Ridley Scotts "Prometheus" (2012)


Recommended Posts

eh... no. This is not an Alien film.

Well there kind of are, but different. It's definitely related to the alien franchise. It's also nice that it explains the whole "takes on the characteristics of its host" thing, well in so far as where that comes from at least.

Going to go see a matinee in a few hours, as long as my wife wakes up. :laugh:

Is it worth seeing in 3D (not iMax 3D just regular) or can I see it without 3D? Wife is not a big fan of the 3D so kind of torn.

Again, different planet, a different engineer & a different ship

I don't know how some people didn't get that...

Erm, How the hell would the spaceship get off that planet when it was completely disabled by them crashing into it and it now sits exactly as it's found in the first Alien film?! I think you're talking through your arse

Erm, How the hell would the spaceship get off that planet when it was completely disabled by them crashing into it and it now sits exactly as it's found in the first Alien film?! I think you're talking through your arse

It is totally different. Go read up on the production of Prometheus and you'll see that this is NOT a prequel to Alien. Not directly anyway.

"[Ridley] Scott has been adamant that while "Prometheus" "carries the DNA" of "Alien," it is an original piece of science fiction that delves into everything from biotechnology to artificial intelligence to the origins (and possible destruction) of mankind itself."

Source: http://en.wikipedia...._(film)#Writing

Also, in an interview with writer Damon Lindelof, he states that if a sequel is produced to Prometheus, "It has to stand on its own... If we?re fortunate enough to do a sequel to Prometheus, it will tangentialize even further away from the original Alien."

Source: http://collider.com/ridley-scott-damon-lindelof-michael-fassbender-prometheus-interview/153243/

Edited by Hurmoth

It's not a direct prequel to Alien, but yet it does have a lot of references to the Alien franchise. I'd like to think of it as

The Evolution of the Alien, because you can clearly see the squidy alien is kind of like a facehugger. With a few more evolutions it will be it. The slime, the acid blood all points to this is how the Xenomorph evolved from a tiny black substance. It will take a long time to evolve as what we know in the Alien films, but that makes total sense. As David would put it, "Big things have small beginnings."

I didn't actually realise until later that the opening scene where an "Engineer" alien disintegrates by taking the dark liquid was taking place on Earth. I suppose he was akin to Prometheus (the Titan) in some sense, as his DNA gave rise to us. I guess we weren't meant to be created in such a way and perhaps this is why the other Engineers wanted to destroy us.

Thought it was a pretty good movie overall.

Well wife made the no 3D decision for us, she just does not want to see it in 3D, so seeing it normally. Should be fine.

I'm so sorry for your loss Larry :p But IMAX 3D for this movie is a must! It was amazing.

And for a lot of the comments coming from posters.... Did you guys actually watch the movie? Or did you only pay attention at a few scenes in between stuffing your holes with popcorn? lol, I swear, a lot of the discussion here is so plainly obvious of what happened.

I'm going to go see this movie agian, not because I feel I missed anything, but just because it is that good.

I loved how there were so many references towards Prometheus... The first alien along with shaw and her husband. Just so many great answers and questions.

I'm so sorry for your loss Larry :p But IMAX 3D for this movie is a must! It was amazing.

And for a lot of the comments coming from posters.... Did you guys actually watch the movie? Or did you only pay attention at a few scenes in between stuffing your holes with popcorn? lol, I swear, a lot of the discussion here is so plainly obvious of what happened.

I'm going to go see this movie agian, not because I feel I missed anything, but just because it is that good.

I loved how there were so many references towards Prometheus... The first alien along with shaw and her husband. Just so many great answers and questions.

It was still very good in non 3D, but I definitely saw scenes that would have been superb in 3D.

And I do have to agree with you about people asking the questions they are asking. Just follow the movie and draw some conclusions. :laugh:

With that I will say, I believe a lot of the story is left open for interpretation, which I personally feel is a great way to make a movie. Have people giving their take on everything. So with that said, here is my take on things, could be dead wrong...

Opening Scene -

Either dude was on Earth before the human race and was killing himself to get his DNA on the planet to start the human race, and/or we were already here and he was trying to save us. What I mean by the latter is he knew his fellow engineers plan to wipe out humans.

I can see either or scenario being the reason.

Some of the more obvious plot points (my take on them) -

David planted the host in Charlie to see if he would transform just for Weyland to know. Even though we never see him transform, it was enough for Weyland to want to take the chance himself of becoming "immortal."

