Ridley Scotts "Prometheus" (2012)


Recommended Posts

What was the point of Charlize Theron and her

dad

in the movie? The movies could have been done without them both.

I think they were pretty essential to the film and the Alien universe as they explain how Weyland Corporation got involved in the first place and demonstrated how ruthless the corporation is. Without them a significant aspect of the storyline would be missing.

I loved this film after seeing a different sort of film Avengers which I also loved. This film was visually beautiful like Avatar and it made you think, a lot of people are complaining about that but I like it. The same sort of style as Inception where it might take another viewing to get the full view because you could miss something very small which has a big effect.

I clearly think that this film needs to be continued to really answer why some of the engineers died 2000 years ago (accident?). Why was the ship heading to Earth with the black fluid which seems to turn people into Zombies with the intention to infect people with the squid thing which then has the ability to get somebody and create one of the Xenomorph ancestor Queen thing's. But unlike something like Battleship, I like the questions that need to be asked which for me increases the appeal of the film like Inception because I can watch it again and again.

I loved this film after seeing a different sort of film Avengers which I also loved. This film was visually beautiful like Avatar and it made you think, a lot of people are complaining about that but I like it. The same sort of style as Inception where it might take another viewing to get the full view because you could miss something very small which has a big effect.

I clearly think that this film needs to be continued to really answer why some of the engineers died 2000 years ago (accident?). Why was the ship heading to Earth with the black fluid which seems to turn people into Zombies with the intention to infect people with the squid thing which then has the ability to get somebody and create one of the Xenomorph ancestor Queen thing's. But unlike something like Battleship, I like the questions that need to be asked which for me increases the appeal of the film like Inception because I can watch it again and again.

It didn't turn people into zombies, the black stuff was obviously a lifeform. You saw the small maggot like things at the beginning, they were taken over by the "ooze" and turned into the snake-like creatures. When the black stuff touched the humans it took them over, trying to create a new lifeform. The whole place was a bio-engineering "farm" which is why any lifeform that entered it ended up being changed in some way. If there is to be a sequel then I would presume it would answer the question why our progenitors, as the huge "people" seemed to be (but we weren't told for sure that this is what they were, only that their dna was identical to ours), were so intent on destruction and creating the ultimate bio-weapon.

I'm sure most have covered the poplar questions. Im curious about how many Aliens (None Human Species) there are ? The Worms, The Engineer, The Black Goo and also the helmets the engineer wear, is this another alien species as this seems to be biological too and why aren't they covered in more detail as its the first discovery by humans. What was the purpose of David infecting the Humans, or did he have a change of conscious ( A Human feeling ) as he helped out at the end or is he also on a mission. Why was the RARE biological pod there, It was set to Male was it there for Mr Wayland or to host / fix an alien ? What does she hope to achieve by going along to a distant planet?

I think the biggest disappointment for me was the fact that the Space Jockey died in the hallway when we quite clearly saw him in Alien sitting in the seat of the gun/telescope/whatever it's meant to be (possibly a gun that shoots off those capsules into a planet's atmosphere).

I'm guessing Weyland was there looking for the "fountain of youth", some kind of "I want to live forever" cure. Obviously the whole film is about gods and men, he wanted to become a god, David was trying to be a man (Peter O'Toole in Lawrence of Arabia), the 2 scientists were trying to find their "creator", we find out that Weyland is Meredith Vickers' dad (aka creator).

For all these fancy themes though I was disappointed that the film, in the end, basically becomes a monster movie, albeit a loftier one than most.

Also, how the hell did she manage to do all that jumping about and heroics after just having major abdominal surgery which would take anyone weeks to months to recover from?

Did anyone else get the feeling that the film closely follows the same story arcs as the original Alien?

Last words...honest...why the HELL do none of these people have the good sense that god (or some gigantic alien :p ) gave them? They mess about with things that look like gnarly poisonous snakes, they take off their helmets in completely alien environments which they know nothing about, they deserved everything they got to be honest

Yes, so have I, lol. I just mean that one shouldn't go into it expecting an Alien film with those "monsters".

Maybe not those exact "monsters" but there is a chestburster of sorts, there are also at least 2 facehuggers, even if one of them is the "mother of all facehuggers" lol ..and then, of course, there's the triumphant birth of the Alien species we all know and love at the end, even if it didn't have the "tongue"

I've not seen this yet but one of my colleagues described it and all I said was "it sounds like Lost." ... and now I hear it's written by some of the same people? Great. :/ So it's predictable then.

I'm disappointed.. but I guess I'll have to go and see it first. Not sure if it's gonna be worth my money though...

The Planet is different, LV 223 is Prometheus , LV-426 is Aliens, I only know because I goggled.

I didn't think they were planets though. I thought the movie stated they were moons?

I've not seen this yet but one of my colleagues described it and all I said was "it sounds like Lost." ... and now I hear it's written by some of the same people? Great. :/ So it's predictable then.

