[PC] GTA: Vice City Movies


Recommended Posts

Hye

i found these movies on a dutch website

these movies are the 1st movies of vice city i saw

cool ;) :blink: :blink:

Movies

Movie 1 (13,9 MB)

-Movie2 (8,5 MB)

-Movie 3 (4,3 MB)

-Movie 4 (2,6 MB)

-Movie 5 (7,9 MB)

-Movie 6 (13,0 MB)

-Movie 7 (3,9 MB)

Source:InsideGamer

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/75337-pc-gta-vice-city-movies/
Share on other sites

Glad to see they've put a bit of effort into it, looks quite nice from what you can see in those small vids. Finally give my 9700 a chance to break into a sweat.

When's it out?

Edit, just found out, May 14th.

http://www.rockstargames.com/vicecity/pc/index.htm

System requirements:

800Mhz Pentium/Athlon or 1.2Ghz Celeron/Duron processor

128 MB of Ram

8 speed CD/DVD drive

915 MB free hard drive space (+ 635 MB if video card does NOT support DirectX Texture Compression)

32 MB video card with DirectX compatible drivers ("Geforce" or better)

Sound Card with DirectX compatible Drivers

Keyboard and Mouse

Win 98/98 SE/ME/2000 Pro with Service Pack 3/XP with Service Pack 1

Direct X 9.0

Glad to see they've put a bit of effort into it, looks quite nice from what you can see in those small vids. Finally give my 9700 a chance to break into a sweat.

When's it out?

It looks ****e compared to most games nower-days. Your 9700 won't break a sweat

It alledgedly out at the end of may, and to get all of the movies in one package, have a look HERE Must admit they do look pretty good, I can't wait now. Let the modding commence :)

Glad to see they've put a bit of effort into it, looks quite nice from what you can see in those small vids. Finally give my 9700 a chance to break into a sweat.

When's it out?

It looks ****e compared to most games nower-days. Your 9700 won't break a sweat

*sigh*

Yes, ok, whatever you say.

Please, tell me some more about how consoles rule the world.

Glad to see they've put a bit of effort into it, looks quite nice from what you can see in those small vids. Finally give my 9700 a chance to break into a sweat.

When's it out?

It looks ****e compared to most games nower-days. Your 9700 won't break a sweat

*sigh*

Yes, ok, whatever you say.

Please, tell me some more about how consoles rule the world.

he isn't saying the console looks better... this game looks crap graphic wise just like it did on the console. If you think that's good graphics, I doubt you've installed ur ATI drivers at all.

Glad to see they've put a bit of effort into it, looks quite nice from what you can see in those small vids. Finally give my 9700 a chance to break into a sweat.

When's it out?

It looks ****e compared to most games nower-days. Your 9700 won't break a sweat

*sigh*

Yes, ok, whatever you say.

Please, tell me some more about how consoles rule the world.

he isn't saying the console looks better... this game looks crap graphic wise just like it did on the console. If you think that's good graphics, I doubt you've installed ur ATI drivers at all.

Yeah, that's right, I haven't installed my video drivers :rolleyes:

Of course there are better looking games out there, I was implying that my 9700 Pro has had nothing to do because there's been **** all to play on it. Therefore - breaking a sweat, do you understand?

And compared to GTA3 on the PC, this is an improvement.

And regarding the console comment, perhaps you just haven't noticed King Mustards stance in regards to gaming. Stuff like "OMG, the PS2 is only 300MHz, and you need a 2GHz PC to play the same games, stupid." And more along those lines.

he isn't saying the console looks better... this game looks crap graphic wise just like it did on the console. If you think that's good graphics, I doubt you've installed ur ATI drivers at all.

Exactly JK1150!

And Dazzla, admit it, console framrates ARE better and most of the games DO look better. PC don't have many excellent looking games, and those that are need a ?1000 PC to run decently

See, there we go. Console frame rates aren't better, GTA3 on the PS2 ran at 30fps and under, you get frame rates in the hundreds on a PC. And you forget, you're on a PC now, they're not soley games machines. That's why they cost more.

Most console games run @ 60 FPS

well i have one of the oldest pc in the world

and i can run almost any game

splinter cell sim city and also vice city

i have a geforce 4 mx 440 64mb

Uhhh, VC? How do you know that? lol

Most console games run @ 60 FPS

Really? Did GTA:VC run at 60fps? Seeing as this game is the topic of discussion?

No.

If you named some of the best console games ever, none of them run at 60fps. Halo, Goldeneye, Zelda. None. Doesn't detract from the game of course, just makes your statement seem stupid.

OMG, no it wasn't. I played it with frame rates in the hundreds. Sorry.

Yes, it WAS. There was a 'Frame Limiter' option in the game and it was enabled by default. Fair enough, you could disable it but the game didn't react very well to it due to syncing problems

well gta has almost the sam specs as vice city

i got a

amd 800m

192MB

20 gig hd space

geforce 4 64mb videochip

i'll bet that i can play vice city

GTA3:VC will run slower than GTA3 on the same hardware, since it looks a LOT better

Yes, it WAS. There was a 'Frame Limiter' option in the game and it was enabled by default. Fair enough, you could disable it but the game didn't react very well to it due to syncing problems

Oh my god! You just contradicted yourself. You said it was limited, then said it wasn't.