The baby Shaw removed from her wound up taking over and impregnating the Engineer, thus creating the new "Alien" lifeforms we all know and love from Aliens. That is that lifeforms beginning.

My wife did ask me

Why was David willing to help Shaw out at the end when he had basically screwed her over the entire time? My theory was since his creator/programmer Weyland was no longer alive, he no longer had a Prime Initiatve so to speak, so he was now taking direction from Shaw as that is what he was created to do. Take directions from a human.

There are other plot points I would be happy to pontificate on if people wish to do so. :laugh:

There is a ton about this I would like to discuss, but at the moment, I just don't have the time to type it all out. But this movie is great in the sense that they have created this idea, this universe, that is very interesting and intriguing, and very close to what reality could be in some form

Could Vickers have been an outdated android? Could be why David kept calling her "mom".

What happened to the guy who had the snake go into his mouth? Did he just die or was he a part of another transformation we didn't get to see?

My take on the very first alien, is that there were 2 groups of aliens. 1 group that wanted to spread and create life, and another group trying to destroy that life.

The alien that comes out of the last "engineer" is the first type that would come from that type of being. After a for more evolutions, that alien could end up looking more like the ones we know of... Or the ones we know of, come from the differences in our DNA compared to our "creators" , thus giving "our aliens" a little different appearance. But what we saw in the previous "Alien/s" movies was a more evolved form of what we saw in this movie.

Was the black goo in the very first scene a hybrid version of the black goo on the moon?

Giving the time period, and what we were told about the age of the ship being 2000 years old... that would put us just about the time of Christ. Maybe we did something so bad during that time... to one of them , that caused them to hate us and plot our destruction. They created us, then through out the thousands of years of evolution, they visited and had enough contact with civilizations. Enough contact that the primitive humans were able to know almost where they came from. But then 2000 years ago, we ****ed them off enough to warrant our destruction. Also with that last tid bit, take into the fact that it was Christmas, and what else is known for christman??? Virgin Births, Christ, Sacrifice...

Erm, How the hell would the spaceship get off that planet when it was completely disabled by them crashing into it and it now sits exactly as it's found in the first Alien film?! I think you're talking through your arse

Well that might be explained in the ship shaw took off in with David, they could have some more space jockeys in status and it could be that the shaw alien ship ends up being the one set in Alien, the other problem with LV223 is that there is a weyland ship, and human dead bodies for the crew of aliens to discover which i took to discount that planet completely being the same one from alien, as mentioned they are name differently as well

It was still very good in non 3D, but I definitely saw scenes that would have been superb in 3D.

And I do have to agree with you about people asking the questions they are asking. Just follow the movie and draw some conclusions. :laugh:

With that I will say, I believe a lot of the story is left open for interpretation, which I personally feel is a great way to make a movie. Have people giving their take on everything. So with that said, here is my take on things, could be dead wrong...

Opening Scene -

Either dude was on Earth before the human race and was killing himself to get his DNA on the planet to start the human race, and/or we were already here and he was trying to save us. What I mean by the latter is he knew his fellow engineers plan to wipe out humans.

I can see either or scenario being the reason.

Some of the more obvious plot points (my take on them) -

David planted the host in Charlie to see if he would transform just for Weyland to know. Even though we never see him transform, it was enough for Weyland to want to take the chance himself of becoming "immortal."

The baby Shaw removed from her wound up taking over and impregnating the Engineer, thus creating the new "Alien" lifeforms we all know and love from Aliens. That is that lifeforms beginning.

My wife did ask me

Why was David willing to help Shaw out at the end when he had basically screwed her over the entire time? My theory was since his creator/programmer Weyland was no longer alive, he no longer had a Prime Initiatve so to speak, so he was now taking direction from Shaw as that is what he was created to do. Take directions from a human.

There are other plot points I would be happy to pontificate on if people wish to do so. :laugh:

i think david helped as really his main goal was to see immortality of Weyland and as you say no he's dead he's left with like the sub parts of his mission which is to discover the alien race. Of course as you say he still takes orders from humans and she's the highest rank

Im disappointed that the film has been crafted as much as it has for a sequel, i would have preferred a film that could have stood on it's own a bit more instead of raising even more questions.

