First info and screens of Uncharted 2 multiplayer and co-op


Recommended Posts

Every single detail they have released was done in GoW 1, they've even gone to the trouble of choosing 5v5 in MP from GoW2 too.

Broken or not, right now it's a carbon copy. Sorry, you can't brush it off guys, try, but you aint foolin' no one!

I'm not even defending GoW2's MP because as most know I think it does suck after they botched it up. That doesn't excuse ND just ripping the whole game off though.

Every single detail they have released was done in GoW 1, they've even gone to the trouble of choosing 5v5 in MP from GoW2 too.

Broken or not, right now it's a carbon copy. Sorry, you can't brush it off guys, try, but you aint foolin' no one!

I'm not even defending GoW2's MP because as most know I think it does suck after they botched it up. That doesn't excuse ND just ripping the whole game off though.

:laugh:

I was going to say I can see similarities to Killzone 2 in some pictures then saw that they are sharing some tech from the devs.

I await to see more info though.

Yeah the motion blur from Killzone 2 most definitely looks shared!

I wouldn't say it's a copy of Gears 2, in fact I see very few similarities apart from the obvious ones.

What I do like though is the clear influence the architecture and environment will have in the game. The ability to climb and scale buildings to gain an advantage over your foes and subsequently tussle for those positions is a really neat feature.

No seriously, all those details released in AB's reply earlier, every one of them is in GoW1/2. Slight changes with the co-op possibly, depends what they have in mind. Cover system was already "taken" in Uncharted 1, now the MP is the same, the co-op is just horde renamed.

The only differences here are characters, setting and instead of capturing the leader in GoW1/2, you capture treasure. Of course CTF wasn't done in GoW first, although Epic games pretty much perfected the mode long ago. I await the announcement of chain saws, flame throwers and grenade tagging..

Bob_c_b, keep shrugging it off, its an accurate observation I've made. Keep QQ though (Y)

Some promo screens for the beta

ztvipc.jpg

2ztc8qw.jpg

2iuru4j.jpg

Confirms the shields from SP will make it into MP also

uncharted2-vouchers.jpg

No seriously, all those details released in AB's reply earlier, every one of them is in GoW1/2. Slight changes with the co-op possibly, depends what they have in mind. Cover system was already "taken" in Uncharted 1, now the MP is the same, the co-op is just horde renamed.

The only differences here are characters, setting and instead of capturing the leader in GoW1/2, you capture treasure. Of course CTF wasn't done in GoW first, although Epic games pretty much perfected the mode long ago. I await the announcement of chain saws, flame throwers and grenade tagging..

You need to sound just a bit more bitter then we'll have hit the sweet spot ;)

You can't really blame them though, Gears of War was very successful, so it's a great source to rip off from. Probably also the reason why I found Uncharted mind numbingly boring, Gears of War was mind numbingly boring too ... Run, cover, shoot, repeat.

Take your Gears Tears and

8x7gva.gif

This topics about Uncharted 2, well saying who's the few trying to derail it eh? :laugh:

News just in, any games with Co-Op or Shields owe royalties to Epic! ;)

I wouldn't say it's a copy of Gears 2, in fact I see very few similarities apart from the obvious ones.

Same here, minus the cover system, which in that case every third person now is a rip-off, I really do not see it either.

Also it is not even like Gears invented the cover system, they just made it really good, so if you want to get technical, they ripped it off too.

But the gameplay, gun-play, etc. from Gears to uncharted is not even close.

In fact I feel Uncharted borrowed more from Tomb Raider than Gears, and I do not even think there was much they completely ripped off there either...

Dark Sector to me was a complete rip of Gears, roadie run and all. Hell, Dark Sector could have been a mod for Gears it ripped it off so hard.

So yeah, while a lot of this MP sounds like aspects of Gears, to call Uncharted a carbon copy of Gears based on the first game and the announcement of some multiplayer modes, I just completely disagree with, along with some others obviously.

The very fact you guys are just brushing it off just shows you know I'm spot on. Not saying other games haven't had these features, but when all of them are in the same game it's pretty ridiculous :rofl:

Uncharted of War 2 ftw eh! =)

@DL, ah I forgot about the Tomb Raider similarities :laugh: ah, I've made my point.

The very fact you guys are just brushing it off just shows you know I'm spot on. Not saying other games haven't had these features, but when all of them are in the same game it's pretty ridiculous :rofl:

Uncharted of War 2 ftw eh! =)

Okay Munky, bye bye now, you put in a good effort!

