Pirates cost software industry $50 billion in 2008


Recommended Posts

Washington, DC - A fifth of PC software in the United States is pirated and the worldwide cost of piracy topped $50bn for the first time, says the annual report from IDC and the Business Software Alliance (BSA). Despite US piracy running at just 20%, market size means megabuck losses - over $9 billion in 2008.

The worldwide PC software piracy rate rose for the second year in a row, from 38 percent to 41 percent, because PC shipments grew fastest in high-piracy countries such as China and India, overwhelming progress elsewhere.

While emerging economies account for 45 percent of the global PC hardware market, they account for less than 20 percent of the PC software market. If the emerging economies' PC software share were the same as it is for PC hardware, the software market would grow by $40 billion a year. Lowering global piracy by just one point a year would add $20 billion in stimulus to the IT industry, says the report.

The monetary value of unlicensed software broke the $50 billion level for the first time. Worldwide losses grew by 11 percent to $53.0 billion in non-adjusted dollars, although half of that growth was the result of the falling U.S. dollar. Excluding the effect of exchange rates, losses grew by 5 percent to $50.2 billion. This compares to a legitimate PC software market of $88 billion in 2008, and a personal computer market of $244 billion.

"We are continuing to make progress against PC software piracy in many countries, which helps people working in the U.S.-led global software industry. That's the good news," said BSA President and CEO Robert Holleyman.

"The bad news is that PC software piracy remains so prevalent in the United States and all over the world," he added. "It undermines local IT service firms, gives illegal software users an unfair advantage in business, and spreads security risks. We should not and cannot tolerate a $9 billion hit on the software industry at a time of economic stress."

The lowest-piracy countries are the United States, Japan, New Zealand, and Luxembourg, all near 20 percent. The highest-piracy countries are Armenia, Bangladesh, Georgia, and Zimbabwe, all over 90 percent.

The highest-piracy regions are Central/Eastern Europe (67 percent) and Latin America (65 percent). The lowest regions are North America (21 percent) and the European Union (35 percent).

http://www.tgdaily.com/content/view/42401/140/

I don't know how I feel about this article. Mostly because a pirated piece of software does not necesarily equate to a loss in sales. But, it still doesn't look good for the PC market. I'm personally more concerned about the PC gaming market, as these numbers have to put a bad taste in the mouth of most developers.

edit: Sorry, I don't know if it's required but I forgot to put "[News]" in the title.

I don't know how I feel about this article. Mostly because a pirated piece of software does not necesarily equate to a loss in sales. But, it still doesn't look good for the PC market. I'm personally more concerned about the PC gaming market, as these numbers have to put a bad taste in the mouth of most developers.

Agreed completely. Also, with those percentages, maybe anti-piracy movements are in the wrong location? I think more should be done in other areas, especially with 90% etc.

Agreed completely. Also, with those percentages, maybe anti-piracy movements are in the wrong location? I think more should be done in other areas, especially with 90% etc.

Or make the prices more appropriate for those areas. After all, there's a reason why people choose a pirated piece of software rather than buying it.

When will these dumb asses get it through their heads that piracy is not a lost sale? If someone was thinking about downloading something then they were most likely not going to purchase it anyway. Now, if that same someone walked off with a physical boxed copy from a store, then that might mean something.

Or make the prices more appropriate for those areas. After all, there's a reason why people choose a pirated piece of software rather than buying it.

Exactly. If software developers could charge less in areas with a weaker economy, then most people there are less likely to pirate software. The numbers alone are scary. Imagine what the PC software market would be like without piracy. I'm sure we'd see more (and better) software.

When will these dumb asses get it through their heads that piracy is not a lost sale? If someone was thinking about downloading something then they were most likely not going to purchase it anyway. Now, if that same someone walked off with a physical boxed copy from a store, then that might mean something.

How is it any different? In the end, the person didn't pay for the software. Stealing is stealing. Pirating or otherwise, anyone who uses software without buying it is stealing. They're using software that they would have had to pay for in order to use.

*looks at title* .... Cue a legion of pirates looking for excuses and word play to downplay the effects of piracy.

Anyway, while I don't want this to happen for a while, the years we start going digital only for most media is when pirates possibly start losing. At least in terms of games, especially on consoles.

Closed platforms will be easy to regulate with digital content, handing out complete bans on consoles/accounts is a sure shot way to annoy the pirates.

All of these huge corporations, publishers and companies complaining about losses due to piracy have been soaking consumers, developers and artists for ages I have zero sympathy for them. If anything I hope they learn a lesson, you can only screw people for so long before people figure out a way to screw you back.