However the cinematography was incredible, i watched this at a standard 2D digital cinema and it looked HD. The shadows and dark areas were really clear and not muddy at all and the opening parts of the film i could easily screen shot for a desktop wallpaper as they were so nicely done and most importantly so clear to see.

Also liked the david character and felt that he carried the film quite a bit, didn't think much of shaws husband and the geologist, i thought they could have expanded the changes and the evolving parts of them a bit more, perhaps introduce an alien like situation with one of them going through the ship hunting them and getting more disfigured in the process.

Overall i was disappointed with the film, it felt like it was building up and building up, the two scientists starting getting attacked i thought this is where the film really kicks off and the build up did produce an uneasy feeling (something i noticed the whole cinema seemed to share), but then it fizzled into nothing, a massive anticlimax and the film never really picked up again.

As a stand alone film i don't think i would have been as disappointed and would have thought it was an ok film, however ridley scott in a spiritual alien type file, i had high hopes.

Maybe I hyped the film up in my mind but I expected more. Visually it was stunning I did enjoy the film but..

It didn't really answer the questions I really wanted, for example who are the aliens why did they create this biological weapon, basically we don't really know much more now than we did after we watched Alien. All we know is some big alien in some big space craft created the weapon that ended up becoming the Xenomorphs but we still don't know why or who these creators are.

Hopefully there will be some kind of sequel that answers these questions but I'm not holding my breath.

Erm, How the hell would the spaceship get off that planet when it was completely disabled by them crashing into it and it now sits exactly as it's found in the first Alien film?! I think you're talking through your arse

It's not the same ship they find in Alien. Again, different engineer, different engineer ship, different planet. This film does not set up the begining of Alien.

  • Like 1

Went to see this for a second time in 2D this evening. Reminded me why 3D is quite overrated - I didn't really feel like I missed anything compared to the first time around!

I still don't know what to make of the film really. I do think it opens some interesting doors and has me asking a lot of questions... I hope there will be more in this series to help answer those questions!

Just saw this and I thought the movie was ok but not as scary as Alien. The special effects were top notch but the movie was predictable and left a lot of questions unanswered. Depending on the box office, there may be talk of Prometheus 2.

Just saw this and I thought the movie was ok but not as scary as Alien. The special effects were top notch but the movie was predictable and left a lot of questions unanswered. Depending on the box office, there may be talk of Prometheus 2.

That's the idea. Damon Lindelof believes in leaving most of the big questions up to the audience. Let me ask you this: if you saw this with someone, did you leave debating the film more than a film that answers everything?

I went with a close friend and we spent a few hours debating all the possibilities. Just in this thread people are going all over the place. That's nothing something you can do with a film that answers most, if not all, the questions. I like a film that leaves things open-ended. It makes it more interesting and a much better conversational film.

Also, with regard to a sequel, I wouldn't be surprised if there was one, but Lindelof just signed on to rewrite World War Z and also a new contract to develop a TV series, so it may be a while before a sequel is done, unless the studio gets a different writer. Which I hope they don't do. Different writers ruin character personalities IMO.

  • Like 2

It's not the same ship they find in Alien. Again, different engineer, different engineer ship, different planet. This film does not set up the begining of Alien.

Remember David said there are multiple ships? Yeah.

.

  • Like 1

Saw the film a little over an hour ago and loved it. I've seen a lot of hatred, but most the claims I'm finding I just can't see much justification for. I mean, sure, there are some problems, but people are really nit-picking stuff (and a lot of the complaints I've seen are directly addressed or at least implied in the film).

I really recommend seeing it if you're on the fence, though.

Yeah, I agree with above. If it was a stand-alone film and there was no 'Alien' to remember, I would have enjoyed it a lot more. I guess its my fault for expecting it to be what I wanted. Ah well.

And I do understand folks are saying there were multiple engineers, multiple ships, blah blah blah. But there are scenes in 'Prometheus' that I interpreted to be direct connections. The way some of the scenes were shot, for example.

1) the way the ship crashed at the end, they had that thing look exactly like how it did in 'Alien'

2) the symbol in the breeding area of the alien we all know from 'Alien' - it clearly shows the head and body so where is the whole evolution thing coming from? How can you have a symbol like that of something that doesn't exist?

I guess one could make the argument that there were multiple 'bases' and one of those could be what crashed on LV-426, or even Shaw's. Like I said, its my fault for inferring differently and I'll keep that in mind going forward with the inevitable sequels.