Some better scans from the beta

18yn7q.jpg

jfl0dx.jpg

2lu7214.jpg

24ccz2b.jpg

2zxm61j.jpg

Gameplay wise I don't see how this is closer to Tomb Raider, not by a long shot. Tomb Raider is a more slow paced, cumbersome game and this is a fast paced, run & gun shooter with a snap-lock cover system, which just screams Gears of War. Actually, Gears of War is the only game that comes to mind when I played Uncharted, they are so similar! Even when reading various user opinions from both camps, the Uncharted / Gears of War comparison is always lurking right beneath the surface.

The only way Uncharted is in any way, shape or form similar to Tomb Raider, it's the 'story' and the 'motive' of the entire game and the jungle settings, which does remind you of the TR games but gameplay wise, GoW.

As for derailing, we're in a Uncharted topic discussing something related to the game, how it shares a lot of similarities with another game - How is that derailing? Are we only supposed to go "Uhhhh, aaahhh", "Nice screenshots!!11" and "OMG BETA! :o" I don't think we ever rolled like that around here, why change now?

It's interesting how you're the only 2 fighting to give a crap about spamming Gear of War 2 all over this Uncharted Multiplayer/Co-Op topic, no? ;) Insecure much because Uncharted 2 is adding multiplayer? I mean what the hell do you want them to add multiplayer wise to a TPS? They've not even announced all the game modes and say there is more to come, you all miss that part of the interviews you should be reading in here? The immediate GoW butthurt was just stupid, the games share similar mechanics but they are far from carbon copies :laugh: Anyone who has genuinely played both of them will know that.

I guess the rest of us care more about reading about how good these multiplayer additions are to a game that was SP only first time around. It will go some way to making a retail price more justifiable if Uncharted 2 is around the same length as Uncharted, which is what most of us probably care about the most, not screaming bloody murder and racing to pride GoW2 "superiority" or "this game done it first, pay it all the attention!".

I never bought Uncharted 2 for RRP, I got it for ?20 like a year later. If MP is decent and Co-Op fun I'll buy it on release this time. They've already got me interested making Co-Op separate, I still want my Uncharted SP experience, and quite frankly Co-Op campaign for Uncharted just wouldn't work - Levels are too heavily scripted on verticality and platforming.

Anyway, you can now throw explosive barrels instead of just shoot them!:woot::

qx3tkg.jpg

:laugh::

Edited by Audioboxer

Yeah, so sorry AB for being one of the few members left who still speaks his mind and doesn't buy into everything Sony says. I'm very sorry we can't all be sheeps just following the rest of the flock, replying with "Oh nice" and "Can't wait". Oh yes I had the nerves to say the game still reminds me a bit too much of Gears of War. Where have I said I wanted them to completely change it, where have I said them ripping off GoW bothers me eternally? I said a few posts back, it was a great source to get some gameplay ideas considering GoW's popularity but I didn't like Gears of War and I hated Uncharted due to being Gears of War in another suit, just as repetitive.

I'm not asking them to change, not asking them to do ****, just brought up an opinion on the game that I've had ever since the first game.

So now you can stop feeling butthurt just because I decided to share my opinion. Also, we're some who like to play games and make up our own opinions, not scour the internet and read articles dry just to make up our opinion then 6 months after release going "Oh I haven't tried the game yet." We play them, we make up our opinions when we have it in our grubby hands and until then, it won't get my juices flowing nor will I buy into all this usual gaming press hype and Neowin GH hype because it doesn't deserve it, yet(?).

Gameplay wise I don't see how this is closer to Tomb Raider, not by a long shot. Tomb Raider is a more slow paced, cumbersome game and this is a fast paced, run & gun shooter with a snap-lock cover system, which just screams Gears of War. Actually, Gears of War is the only game that comes to mind when I played Uncharted, they are so similar! Even when reading various user opinions from both camps, the Uncharted / Gears of War comparison is always lurking right beneath the surface.

The only way Uncharted is in any way, shape or form similar to Tomb Raider, it's the 'story' and the 'motive' of the entire game and the jungle settings, which does remind you of the TR games but gameplay wise, GoW.

As for derailing, we're in a Uncharted topic discussing something related to the game, how it shares a lot of similarities with another game - How is that derailing? Are we only supposed to go "Uhhhh, aaahhh", "Nice screenshots!!11" and "OMG BETA! :o " I don't think we ever rolled like that around here, why change now?

I would barely call Uncharted run and gun fast paced, in-fact I thought it was much more slow and deliberate when it comes to the actual shooting aspect of it... The fast paced parts were the rail shooters, but I remember fighting at most about 10-15 people at any one time in Uncharted... Just totally different gameplay than Gears IMO...

