Recommended Posts

Said it before and will say it agian...Vista failed because....

People bought it and tried to run it on really old systems like they did with XP. Vista was the first OS from MS in a LONG time that required major hardware upgrades. People knew this but were to dumb and ignored the requirements and purchased Vista anyway. So they bitched and moaned so Vista got a bad rep. I do get a good laugh seeing people try and run Vista on a 20gb HD with 512mb of RAM...

Driver support was a big issue as well. MS released Vista way to soon.

The install size of Vista seems to be a big concern for a lot of people. It doesnt bother me since hard drives are CHEAP these days and most new systems have a 150gb or larger HD.

I have the following...

Vista Ultimate 64bit (personal gaming system)

Vista Business 64bit (personal work system)

Vista Business 32bit (laptop)

Vista Business 32bit (work laptop)

I have also installed Vista for several people. I have NO PROBLEMS what so ever with Vista and neither does the several other people I installed it for.

The initial RTM of Vista did have some annoying bugs in it, file copy, network performance and high memory utilization. This of course put a lot of people off Vista.

However this was understandable given that there was a lot of new technology in it (i.e. new network stack which was needed with improved IP6, new sound stack, etc.. etc..), which has to be matured, which it has, SP1 Vista runs well.

In my opinion Windows 7 and the Windows adverts are proof that Vista did fail, not in a technology point of view but more in a PR view. Windows 7's core is of course Windows Vista which proves of course that the underlying technology is sound.

However the high profile nature (i.e. it being named and shown everywhere) of Windows 7, coupled with the Microsoft Adverts which doesn't mention vista anywhere but simply refers to Windows, suggests that Microsoft wants to get rid of Vista ASAP.

There comes a point where the PR is so bad that it's practically impossible to change, so the only option is to release a newer product.

Windows ME suffered the same fate, i found ME very fast and very stable, however the bad press of ME continues to this day. At the time there were plenty of smaller networks using ME without a single problem.

I see a lot of companies and people hold off for Windows 7 and skip Vista entirely.

Have you looked through Microsoft's knowledge base articles to see if a hotfix is available for your particular bug? Many hotfixes are only available in specific cases and linked to in these articles.

Aren't hotfixes best explained as BETA patches that are rushed out to fix immediate issues affecting specific cases? Hence why MSs previous policy was to only make them available after a support call and now making them STILL not directly (easily) downloadable. The hotfixes are properly tested and vetted when they are rolled out in the next Service Pack build. That alone makes service packs worth it.

Even Microsoft warns you to be careful installing their hotfixes...

A supported hotfix is available from Microsoft. However, this hotfix is intended to correct only the problem that is described in this article. Apply this hotfix only to systems that are experiencing this specific problem. This hotfix might receive additional testing. Therefore, if you are not severely affected by this problem, we recommend that you wait for the next software update that contains this hotfix.

A hotfix warning message on Microsoft Support.

People that open their comment to me calling me a troll don't deserve a response. If they can't be at least respectful of different opinions, then I have no use for such a person.

While I agree with that, stop picking fights online. :p

Let's all get along before the Neowin Forum Police shows up. :woot:

Hey, quick question. Does anyone know what version of .NET comes pre-installed with Vista SP2?

.net 2/3 Sp2.

Vista was the first OS from MS in a LONG time that required major hardware upgrades. People knew this but were to dumb and ignored the requirements and purchased Vista anyway.

This is nonsense. You can run Vista fine on PCs from 2002/2003 if you install 1 or 2 GB of RAM.

Driver support was a big issue as well. MS released Vista way to soon.

this is not the fault of MS. nVIDIA was the devil. They made the worst drivers, which caused over 30% of the BSODs you got on Vista. MS released WDK and SDK packages for every TAP and CTP Build and if the partners didn't made the drivers it's not the fault of MS :rolleyes:

The install size of Vista seems to be a big concern for a lot of people.

this come from a NTFS limitation. NTFS counts the size of a hardlink. The files are stored inside the WinSxS folder and are hardlinked into the destination folder. Now NTFS reports that such linked file uses the spaces inside the WinSxS and the destination folder. This is a 10 year old NTZFs issue, not an issue of VISTA. Windows 7 has the same issue!! So Win7 also sucks because of this issue?

