Recommended Posts

oops I meant "Vista looks better THAN Win7"

Don't get me wrong, win7 is fast stable and reliable...no question it's better...but cosmetically, I'm afraid it's not.

People are not going to be able to tell this is a new version of windows, as it looks way too much like Vista. They may just not upgrade thinking its just vista, and vista has a bad rep.

But in cosmetic dept.

These are the things I prefer in Vista.

-Fade in into the login screen - not in win7 it just abruptly pop-ups after boot screen ? not very elegant.

Never noticed it. Don't particularly care as I skip the login screen.

-Toolbar is plain looking in win7 with no icons - this looked much better in vista.

I much prefer the Windows 7 taskbar. I love clean and minimal interfaces.

-Start orb glow in win7 looks odd

Not really, but I'm using 7000. I know they changed it a bit in later builds, though.

-Transparency when window is maximized does not look good at all ? should be black like in vista. Same with the taskbar.

Have to absolutely disagree with you here. The black in Vista really turned me off. I really, really hated it.

-Default background for login and installation ? it?s nice and all ? a little feminine looking but it really does not make the login screen look good or modern. And the white font ?windows 7 ultimate? at the bottom blend in too much with the background.

Don't know what you're referring to, sorry.

-The animations while coping or moving or deleting files is pretty ugly and looked better in Vista.

The animations are fine, IMHO.

That?s about it.

But although I love Win 7 so much more than Vista (win 7 screams) cosmetically win7 seems unfinished.

Edit - I would like to add the following.

--The boot screen in Win7 - is leaps and bounds better than Vista. It's hard to explain, but I get the sense that it's modern/futuristic and a look (peek) into what is coming for Win7

OK.

You're entitled to your opinion, but I think the Windows 7 GUI is leaps and bounds better than the Vista GUI.

Please don't bring Black Vipers guide into all of this. How Windows 7 handles it's services is different from Vista or XP.

Windows 7 uses "triggers" to start services only when you need them. Disabling loads of services makes little to no difference and you are only crippling Windows 7's features by doing so.

Also to add onto my post. While the argument that Windows 7 doesn't look much different from Vista, Windows 98 didn't look more different than Windows 95, Windows 98SE didn't look much different than Windows 98FE, Windows ME didn't look much different than Windows 98SE and Windows 2000 didn't look much different than Windows ME, 98FE/SE or Windows 95, but at the end of the day is, they were different, not visually, but under the hood, they were.

If anything, the one version of Windows which does look out of place is XP with it's stupid blue/silver/olive green/zune/royale themes.

Please don't bring Black Vipers guide into all of this. How Windows 7 handles it's services is different from Vista or XP.

Windows 7 uses "triggers" to start services only when you need them. Disabling loads of services makes little to no difference and you are only crippling Windows 7's features by doing so.

Also to add onto my post. While the argument that Windows 7 doesn't look much different from Vista, Windows 98 didn't look more different than Windows 95, Windows 98SE didn't look much different than Windows 98FE, Windows ME didn't look much different than Windows 98SE and Windows 2000 didn't look much different than Windows ME, 98FE/SE or Windows 95, but at the end of the day is, they were different, not visually, but under the hood, they were.

If anything, the one version of Windows which does look out of place is XP with it's stupid blue/silver/olive green/zune/royale themes.

Using the classic theme all of them look like W98, with the blue gradient bar... oh, and Royale rules :p

oops I meant "Vista looks better THAN Win7"

Don't get me wrong, win7 is fast stable and reliable...no question it's better...but cosmetically, I'm afraid it's not.

People are not going to be able to tell this is a new version of windows, as it looks way too much like Vista. They may just not upgrade thinking its just vista, and vista has a bad rep.

But in cosmetic dept.

These are the things I prefer in Vista.

-Fade in into the login screen - not in win7 it just abruptly pop-ups after boot screen ? not very elegant.

-Toolbar is plain looking in win7 with no icons - this looked much better in vista.

-Start orb glow in win7 looks odd

-Transparency when window is maximized does not look good at all ? should be black like in vista. Same with the taskbar.

-Default background for login and installation ? it?s nice and all ? a little feminine looking but it really does not make the login screen look good or modern. And the white font ?windows 7 ultimate? at the bottom blend in too much with the background.

-The animations while coping or moving or deleting files is pretty ugly and looked better in Vista.

That?s about it.

But although I love Win 7 so much more than Vista (win 7 screams) cosmetically win7 seems unfinished.

Edit - I would like to add the following.