Uncharted also had its fair share of Platforming and Puzzle based gameplay... neither of which rings Gears at all to me... and again is like Tomb Raider... So that is two clear shape and forms it is similar to Tomb Raider...

So we all have opinions on the game obviously, but man I could not disagree with this take at all...

In all fairness though, I did always describe the game to people who never played it as Gears meets Tomb Raider... I am not saying it is not like Gears, just saying every third person game can be compared to Gears and I do not feel it is a similar experience playing the two games.

I never said GoW was superior, now you're just putting words in my mouth to fuel your own arguments. Not to mention I have played both games so I am more than capable of drawing a comparison. Insecure? Not at all, I'm a hardcore gamer I buy games no matter what the system is. If you really want to discredit me, put some frickin' effort in dude.

I've gave a comparison and I can back it up. It's more than any of you can say who have so far shrugged it off. I'm all for U2 including mutliplayer, I am a mutliplayer gamer the majority of the time. It has nothing to do with insecurity, I just want to pay for something original or I may as well sit down to GoW2 again. Paying ?40 for something already done? Yeah, why wouldn't I speak up or care.

:rolleyes::

Also another classic case where I speak my mind about something and everyone just cries telling me to shut up. I've put across a discussion and comparison and you complain. Had I just said it sucks and not gone into detail "wah wah wah I want a discussion". Make your mind up!

I would barely call Uncharted run and gun fast paced, in-fact I thought it was much more slow and deliberate when it comes to the actual shooting aspect of it... The fast paced parts were the rail shooters, but I remember fighting at most about 10-15 people at any one time in Uncharted... Just totally different gameplay than Gears IMO...

Uncharted also had its fair share of Platforming and Puzzle based gameplay... neither of which rings Gears at all to me... and again is like Tomb Raider... So that is two clear shape and forms it is similar to Tomb Raider...

So we all have opinions on the game obviously, but man I could not disagree with this take at all...

The first 3/4 of Uncharted I had to do fairly slow gunplay or I'd be gunned down, the AI is good. Constant cover and pot shots at the enemy.

The last 1/4 changes things around and encourages you to run & shoot from the hip when facing the zombie things. They were too fast to attack you to sit back behind cover and pot shot them.

That's my take on the pace of the game anyway.

I never said GoW was superior, now you're just putting words in my mouth to fuel your own arguments. Not to mention I have played both games so I am more than capable of drawing a comparison. Insecure? Not at all, I'm a hardcore gamer I buy games no matter what the system is. If you really want to discredit me, put some frickin' effort in dude.

I've gave a comparison and I can back it up. It's more than any of you can say who have so far shrugged it off. I'm all for U2 including mutliplayer, I am a mutliplayer gamer the majority of the time. It has nothing to do with insecurity, I just want to pay for something original or I may as well sit down to GoW2 again. Paying ?40 for something already done? Yeah, why wouldn't I speak up or care.>

:rolleyes::

Also another classic case where I speak my mind about something and everyone just cries telling me to shut up. I've put across a discussion and comparison and you complain. Had I just said it sucks and not gone into detail "wah wah wah I want a discussion". Make your mind up!

Here's what you're missing, you're comparing a released game, GoW2, to a MP portion of a game NONE of us have played yet, NONE of us know all the components of and ALL of us have JUST seen uncovered for the first time with a few scraps of details.

Yet your first post was telling us all Uncharted 2 is now a carbon copy of GoW2.