I'm disappointed.. but I guess I'll have to go and see it first. Not sure if it's gonna be worth my money though...

Lost? How is it anything like Lost? It is part of the Alien franchise. Damon Lindelof, who co-created Lost, was a co-writer of the film, but I never got anything from Lost out of this film.

If you're going to write this off simply because it has one of the writers from Lost on it, you should also write off the rebooted Star Trek and its upcoming sequel too. Both of which, are directed by J.J. Abrams and the sequel being co-written by Damon Lindelof (along with two Fringe writers).

Don't be disappointed until you see it for yourself. I've never understand taking someone else's word for something. Can't we think for ourselves? :/

Edited by Hurmoth

Hope you Mercuns enjoy it :)

If you're going to write this off simply because it has one of the writers from Lost on it, you should also write off the rebooted Star Trek and its upcoming sequel too. Both of which, are directed by J.J. Abrams and the sequel being co-written by Damon Lindelof (along with two Fringe writers).

It's also written by Jon Spaihts and Damon Lindelof, I'm sure I also saw a written by credit for Ridley Scott himself, I was surprised to see it was produced by him so he really went for this in a big way, including pumping his own money into it.

Also....for anyone who has already seen it...

Did anyone else think the eventual reveal of the aliens we know and love looked more like this from beelejuice (The one on the left) :) than one of the original aliens :

http://1.media.colle...99432a207cd.jpg

Hope you Mercuns enjoy it :)

It's also written by Jon Spaihts and Damon Lindelof, I'm sure I also saw a written by credit for Ridley Scott himself, I was surprised to see it was produced by him so he really went for this in a big way, including pumping his own money into it.

Also....for anyone who has already seen it...

Did anyone else think the eventual reveal of the aliens we know and love looked more like this from beelejuice (The one on the left) :) than one of the original aliens :

http://1.media.colle...99432a207cd.jpg

The aliens take over the look of whatever their host was, in some fashion. Maybe that's what that planets inhabitants looked like....

Saw it tonight with a buddy who is also a big 'Alien' fan...and we were left dumbfounded. I mean, really? They couldn't even get the name of the planet right?

The ending scene felt so forced as well because in 'Alien', Dallas and the crew find the exoskeleton IN THE DAMN BIG CHAIR will a hole in the stomach; obviously couldn't happen when the Engineer made it over to the other ship to attack the doctor.

Calling this a prequel is stretching it, in my opinion.

I wanted to find out how the distress signal the Nostromo picked up was initiated, I wanted to know who the hell was actually in the chair, and I mostly wanted to know where Mother came from and what its purpose was.

What made 'Alien' and 'Aliens' so good was that they were not trying to force some ideology on you but still left you with questions and doubts about higher beings, not to mention it had great action and a kick-your-ass mentality. 'Prometheus' was the exact opposite; it felt soft and very forced. If it were its own movie with no pretense behind it, I probably would have enjoyed it more.

Stringer Bell (the captain for the non-Wire fans) was awesome, loved the little moment between he and Charlize Theron.

For those interested: http://screenrant.com/prometheus-alien-connection-benk-176223/2/ Some compelling theories connecting the films.

Saw it tonight with a buddy who is also a big 'Alien' fan...and we were left dumbfounded. I mean, really? They couldn't even get the name of the planet right?

The ending scene felt so forced as well because in 'Alien', Dallas and the crew find the exoskeleton IN THE DAMN BIG CHAIR will a hole in the stomach; obviously couldn't happen when the Engineer made it over to the other ship to attack the doctor.

Calling this a prequel is stretching it, in my opinion.

I wanted to find out how the distress signal the Nostromo picked up was initiated, I wanted to know who the hell was actually in the chair, and I mostly wanted to know where Mother came from and what its purpose was.

What made 'Alien' and 'Aliens' so good was that they were not trying to force some ideology on you but still left you with questions and doubts about higher beings, not to mention it had great action and a kick-your-ass mentality. 'Prometheus' was the exact opposite; it felt soft and very forced. If it were its own movie with no pretense behind it, I probably would have enjoyed it more.

Stringer Bell (the captain for the non-Wire fans) was awesome, loved the little moment between he and Charlize Theron.

For those interested: http://screenrant.co...-benk-176223/2/ Some compelling theories connecting the films.

I assume you mean because it takes place on LV-223 or whatever, a moon that isn't LV-426? I think the ending is pretty simple to explain away (other than they wanted to set up an eventual sequel that would explain alot more) that the SJ you see in the end get killed, isn't the SJ we see in Alien that the Nostromo crew finds.

And since the distress beacon wasn't activated one can assume something else triggers it, or someone else triggers it. And Mother? Mother is just the AI computer brain, I don't think that has to be explained really? Other than it is programmed by Weyland-Yutani and finds the crew expendable.