--The boot screen in Win7 - is leaps and bounds better than Vista. It's hard to explain, but I get the sense that it's modern/futuristic and a look (peek) into what is coming for Win7

Windows 7 has a newer appearence with how you deal with things, also you just have to think that Windows 7 isn't finished and Vista is now upto SP2 RTM.

wow OP is on glue lol :D

Windows 7 got it right this time around in terms of UI, i liked it since beta and its ever so slightly more refined now... in fact awhile back when i was still using XP (i use Vista as my primary atm) i wanted XP to look like Windows 7 does today, believe it or not

i can't even go back to using Vistas default theme now, i'd prob be angry all the time haha, instead i use http://giannisgx89.deviantart.com/

this guys 'Windows 7 Style for Vista'

Like i've said, Vista's UI was great but Windows 7 builds on this and makes it more refined, more snappier and more efficient. Looking at XP now (after using Vista/7) its just so archaic, so inefficient and even more important, UGLY!

To a slight, slight degree I agree with the OP, but If Microsoft keeps the skin the way it is, ill be very happy.

And there isnt anything stopping them creating a new skin (not GUI), why dont they make it slightly less blue? And change the fish wallpaper haha.

The fish is a Betta. It's just a pun. :) I'm sure it'll be gone for RTM.

Well well I also want to throw in my honest opinion, Win 7 looks waay better then Vista.

I'm a user that customizes his Windows to no end and goes for eyecandy to the max. I love changing every part of an OS to make it look like I want and the default Windows UIs where always plain boring for me. Yeah sure XPs Luna finally made Windows stop looking like a gray something but in exchange it felt a little like some child toy.

When I installed Vista Beta 2 I was overwhelmed at first by the beauty and freshness of AERO but soon I realized there was still a bit of a XPs/98s feeling in it after it went RTM. Sorry I can't point my finger on it, it's just a feeling I have when I use Vista. Also I never liked this greenish color Vista had, of course different people like different colors but this color which could not decide if it was green or blue together with that babyblue at most places and the black maximized Windows quickly became annoying for me.

So now we are at Win7... when I first booted build 7000 I was like... wow..... this looks like Vista but it's so pretty from start to end. (Not to mention the bootscreen) No more annoying colors or black stuff, just a 100% modern looking, for the most part consistent AERO UI. I don't even felt like customizing it much, it was the first default Computer UI which I was happy with. And that comes from someone who used everything from Win98 upwards, Linux and OSX. I can't even sense a bit of this Win98/XP feeling for the most time, just in some rare places like Device Manager.

It's really as someone said here before, Vistas UI was a cocoon and 7s UI is the beautiful butterfly that evolved from it.

The only things I would like to see change in RTM are the removal of the few remaining things that where 1:1 taken over from Vista like the Close, Maximize and Minimize buttons, a fresh soundset along with a fresh iconset to shake off the last bit of old Vistaness.

Now for the OP (man this is the longest post I've ever written^^):

- I agree the fade on login was nice.

- I think the text toolbar blends well with the rest of the UI but it should be the users choice.

- I disagree, the start glow fits just fine.

- The black maximized borders where just a horrible distraction if you switched to fullscreen.

- What about it is feminine? I think it has a nice fresh look to it. (It's the same with the color pink... everyone thinks pink is a girls color whilst it is a totally normal color like blue, yellow etc. just our society taught us pink = girl)

- Ummm the animations look the same it's just they changed it to a matching color oO

Conclusion, as said Win7 has the most polished default UI I've ever seen and is by no means unfinished.

The last thing I want to talk about, I think most people just talk bad about new UIs because ever since Win95 they are used to how Windows works since the most basic things never changed and whenever some radical UI changes are introduced like the Ribbon UI people have to relearn everything because what they know does not apply anymore.

Whilst I agree this can be tough for companies and such I believe that exploring a new OS can be quite a fun thing for a normal user.

When I first used Office 2007 I almost found nothing. But I didn't accursed Microsoft and their damn new Ribbon UI, I just threw most things I knew about Office out of the window and started to discover the new Ribbon UI. After a very short amount of time I was able to use office as fast as before if not faster.

Same with Win7, out of my habit I clicked on the last point in the context menu to access screen resolutions which lead me to Personalize.

I was a bit like... umm... okay... then looked again and found it instantly. I wont blame and say Microsoft put it back where it was, I just will adapt. Technological innovations and evolution cannot happen if the users aren't willing to evolve and adapt themselves.

I believe that's a major point of Microsoft why they don't want to make a total revolution of Windows, they are scared that the userbase isn't willing to adept a learn from anew.

But if people hadn't done this in the past we would maybe still use text based OSs like DOS, I mean Bill Gates didn't said "Oh making a Graphical User Interface for PCs wont work out, people are used to text based input and a scared of new things..."

