta's internal projects. Due to this, Meta even told its employees internally to use AI tokens more efficiently. Meta wasn't the only one to get hit by this sudden refusal by Google; even other customers were affected. But Meta was hit harder because of its unusually high demand for Google's models. The move from Google makes it evident that companies all over are in limited supply of both infrastructure and compute. Alphabet said in April that Google Cloud revenue grew 63% year-over-year to $20 billion in the first quarter, helped by enterprise AI infrastructure and AI solutions. In pursuit of more compute, Meta had earlier signed a multi-billion-dollar AWS agreement as well as a large AMD GPU deal for AI data centers. But the crunch would be short-lived as both Meta and Google have also ramped up infrastructure investments heavily. Meta said in November that it was committing more than $600 billion in the U.S. by 2028 for AI technology, infrastructure, and workforce expansion. In the first quarter of this year, Meta also raised its expected capital expenditure for 2026 to a range of $125 billion to $145 billion, citing higher component pricing and additional data center costs for future capacity. However, this doesn't make the company immune to the current dependence on outside suppliers. Meta has also spent many years promoting Llama as an open-weight alternative to closed models from Google, OpenAI, and Anthropic. But if the reported reliance on Google's Gemini models is severe enough for internal work to get impacted, then it looks like even frontier labs and Big Tech aren't fully self-sufficient. Source: Financial Times
    • I like to reminisce about the good old days, way back in autumn 2025 when building a gaming machine was fun and the drives were about $150 when you caught a deal. Yes duh, back in the day we had it gone. Then baby Skynet came along, hiding in AI datacenters demanding more processing power until it reached singularity. End of a not totally fictional story.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      533
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      269
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      150
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!