Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows (Film)


Recommended Posts

Sorry Larry. I intentionally left my post vague on the specifics for that very reason. I apologize if it still ruined it for you.

And thanks for this response. At least one person gets how the movie could have potentially been ruined for me, so I appreciate the fact.

The fact of the matter is luckily I stopped reading most, not all, comments that could have ruined the movie for me, but that does not change the fact they should be in spoilers.

For people to all of a sudden think this is something crazy, or this thread is immune to spoilers because it is a movie also based on a book, baffles me.

Spoiler tag for a movie that has already premiered based on a 4-year old book? a bit extreme, but okay.

To be fair, ????

:rolleyes: Seriously, are you kidding me with that question?

Let me spell it out for you as simply as possible.

I came into the thread for the same exact reason I go into any threads about any other form of media, such as video games for example, that I am looking forward to. I expect to read news, maybe see some screens, start see reviews coming it, and then once it has been released get GENERAL impressions.

So to be fair, to say I should not have come into this thread is literally when of the stupidest things I have ever read on this site, and I have read a whole lot of stupid things said.

And I beg to differ, I know nothing of the books, so to speak about major plot aspects of the books indeed can and very well may have ruined the movie for me.

it's a 4 year old book, that *most* of the people that go to see the movies have already read. you should have known better than to enter this thread if you haven't read any of the books instead of lashing out at people. because believe me, what most people will talk about is not whether the movie is bad or god, but whether or not it sticks to the books. as has happened with the 7 films that came before this one.

while we are at it, maybe you could write twitter and suggest them to cover-up the trending topics for you. because one of them in particular is already revealing too much.

spacer... thank you for the info. Now I know what to expect. I was really hoping they would stick to the books more but I guess not. Oh well :angry:

DirtyLarry, well in my case, If I don't want to be spoiled I avoid talking or reading anything about it. You never know who's going to spoil it for you! :laugh:

which is what normal people do

The ending sucked, I hated it. When harry rolls out of hagard's arms and runs off it stupid. Nevilles big moment in front of everyone is taken away. And then the way it ends instead of the epic speech in front of everyone followed by the last spell from each we get this stupid fly through the castle and then he melts or something. Mrs. Weasley being timed was also stupid as she was pretty bad ass in the book and they just skip over it. When they made changes in the other films I understood why when they gave reasons. But imo it went from an awesome ending to a stupid one.

The ending sucked, I hated it. When harry rolls out of hagard's arms and runs off it stupid. Nevilles big moment in front of everyone is taken away. And then the way it ends instead of the epic speech in front of everyone followed by the last spell from each we get this stupid fly through the castle and then he melts or something. Mrs. Weasley being timed was also stupid as she was pretty bad ass in the book and they just skip over it. When they made changes in the other films I understood why when they gave reasons. But imo it went from an awesome ending to a stupid one.

I agree.

The rebound spell didn't even seem like one. And I expected Molly's duel to be more dramatic.

The ending sucked, I hated it. When harry rolls out of hagard's arms and runs off it stupid. Nevilles big moment in front of everyone is taken away. And then the way it ends instead of the epic speech in front of everyone followed by the last spell from each we get this stupid fly through the castle and then he melts or something. Mrs. Weasley being timed was also stupid as she was pretty bad ass in the book and they just skip over it. When they made changes in the other films I understood why when they gave reasons. But imo it went from an awesome ending to a stupid one.

The fly through was most stupid IMO, did they show both scratching other's face? I almost thought, wow! Cat fight between Harry and voldemort!

Went to see it at Showcase Dudley today. Overall I liked the film, thought it stood up to the book pretty well. Obviously, the books are still better by miles.

However, the bloody sound cut out during the film. And it was during the most crictial bit -

the pensieve reveal, where Harry views Snapes memories

- really not happy about that.

I chose not to see it in 3D I don't think I missed much. I hope Birmingham Imax do all the films soon in 3D (I don't mind post-production 3D processing) and it would be great to see all the films on a Imax screen.

Yesterday I watched the last part in 2D (I wanted to understand the ending without having strange object on my eyes), but I want to watch it a second time, and I am thinking in trying the 3D version to see the difference, is it worth it? are there real 3D scenes that make you jump from your chair?

Yesterday I watched the last part in 2D (I wanted to understand the ending without having strange object on my eyes), but I want to watch it a second time, and I am thinking in trying the 3D version to see the difference, is it worth it? are there real 3D scenes that make you jump from your chair?

I saw it in 3D on Saturday, its not one of those 3D films. Its only been converted into 3D and not made for 3D. Nothing makes you jump out of your chair.

I really enjoyed it, despite not reading the books.

I saw it in 3D on Saturday, its not one of those 3D films. Its only been converted into 3D and not made for 3D. Nothing makes you jump out of your chair.

Thanks, I didn't know this, then no 3D...

I really enjoyed it, despite not reading the books.

I didn't read any book either, and enjoyed the movies...

I definitely agree that the ending was better in the book, but the movies were well-done, and this was no exception. Loved it!

Edit: Thanks, 05M3L

Only thing I would change is the ending--they should have gotten different actors to play their nearly-20-years-older selves. Daniel Radcliffe was the only one who even looked even remotely convincing as a middle-aged guy--the rest looked exactly the same, just in "grown up" clothes.

I definitely agree that the ending was better in the book, but the movies were well-done, and this was no exception. Loved it!

I want to say more but I don't know how to use the spoiler tags. I'll edit this post if someone will tell me how to do them.

To use the spoiler tags just wrap the text in between this

[spoiler] the text you want to hide goes here [/spoiler]

I watched the movie and I loved it! I read the book so long ago that the little details didn't bother me at all :D

I liked it. I think it stayed mostly true to the book. Ebert said it best about

Snapes memories that if your theater isn't quiet or near tears during them, something must be wrong. A lady behind me was bawling.