There ends my longest post ever, and remember it's all my personal opinion ;)

Oh and how would I get this small "quicklaunch thingy"?

post-107785-1241110576_thumb.png

Edited by SkyDX
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • As I've been usually saying lately - we all can thank "AI" for this.
    • Friday Windows 11 preview builds are here. Insiders in the Experimental (formerly Dev) and Beta Channel can download builds 26300.8697 and 26220.8690. My Windows11 device on the Preview Channel just got 26220.8728. My guess is this build is a nightly update from 26220.8690.
    • Traffic has a surprisingly unexpected impact on your surroundings by Sayan Sen Image by Radik 2707 via Pexels A collaborative study by researchers from several Israeli institutions found that everyday pollution from traffic and industrial activity measurably changed the atmospheric electric field over the Tel Aviv metropolitan area, providing new evidence of how human activity can influence the lower atmosphere. The research was led by Dr. Roy Yaniv of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and the Gertner Institute at Sheba Medical Center, Dr. Assaf Hochman of the Fredy & Nadine Herrmann Institute of Earth Sciences at the Hebrew University, and Prof. Yoav Yair of Reichman University. The study also involved Itay Froomer, a student from Hadera High School and the Israeli Museum of Medicine and Science (Technoda), who carried out the work as part of the Ministry of Education's 5-unit physics research track. The researchers focused on the atmospheric electric field under fair-weather conditions. Even in the absence of storms, a weak electric field naturally exists between Earth's surface and the atmosphere. One of the main ways scientists measure this field is through the Potential Gradient (PG), which is the inverse of the vertical component of the electric field. PG is a key part of the global electric circuit, a planet-wide system of electrical currents maintained by thunderstorms and electrified clouds around the world. Scientists have long known that the atmospheric electric field can be influenced by factors ranging from large-scale atmospheric processes to local weather conditions such as dust, fog and clouds. Human-made pollution is also known to play a role, but understanding exactly how urban emissions affect the electric field close to the ground has remained an area of ongoing research. To investigate this relationship, the team analyzed measurements from a newly installed electric field mill, an instrument used to continuously monitor the strength of the atmospheric electric field. The instrument was installed at the Center for Technological Education (Roter House) in Holon and became operational in August 2024. It was funded by Israel's Ministry of Education and the Holon municipality. The electric field mill forms part of a broader monitoring network that includes nearby meteorological stations and air-quality monitoring sites. This allowed researchers to compare electric field measurements with detailed weather data and pollution records to better understand what was driving changes in the Potential Gradient. The study focused on two major urban pollutants: fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and nitrogen oxides (NOx), both commonly produced by vehicle traffic and industrial activity. PM2.5 refers to microscopic airborne particles small enough to remain suspended in the atmosphere for extended periods, while NOx is a group of gases released during fuel combustion. Researchers examined daily, weekly and seasonal patterns in the atmospheric electric field and compared them with changes in pollutant concentrations. Their analysis revealed a clear relationship between NOx levels and changes in the Potential Gradient, particularly during morning and evening rush hours when traffic emissions were at their highest. “What we observe is a direct physical link between emission peaks and electrical variability,” explained Dr. Roy Yaniv. “NOx reduces atmospheric conductivity very quickly, so the electric field responds almost instantaneously during traffic rush hours.” Atmospheric conductivity describes how easily electrical charges move through the air. According to the researchers, nitrogen oxides rapidly alter this conductivity, causing a near-immediate response in the electric field. PM2.5, however, was associated with a delayed response. The researchers attributed this difference to the particles' longer atmospheric residence time, meaning they remain in the atmosphere for longer periods, as well as their different microphysical interactions with surrounding air and atmospheric components. The study also identified a pronounced "weekend effect." In Israel, traffic volumes and some industrial activity decline significantly on Fridays and Saturdays. During these periods, concentrations of both NOx and PM2.5 dropped, and corresponding changes were observed in the atmospheric electric field. “The weekend signal demonstrates just how sensitive the electric field is to changes in human activity,” the researchers noted. “When emissions decline, the electrical environment adjusts at once, providing a high-resolution indicator of urban atmospheric conditions.” The findings showed that pollution levels can influence not only the chemical composition of the atmosphere but also its electrical properties. Researchers said the results strengthened the case for using atmospheric electricity as an additional tool for environmental monitoring, particularly in densely populated urban areas where anthropogenic, or human-caused, influences are most pronounced. The study also pointed to potential public health applications. By combining air-quality measurements with observations of atmospheric electricity, researchers said they could gain a more complete picture of how urban atmospheric conditions change over time. “Integrating air-quality data with electric-field measurements gives us a clearer picture of how the lower atmosphere evolves moment by moment,” the researchers added. “It’s a framework that can support both scientific insight and practical environmental decision-making.” Beyond the scientific findings, the project highlighted a collaboration between universities, public institutions and secondary education. Researchers said the work demonstrated how students could take part in real-world environmental research while contributing to studies of air quality, atmospheric processes and their potential effects on society. Source: Hebrew University, ScienceDirect This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • We aren't even at the all-star game and Microsoft is talking about an update that will most likely be released during the World Series if not after. A lot can happen in the world between now and the 2026 World Series, including the 2026 FIFA Cup. Tell me about it again after the FIFA Cup is concluded. That should allow plenty of time to prepare for it.
    • Great, tell me when I have a "Bad Pool Caller" elsewhere not in Windoze.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      540
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      186
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      79
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      77
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!