Mac OS X Market share, falling?


Recommended Posts

They actually INCREASED the prices of most of their computers recently

False. The Aluminum MacBook doesn't represent "most of their computers" aka "most of their lines" (yes I know they sell a whole lot more MacBooks than anything else) and it's pretty much the only one who had a price bump.

And the white MacBook dropped like 200 or 300, meaning it didn't increase, on the contrary.

The Canadian dollar is falling so they had to readjust the prices of the newest lines with that... and they still didn't INCREASE here. It stayed the same.

I agree though that the prices should have lowered, they're not helping the economic crisis, but saying they increased them, is bad faith.

Yeh just keep dreaming la la la everyone else is wrong.

3%, 1%, who cares? Macs still work, PC's still work, everyone chooses to buy what they like.

And it's true what he said, it does look like you just posted this to see if you could stir up some trouble.

3%, 1%, who cares? Macs still work, PC's still work, everyone chooses to buy what they like.

And it's true what he said, it does look like you just posted this to see if you could stir up some trouble.

Completely agree. All this bashing by both sides is extremely annoying. So what if someone chooses to buy a different computer than you. How in any way does it affect you?

Completely agree. All this bashing by both sides is extremely annoying. So what if someone chooses to buy a different computer than you. How in any way does it affect you?

Hopefully,one company or the other, get so scared from everyone buying the competing product, that they try even harder to make better products. :laugh: .

I would think apples market share would decline in todays economy due to pc's having cheaper prices then apple computers. Once the economy comes back then i excpect them to gain market share again.

That's sort of what I was thinking too.

i do not think the market share should matter it should matter more what computers are being USED more because i know a few people that have purchased cheap windows based netbooks and they just sit around and they are not using them for anything unless they go on a trip or something and then even then they are not using the computes that much anyway.

Apple will never have a large market share while the majority of people can buy, and prefer to buy, cheaper PCs.

I'm not sure why anyone cares about marketshare. What does it mean exactly? Just sounds like a popularity contest to me; arbitrary and inconsequential to the average user. The only important thing is that the pressure of competition keeps companies working hard to produce good products with good support and software options.

As for this statistic:

Stats are based on aggregate data collected by StatCounter on a sample exceeding 4 billion pageviews per month collected from across the StatCounter network of more than 3 million websites.

It's an interesting guide but is clearly not an accurate figure. It doesn't take into account users who are not online, for example, and there is no way of telling what bias is present on the websites included (for example being all North American focused, as someone said, or commercial shopping, or blogs, whatever).

It really bugs me when people claim that statistics represent something that they do not. People should be taught some basic statistics at school. They might learn to take things with a pinch of salt.

Thanks, I look forward to the day AOL brings it back.

Also I heard a good quote from someone talking about a MacBook, they'd been shown one of good specs about ?2000. They said it's like buying your first car you have to get a small loan to get it. Apple bringing us back to past when families would have to scrimp together to buy their first computer.

If you can't afford the ?2,000 computer then buy a PC. There is no way to avoid spending a fortune on a house or car, but you can get a cheap computer if you need one. Apple simply aren't big enough to "bring us back to past ..". They are no threat to Windows users.

I'm not sure why anyone cares about marketshare. What does it mean exactly? Just sounds like a popularity contest to me; arbitrary and inconsequential to the average user. The only important thing is that the pressure of competition keeps companies working hard to produce good products with good support and software options.

+1

Apple is a billion dollar company so why should they care if they have the lion's share of the market share or not. They are already laughing all the way to the bank.

+1

Apple is a billion dollar company so why should they care if they have the lion's share of the market share or not. They are already laughing all the way to the bank.

I actually agree. That's the reason why they switched from "Apple Computer" to "Apple Inc".

Mac's and related computing account for about 1/3 of their total revenues. They are now a consumer electronics company that makes a PC with a it's own novelty OS. Even if the iPod business flattens, the iPhone game is a huge multiplier. They can afford to keep Macs as this boutique solution. Just look at the exponential growth in the iPod/iPhone business verus their sub-double digit OS desktop share for the last 30yrs.