Have you looked through Microsoft's knowledge base articles to see if a hotfix is available for your particular bug? Many hotfixes are only available in specific cases and linked to in these articles.

The hotfix made available doesn't fully address the problem I have. On my PC, it won't re-establish a connection at all after resuming from sleep. Only a reboot fixes it. I remember reading about the problem and an MS rep saying the fix for it won't be made available till SP2. Might as well wait now since its so close.

This is nonsense. You can run Vista fine on PCs from 2002/2003 if you install 1 or 2 GB of RAM.

this is not the fault of MS. nVIDIA was the devil. They made the worst drivers, which caused over 30% of the BSODs you got on Vista. MS released WDK and SDK packages for every TAP and CTP Build and if the partners didn't made the drivers it's not the fault of MS :rolleyes:

this come from a NTFS limitation. NTFS counts the size of a hardlink. The files are stored inside the WinSxS folder and are hardlinked into the destination folder. Now NTFS reports that such linked file uses the spaces inside the WinSxS and the destination folder. This is a 10 year old NTZFs issue, not an issue of VISTA. Windows 7 has the same issue!! So Win7 also sucks because of this issue?

Let me make one thing clear, I never said vista sucked. I said I like Vista...I use it on 4 diff systems...

And to a lot of novices, a memory upgrade is a big deal. The fact that you have to upgrade your hardware is a big deal to a lot of people who want to just install something without buying extra components.

And Vista had more driver issues besides NVIDIA's crappy ones.

And my point still stands on the size issue. It took up a lot of space...period...doesnt matter if it is an NTFS issue, it is a Vista issue as well. They designed Vista with this limitation using an old file system.

While I agree with that, stop picking fights online. :p

Let's all get along before the Neowin Forum Police shows up. :woot:

I wasn't picking a fight, that is the point. If my post came across that way, it was not my intention at all.

Let me make one thing clear, I never said vista sucked. I said I like Vista...I use it on 4 diff systems...

And to a lot of novices, a memory upgrade is a big deal. The fact that you have to upgrade your hardware is a big deal to a lot of people who want to just install something without buying extra components.

Most people don't upgrade their operating system, they just buy a new computer. If a user is technical enough to figure out how to upgrade or install a new OS, they are technical enough to figure out how to upgrade their RAM.

Most people don't upgrade their operating system, they just buy a new computer. If a user is technical enough to figure out how to upgrade or install a new OS, they are technical enough to figure out how to upgrade their RAM.

Where do you live that people buy a new system every time a new OS comes out? And I know many people who can install a new OS and are very software savy but dont know crap about on the hardware side. Seems like you are making assumptions on how you think people are and their abilities.

This is nonsense. You can run Vista fine on PCs from 2002/2003 if you install 1 or 2 GB of RAM.

Have you personally seen Vista running on a PC from 2002?

Where do you live that people buy a new system every time a new OS comes out? And I know many people who can install a new OS and are very software savy but dont know crap about on the hardware side. Seems like you are making assumptions on how you think people are and their abilities.

They don't because most people could care less about the OS on the computer as long as the word Windows is in the title. The point is only a small percentage of people actually ever upgrade a old computer to a new OS.

You are not represenative of everyone and installing memory is a heck of a lot easier than installing a OS so I don't see how someone can figure out how to install a OS and be completely clueless on how to upgrade memory. All it takes is Google to figure something so simple out.

I, as I'm sure many others, would have to disagree with that.

There are actually some people who would rather spend $200 on an OS rather than $1500 on a new setup.

I bolded the key word some.

Some = Few

They don't because most people could care less about the OS on the computer as long as the word Windows is in the title. The point is only a small percentage of people actually ever upgrade a old computer to a new OS.

You are not represenative of everyone and installing memory is a heck of a lot easier than installing a OS so I don't see how someone can figure out how to install a OS and be completely clueless on how to upgrade memory. All it takes is Google to figure something so simple out.

Where is your stats or where does it say that most people would rather buy a new PC than upgrade the OS? As far as I am concerned, you are stating your opinion and it is not fact. If people dont want to upgrade the OS, then when sell it separately and limit it to new systems only?

ANd installing memory is easier? MOST people dont know what speed/brand/model to buy. They go out and buy the wrong kind and it can damage your other components or not work at all. I have worked on PCs where the wrong memory was installed so people try to jam it in there damaging the memory slot. I have even worked on PCs where the memory wasnt plugged in all the way, or upside down, frying the mobo.

