Recommended Posts

Windows_Seven___7_Concept_by_jurcheck.png

Issues I see with the taskbar in that concept:

1). The icons will move around. If the bar is already almost full, where does the overfill go? Is it centred, or left-aligned?

2). What reason is there for the targetting reticule over the older, better established box highlight. How does it represent multiple windows being open?

3). What happens if you mouse off the taskbar with a zoomed icon. Is the entirety of the icon clickable, or only the part overlapping the taskbar? How would you select stuff that's behind the icon, but not on the taskbar? Do you have to move away and come back?

4). How is the start menu icon differentiated from the other icons?

5). Just how large will the program icons need to be designed up to?

6). How do you switch between multiple instances of the same program?

That's just to start...

Edited by Kirkburn
I have to admit I haven't used it so I can't comment at all on it's functionality. Based on nothing else but screenshots I feel the new bar looks a bit flat and chunky, it's not pleasing to look at in the slightest.

I know this concept really pushes the way Apple do their iteration of a dock but if we pretend for a moment that Mac OS X doesn't exist, this would be an incredibly awesome way of implementing it:

<<snipped>>

Hell no. Dock icon magnification was such a ****ed up idea that even Apple doesn't use it (by default) any more.

What's up with brownish Taskbar or Titlebar. It looks ****ing ugly, totally out of place with the rest UI. I suppose they changed its color.

That's just the aero color that the user picked, not something that's built into the UI. I would imagine that the default is still the almost transparent blue color.

That's just the aero color that the user picked, not something that's built into the UI. I would imagine that the default is still the almost transparent blue color.

no this smacks of 3 or 4 stardock apps with a turdish tint. :blink: the beauty is truly in the eyes of the beholder here. :|

That's just the aero color that the user picked, not something that's built into the UI. I would imagine that the default is still the almost transparent blue color.

I'm fairly sure it's just a mockup. If it were a theme, it would have to be extremely advanced, as many elements of the UI have entirely changed.

No, you are not. I also very much prefer the 7077 look. With the other style there is just too much ugly white gloss like surface, yuck.

They dropped that again, as you can see in later builds like here in 7082, and in 7106 as well.

I don't like the 7077 look much and am glad they changed it back again.

Am I the only one who likes the ver. 7077 active taskbar icon look better?

No

No, you are not. I also very much prefer the 7077 look. With the other style there is just too much ugly white gloss like surface, yuck.

I agree

They dropped that again, as you can see in later builds like here in 7082, and in 7106 as well.

I don't like the 7077 look much and am glad they changed it back again.

Doesn't surprise me a bit

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Looks like the 7.1 is fake effects, can it at least do real 5.1? It says 'virtual 7.1' in all descriptions.
    • You can't, if you didn't notice, it doesn't support surround at all, it's right in the spec list.
    • Hi — I’m always interested in soundcards. Like displays, I just want to know I’m getting as much clean “sonic juice” into my brain as possible as the years take their toll. I’m not entirely sure what to take away from this review, though. It doesn’t really tell me whether the AE‑X is a good product or who it’s actually for. Most of what I’m getting is: there’s a driver to install, here’s what it looks like, and here’s what’s in the box. There’s a lot of emphasis on the SPDIF input. When you mention not needing to switch headphones between console and PC — does that mean the PC has to be powered on just to pass audio through? That seems like a fairly big waste of energy. Is this more something a streamer would use alongside a capture card? How are you testing the sound? (Also, you might want to clarify that you’re using the headphones in wired mode when you mention they’re wireless.) You mention the lack of EMI shielding — how much real‑world difference does that make compared with typical motherboard audio? On multi‑channel: what exactly isn’t supported? Does this mean Windows spatial audio (Dolby Atmos for Headphones, DTS Headphone:X, etc.) won’t work, or just that the card itself doesn’t decode surround formats? And are there any true multi‑driver “surround” headphones left that would even use that? You also highlight support for high‑impedance headphones — but what does that translate to in practice? How does it compare to driving the same headphones from a normal device, and does it make any difference for everyday, lower‑impedance models? In short, who is this card actually targeted at?
    • Yes, THIS is wordart, not the styling that can now be done. Wordart was all about those curvy words, that you could change the path of, like making words go around a circle. I don't think it can be done now, right?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      88
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      74
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!