Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows (Film)


Recommended Posts

I'm going on Monday, but I'm not expecting much - I haven't liked any of the films, except Prisoner of Azkaban, which I liked as a film, but HATED as an adaptation. Since then, I've realised that even if they get brilliant directors [which Yates most definitely isn't], they're still at the Mercy of Steve Kloves, whose adaptations have generally been awful.

Oh, and I'll be 'completing the journey', in 2D.

Just got back from the screening. The movie was good, but the ending was as I feared. The climax of the movie was almost entirely different than the book, and it completely ruined it. The rest of the movie did a great job of stuffing details from the book into the the plot, but the ending just sucked.

Do you really think they should have kept the book's version of

the final duel

? it would have been so anticlimatic. Those who haven't read the book would be furious.

Edited by Anaron

Do you really think they should have kept the book's version of

the final duel

? it would have been so anticlimatic. Those who haven't read the book would be furious.

I don't think Harry's speech followed by each casting their signature spell would be anticlimatic.

Edited by Anaron

Do you really think they should have kept the book's version of

the final duel

? it would have been so anticlimatic. Those who haven't read the book would be furious.

I havent read the book in a long time, but if I recall correctly,

harry explained to voldermort why he couldn't master the elder wand?

And I think that they should've actually SAID the spellls. the whole avada kedavra vs. expelliarmus is special in both the books and earlier moves (they kept it on GoF). also I wished you saw molly say it as well

Edited by Anaron

I did NOT like the next to last scene with the Elder Wand. They should have kept it the same

Obviously at a midnight showing theres alot of fans. I could hear just peoples reactions to that scene and knew instantly that it must have been different from the book. I myself have not read the books. I should...

Edited by Anaron

Obviously at a midnight showing theres alot of fans. I could hear just peoples reactions to that scene and knew instantly that it must have been different from the book. I myself have not read the books. I should...

I went with some friends that hadn't read the book, and I told them what actually happened to

the elder wand

in the books and they were like: well that makes a lot more sense!

But meh, the purpose was the same anyway

Edited by Anaron

did they change the ending? i don't remember the ending like that in the book especially voldemort and nagina specially as well as Nevill's final action in the movie

they re-arranged things a bit. neville's sword thingy was supposed to happen earlier and not like that. in the book, neville kills the snake while harry is still presumed dead (but is casting spells behind the invisibility cloak I think). then voldemort is fought by minerva, slughorn and shacklebolt, while ron, hermione and ginny are fighting off bellatrix (until molly steps in). at some point harry shows himself, gives volvemort a speech on where he failed and they cast 'expelliarmus' and 'aveda kedavra' at the same time.

Edited by Anaron

WTF is going on with this thread? There should be a TON of spoiler tags that no one is using!!!

I have not read the books, but I enjoy the movies and planned on going to see it tomorrow for a matinee, and thanks for no one using spoiler tags the movie was possibly ruined for me.

Thanks alot. :angry:

I've added spoiler tags to most of the recent posts in this thread. In the future, please use them when you mention details about the movie or book.

If you're unaware of the spoiler tags, use this as a reference:

[spoiler]text[/spoiler]

I havent read the book in a long time, but if I recall correctly,

harry explained to voldermort why he couldn't master the elder wand?

And I think that they should've actually SAID the spellls. the whole avada kedavra vs. expelliarmus is special in both the books and earlier moves (they kept it on GoF). also I wished you saw molly say it as well

So why couldn't voldermort master the elder wand?

So why couldn't voldermort master the elder wand?

Draco mastered Dumbledor (6th book) and then later Harry mastered Draco (7th book part 1). Voldemort tough that to be the master of the wand you had to kill the person who owns it. But you only need to master/disarm like Draco did against Dumbledor. Snape killed him but did not disarm him.

Voldemort would need to disarm Harry in order to master the wand. He killed Snape instead.

WTF is going on with this thread? There should be a TON of spoiler tags that no one is using!!!

I have not read the books, but I enjoy the movies and planned on going to see it tomorrow for a matinee, and thanks for no one using spoiler tags the movie was possibly ruined for me.

Thanks alot. :angry:

To be fair, why would you come in this thread if you knew they were talking about the movie?

Nothing said ruined the movie, just comparing the differences between the book and movie. Just don't go visit IMBD's website...

Draco mastered Dumbledor (6th book) and then later Harry mastered Draco (7th book part 1). Voldemort tough that to be the master of the wand you had to kill the person who owns it. But you only need to master/disarm like Draco did against Dumbledor. Snape killed him but did not disarm him.

