Star Trek Into Darkness

[Asrokhel]

Here's the non-mobile version:

http://www.superherohype.com/news/articles/172589-is-jj-abrams-taking-a-star-trek-into-darkness

[neufuse Veteran]

anyone see the three frames from the movie last night on Conan?

[_neutrino Veteran]

anyone see the three frames from the movie last night on Conan?

Brilliant 3 frames of fiery goodness.

[Rappy Veteran]

anyone see the three frames from the movie last night on Conan?

posted a few posts up

[neufuse Veteran]

posted a few posts up

ah missed that

[George P Global Moderator]

If anything you do get the feeling that we're in for yet more action like the first one, which is good to me. I've always been a big fan of the star trek ship to ship battles like in the 2nd and 6th movies with the original crew. The 2009 movie did that good, we'll see what happens in this sequel.

[McCordRm]

The first one was all character... well, Main character. The villain was there

for fluff. I'm expecting this one to change gears and up the action ante.

But even that being said... it's still going to be character driven, obviously.

Just look at the cast. It's phenomenal.

[fix-this!]

long time coming to see this sequel, i look forward to it as i really liked the first one.

[+Anarkii Subscriber²]

I expect nothing short of brilliance for this movie. I seriously hope it will fall along with Terminator 2 as one of the best sequels of all time :D

[DocM]

At IMAX theaters the first 10 min of STID will screen before The Hobbit.

http://m.hollywoodreporter.com/news/star-trek-darkness-footage-will-390690

[Rappy Veteran]

At IMAX theaters the first 10 min of STID will screen before The Hobbit.

http://m.hollywoodre...age-will-390690

hmmm wonder if it will make it online

[mrp04]

At IMAX theaters the first 10 min of STID will screen before The Hobbit.

http://m.hollywoodre...age-will-390690

Ahh why would you want to see that? Seeing a trailer is one thing (though I even avoid those) but seeing the first 10 minutes then having to wait months to see the rest would be really annoying.

[Asrokhel]

Ahh why would you want to see that? Seeing a trailer is one thing (though I even avoid those) but seeing the first 10 minutes then having to wait months to see the rest would be really annoying.

You think that's bad? I used to know a guy who'd pay full price at the theatre just to see a trailer for a movie he's interested in, then he'd leave. The last time I saw him was at a movie showing the trailer for "Spider-Man" (2002)!

[Albert]

this is really an alternate universe story to the original star trek timeline. right off the bat the owners of star trek are playing it safe. i don't think i want to invest any attachment to something that even the franchise itself has no confidence in, or can easily brush off later.

[George P Global Moderator]

this is really an alternate universe story to the original star trek timeline. right off the bat the owners of star trek are playing it safe. i don't think i want to invest any attachment to something that even the franchise itself has no confidence in, or can easily brush off later.

Where do you get that they have no confidence in it? JJ and his writers are huge Star Trek fans and they know the show and the universe well. Doing the "alternate universe through time travel changing history" bit is just a scifi way to reboot the series. I don't see a problem with it doing so.

[M_Lyons10]

Ahh why would you want to see that? Seeing a trailer is one thing (though I even avoid those) but seeing the first 10 minutes then having to wait months to see the rest would be really annoying.

Yeah, I agree. I think that would annoy me too. LOL

[Rappy Veteran]

Will STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS Be The Last Time We See Zachary Quinto As Spock?

?It?s like an era of association with certain roles ? a specific part like Spock, or a kind of part, like Sylar ? is coming to an end,? he says.

[McCordRm]

Nooooo... you can't have Star Trek without Spock, and he's perfect for it.

[Powerless]

He's after more money :shifty:

[+SOOPRcow MVC]

I dunno, sounds like a whole lot of stuff being taken out of context to make a rumor for a movie that has had little to no spoilers :)

[Yusuf M. Veteran]

If he doesn't play Spock anymore, then they'll have to take the story into a radically different direction. Maybe even one with a new crew and starship.

[Rappy Veteran]

Javascript is not enabled or refresh the page to view.

Click here to view the Tweet

[DocM]

If he doesn't play Spock anymore, then they'll have to take the story into a radically different direction. Maybe even one with a new crew and starship.

Why? Just recast it. That or add a few digits to his salary in a multi-film contract renegotiation, which is what this is probably all about.

[Yusuf M. Veteran]

Why? Just recast it. That or add a few digits to his salary in a multi-film contract renegotiation, which is what this is probably all about.

There's that too. :p

[Growled Member]

Nooooo... you can't have Star Trek without Spock, and he's perfect for it.

He looks the part but he didn't win me over with his interpretation of Spock. Too much emotion.