Their cheerleaders in the MSM and blogosphere however can't afford to parrot that marketing logic going forward in face of Win7. That's why you see this visceral lashing out at these ad's from Giz/Engagdet et all. You have "Tech Writers" who couldn't write an "if/else statement" if their lives depended on it but are 'opinion makers'. Unfortunatley the world is bigger than than their little sandbox.

Apple's 2Q earnings were announced. They did lose Mac sales, but gained in PMP and phone sales.

Sales of iPod music players were up 3.4% from a year ago, and iPhone sales totalled 3.79 million units, up 253% from a year ago.

But Macintosh computer sales were 2.2 million units, down 3.9% from a year ago.

http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/Inves...hes-042209.aspx

I was browsing today and found this, http://gs.statcounter.com/#os-ww-daily-20080701-20090413. It shows Mac OS X's market share at 6.13% in July 2008 but by April it had halved to around 3.74%. Taking in account a margin of area on both figures there is a very clear picture been painted by Stat Counter. Macs market share is falling. Knowing what forum I've posted this in I have a hunch what reception this is going to get.

Apple is notorious for using the US figures to tout market share but ignore the figures for world wide market share which is half of the US share. That number you saw of 3.74% is represetnative of the Mac's actual world wide market share.

Apple needs to quit confusing people and admit to their real market share instead of padding the numbers with US figures only.

They are more expensive because they provide quality and give you more for the buck than a garbage PC with Windows can provide.

Pigs fly, Obama is the savior of the world and Steve jobs does not poop like normal people because he is a God.

Haha more stupid, garbage posts from cabron. Suprise, suprise.

My MADE IN JAPAN Sony VAIO with WINDOWS on it surely must be inferior to a beautiful piece of Apple machinery built in the fine province of Guangdong, China (hey, that's where my $400 ASUS netbook is built too!).

The perfect Apple customer right here folks.

I bet many non-Apple PC's are built in the same factory by the same workers too.

(Edited to make more sense)

Edited by soonerproud
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Hello, I have used a few TEAM Group SSDs, USB flash drives, and Micro SDXC cards in the past. They all seemed to work fine. Regards, Aryeh Goretsky
    • "just $100 per TB"? Just? Are we trying to make this seem like the new normal? Kinda weird to make it sound like that is not a ridiculously expensive asking price.
    • The reviews you refer to mean nothing. Where there is no journalism there is no reason to call the gaming media's opinion pieces "reviews". For GP games there is indeed a metric for success - increasing subscriptions. Which turns in revenue. The only circumstance in which subs do not rise when great is being released is a Game Pass system where the company is close to fully saturated with customers in a subscription. However, in that case as the theory goes you spend aplenty in all kind of games - from shady live service cash cows and customer offending agitprop crap in purple colours to robust and entertaining single player games. And keep a solid level of profitability. Ignoring the simply innocuous but mid games MGS has released primarily of the second kind.
    • Report: Microsoft to use AWS to help GitHub deal with a major surge in demand by Pradeep Viswanathan Thanks to the surge of coding AI agents, GitHub's usage has skyrocketed over the past 12 months. To meet this demand, GitHub started with a plan in October 2025 to increase capacity by 10x. However, by early this year, the company realized that it needed 30x scale. This rapid growth has caused severe strain on the platform's reliability, resulting in several small outages over the past few months. In April, GitHub published a long blog post explaining the steps it is taking to resolve these reliability issues. In the post, the company also confirmed that it is working toward a multi-cloud architecture for better resilience. Today, Business Insider reported that GitHub is turning to Amazon Web Services to help deal with a major surge in AI-driven coding activity. It is important to note that GitHub is still in the process of moving completely to the Azure cloud. The current plan is to move the platform fully to Azure by 2027 so that it can scale better as per developer demand. Therefore, the current decision to utilize AWS might be part of a short-term plan to meet immediate demand. A Microsoft spokesperson confirmed that GitHub is using multiple cloud providers with the following statement: For Microsoft, the decision highlights the operational pressure behind the AI boom. GitHub has to stay reliable for developers at a time when rivals such as Codex, Cursor, Claude Code, and other AI coding tools are gaining attention. And the decision to use AWS for computing capacity seems practical given the circumstances.
    • It's growing on me, however, your right, it make better usability sense if the tabs were bellow the address bar.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      vjlex earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Reacting Well
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Conversation Starter
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      Console General earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      517
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      106
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      88
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!