And people are afraid of hardware and opening up the computer. It can be very intimidating for a lot of people to look in side of a PC and try to figure things out. I have stood by people and had them do the work before and they were resistant even after they knew how to do it. If everyone could work on hardware/software...then I would be out of a job.

Edited by techbeck
Where is your stats or where does it say that most people would rather buy a new PC than upgrade the OS? As far as I am concerned, you are stating your opinion and it is not fact. If people dont want to upgrade the OS, then when sell it separately and limit it to new systems only?

ANd installing memory is easier? MOST people dont know what speed/brand/model to buy. They go out and buy the wrong kind and it can damage your other components or not work at all.

And people are afraid of hardware and opening up the computer. It can be very intimidating for a lot of people to look in side of a PC and try to figure things out. I have stood by people and had them do the work before and they were resistant even after they knew how to do it.

Neither one of us have provided stats but all you have to do if you want to do the actual leg work is get Microsoft's numbers on how many retail and upgrade copies they sale and divide that by the number of known working PC'S. (Which is over a billion to date.) Knock yourself out if you want to do the math, but mark my words I am right on this one.

(You are coming at this from our geeky perspective and I am trying to get you to look at this from a regular consumers point of view.)

People are afraid of a lot of simple things, but that doesn't mean they will never try it.

Edit: All the end user has to do is Google the make and model of the PC and they will find out all the info they need to upgrade their memory. Nothing hard about it.

Neither one of us have provided stats but all you have to do if you want to do the actual leg work is get Microsoft's numbers on how many retail and upgrade copies they sale and divide that by the number of known working PC'S. (Which is over a billion to date.) Knock yourself out if you want to do the math, but mark my words I am right on this one.

(You are coming at this from our geeky perspective and I am trying to get you to look at this from a regular consumers point of view.)

People are afraid of a lot of simple things, but that doesn't mean they will never try it.

Dude, networking and computers is my job. I deal with the average Joe every single day and I know how they think and act. And dont get me started on family. Retail copies mean people doing a non upgrade/full install of an OS on an exisiting system. People who buy computers use OEM copies of the software.So yea, there are A LOT of retail copies of an OS being sold because people want to upgrade their system instead of buy a new one.

And my points on memory still stand. I can Google how to switch out the radiator in my car...but do I feel comfortable doing it on myself? Mechanics will think this is easy but for me who doesnt dig to deep in to car repairs, will think its a PITA even after seeing it done.

Edited by techbeck

Thats the beauty of PCs isnt it - plenty of choice to go around.

I would agree though hardware requirements and driver support were some of the initial issues that hurt vistas opening perceptions very harshly. For the most part I agree with people who tried it on launch and didnt like it, I can see why, but Vista SP1 onwards has been great, and I agree with the person who said Windows 7 is proof Vista is a success. I think Microsoft must have had to swallow a pill to quitely abandon vista as such, however Windows 7 is like a R2 of Vista which leads me to believe Microsofts original vista based evolutionary roadmap is right on track.

I do find it amusing though how zealots will tear Vista down to shreds yet praise Windows 7 suggesting its nothing like Vista...

In any case, cant wait for SP2 and Office 2007 SP2 should hopefully be a good month of releases.

Dude, networking and computers is my job. I deal with the average Joe every single day and I know how they think and act. And dont get me started on family. Retail copies mean people doing a non upgrade/full install of an OS on an exisiting system. People who buy computers use OEM copies of the software.

What I am trying to get across to you is the percentage of retail and upgrade copies pale in comparison to the number of OEM copies sold by a very large margin. You do this for a living so in your eyes people upgrade OS's all the time because that is what they hire you for. (Which also makes your memory argument moot because you install memory for these people too.)

I don't do this for a living and this is a hobby for me. I see far more people in my world every day using Windows 2000 and XP on computers over three years old all the time. I am the one that gets called to fix them and I am always trying to convince these people to upgrade to Vista. these people see no need because 2000 and XP does what they want and they are still happy with them. They also will not upgrade to a new version of Windows until time to buy a computer.

Edited by soonerproud
And my point still stands on the size issue. It took up a lot of space...period...doesnt matter if it is an NTFS issue, it is a Vista issue as well. They designed Vista with this limitation using an old file system.