That's the idea. Damon Lindelof believes in leaving most of the big questions up to the audience. Let me ask you this: if you saw this with someone, did you leave debating the film more than a film that answers everything?

I went with a close friend and we spent a few hours debating all the possibilities. Just in this thread people are going all over the place. That's nothing something you can do with a film that answers most, if not all, the questions. I like a film that leaves things open-ended. It makes it more interesting and a much better conversational film.

Also, with regard to a sequel, I wouldn't be surprised if there was one, but Lindelof just signed on to rewrite World War Z and also a new contract to develop a TV series, so it may be a while before a sequel is done, unless the studio gets a different writer. Which I hope they don't do. Different writers ruin character personalities IMO.

I saw the movie with my wife and she wasn't a big fan of the Alien franchise (I am) but she went to see what all the hoopla was about. The ending of the movie does lend itself to a sequel and she didn't like how it ended especially with all them open questions that have yet to be answered. According to the net, Scott may direct Prometheus 2 after the Blade Runner sequel...

The problem with this movie is quite simple, it managed to

break immersion in the first five minutes.

It also continued at this pace. Essentially the direction took a giant **** on common sense of the plot, science fiction, and how characters acted (ooo look alien thing, lets pet it!)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Is the article messed up? I understand 26H2 is in Beta, now Build 28020.2308. I'm not even sure what this is supposed to mean: "..... Microsoft is officially moving the Experimental Channel to version 26H2." And...would you please fix your graphics. They are outdated and don't fit the article.
    • The Light of Life? We actually do glow till our Death, study finds by Sayan Sen Image by Rafael Rendon via Pexels A study by researchers at the University of Calgary has found that living organisms produce an extremely faint light known as ultraweak photon emission, and that this glow appears to drop significantly after death. The research was published in the Journal of Physical Chemistry in April 2025 and quickly drew widespread attention, leading to more than 200 news stories about the findings. Ultraweak photon emission (or UPE), sometimes called biophoton emission, refers to tiny amounts of light released by living cells as a result of normal biological activity. A photon is the basic particle of light, and researchers say every living system examined so far, including plants and animals, has been found to emit these photons. The glow is far too faint to be seen by the human eye. “I suppose it has a little to do with people being reminded of auras,” says Dr. Christoph Simon, PhD, one of the authors of the study and a professor in the Department of Physics and Astronomy in the Faculty of Science. “It is a fact that living beings glow. It’s a very weak glow, but it’s there and visible with very sensitive cameras.” According to the study, the light involved is extremely weak, ranging from 10 to 1,000 photons per square centimetre per second across a spectral range of 200 to 1,000 nanometres. For comparison, a nanometre is one-billionth of a metre and is commonly used to measure wavelengths of light. Detecting emissions at such low levels requires highly specialized equipment. To study the phenomenon, researchers used electron-multiplying charge-coupled device (EMCCD) and charge-coupled device (CCD) cameras. These imaging systems are designed to detect extremely small amounts of light, including individual photons, while minimizing background noise. The technology allowed researchers to capture signals that would otherwise be impossible to observe. The team worked with the Human Health Therapeutics Research Centre at the National Research Council of Canada (NRC) in Ottawa to examine photon emissions in mice. Researchers took two-hour exposure images of the animals before and after death and compared the results. “We saw that the level of light that they emit – this biophoton glow – is distinctly different between living and dead animals,” says Dr. Daniel Oblak, PhD, an associate professor in Physics and Astronomy and the corresponding author of the study. The images showed a clear decrease in photon emissions after death across the entire body of each mouse. According to the researchers, this provided direct evidence that living and dead tissue produce different levels of ultraweak photon emission. “It’s a very small amount and it’s, of course, very tricky to detect,” Oblak says. The study grew out of discussions between Simon, whose research interests include quantum biology, and Oblak, whose work focuses on detecting light for quantum communication experiments. Quantum biology is a field that explores whether processes described by quantum physics, which studies matter and energy at very small scales, may also play a role in living systems. “Since I work as a quantum physicist on light detection for quantum communication, I thought that experimentally we have a lot of the tools to be able to detect the light,” Oblak explains. The researchers also investigated UPE in plants and found that the light changed in response to stress. When plants were exposed to higher temperatures or physically