Frame limiter off = more then 30 fps, end of story. You were blatently shown up.

Uh, no. I re-read what I wrote it was was correct.

The game comes with the Frame Limiter option ENABLED (i.e. the game limited the FPS to 30)

If it was DISABLED, there general was a syncing problem with most PCs

Most console games run @ 60 FPS
well i have one of the oldest pc in the world

and i can run almost any game

splinter cell sim city and also vice city

i have a geforce 4 mx 440 64mb

Uhhh, VC? How do you know that? lol

Still, you can get 2 to 3 times that on the PC. So in what way are console framerates better?

Also, you dont have AA, I dont think you have trilinear filtering or any of that good stuff. Plus the TV screen isnt as close to your face when you are playing a game as the monitor, and if it is you have problems. The fact is PC games look better. Just leave it at that, because its true. I dont see a ATI Radeon 9800 in the Xbox. The fact is PC is upgradeable to a huge degree. Any game on a console can and does look better on a good PC and even some mediocre ones. :angry:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Researchers claim Microsoft's quantum breakthrough is flawed by basic Python errors by Karthik Mudaliar Microsoft's aggressive roadmap to deliver a commercial quantum supercomputer by 2029 has now hit a bit of a snag, and it's not because of a complex sub-zero dilution refrigerator, but rather because of a few lines of basic Python code. A new critique published in the scientific journal Nature argues that simple software errors effectively manufactured the breakthrough that Microsoft's foundational research claimed back in 2025 into Majorana-based topological qubits. Topological quantum computing, the path that Microsoft chose for its research, relies on creating and controlling "Majorana zero modes." These are exotic quasiparticles that theoretically offer vastly superior error resistance compared to the highly sensitive superconducting qubits currently being championed by rivals like Google and IBM. However, physically proving you have created these particles requires sifting through massive amounts of complex electrical conductance data to isolate a specific "topological gap." Because of the sheer volume of data, physicists rely heavily on custom software pipelines to process the results. This is where the Python scripts come in. Now, according to the critique, Microsoft’s data processing software contained fundamental programming errors that ultimately skewed the published results. By mishandling data arrays or deploying incorrect logic within the Python script, the software supposedly discarded "noisy" or contradictory data. Which is why it only highlighted the specific electrical measurements that supported the topological-gap claim. The researchers behind the critique argued that this makes the findings invalid, suggesting the heralded "quantum leap" was actually a false positive generated by bad code and not a product of groundbreaking physics. However, Microsoft is pushing back hard against these allegations. The Redmond giant has formally rejected the criticism, saying that it's just a minor anomaly rather than a fatal flaw. According to the company, while there may have been a minor oversight in the data parsing scripts, it does not alter the fundamental reality of their physical experiment. Just weeks ago, Microsoft unveiled the Majorana 2 quantum processor, a milestone so significant that the company boldly accelerated its timeline for a commercial quantum supercomputer from 2035 down to 2029. But the new software allegations reopen an old wound. Microsoft's quantum division faced a remarkably similar crisis when a landmark 2018 paper on Majorana particles was famously retracted in 2021 after independent physicists discovered the data had been inappropriately cropped. That historical baggage makes the current Python-related allegations particularly sensitive. If the foundational math and data processing for the 2025 breakthrough are genuinely flawed, the highly anticipated 2029 commercial timeline could easily be delayed or, worse, cancelled.
    • Because of what they have done to VMware I will never buy anything Broadcom again.
    • AMD releases hotfix for driver install issues on Windows 10 PCs by Taras Buria Earlier this week, AMD released an important graphics driver update. Version 26.6.2 brought AMD FSR 4.1 support to the previous-gen Radeon lineup, the RX 7000 series, giving users better upscaling tech that was previously locked to the newest GPUs. However, the driver turned out to be a little buggy, with users reporting installation issues on systems still running Windows 10. AMD quickly acknowledged the bug and today released a hotfix to resolve the problem. The AMD 26.6.3 Hotfix update is now available for download from the official website. Given that it is a hotfix release, it has only one change in its release notes: AMD announced the update on its official X account and added that a WHQL driver update with the necessary fixes would be released next week. Meanwhile, users can apply the hotfix or roll back to the previous driver using the official AMD Cleanup Utility. You can download AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 26.6.3 Hotfix Preview Driver from the official website here. It is compatible with all currently supported graphics cards and 64-bit Windows 10 and 11. Full release notes are available on the same page.
    • With Microsoft now listening to its core audience and acting upon received feedback, fans can finally expect a much better version of Windows 11 than what was available five years ago. Here is to five more years, Windows 11! I guess we all need a good laugh now and again...
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      465
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      123
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      82
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!