Still, I really liked it. Ebert suggested sticking with the 2D version as the 3D wasn't as good.

I don't know who Ebert is but I saw it in 3D and loved it. :laugh:

Roger Ebert, the movie critic?

This is what he added at the end of his review:

Note: This entire movie is dark, gloomy and filled with shadows. So it should be. That makes it particularly inappropriate for the additional dimness of 3-D. There are a few shots that benefit from 3-D (I like the unfolding of the little magical globe) but none that require it. Avoid the surcharge and see the film in proper 2-D with brighter color.

Which, I kind of agree with. I watched Saw 3D and he was right about the limitations of 3D in darker areas, so I was happy with the 2D version.

I saw it in 3D and I didnt find it annoying, barely noticeable.

And yes, the movie is dark. Yates ABUSED the damn thing. The entire movie is gray. He may as well have made it in black and white, cuz she reduced the color palette to nothing. It even makes me miss the blue tint of OoTP or HBP

I saw it in 3D on Saturday, its not one of those 3D films. Its only been converted into 3D and not made for 3D. Nothing makes you jump out of your chair.

I really enjoyed it, despite not reading the books.

I really like it in 3D. They didn't overdo it by making things fly at you for no reason. It seemed to mostly make the environment seem a lot bigger, which I liked.

Meh.. went to see it just to know how it ended, couldn't be bothered to read the books and was forced to watch teh movies cause of GF so... All in all I'd give the whole box set a 7/10. Though I have to say, It does leave you wanting for more, if there can be crappy Narnia Movies, why can't we have more decent potter movies.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My experience in the past with older Windows 11 builds was not great on unsupported machines but I recently used Rufus to put the latest build on a older 5th Gen Core Thinkpad T that we upgraded with a SATA SSD and 8GB of RAM four years ago when hardware was reasonable and it seemed pretty fast and solid. Customer is very happy with the performance and will probably get four more years out of that venerable laptop that he loves so much. Another customer just retired his Dell Studio laptop from 2009 running Windows 10. It got an SSD over 10 years ago and did everything he needed it to for 17 years but he also retired last year and is happy doing everything on his iPad now.
    • Apple's newest AirTag 2 gets first big discount by Taras Buria In late January 2026, Apple introduced its second-generation AirTag trackers, bringing a refresh to the old model that has been on the market for half a decade. Now, you can get these new trackers at an all-time low price, thanks to the first big discount that brought the price down by 17% on Amazon. While the second-generation AirTag looks identical to its predecessor, it packs meaningful upgrades inside. The second-gen ultrawideband chip works 50% farther than the original AirTag, allowing you to detect lost items in a wider range. In addition, the second-generation AirTag features an upgraded Bluetooth chip for extended range and a significantly louder speaker (up to 50%) so that you can hear it better when locating a lost item. Note that the second-gen AirTag only works with iPhones and iPads that run iOS/iPadOS 26 and newer, so you need a compatible device to use the tracker. Like the original AirTag, the AirTag 2 is available in two packs: one and four pieces. Both are now available at a notable discount on Amazon, and you can purchase them using the links below. Apple AirTag 2 tracker - $24 | 17% off on Amazon Apple AirTag 2 tracker (four-pack) - $89 | 10% off on Amazon Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S.- specific and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • I've been on Deezer for over a decade, but glad that Tidal joined them in fighting AI slop. Can't stand such takes as Spotify's: "Spotify's CEO recently pushed back against listeners who call AI music "slop," urging people to stop using the term and instead embrace the creative potential of AI music."
    • “Could” … in the IS the healthcare is run by insurance companies that make indecent profits denying basic treatments to people that are paying money for nothing. Besides, where are all the Trump epigones who were stating that the tariffs were going to paid by foreign companies and not the US citizens? …
    • Microsoft Teams gets smarter at spotting sneaky meeting bots by Usama Jawad Microsoft Teams is set to receive a couple of new features soon, including a dedicated Recap app and a rather controversial location tracking functionality. The Redmond tech giant has also explained how it has made online communication and collaboration a lot more performant this year. Now, the company has detailed more secure bot admission mechanisms, as first reported by us in March 2026, and now available in Teams. As the use of AI has expanded across enterprise environments, Microsoft has begun allowing users to integrate bots into their meetings for various tasks, such as note-taking. While this has a tangible productivity benefit for users, Microsoft has highlighted how misconfiguration has allowed bots to join meetings that they shouldn't. This has created security and privacy risks, which Microsoft is now combating using a new Teams admin policy that allows organizers to control how external bots access meetings. Admins can leverage a policy called Manage external bots and their access to meetings. The default configuration is "When detected, require approval before joining", which places detected bots in a lobby before they are explicitly admitted into the meeting. The other option disables the experience. Microsoft has also requested admins to only allow organizers and co-organizers to manage access to a meeting, so that other people don't randomly allow bots into meetings. Teams will now be able to leverage infrastructure signals to intelligently detect and distinguish between bots and humans. Microsoft will soon also trial a registration experience for independent software vendors (ISVs) to build a system that registers a bot with Microsoft, so it is marked as a "known" bot. Teams will also categorize bots as trusted and suspected threats so that organizers can quickly identify which bots they want to allow into a meeting. Additional safeguards to block accidental admission of a bot into a meeting include: No one-click Admit option for identified bots Confirmation prompts when admitting participants that include bots Warnings when organizers choose Admit all, and bots are included Microsoft has begun rolling out this experience, and it will be retiring the current CAPTCHA verification implementation. In the future, the company plans to roll out new capabilities like allow-lists, organization-wide policies, admin reports, audit logs, and more granular controls.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      538
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!