Voldemort would need to disarm Harry in order to master the wand. He killed Snape instead.

The only plot hole is that he did kill harry.

To be fair, why would you come in this thread if you knew they were talking about the movie?

Nothing said ruined the movie, just comparing the differences between the book and movie. Just don't go visit IMBD's website...

To be fair, ????

:rolleyes: Seriously, are you kidding me with that question?

Let me spell it out for you as simply as possible.

I came into the thread for the same exact reason I go into any threads about any other form of media, such as video games for example, that I am looking forward to. I expect to read news, maybe see some screens, start see reviews coming it, and then once it has been released get GENERAL impressions.

So to be fair, to say I should not have come into this thread is literally when of the stupidest things I have ever read on this site, and I have read a whole lot of stupid things said.

And I beg to differ, I know nothing of the books, so to speak about major plot aspects of the books indeed can and very well may have ruined the movie for me.

Do you really think they should have kept the book's version of

the final duel

? it would have been so anticlimatic. Those who haven't read the book would be furious.

The movie cut out or down-played HUGE plot points from the Hogwarts battle.

The deaths of Fred, Lupin, and Tonks weren't given any screen time and they were just kind of passed over in less than a minute. The attack of the House Elves, lead by Kreacher against Voldemort was completely left out. Neville's badass scene that completes his character's arc in a supremely awesome way (where, in front of everyone, he stands up to Voldemort, gets tortured, and STILL kills Nagini) was changed for the worse. The entire scene about the fate of the Elder wand after Voldemort's death was completely changed, and completely ruined the meaning of it.

In the book the final duel between Harry and Voldemort happens in front of everyone in the Great Hall. The Death Eaters are being overrun or driven out of the castle, but everyone stops to watch the duel. Intensely silent. Voldemort and Harry circle each other. With wands drawn and staring each other down, they have an intense conversation as to why none of Voldemort's spells can hurt anyone. How Harry's sacrifice earlier in the forest permanently protects everyone from Voldemort. How he STILL doesn't understand why those who know love will always be more powerful than he. Voldemort's disposition goes from confident to angry and scared as he finally realizes. They both cast their signature spells and Voldemort is killed by his own, rebounding spell. Everyone sees his death. And in that moment there is a huge uproar of happiness and excitement.

In the movie, some of the things mentioned above are correct. But, on the whole, the movie completely missed what made all of those scenes great.You asked if the book version would have been anticlimactic, and I say that the book's ending was far and away the better of the two.

WTF is going on with this thread? There should be a TON of spoiler tags that no one is using!!!

I have not read the books, but I enjoy the movies and planned on going to see it tomorrow for a matinee, and thanks for no one using spoiler tags the movie was possibly ruined for me.

Thanks alot. :angry:

Sorry Larry. I intentionally left my post vague on the specifics for that very reason. I apologize if it still ruined it for you.

To be fair, ????

:rolleyes: Seriously, are you kidding me with that question?

Let me spell it out for you as simply as possible.

I came into the thread for the same exact reason I go into any threads about any other form of media, such as video games for example, that I am looking forward to. I expect to read news, maybe see some screens, start see reviews coming it, and then once it has been released get GENERAL impressions.

So to be fair, to say I should not have come into this thread is literally when of the stupidest things I have ever read on this site, and I have read a whole lot of stupid things said

I don't think it's that stupid. You should know most people don't know about spoiler tags. You don't want the movie spoiled then you shouldn't be looking for info before you watch it. :pinch: What do you think people are going to be talking about after the release? :blink:

To be fair, why would you come in this thread if you knew they were talking about the movie?

Nothing said ruined the movie, just comparing the differences between the book and movie. Just don't go visit IMBD's website...

The only plot hole is that he did kill harry.

Voldemort did not kill Harry. Voldemort killed the piece of his own soul that was attached to Harry.

I don't think it's that stupid. You should know most people don't know about spoiler tags. You don't want the movie spoiled then you shouldn't be looking for info before you watch it. :pinch: What do you think people are going to be talking about after the release? :blink:

Again, reviews from critics, and other members GENERAL impressions. liked it, hated it, effects were awesome, it was way to long, way to short, etc. etc. etc. Screen shots. The same things that are discussed in countless other threads about movies and video games that have never ruined a movie for me or anyone else in the past, but now all of a sudden this is some new foreign concept and I am the idiot for being in the thread??? :rolleyes:

Whatever, I am done with this thread. Especially if the people participating in it find it SO damn confusing why spoiler tags have always been used on this site and cannot grasp the fact why I came into the thread if I have not seen the movie yet.