It didn't take up as much space as you think it does or that it appears to.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Disabling open on hover, great! That was so stupid! They need to do a fix, where if a network share is disconnected, it doesn't hang when opening "This PC" for 20 seconds.
    • Microsoft releases major feature updates for stock Windows 11 apps by Taras Buria In addition to releasing new Windows 11 preview builds, Microsoft announced that inbox Windows apps now have dedicated release notes in the official documentation. At long last, users have access to all the release notes for each app, with changes listed in chronological order. Microsoft used to announce feature updates for stock apps with each build. Now, with Windows Insider release notes hosted on the Microsoft Learn website, each app has a dedicated space for its changelog, which is very useful for those who want to track new features and improvements. Alongside that, Microsoft dropped massive feature updates for six stock apps: Clock, Media Player, Calculator, Voice Recorder, Photos, and Paint. Each app packs quite a lot of changes and new capabilities, so here are the release notes. Here are quick notes so that you can jump to the app you are interested in the most: Calculator Camera Clock Media Player Paint Photos Sound Recorder Here is what is new for the Calculator in version 11.2605.9.0: More accurate square-root results — Fixed rare cases where a calculation that should equal zero (like sqrt(2.25) - 1.5) returned a tiny leftover value instead. Readable text in High Contrast themes — Settings text now shows the correct colors in the High Contrast Aquatic and Desert themes. Fixed layout for right-to-left languages — For languages like Arabic and Hebrew, the graph, number pad, equation fields, and scroll buttons now appear correctly oriented. Reliable launch after upgrading — Fixed an issue where upgrading from much older versions could leave outdated settings that stopped the app from opening. Here is what is new for the Camera app (version 2026.2605.7.0): Zoom slider works on more cameras — The zoom slider now works on the latest cameras, respects your system zoom settings, and updates instantly when you change those settings. Full range of zoom levels — Fixed an issue where the zoom slider only showed three steps on some devices that zoom in finer increments. Front camera works on more devices — Resolved a problem that blocked the front-facing camera on certain wide-angle devices. More video resolution choices — You can now pick video resolutions that were previously hidden; the app shows a heads-up warning instead of removing them. QR links you can still use — When a scanned QR code points to something with no matching app, the link is now copied to your clipboard (with a notification) while still offering a Store search. Smarter default settings — When you haven't set a preference, the app now follows your system settings by default. The Clock app has a massive changelog with the following improvements in version 11.2605.9.0: Timers keep counting after they hit zero — When a timer runs out, it now keeps counting up (for example, -00:27:31) so you can see how far past the time you've gone. You can turn off the daily goal — Focus Sessions now include an "Off" option so you can skip setting a daily goal entirely. New 15-minute snooze option — Alarms now offer a 15-minute snooze interval. Run up to 3 countdowns at once — The Countdown Widget now supports three simultaneous countdowns, up from two. Timer Widget notifications now appear — Fixed an issue where the "timer finished" notification didn't show when the timer was started from the widget. Less clutter in Focus Sessions — Tasks you've already completed no longer show up in the Focus Session task list. More accurate focus progress — Fixed a rounding issue that could show your daily focus progress as a minute short (for example, 49 minutes instead of 50). Smoother World Clock comparisons — The World Clock compare page now loads dates as you scroll, so it feels more responsive. Up-to-date World Clock locations — Refreshed country and city names to match their current names. Correct sun and moon icons during midnight sun — Fixed an icon that wrongly showed a moon during all-day daylight in polar regions. Fixed back-button behavior in clock comparisons — Pressing back once now takes you back as expected, instead of jumping the date to 1926. Corrected the Newfoundland time zone — Newfoundland now uses the right time zone (St. John's). Disabled alarms stay looking disabled — Editing a turned-off alarm no longer makes it appear turned on. Cleaner timer cards — The expand button is now turned off on timer cards that have no time set, preventing actions that wouldn't do anything. Clearer theme setting — Updated the wording to "Choose your preferred app theme." Smoother Settings links — The "About" links in Settings no longer trigger an unexpected "switch apps" prompt. Fixed spacing in Spotify settings — Corrected uneven spacing in the Spotify settings card. Better focus visibility in High Contrast — The focus highlight in World Clock is now clearly visible in the High Contrast Aquatic and Desert themes. No more double announcements — Screen readers no longer read the timer value twice. Countdown names read correctly — Screen readers now properly announce the name of each countdown. Keyboard focus stays put — Focus no longer disappears after you press the Timer Reset