@mattmatik,

LOL!

err... It's supposed to be a different planet, a different engineer & a different ship.

I think the biggest disappointment for me was the fact that the Space Jockey died in the hallway when we quite clearly saw him in Alien sitting in the seat of the gun/telescope/whatever it's meant to be (possibly a gun that shoots off those capsules into a planet's atmosphere).

Again, different planet, a different engineer & a different ship

I don't know how some people didn't get that...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Ocenaudio 3.19.4 by Razvan Serea  Ocenaudio is a full featured, fast and easy to use audio and music editor. It is the ideal software for people who need to edit and analyze audio files without complications. Ocenaudio also has powerful features that will please more advanced users. To assist ocenaudio development, a powerful toolset of audio editing, analysis and manipulation called Ocen Framework was created. ocenaudio is also based on Qt framework, a well known library for cross-platform development. Cross-platform support ocenaudio is available for all major operating systems: Microsoft Windows, Mac OS X and Linux. Native applications are generated for each platform from a common source, in order to achieve excelent performance and seamless integration with the operating system. All versions of ocenaudio have a uniform set of features and the same graphical interface, so the skills you learn in one platform can be used in the others. VST plugins support Ocenaudio supports VST (Virtual Studio Technology) plugins, giving its users access to numerous effects. Like the native effects, VST effects can use real-time preview to aide configuration. Real-time preview of effects Applying effects such as EQ, gain and filtering is an important part of audio editing. However, it is very tricky to get the desired result by adjusting the controls configuration alone: you must listen the processed audio. To ease the configuration of audio effects, ocenaudio has a real time preview feature: you hear the processed signal while adjusting the controls. The effect configuration window also includes a miniature view of the selected audio signal. You can navigate on this miniature view in the same way as you do on the main interface, selecting parts that interest you and listening to the effect result in real time. Multiselection for delicate editions To speed up complex audio files editing, ocenaudio includes multi-selection. With this amazing tool, you can simultaneously select different portions of an audio file and listen, edit or even apply an effect to them. For example, if you want to normalize only the excerpts of an interview where the interviewee is talking, just select them and apply the effect. Eficient edition of large files With ocenaudio, there is no limit to the length or the quantity of the audio files you can edit. Using an advanced memory management system, the application keeps your files open without wasting any of your computer's memory. Even in files several hours long, common editing operations such as copy, cut or paste happen almost instantly. Fully featured spectrogram Besides offering an incredible waveform view of your audio files, ocenaudio has a powerful and complete spectrogram view. In this view, you can analyze the spectral content of your audio signal with maximum clarity. Advanced users will be surprised to find that the spectrogram settings are applied in real time. The display is updated immediately when altering features such as the number of frequency bands, window type and size and dynamic range of the display. Ocenaudio 3.19.4 changelog: Adds fallback fonts so every language and symbol displays correctly Improves autosave and session recovery stability Improves region navigation and display Fixes a crash when the level meter is used on displays with a scaling greater than 200% Fixes memory corruption when using the silence selection tools Fixes crashes when closing a file while effects are still being processed Fixes a freeze when applying effects to many files at once (macOS) Fixes crashes related to audio devices on Windows Fixes invalid file names when exporting regions whose label is used as the file name Other bug fixes and improvements Download: Ocenaudio 64-bit | Portable | ~40.0 MB (Freeware) Download: Ocenaudio for Linux and Mac OS View: Ocenaudio Homepage | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Hasleo Disk Clone 5.8.2.1 by Razvan Serea Hasleo Disk Clone is a free and all-in-one disk cloning software for Windows 11/10/8/7/Vista and Windows Server that can help you migrate Windows OS to another disk, clone one disk to another disk or clone one partition to another location quickly and efficiently. Completely Free Windows Migration and Disk/Partition Cloning Software Migrate Windows from one disk to another without reinstalling Windows, apps. Clone one disk to another and makes the data on 2 disks are exactly the same. Clone a partition to another location without losing any data. Easily adjust the size and location of the destination partition. Convert MBR to GPT or convert GPT to MBR by cloning. Creation of Windows PE emergency disk. Extremely fast cloning speed and multi-language support. Supported OS: Windows Vista/Server 2008 or later, fully compatible with GPT and UEFI. Hasleo Disk Clone 5.8.2.1 changelog: Fixed an issue that caused disk enumeration to fail Fixed an issue where WinPE created under Windows ARM64 26H1 did not work properly Download: Hasleo Disk Clone 5.8.2.1 | 32.3 MB (Freeware) Link: Hasleo Disk Clone Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • This got me thinking, would you rather a self driving car prioritise protecting its passengers or everyone else? I'd choose the one that keeps me and my kids safest. At some point, these cars have to make those choices already, don't they? Wonder if we have a way to find out what way they lean.
    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      554
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      78
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      74
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!