spacer... thank you for the info. Now I know what to expect. I was really hoping they would stick to the books more but I guess not. Oh well :angry:

DirtyLarry, well in my case, If I don't want to be spoiled I avoid talking or reading anything about it. You never know who's going to spoil it for you! :laugh:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I like Tidal, but it still does not control devices from the mobile/app and still no surround support. And yeah re: above comment I still get a lot of network errors and I am on a 4/4 Gbit Fiber connection.
    • Aren`t "security features" and "AI model that can see your screen" a tad diametric!
    • Samsung, Amazon extend 990 PRO 2TB NVMe SSD deal beyond Prime Day 2026 by Sayan Sen Recently, we had Amazon's Prime Day 2026 sales wherein there were several great deals including on SSDs. One of those discounted components was the Samsung 990 PRO SSD as the 2TB variant of it was selling for $370, a very good price after a long time. Although that deal was supposed to expire today, Amazon has now extended that sale further (purchase link under the specs table down below). The 990 PRO is a PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD and still one of the fastest drives available today for under $400. Speaking of fast, sequential reads and writes are rated at 7450 MB/s and 6900 MB/s, respectively. The random throughputs for reads and writes are 1400K IOPS and 1550K IOPS, respectively. The 990 PRO is based on Samsung's 7th Gen V-NAND flash, and it too is TLC. It packs 2 gigs of LPDDR4 DRAM cache, which helps the random performance. The endurance rating for this is 1200 TBW (terabytes written), which should be sufficient for most users. The Samsung 990 PRO is compatible with the PlayStation 5, but if you are going to use the 990 PRO on a PC, check out the Samsung Magician app that lets you track your drive's health, update its firmware, customize various settings, and more. The technical specs of the Samsung 990 PRO 2TB are given in the table below: Specification Value Form Factor M.2 2280 Interface PCIe Gen 4.0 x4, NVMe 2.0 NAND Flash Samsung V-NAND TLC Controller Samsung In-house Controller Cache Memory Samsung 2GB Low Power DDR4 SDRAM Sequential Read Speed Up to 7,450 MB/s Sequential Write Speed Up to 6,900 MB/s Random Read (4KB, QD32) Up to 1,400,000 IOPS Random Write (4KB, QD32) Up to 1,550,000 IOPS Random Read (4KB, QD1) Up to 22,000 IOPS Random Write (4KB, QD1) Up to 80,000 IOPS Operating Temperature 0°C to 70°C Reliability (MTBF) 1.5 Million Hours Endurance 1,200 TBW (Total Bytes Written) Get it at the link below: Samsung 990 PRO SSD 2TB NVMe SSD (MZ-V9P2T0B/AM): $369.99 (Sold and Shipped by Amazon US) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases
    • Glad im on the right boat. Tidal has lots of issues in terms of app and music mix, its worst than spot but its honest. Spot algo is very tendentious and they pess less to artists, so im comfortable with the tidal errors, for now.
    • Tidal won't monetize AI slop music, company says by David Uzondu Image via Tidal Tidal has announced an AI policy aimed at protecting artists and their crafts, as AI music generation tools continue to improve both in speed and quality. According to the music streaming platform, AI-generated music will be accepted, but these tracks will be held to a "higher standard" of content integrity. Next month, the company plans to auto-identify and tag these uploads. Listeners will spot a special icon next to content that algorithms flag as 100% AI-generated starting mid-July, and the platform hopes to expand this tag to partially generated songs as detection tech improves. Any AI music that exploits an artist's voice or likeness will be taken down, and Tidal will immediately block tracks associated with fraudulent activity, which includes artificial streaming and deceptive content that interferes with real creators. And finally, music that's 100% AI-generated will not be monetized. Tidal said there is "ongoing debate" about whether certain licensed synthetic models deserve payouts, so it's possible that this part will change in the future. Streaming platforms are absolutely getting flooded with AI-generated music because of how easy it is to pump out endless tracks every minute. To give you an idea of how "bad" it is, Deezer alone reported that synthetic uploads now make up about 44% of its daily intake, which translates to roughly 75,000 automated tracks hitting its servers every single day. Interestingly, Deezer found most people cannot tell the difference between human and machine creations, with an Ipsos study revealing that 97% of listeners failed to spot the AI-generated tracks. Spotify's CEO recently pushed back against listeners who call AI music "slop," urging people to stop using the term and instead embrace the creative potential of AI music. The Swedish platform partnered with Universal Music Group to test "legal and controlled" generative AI tools that let subscribers remix songs with AI.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      539
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      269
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!