button. Clearer alarm toggle for screen readers — Tidied up how the alarm on/off switch is announced. The Media Player app received plenty of changes as well (version 11.2605.14.0): Custom captions — You can now personalize how closed captions appear, with caption styling tied to your Windows caption settings, plus a quick link to open those settings directly. "Indexing" banner in the play queue — When your media library is still being scanned, a banner now explains why some items may not appear yet. Fixed the look of selected items — Corrected a layout glitch with selected items in lists. Fewer playback failures — Improved how the app recognizes supported file types, so more files play without issues. Playlists need a name — You can no longer accidentally save a playlist with a blank name. Cleaner look for empty playlists — Improved how a playlist appears when it has no items yet. More stable play queue edits — Fixed a crash that could happen when changing the play queue while the app was switching between sessions. Clearer "missing codec" message — Improved the dialog that appears when a file needs a codec you don't have, with clearer guidance on what to do. A big update is also available for Paint in version 11.2605.61.0: Adjustable eraser transparency — You can now control how transparent the eraser is. Cleaner stamp brush strokes — Fixed visible color shifts and artifacts when using stamp-style brushes. JPEG photos save in place — Opening a rotated JPEG and pressing Save now overwrites the original instead of unexpectedly prompting "Save As." No more crash on bad image files — Opening a damaged or invalid image, from within the app, by double click, or commandline, now shows a clear error message instead of closing the app. Classic selection behavior restored — The selection outline now hides while you move, resize, or rotate a selection, just like in classic Paint. Tidier AI image panel — Fixed missing spacing at the bottom of the AI image generation panel for a cleaner layout. Visible button hover in light theme — Toolbar split buttons now show a clear hover highlight in the light theme. Snappier toolbar — Streamlined how the ribbon lays out, giving a small speed boost at startup. Fewer background crashes — Fixed a crash that could happen while background tasks were finishing up. Stable app shutdown — Prevented rare crashes when closing the app. Fixed layer removal glitch — Deleting the active layer no longer leaves the layers list in an inconsistent state. Here is what is new in the Photos app (version 2026.11060.2004.0): AI watermarking — AI-generated or edited images can now carry a visible Copilot watermark. You choose Never, Always, or Ask Every Time in Settings, with a confirmation when saving. The watermarking is off by default in settings. Better viewing of small images and pixel art — Tiny images (like 16×16 pixel art) now zoom in far more to fill the screen and stay crisp instead of looking blurry. Select scanned text with the keyboard — When text is detected in an image, you can now navigate and select it using the arrow keys, Shift+Arrow, Home/End, and Ctrl+A, with a clear focus highlight. Fixed a crash in text recognition — Resolved a crash that could close Photos while detecting text in images; the app now recovers gracefully. Easier keyboard navigation — Tabbing through the navigation bar no longer stops on hidden controls, so it takes a single Tab to move past it instead of three. And finally, here is the Sound Recorder (version 11.2605.1.0): Waveform shows with Bluetooth mics — The live waveform now displays correctly when you record using a Bluetooth audio device. No more stray scrollbar — A non-working horizontal scrollbar no longer appears at the bottom of the waveform unless you've zoomed in. Mark button ready right away — The Mark button no longer looks grayed out until you hover over it after opening the app. Markers hidden for WAV files — Markers are now turned off for WAV recordings, since that format can't store them — so they're no longer lost silently. Smoother deleting — Quickly pressing Delete and Enter to remove several recordings in a row no longer triggers a "file doesn't exist" error. Fixed a memory issue — Resolved a memory leak that occurred each time a recording started. You can find all these changelogs in the official documentation here.
    • again, an article about Microsoft Edge and ridicules hater's comments
    • From this very same article: "For organizations that prefer a “more deliberate pace”, the Extended Stable channel remains an option."
    • Or every other browser, because they all behave the same, at least the mainstream ones. Firefox does exactly the same: background updates, restart to install them. Haters gotta hate, I guess.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Very Popular
      AndrewSteel earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Veteran
      Taliseian went up a rank
      Veteran
    • One Month Later
      Clizby earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Timaximus earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Timaximus earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      508
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      170
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      162
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      85
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      78
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!