Mozilla Firefox 3.5 Beta 4


Recommended Posts

post-1302-1240901298_thumb.jpg

Hmm, that square in the top right corner shouldn't be there (that part tests @font-face, which was also in the previous beta)

Acid3 depends on a couple of big things to pass, for example an SMIL and SVG Fonts implementation, both of which should hopefully be in Gecko 1.9.2 (And I think it'll get another point due to a fix in the HTML parser). This also gives you a good idea of how long it'll take IE to pass the test.

There's also a few issues (like the favicon, but there's still questions about that, if the server returns a 404 and data, what should the client do?) and Acid3 breaks the back/forward buttons (due to iframes it uses).

Edit: Oh yeah, the current nightlies are up to 96/100 if you enable SMIL in about:config.

If I'm using Minefield, should I bother with this beta? Is Minefield already as advanced as 3.5 Beta 4?

Well, that would depend when you last updated your Minefield. If you are using daily updates then you should have something newer than 3.5 Beta 4.

If, however, you have a Minefield build that was downloaded months ago then that changes things.

I find flash videos just don't run with this beta. Anyone else?

Example, http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=4131450 I see the still, hit the play, and nothing happens.

running here with no problems ... and after a clean install I find this beta much better than 3.0.10

Flashgot doesn't work properly in 3.5 Beta 4, messes up the Save (download) Dialog:

th_firefox-1.jpg

Odd. Maybe it has to do with windows 7? not sure.

Went to http://www.adobe.com/software/flash/about/

and it says You have version 10,0,22,87 installed

The Video plays fine for me too. Windows 7 x64 build 7100

Odd. Maybe it has to do with windows 7? not sure.

Went to http://www.adobe.com/software/flash/about/

and it says You have version 10,0,22,87 installed

I have two pc's running win7 64 bit build 7100 and firefox 3.5 beta 4 and flash works flawlessly on both.

I can't use my back and forward buttons on my MX Revolution. I thought it was my mouse at first but then it works in IE8 and Google Chrome. I also have the same issue as James_478 with FlashGot but other than that it runs flawlessly. Just a bit annoying that I have to move my mouse a bit to return to a previous page.

Scirwode

I can't use my back and forward buttons on my MX Revolution. I thought it was my mouse at first but then it works in IE8 and Google Chrome. I also have the same issue as James_478 with FlashGot but other than that it runs flawlessly. Just a bit annoying that I have to move my mouse a bit to return to a previous page.

Scirwode

Back and forward buttons on my mx518 work fine.

I can't use my back and forward buttons on my MX Revolution. I thought it was my mouse at first but then it works in IE8 and Google Chrome. I also have the same issue as James_478 with FlashGot but other than that it runs flawlessly. Just a bit annoying that I have to move my mouse a bit to return to a previous page.

Scirwode

Works fine on my MX Revolution.

Back and forward buttons on my mx518 work fine.

Then I have no idea what's wrong, I have SetPoint installed so it should work. The fact that it works in other places means it is something to do with Firefox, as the previous version worked fine but this didn't.

Scirwode

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • These features described above are good, but far from what developers like me was eager to get. And that main feature that developers will love it`s the ability to connect to LOCAL AI models running on Ollama. So if you have a beefy spec machine you can now use your own model 100% local inside Visual Studio 2026 18.7.0
    • Microsoft Teams is getting a controversial location tracking feature that users may hate by Usama Jawad Image generated with Microsoft Copilot Earlier this year, Microsoft planned to roll out a controversial location tracking feature in Teams, but following customer feedback, it decided to delay its release. The bad news is that the company has decided to launch it later this year, but it's based on roughly the same design that was shared earlier, which means that many users still have good reason to worry. Basically, Microsoft Places and Teams have received workplace check-ins via Wi-Fi. The idea is that if an employee arrives at the office and connects to their enterprise network, their profile status indicator will show them as being present in the office. For example, if you arrive at work, open Teams on your PC, and connect to the "Studio B" company Wi-Fi network, your Teams profile will indicate that you are present in "Studio B", as shown below: Microsoft says that this feature is basically a replacement for physical workplace check-in peripherals, it reduces the need to manually update your status, and it also enables co-workers to know that you're at work so that they can coordinate in-person meetings with you. IT admins can enable this workplace check-in capability at a tenant level, and users have the ability to control whether they want to enable it or not. Of course, all of that sounds great on paper, but naturally, many Teams customers may still have concerns, as they did before. This is because it enables your reporting manager and other members of the organization to track if you are at the office, when you arrive at the office, and where you are right now. This could be problematic for people who work in what they consider to be flexible work environments or hybrid setups, and this kind of location tracking could be considered an invasion of privacy. Microsoft has tried to alleviate some of these concerns by letting users know that they can manually set their location easily, which essentially overrides workplace check-in if they feel uncomfortable with it. However, that doesn't really solve the problem because your organization could enforce a workplace policy that mandates that this feature remains enabled. The Redmond tech giant has also assured users that this capability does not store historical data and is only a real-time indicator of location. Finally, it only generates a signal when you connect to a corporate network, which means that if you are working from home and connect your PC to your personal Wi-Fi, it won't broadcast your location to your employer; you will simply be shown as "Remote". Microsoft has encouraged IT admins to prepare for this change and begin informing users so they know what to expect once it begins rolling out later this year.
    • Wow, Microsoft IS cooking lately... This only shows that they COULD improve, they just chose not to for whatever reasons. That obsession with AI was destroying them from the inside out.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Very Popular
      AndrewSteel earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Veteran
      Taliseian went up a rank
      Veteran
    • One Month Later
      Clizby earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Timaximus earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Timaximus earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      511
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      162
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      157
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      83
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      80
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!