Recommended Posts

I've decent hardware already (vista capable before i bought it), its just my old habit to tweak system, isn't that yours too? I've another old system with P4 and Geforce 6800 and if I install XP, I can watch 1080p movies without any problem but thats not going to happen with Vista or 7 :D (even if i put decent hardware with this 6800 card)

One thing I agree, 7 is anytime better then Vista (just won't be better then my XP) :p

Tweaking of the services is not necessary in Vista and Windows 7 due to a new priority IO system introduced in Vista and further refined in Windows 7 by adding a run only when needed policy. Your programs will get all the resources they need without any intervention on your part because of this.

Over-tweaking is one of the major causes of performance degradation in Vista because people who know enough to be dangerous disable services the OS uses to tune performance. One example is ReadyBoost. It is really popular for some people to disable ReadyBoost because they think they will never use the feature. The problem with that philosophy is that other things besides ReadyBoost use that exact same service. There is a feature in both Vista and Windows 7 called ReadyBoot that uses that service along with Prefetching and Superfetch to tune boot times. Disabling any of these services will result in boot time degradation.

You should quit reading Black Viper and others that have not caught up with the technologies in Vista/Win 7. If you feel the need to tweak something, turn off Defender as that will give you a perceivable performance boost and Defender is useless. Do it from the Application itself as it will disable that service for you. Other than that, there is really not much outside of turning off desktop effect on skimpy graphics hardware (Intel I am looking squarely at you on this one!) that will boost performance.

The best tweak guide for Vista (Much of it applies to 7 too) is located here.

You're talking about to the login screen, right? I think from login screen to desktop it fades. Not sure about boot screen to login screen though, I believe you're right.

The fade is nice, but in all honesty, I plan on using my computer, not watching it boot so it's not really much of an issue for me.

Still being honest here, as much as I like 7, I still like the look of Vista's taskbar. I was messing with 7 the other night, and I'm not sure whether I simply didn't try hard enough or what, but it doesn't seem to be possible to get that same dark shade as Vista's. Looks more grayish or something if I remember correctly. Will have to go home and fool with it again to be sure, but if I had any complaint, it'd be that.

The other thing that doesn't feel right to me is the start button. I just... don't like it. Vista's start button fit in perfectly, but with 7, it just feels like they threw it there and didn't bother looking at it again. I dunno though...

From boot screen to login screen...no fade effect that was present in Vista, and as my original statement, I liked better.

I like Win7 Taskbar better, but in vista when you maximized a window it would change to black and removed transparency, which looks a lot better than the mess of having a translucent taskbar in Win7

I don't think we are talking about the same thing here - I'm referring to the fade effect while your comp boots.

Well said, but the people (avarage joe) who are on XP and stayed away from Vista, looking at Win7 - why would they switch? - They will think Vista 1.5 at most and stay with their trusted and familliar XP... now if MS would offer something that did not remind average joe's of vista, like new UI, theme or whatever, than I believe people will jump ship.

I completely disagree. The average Joe stayed away from Vista because it had such a bad rep. One of my friends (not tech savvy at all) was looking for a computer, and he said: "You know, this laptop is great but it's got Vista! I HATE Vista!" Did he even try Vista to say that? No, but he heard so much crap about it that he automatically rejected it.

Now with 7 it's a totally different story. People are raving about it, and there's a very very positive image associated with it, unlike poor Vista. Some people go as far as to say 7 is faster than XP in their system. There's this extremely positive image surrouding it and trust me, they're going to be hearing about it and that's a HUGE reason to want to upgrade. I bet most people won't think this is Vista's successor, they'll just think this is "that great new OS Microsoft is releasing and everyone seems to be very excited about it". :)

I completely disagree. The average Joe stayed away from Vista because it had such a bad rep. One of my friends (not tech savvy at all) was looking for a computer, and he said: "You know, this laptop is great but it's got Vista! I HATE Vista!" Did he even try Vista to say that? No, but he heard so much crap about it that he automatically rejected it.

Now with 7 it's a totally different story. People are raving about it, and there's a very very positive image associated with it, unlike poor Vista. Some people go as far as to say 7 is faster than XP in their system. There's this extremely positive image surrouding it and trust me, they're going to be hearing about it and that's a HUGE reason to want to upgrade. I bet most people won't think this is Vista's successor, they'll just think this is "that great new OS Microsoft is releasing and everyone seems to be very excited about it". :)

I dunno, are people going to think it's not Vista when they are looking at a laptop at Best Buy? - It looks almost exactly like vista? And with that it's bad rep. Sure it has a lot of positives, but to whom, my non tech savvy dad or mom? They have seen Vista and it has a bad taste in their mouths, they will need to see a different UI to make a purchase of a new OS ? They need to think that THIS new OS is nothing like Vista.

SO do I. I find myself fumbling trying to find opened application in Win 7. I hope they include an option to enable quick launch.

as far as I understand - it's RC and that will not change... that's why my cosmetic hopes for Win7 was crushed... I don't think nothing will change from this point on. Most believe it's all bug fixes from this point on.

Win95 to win98 looked almost the same as paralleled to Vista -> going to Win7 ? but the big difference here is that win95 was a major success and had both enthusiast and average Joes AGREEING that windows was awesome, the same thing cannot be said with Vista. That's why I think they need to change the look of Win7?.

Seems? It just reached RC. It is unfinished.

Ahh read up... nobody believes that anything will change from this point on, at least not drastically such as UI - it's all bug fixes from this point on.

That option has been there the whole time. It's called Toolbars. Quick Launch is now redundant with the new superbar.