There is why people get annoyed and it looks like an agenda is on the cards.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I notice how you dodged the questions I had about the racism shown by ignorant, gullible, cowardly people when the Poles, like your partner, were the immigrants. Ahem. I wonder how you'd feel if native born Brits suddenly treated you as "dirty crooked immigrant" for being half Trump-American? If they ordered you to leave and "go back to your corrupt country" (on the other side of the Atlantic), would you go? The truth is based on facts as supported by evidence. As requested in your previous posts, I have used the facts in your own post to show everyone the truth.
    • US citizens are paying to their government, who could use that to fund healthcare and tuition and relieve the costs of these for citizens instead of making tax breaks that overwhelmingly favor the rich. I'm not saying that tariffs are the correct solution, but what else would they be used for? What else could Trump have in mind for wanting them, if he hasn't figured out that labor costs are higher in the US?
    • I’m in need of a new chair and it sounds like the backrest cannot be locked? I also sat on a Herman miller and was devastated that it couldn’t be locked also, what is going on with chairs. I want to be able to lock the backrest into any position but not even the Herman’s do that
    • Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 Ergonomic Office Chair review: The Ikea of chairs by Steven Parker I've reviewed a few gaming chairs over the past three years or so and generally found them to score well in our reviews. SIHOO reached out asking if I was interested in taking a look at their flagship chair, the Doro C300 Pro V2. I never got the chance to check out its predecessor, but the V2 is described as an "Adaptive Ergonomic Chair." It became available to buy in April of this year. Let's get things rolling with a closer look at the specifications and features. Specifications Doro C300 Pro V2 Model Ergonomic Materials Mesh Back and Seat; Soft PU Coated Armrests Height adjustability 45.5 - 53 cm / 17.5" - 20.9" Seat (w+d) 52 x 43 - 47 cm / 20.5" x 16.9" - 18.5" (adjustable) Backrest 52 – 60 cm / 20.5" - 23.6" (adjustable) Lumbar support Mesh built-in (adjustable) Armrest adjustability 8D Bionic Armrests Rocking angle 105°, 120°, 135° (fixed) Neck support Mesh built-in (adjustable) Net weight 27.3 kg / 59.64 lbs Weight support 150 kg / 330 lbs Colors Black, White Warranty 5 years (upon registering) Price $499.99, $539.99 Introduction At first glance, it looks like a chair that in another life wants to be a Herman Miller; It certainly looks like my Aeron Remastered, but the Doro C300 Pro V2 has quite a few more features and costs quite a bit less. SIHOO says that it is made up of a "DynaCore" system that tracks your movement and synchronizes the headrest, backrest, lumbar support, and armrests as you shift, twist, or recline. They also say that the "SyncroFlex Backrest" molds to your spine, which kind of describes how the mesh fabric works in most ergonomic chairs, but anyway. Below are the meat and potatoes measurements for the chair. Here is the same tech sheet, but in inches. Durability I would be remiss to not talk about the various durability testing this chair underwent before coming to market, as this is claimed on the product page. First of all, the chair is BIFMA-, SGS-, and TÜV-certified. As for durability, the tests undergone were: 100,000 Castor cycles tested 120,000 Armrest cycles tested 120,000 Recline cycles tested 120,000 Gas lift cycles tested 60,000 Armrest durability cycles tested 120,000 Rotation cycles tested Nothing about weights testing, though. Now that's all disclosed, now onto my own personal findings. Assembly The Doro C300 Pro V2 came in two large boxes (1) (2), and everything was packed very well, protecting the different parts of the chair. In the box, there is a folded sheet that explains the 12 steps to assemble it; they are: Remove the bottom cover on the aluminum base; Insert the five legs into the aluminum base and use ten screws to fasten them; Insert the castors into the legs; Replace the bottom cover on the bottom of the aluminum base; Place the Class 4 Hydraulics gas cylinder into the aluminum base; Screw the bottom part of the arm rests, taking care of the orientation using two screws on each side; Use three torx screws to fasten the footrest to the bottom of the seat; Fasten the backrest to the seat using four torx bolts; Fasten the armrests to the backrest using four Torx bolts (two on each side), taking care to note the orientation; Place the chair onto the Class 4 Hydraulics gas cylinder; Insert the headrest into the top of the backrest; Use two torx screws to fasten the headrest to the backrest. There's also an online guide you can refer to. Carefully unpacking the two boxes took around 15 minutes because almost everything is wrapped in plastic and protective foam; the chair assembly itself took around an hour. I say in the above assembly steps to take note of the orientation, because it's not obvious which way around the bottom portion of the armrests go, and although there is an L and R on the bottom of the armrests, it also wasn't clear from the instructions which was actually left or right, facing the chair, or in the seated down orientation? Anyway, I ended up putting the bottom portions on the wrong sides, and after securing one of the armrests, I discovered that although it was on the correct side, the armrest base could rotate a full 360°, but not when bolted to the chair, so I had to remove it, rotate it, and then bolt it back on. Truly an Ikea experience! Also, to complicate things further, although all the parts are labeled from A to X (yes, that's 24 parts) unhelpfully, these letters do not appear on the parts themselves or the package with the bolts, screws, and washers. There's also a pair of protective gloves in the box, but I think they were made for much smaller hands than I have. Even my friend, who is 5.1, had difficulty putting them on. Once assembled, I needed to sit down. Anyway, as I said, it looks quite similar to my Herman