injured, their photon emissions increased. Chemical treatments also affected the glow. Among the substances tested, the local anesthetic benzocaine produced the strongest emission response when applied to injured plant tissue. These findings suggest that ultraweak photon emission is closely linked to biochemical and metabolic activity inside living organisms. Metabolism refers to the chemical reactions that allow cells and organisms to stay alive and function. Because these reactions change when an organism experiences stress, injury or disease, researchers believe UPE may provide a way to monitor those changes. The researchers stress that the glow is a physical and biological phenomenon, not a metaphysical one. Oblak says more research is needed to understand exactly how the light is produced and what information it may reveal about the condition of living tissue. “We must understand what that is to figure out what’s happening,” he says. “If we can understand how that relates to certain influences on the body – stress, diseases – then that could be used as a diagnostic tool.” The researchers believe the technique could eventually help scientists study health and disease without invasive procedures. Because UPE can be measured without adding dyes, markers or labels, it may offer a way to monitor whether tissue is healthy, damaged or alive. In plants, it could help researchers better understand how organisms respond to injury, heat and other forms of stress. While the work is still in its early stages, the study demonstrates that ultraweak photon emission imaging can provide a non-invasive and label-free way to observe biological activity. Researchers say the approach could become a useful tool for studying vitality, stress responses and other important processes in both animals and plants. Source: University of Calgary, ACS publication This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Damn, I loved this show back in the day.  
    • Rufus 4.15.2393 Beta 2 by Razvan Serea Rufus is a small utility that helps format and create bootable USB flash drives, such as USB keys/pendrives, memory sticks, etc. Despite its small size, Rufus provides everything you need! Oh, and Rufus is fast. For instance it's about twice as fast as UNetbootin, Universal USB Installer or Windows 7 USB download tool, on the creation of a Windows 7 USB installation drive from an ISO (with honorable mention to WiNToBootic for managing to keep up). It is also marginally faster on the creation of Linux bootable USBs from ISOs. A non-exhaustive list of Rufus supported ISOs is available here. It can be especially useful for cases where: you need to create USB installation media from bootable ISOs (Windows, Linux, UEFI, etc.) you need to work on a system that doesn't have an OS installed you need to flash a BIOS or other firmware from DOS you want to run a low-level utility Rufus 4.15.2393 Beta 2 changelog: Add RISC-V 64 support to UEFI:NTFS Improve the guards for using the "silent" option Improve the ability to cancel during write retries Improve progress reporting for compressed image extraction Fix unrestricted XML entity expansion and integer overflow in ezxml parser (courtesy of @esadowski4) [GHSA-55r2-34wg-8mv9] Fix "silent" Windows installation failing at 75% in most cases [#2960] Fix a crash during boot when using UEFI:NTFS on Snapdragon X based ARM64 platforms [#2934] Fix the first WUE option always being checked by default [#2965] Fix an infinite loop when using Windows ISOs that contain multiple WIMs Fix "Enable runtime UEFI media validation" checkbox not always being properly enabled Other WUE improvements/fixes for OneDrive removal and username validation (with thanks to @christian8641) [#2984, #2991] Download: Rufus 4.15 Beta 2 | 1.9 MB (Open Source) Links: Rufus Home Page | Project Page @GitHub | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Tixati 3.43 by Razvan Serea Tixati is a free and easy to use BitTorrent client featuring detailed views of all seed, peer, and file transfer properties. Also included are powerful bandwidth charting and throttling capabilities, and a full DHT implementation. Tixati is one of the most advanced and flexible BitTorrent clients available. And unlike many other clients, Tixati contains NO SPYWARE, NO ADS, and NO GIMMICKS. Tixati portable version is meant to run on a USB flash drive or other portable media. It stores all its configuration files in the same folder as the executable binary files, and all file paths are stored in a format relative to the program executable folder. It is important you do not delete the "tixati_portable_mode.txt" file within the executables folder. This file is what triggers Tixati to run in portable mode. (The executable binaries are actually the same as the standard edition binaries.) When running the portable edition from a USB flash drive, especially one that is formatted in FAT16/FAT32, you may experience some lag when initially loading a new transfer. This is because initializing and allocating large files on flash-based media consumes a greater amount of time and resources compared to a conventional hard-drive. Tixati has the following features: detailed views of all aspects of the swarm, including peers, pieces, files, and trackers support for magnet links, so no need to download .torrent files if a simple magnet-link is available super-efficient peer choking/unchoking algorithms ensure the fastest downloads peer connection