Mozilla Firefox 3.5 Beta 4


Recommended Posts

post-1302-1240901298_thumb.jpg

Hmm, that square in the top right corner shouldn't be there (that part tests @font-face, which was also in the previous beta)

Acid3 depends on a couple of big things to pass, for example an SMIL and SVG Fonts implementation, both of which should hopefully be in Gecko 1.9.2 (And I think it'll get another point due to a fix in the HTML parser). This also gives you a good idea of how long it'll take IE to pass the test.

There's also a few issues (like the favicon, but there's still questions about that, if the server returns a 404 and data, what should the client do?) and Acid3 breaks the back/forward buttons (due to iframes it uses).

Edit: Oh yeah, the current nightlies are up to 96/100 if you enable SMIL in about:config.

If I'm using Minefield, should I bother with this beta? Is Minefield already as advanced as 3.5 Beta 4?

Well, that would depend when you last updated your Minefield. If you are using daily updates then you should have something newer than 3.5 Beta 4.

If, however, you have a Minefield build that was downloaded months ago then that changes things.

I find flash videos just don't run with this beta. Anyone else?

Example, http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=4131450 I see the still, hit the play, and nothing happens.

running here with no problems ... and after a clean install I find this beta much better than 3.0.10

Flashgot doesn't work properly in 3.5 Beta 4, messes up the Save (download) Dialog:

th_firefox-1.jpg

Odd. Maybe it has to do with windows 7? not sure.

Went to http://www.adobe.com/software/flash/about/

and it says You have version 10,0,22,87 installed

The Video plays fine for me too. Windows 7 x64 build 7100

Odd. Maybe it has to do with windows 7? not sure.

Went to http://www.adobe.com/software/flash/about/

and it says You have version 10,0,22,87 installed

I have two pc's running win7 64 bit build 7100 and firefox 3.5 beta 4 and flash works flawlessly on both.

I can't use my back and forward buttons on my MX Revolution. I thought it was my mouse at first but then it works in IE8 and Google Chrome. I also have the same issue as James_478 with FlashGot but other than that it runs flawlessly. Just a bit annoying that I have to move my mouse a bit to return to a previous page.

Scirwode

I can't use my back and forward buttons on my MX Revolution. I thought it was my mouse at first but then it works in IE8 and Google Chrome. I also have the same issue as James_478 with FlashGot but other than that it runs flawlessly. Just a bit annoying that I have to move my mouse a bit to return to a previous page.

Scirwode

Back and forward buttons on my mx518 work fine.

I can't use my back and forward buttons on my MX Revolution. I thought it was my mouse at first but then it works in IE8 and Google Chrome. I also have the same issue as James_478 with FlashGot but other than that it runs flawlessly. Just a bit annoying that I have to move my mouse a bit to return to a previous page.

Scirwode

Works fine on my MX Revolution.

Back and forward buttons on my mx518 work fine.

Then I have no idea what's wrong, I have SetPoint installed so it should work. The fact that it works in other places means it is something to do with Firefox, as the previous version worked fine but this didn't.

Scirwode

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • low latency mode is still bugged and causing bootup times slow to a crawl. To fix, you have to disable the feature with vivetool. Seems as though it's not rolled out to a lot of people yet since I've only been able to find only a handful of people that are having issues.
    • I would recommend the Nothing 2a. The battery life is awesome, 2 or 3 days without going into battery power mode. The only thing that I've been looking into recently is that it doesn't "support" Graphene OS. I'm pretty sure there is a way, I just need to do some more looking.
    • You'd have to show me an example of a listing that says Gen 1, usually i'd expect that to mean Snapdragon Gen 1 (a type of chipset, which the Pixels don't use). Pixel 7 - White - 128gb - Unlocked - 85%+ battery - Grade B+ - $159 with free delivery - https://www.ebay.com/itm/398046617206 Pixel 7 - Obsidian - 128gb - Unlocked - 80%+ battery - Very Good - $157 with free delivery - https://www.ebay.com/itm/355617734563 Both look to be sold by companies with good feedback, dealing with refurbished phones and state the phones are unlocked with a clean IMEI. Obviously I can't vouch for either company though, but the listings look good in my opinion.
    • Because Chrome is doing it. And no one said anyone had to update immediately. That's silly. They could update every day for all I care as long as it's fast, and the next time the browser restarts, you're good. And the basic point is not to tee it up for bigger updates. As it is right now, all the windows I had open reopen anyway except inprivate.
    • Why? Does anybody actually want this? The constant need to close all browser sessions and wait for a new version to install, just so that there’s a integrated coupon manager feels like a waste of everyone’s time
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      davidbazooked earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      Marzoid went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Community Regular
      coch went up a rank
      Community Regular
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      514
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      185
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      159
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      83
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!