Miller. And here is the back of it. If you look at the product page and on Amazon, it seems like a lot of thought has gone into the chair itself and what it's capable of, but there is no mention at all about the castors, and this is an area where I think the chair trips up quite quickly. I found it difficult to move the chair in any direction. I asked a friend who came to visit me earlier this week to test my findings, and she said that the wheels were "no good," so it definitely isn't just me. I am 6'2 myself and a big guy, I work from home and gained a few pounds from mostly staying in and the hell away from other people. However, the Doro C300 Pro V2 is rated for up to 150kg (330lbs), which in my case is used well within its max rating. Ergonomics The number of adjustments you can make, right up to setting it in nap mode — which I haven't fully tested yet — is what you'd expect from a premium chair. Yes, you can go up and down (max 7.5 cm adjustment), rock back and forth (with tilt adjustment), and lock the chair between three stages of 105°, 120°, 135°, which is not quite as flat as the AndaSeat I tested at 160°. Some thought has also gone into the "8D" armrests, too, which are cushioned but quite firm; you'll only know it if you press hard into the PU-covered tops, which give about half a centimeter, but it's enough to ensure your skin won't get awkwardly stuck to it in warmer (or sweatier) conditions. It almost feels like plastic and is very easy to keep clean. However, the armrest positions move far too easily, and I am not sure what that "elbow" function is. Maybe it is good for a short person with short arms, anyway, I never used it and kept it flat at all times. There are eight levels of adjustment for the armrests, they are: backwards, forwards, swing left/right, height up and down, tilt, and 360° rotation, which can be handy for desk clearance. As I said, the armrest pads shift far too easily, which could give off an ergonomic vibe, but who wants the armrest sliding when you are shifting weight? The height adjustability does lock into place when lifting and adjusting. Comfort This is ultimately what it boils down to at the end of the day, right? Quite a lot of reviews praise the comfort of this chair, and I don't disagree that the mesh seating is quite comfortable. I am used to the material from my daily Herman Miller. However, the backrest cannot be locked into place, and this is actually a feature; as you shift or recline yourself on the chair, the backrest moves with your body. It took some getting used to. The lumbar gives ample support, but I would have preferred an adjustable one built into the seat base, as this causes the backrest to move up and down at will. Again, as with my previous chair review, this chair is also rated for tall people, but nowhere in the product documentation does it say how tall. Being 6'2 myself, I'm happy to say that the backrest is tall and wide enough, and thought has been given to being able to adjust the neck rest, but as others have mentioned in their reviews, people as tall as 6.2ft is about the limit for the neckrest. Conclusion What I didn't like The footrest is rated for 15kg (33 lbs), which to me seems a bit light, and after looking online, it seems like a chair footrest for adults must be at least twice that rating. In all honesty, they are just hollow metal tubes, so it is not recommended to let a kid sit on them. I also feel like it doesn't really go out far enough for my height, so that kind of puts the dampener on me being able to use it regularly. I'll just have to continue to use my subwoofer as a footrest! I do not like the armrests being able to shift around as easily as they can, and they are a little too forward-positioned in the chair to comfortably sit close to my desk, because even in the lowest height position, they don't allow me to go under the desk like is possible with my Herman Miller. I also feel like this chair could have been delivered partially constructed, especially the armrests on the seat, and why the aluminum base wasn't already pre-constructed (without the castors) is baffling, considering it would have fit in one of the two boxes that way. The instructions also need to be clearer. On the pamphlet, there's an A to X listing (which is also used in the steps), but none of the physical parts use this lettering system! What I did like I'll be honest, I haven't used it for very long, just one week, and seating comfort is subjective after all! Any spills wiped straight off it, the stitching, and the lines look great, not a fray to be seen or stitch out of place. It looks kind of cool, too. My favorite feature of these seats is the nap mode. While you're not lying completely flat, it leans far back enough to make you easily doze off after a heavy gaming or working session. Overall, this chair offers plenty of comfort features. The MSRP does vary quite a bit depending on the region, at £549.99 in the UK, and €580 in Europe, and $599 before tax in the U.S. However, shipping is free, which is a bonus for such a heavy item. Is it worth it, though? At three years' warranty, I think it's a decent deal. Another firm out of Germany sent me a free replacement hydraulic gas spring for a chair that failed after almost four years, so it was well outside its two-year warranty. My advice is to always try, as you might have the same luck I did. If I could fault it at all, it would be the constant shifting of the armrests and backrest. Where to buy Although the footrest variant normally costs $539.99, it has been discounted to $469.99 on the official website in Black or White. In fact, the non-footrest variant is only $40 cheaper. On Amazon, it currently costs more at $499.99 links below. Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 for $469.99 (official website) Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 for $499.99 at Amazon US SIHOO provided a free sample without any review or pre-approval. Good to know This Amazon link is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      207
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      macoman
      62
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!