encryption for added security full DHT (Distributed Hash Table) implementation for trackerless torrents, including detailed message traffic graphs and customizable event logging advanced bandwidth charting of overall traffic and per-transfer traffic, with separate classification of protocol and file bytes, and with separate classification of outbound traffic for trading and seeding highly flexible bandwidth throttling, including trading/seeding proportion adjustment and adjustable priority for individual transfers and peers bitfield graphs that show the completeness of all downloaded files, what pieces other peers have available, and the health of the overall swarm customizable event logging for each download, and individual event logs for all peers within the swarm expert local file management functions which allow you to move files to a different partition even while downloading is still in progress 100% compatible with the BitTorrent protocol Windows and Linux-GTK native versions available Tixati 3.43 changelog: Several major DHT improvements Added several screening heuristics to filter malicious DHT nodes, prevent Sybil floods Rewrote DHT search algorithms to add support for multi-path lookups Improved DHT logging, more details in several error messages Extended timeout lengths for outgoing queries over I2P Added incoming query / response per second to DHT table status display Updated Regex engine to PCRE2 Faster Search function, scans channel user profiles in much less time Fixed problems with file name parsing and date handling in RSS Faster and more accurate RSS filtering and episode number detection Several optimizations to global text processing functions, such as UTF-8 cleaning, line splitting, and token parsing Complete update of port-mapping UPNP/NAT-PMP engine, added PCP support, mapping over VPN support, and more Several refinements to default gateway detection on Windows / Android, which is used for port-mapping Support for IPv6 interface-scoped addresses, which is sometimes needed for IPv6 gateway detection and port mapping Full support for PCP port remapping, added backup zero-port query in case requested port is rejected New UPNP/NAT-PMP Monitor in Help > Diagnostics New reflected local port/location tracker that analyzes DHT replies to detect true port/location and NAT mapping type New TCP/UDP Ports monitor in Help > Diagnostics, with several statistic and information tabs, and a detailed event log Calculated/reflected local port is now used for port parameter in tracker queries and peer handshake Fixed several problems with Linux Wayland compatibility Completely replaced tray icon functions in Linux, new SNI implementation is now the default with GSI backup Implemented full DBus-Menu server to be used by new SNI tray icon implementation Replaced Linux tray balloon notification DBus client Rewrote auto-shutdown DBus interface for Linux Rewrote sleep inhibit DBus interface for Linux Dropped deprecated Linux dbus-glib dependencies Completely new Windows asynchronous file handling, now using IOCP model with several block-alignment optimizations Better handling of system network resets and interface down/up cycles Added option to fully clear configuration in Settings > Import/Export Remember last option checkboxes when using Import/Export Fixed minor I2P incoming connection routing problems Much faster I2P vanity host name finder Much faster channel user vanity key finder Raised length limit for torrent tracker remote failure messages to 120 from 64 Fixed problems setting download location on a torrent before the meta info is resolved Added location/MOC paths to category pane tooltips Several minor Web Interface fixes Refinements to static and scrolling ellipsizing layout routines Several fixes and improvements to single and multi-line text edit controls Many other minor fixes throughout the user interface A major overhaul of the Android framework has also been done: API target raised to 35, page alignment set to 16K Rewrote all inset processing routines Full rewrite of foreground service, application, and main activity objects New permission request routines Added multi-cast lock request before UPNP/LPDP discovery operations Fixed file permission and locking problems when loading .torrent from web browsers Fixed problems with Z-ordering of modal / non-modal and popup windows Fixed handling of back gesture on newer OS Added status bar icon adjustment based on status bar background color Added option in Settings > UI > Behavior to continue running in tray when task removed from recents App can be closed by swiping away notification Rewrote IME interface, fixed several problems with auto-correct, on-screen keyboard visibility, and cursor positioning Added full support for Android hardware mouse and keyboard function Added full tooltip implementation for Android hovering via mouse or other cursor device Full rewrite of popup menu widgets to better support hardware pointers and keyboard Added mouse cursor updating framework for Android hovering Added Settings > Import/Export to Android builds Added language file support to Android builds Download: Tixati 64-bit | Tixati 32-bit ~20.0 MB (Freeware) Download: Portable Tixati 3.43 | 114.0 MB Download: Tixati 3.43 for Linux | Android View: Tixati Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      514
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      83
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!