Right, I don't know why everyone's crying over the lack of quicklaunch, when the new toolbar is way, way, way better.

Right, I don't know why everyone's crying over the lack of quicklaunch, when the new toolbar is way, way, way better.

I agree - I love the new taskbar. it's the toolbar I hate in Win7 - It's fugly, no icons and hate the shade used. I think we will see are refinement of this RC2...look unfinished. But yeah taskbar = awesome.

I agree - I love the new taskbar. it's the toolbar I hate in Win7 - It's fugly, no icons and hate the shade used. I think we will see are refinement of this RC2...look unfinished. But yeah taskbar = awesome.

There isn't going to be a RC2.

7 looks more modern than Vista by a wide margin, even on my netbook 7 looks like an OS of today whereas with Vista on my PC and 24" screen it still resembles the "Windows" look.

C'mon really...???? Windows is so far away from using a graphic cards capacity; it's not even funny...have you played games on your PC or Xbox recently? - Look at their menu system and UI, they're graphically rich and look wonderful - except for the transparency, what is so special with the current UI that XP did not do? fip 3D...WOW, I'm sure in 2009 we can have something a little bit more of a WOW factor!!!

C'mon really...???? Windows is so far away from using a graphic cards capacity; it's not even funny...have you played games on your PC or Xbox recently? - Look at their menu system and UI, they're graphically rich and look wonderful - except for the transparency, what is so special with the current UI that XP did not do? fip 3D...WOW, I'm sure in 2009 we can have something a little bit more of a WOW factor!!!

You must be joking, right?

There's a really fine line to walk between a visually pleasing UI and one catered to flashy in-game UIs or those you see in movies. Yes they're cool, yes they're full of WOW, but would you be saying those things after seeing them for the 500th time?

OS X is slightly better than Windows in this department, but not by much. The visual effects in that OS are also nice and subtle, without going too over the top.

The key word here is subtle. For something to be visually pleasing it must stay pleasing on its first look and after many many encounters by a majority of its users. Some people would be fatigued at seeing exploding or wobbly windows after a while, stuff that Compiz does on Linux.

Please don't bother linking to the Longhorn concepts of 2003 or that concept video released a few weeks ago - they're just that, concepts. Flashy demonstrations that, for the time being, don't translate well into reality.

Everyone's entitled to their opinion. And while I respect yours, I disagree on every single point you brought up. I get the same feeling about 7 compared to Vista as I did with Vista compared to XP (visually). I think 7 is fantastic. And while I still love Vista's feel and appearance, 7 is a vast improvement.

And don't even get me started on that archaic, UGLY XP :D

I agree 100%. Vista is to Win 7 as The Swine Flu is to Good Health. :rolleyes:

Windows 7 is huge steps ahead of vista in the UI windows 7 is less cluttered the issue with Vista was users complained it was to clutter and had a rough feel and look to it . Windows 7 is near perfect if you ask me it is.

now as for the longhorn concept well when Jim alchin at the time project leader for windows long/vista everything they talked about as for user experience and scenarios never happen at least not on screen the words during some of his Winhec speeches talking about longhorn and or some of the concept UIs using an animation program to do them never matched but now you can look back at what he talked about and finally see that vision come to life in windows 7 it is almost to a T the vision Jim alchin and his windows team tried to show us but failed. Windows 7 is by a whole new team and they took a good 90% of that vision and what not and made it reality

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "What an interesting smell you've discovered"
    • It could EASILY be 70 for the base game BUT + lots of FOMO to make it up to 100-120, like a few days Early Access, online money, pre-order bonus cars, weapons, missions, clothing, avatars or profile stuff, etc... And still WAY TOO MANY people would buy those and make Rockstar insane money.
    • Just to understand: your solution to getting rid of an online password manager is...another online password manager?
    • Cjam 2.5.0.0 by Razvan Serea Cjam is a lightweight and fast MP3 editor for Windows that lets you cut, join, and edit MP3 files without re-encoding. This means your audio quality remains untouched, and edits happen instantly. Cjam is ideal for quick, lossless edits—whether you're trimming music, combining tracks, or preparing audio for learning tools or podcasts. It features batch processing, scripting support, cue and playlist file handling, and a simple interface. Cjam is perfect for anyone who needs efficient MP3 editing without the complexity of full audio suites. Cjam requires a PC running Windows 10 or later and Microsoft .NET 6.0 or later. Key features for Cjam: No Re-encoding: Edit MP3 files without losing quality. Cut and Join MP3: Easily cut, trim, and combine MP3 tracks. Batch Processing: Edit multiple files at once for faster workflows. Scriptable Interface: Automate tasks with a custom command language. Cue and Playlist Support: Handle CUE and playlist files for seamless audio management. Fast and Lightweight: Quick processing with minimal system resources. Lossless Audio Editing: Ensure your edits don't affect audio quality. Simple User Interface: Clean, intuitive design for easy navigation. File Format Support: Works with MP3, Cjam-specific file formats (CJAMC, CJAMJ, CJAM). Cjam 2.5.0.0 changelog: Added clipboard-based import/export support for mp3DirectCut Added clipboard-based export support for REAPER Added support for naming IMP3 elements Changed the Reset behavior to preserve Undo/Redo history; use Shift key + Reset button to clear it Added a new command parameter (qcp) Added 8 new entries to lang.txt (main_c124-126, main_d150-151, main_m082, vme_c014, vme_d005) Fixed a bug where the il parameter was incorrectly applied when pasting VMP3s into the main list Fixed several other minor bugs Download: Cjam 2.5.0.0 | 1.4 MB (Freeware) Links: Cjam Home Page | Cjam Manual | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      91
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!