[Cancelled] Heroes Season 4 (Volume 5 : Redemption)


Recommended Posts

well maybe its by hand because Samuel was but he mum he didn't touch her hand but he then did touch Emma's hand....might have to go back and see when he got it...they focused on it.

didnt he take speed guys power just by being in the same room? i really wish they would just give him back his original power

Yes, he can only have one power at a time. Do you like not watch the same show as the rest of us. They've made it pretty damn clear. I'm sorry if I sound annoyed but I just don't understand how you can miss it.

Maybe because they let Peter keep his speed after touching tattoo boy and getting the inky compass on his arm. How did you miss that?

He didn't get Samuel's power. Samuel put the ink into Peter.

Right, but he still touched Peter though, so Peter should have gotten his powers. If this is a case of Peter has to touch them to get their powers, that's the stupid thing I've ever heard. That would be like me saying, if I had H1N1, I could only give it to someone else if I touched them, but if they touched me, they are perfectly safe or vise verse.

oh noes massive plot hole this show is flawed!...wait we knew that already!

unless the writer from Heroes comes onto Neowin and actually explains it we don't know we could speculate till we are blue in the face.

Right, but he still touched Peter though, so Peter should have gotten his powers. If this is a case of Peter has to touch them to get their powers, that's the stupid thing I've ever heard. That would be like me saying, if I had H1N1, I could only give it to someone else if I touched them, but if they touched me, they are perfectly safe or vise verse.

He didn't take his mother's power either, and he touched her.

Honestly, I think the explanation is skin to skin contact.

Maybe because they let Peter keep his speed after touching tattoo boy and getting the inky compass on his arm. How did you miss that?

The Inky compass was being controlled by Samuel who can manipulate all elements including the ink he put into peter. I assume he used the compass image because he wanted peter to follow the trail of that compass he (peter) already found with Noah.

Heroes producer Adam Armus confirmed that there will be a major death to SciFi Wire, but the question still remains WHO IS IT!?

Thanks to Carnie for the heads up

We chatted with Heroes executive producer Adam Armus, and he says the rumor is true. "We always pull surprises on Heroes. That's all I have to say. It is an epic battle. It's an epic struggle between two very well-loved characters, and it's going to be really compelling," says Armus.

Armus added: "To say goodbye to one of those people, it's really painful for us. It's really a hard thing to do... We have a deep love for the actors and for the characters, and, you know, these are families. These are real tragedies to get over if you do kill some of these people," he says. He also promises that no actors were actually harmed in the making of the series.

Source: SciFi Wire

epic battle :woot:

Peter's powers have always been tied to his emotions. Maybe he has learned to control when he takes powers but in a weakened emotional state he has less control. I'm pretty sure he is attracted to the sound girl :)

Very doubtful and a cop out to a huge oversight. Peter has obtained powers numerous times with and without being an "emotional state".

Heroes producer Adam Armus confirmed that there will be a major death to SciFi Wire, but the question still remains WHO IS IT!?

Thanks to Carnie for the heads up

We chatted with Heroes executive producer Adam Armus, and he says the rumor is true. "We always pull surprises on Heroes. That's all I have to say. It is an epic battle. It's an epic struggle between two very well-loved characters, and it's going to be really compelling," says Armus.

Armus added: "To say goodbye to one of those people, it's really painful for us. It's really a hard thing to do... We have a deep love for the actors and for the characters, and, you know, these are families. These are real tragedies to get over if you do kill some of these people," he says. He also promises that no actors were actually harmed in the making of the series.

Source: SciFi Wire

epic battle :woot:

Sylar vs Peter?! :) (probably sylar vs parkman and sylar wins)

Sylar vs Peter?! :) (probably sylar vs parkman and sylar wins)

Nope it won't be Sylar vs. Peter, that will be in the final ever episode of Heroes, a major huge super dooper gigantic battle between the 2 super powers of the show, at least I hope :D

I just want Claire to die, her attractiveness has worn off...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Maradona if hydration breaks had existed in Mexico 86.
    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      581
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!