Mac OS X Market share, falling?


Recommended Posts

They actually INCREASED the prices of most of their computers recently

False. The Aluminum MacBook doesn't represent "most of their computers" aka "most of their lines" (yes I know they sell a whole lot more MacBooks than anything else) and it's pretty much the only one who had a price bump.

And the white MacBook dropped like 200 or 300, meaning it didn't increase, on the contrary.

The Canadian dollar is falling so they had to readjust the prices of the newest lines with that... and they still didn't INCREASE here. It stayed the same.

I agree though that the prices should have lowered, they're not helping the economic crisis, but saying they increased them, is bad faith.

Yeh just keep dreaming la la la everyone else is wrong.

3%, 1%, who cares? Macs still work, PC's still work, everyone chooses to buy what they like.

And it's true what he said, it does look like you just posted this to see if you could stir up some trouble.

3%, 1%, who cares? Macs still work, PC's still work, everyone chooses to buy what they like.

And it's true what he said, it does look like you just posted this to see if you could stir up some trouble.

Completely agree. All this bashing by both sides is extremely annoying. So what if someone chooses to buy a different computer than you. How in any way does it affect you?

Completely agree. All this bashing by both sides is extremely annoying. So what if someone chooses to buy a different computer than you. How in any way does it affect you?

Hopefully,one company or the other, get so scared from everyone buying the competing product, that they try even harder to make better products. :laugh: .

I would think apples market share would decline in todays economy due to pc's having cheaper prices then apple computers. Once the economy comes back then i excpect them to gain market share again.

That's sort of what I was thinking too.

i do not think the market share should matter it should matter more what computers are being USED more because i know a few people that have purchased cheap windows based netbooks and they just sit around and they are not using them for anything unless they go on a trip or something and then even then they are not using the computes that much anyway.

Apple will never have a large market share while the majority of people can buy, and prefer to buy, cheaper PCs.

I'm not sure why anyone cares about marketshare. What does it mean exactly? Just sounds like a popularity contest to me; arbitrary and inconsequential to the average user. The only important thing is that the pressure of competition keeps companies working hard to produce good products with good support and software options.

As for this statistic:

Stats are based on aggregate data collected by StatCounter on a sample exceeding 4 billion pageviews per month collected from across the StatCounter network of more than 3 million websites.

It's an interesting guide but is clearly not an accurate figure. It doesn't take into account users who are not online, for example, and there is no way of telling what bias is present on the websites included (for example being all North American focused, as someone said, or commercial shopping, or blogs, whatever).

It really bugs me when people claim that statistics represent something that they do not. People should be taught some basic statistics at school. They might learn to take things with a pinch of salt.

Thanks, I look forward to the day AOL brings it back.

Also I heard a good quote from someone talking about a MacBook, they'd been shown one of good specs about ?2000. They said it's like buying your first car you have to get a small loan to get it. Apple bringing us back to past when families would have to scrimp together to buy their first computer.

If you can't afford the ?2,000 computer then buy a PC. There is no way to avoid spending a fortune on a house or car, but you can get a cheap computer if you need one. Apple simply aren't big enough to "bring us back to past ..". They are no threat to Windows users.

I'm not sure why anyone cares about marketshare. What does it mean exactly? Just sounds like a popularity contest to me; arbitrary and inconsequential to the average user. The only important thing is that the pressure of competition keeps companies working hard to produce good products with good support and software options.

+1

Apple is a billion dollar company so why should they care if they have the lion's share of the market share or not. They are already laughing all the way to the bank.

+1

Apple is a billion dollar company so why should they care if they have the lion's share of the market share or not. They are already laughing all the way to the bank.

I actually agree. That's the reason why they switched from "Apple Computer" to "Apple Inc".

Mac's and related computing account for about 1/3 of their total revenues. They are now a consumer electronics company that makes a PC with a it's own novelty OS. Even if the iPod business flattens, the iPhone game is a huge multiplier. They can afford to keep Macs as this boutique solution. Just look at the exponential growth in the iPod/iPhone business verus their sub-double digit OS desktop share for the last 30yrs.

Their cheerleaders in the MSM and blogosphere however can't afford to parrot that marketing logic going forward in face of Win7. That's why you see this visceral lashing out at these ad's from Giz/Engagdet et all. You have "Tech Writers" who couldn't write an "if/else statement" if their lives depended on it but are 'opinion makers'. Unfortunatley the world is bigger than than their little sandbox.

Apple's 2Q earnings were announced. They did lose Mac sales, but gained in PMP and phone sales.

Sales of iPod music players were up 3.4% from a year ago, and iPhone sales totalled 3.79 million units, up 253% from a year ago.

But Macintosh computer sales were 2.2 million units, down 3.9% from a year ago.

http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/Inves...hes-042209.aspx

I was browsing today and found this, http://gs.statcounter.com/#os-ww-daily-20080701-20090413. It shows Mac OS X's market share at 6.13% in July 2008 but by April it had halved to around 3.74%. Taking in account a margin of area on both figures there is a very clear picture been painted by Stat Counter. Macs market share is falling. Knowing what forum I've posted this in I have a hunch what reception this is going to get.

Apple is notorious for using the US figures to tout market share but ignore the figures for world wide market share which is half of the US share. That number you saw of 3.74% is represetnative of the Mac's actual world wide market share.

Apple needs to quit confusing people and admit to their real market share instead of padding the numbers with US figures only.

They are more expensive because they provide quality and give you more for the buck than a garbage PC with Windows can provide.

Pigs fly, Obama is the savior of the world and Steve jobs does not poop like normal people because he is a God.

Haha more stupid, garbage posts from cabron. Suprise, suprise.

My MADE IN JAPAN Sony VAIO with WINDOWS on it surely must be inferior to a beautiful piece of Apple machinery built in the fine province of Guangdong, China (hey, that's where my $400 ASUS netbook is built too!).

The perfect Apple customer right here folks.

I bet many non-Apple PC's are built in the same factory by the same workers too.

(Edited to make more sense)

Edited by soonerproud
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
    • So how did you solve the problem? Disabling Secure Boot isn’t a solution.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!