How is it any different? In the end, the person didn't pay for the software. Stealing is stealing. Pirating or otherwise, anyone who uses software without buying it is stealing. They're using software that they would have had to pay for in order to use.

Because a physical copy of the software is not missing. They can't claim it's a lost sale because it would never have been purchased to begin with. They didn't make or lose money on a pirated copy.

Most companys should realize that the global market means, lowering prices to get the software spread wider and not to ask for high prices to only enable a few to buy it and let the shareholders swimm faster in money instead of a more solid money pool.

The whole industry needs to shift away from that piracy panic, open up their apps/games, massively lower the price and go for quality, customer involvement, massive spread, neater more logical trials, better shop/page designs that have been measured in time and attractivity and how fast they find it etc.

They head just into the direction of less sales, more piracy and then they finally push the goverments to censor the internet and hurt the privacy of peoples.

Open up your mind and don't blame anyone... blaming is just a downward spiral...

Try to find out how to get them buy and more happy instead of concentrating on crying that they don't buy.

You should concentrate on what you and what the buyers want and not on what you don't want and what to change to kill the pirates... this will hurt your paying customers.

Face it and solve it, instead of cheaply whine and feed the antipiracy censorship and bad protections.

Ah... and forget about thoose big numbers... they don't know anything... they just see dollar signs on theyr eyes and think... ooh X pirates = $X profit.

But hey... they don't buy cause your way/software/price/shop/support... sucks, so don't think shutting off them will lead them to buy it.

And you can't estamine the number of sales from the number of global pirates...

Gosh theese peoples/companys shift away from reality and logical thinking more and more, hold their hands and sing the pirate song and how poor they are with doing nothing wrong and getting those bad pirates...

Open your eyes, finally open them!

The global market in the software and music industry will change and you need to adapt or you get massive losses.

Don't lead our way into censorship... lead it into a new bright future...

Bla...

Because a physical copy of the software is not missing. They can't claim it's a lost sale because it would never have been purchased to begin with. They didn't make or lose money on a pirated copy.

That makes no sense. Not all software is sold with physical media. A vast majority are sold online as downloads. Just because there isn't a physical copy doesn't mean they can't make money on it. Each time someone pirates software, it's a loss of what would have otherwise been a potential sale.

Edited by Anaron

I hate these kind of statistics. It's nearly impossible to trully estimate the losses. There are a million factors that you need to take into consideration. And even if we imagined that piracy didn't exist and everything would be perfect, I doubt the industry will earn 50 billions more. If piracy didn't exist a lot of people would simply do something else with their time or turn to freeware. And what about some of the crap they throw at users?

I'd say a lot of people pirate Photoshop. It must be one of the most pirated pieces of Software on the planet. But each pirated copy does not equate to a lost sale that is what these developers need to realise. How many people do you think would shell out ?535 for Photoshop if they couldn't pirate it?

I'm going to say none of the Home Users would buy it. Only freelancers who are making money out of using it and Businesses but these aren't the majority of people pirating it.

What this all means is, if you get rid of piracy your sales wont suddenly increase through the roof. Sure they may go up 1-2% but then you need to also consider all the pirates who played your game and recommended it via their blogs, forum posts and simple word of mouth which would have made more people pirate it or purchase it (which would have created either more buzz or more sales).

I'm of the opinion that Piracy of Big successful titles deminishes the revenue stream. But of the Little Small titles with zero marketting budgets it helps. I'm a developer myself and does annoy me when I think'Gee all those users pirating it could have bought it instead and made me so much more money'> but you just can't look at it like that it isn't so black and white.

Wow... $50 billion? Very true. Because every downloaded software/game/mp3 from the internet for free is a lost sale, right? :rolleyes:

Exactly, these kinds of estimates are totally random. They have no idea how many copies are downloaded and they have no idea how many of these downloads constitute a lost sale. So putting a number on it is just for the sensationalism.

That makes no sense. Not all software is sold with physical media. A vast majority are sold online as downloads. Just because there isn't a physical copy doesn't mean they can't make money on it. Each time someone pirates software, it's a loss of what would have otherwise been a potential sale.

If someone is going to pirate something, it was never a potential sale, let alone a lost sale. And you can't lose 50 billion that you never had to begin with.

If someone is going to pirate something, it was never a potential sale, let alone a lost sale. And you can't lose 50 billion that you never had to begin with.

Uhm...wrong. If it were completely impossible to pirate software, there WOULD be potential sales since anyone who would want it would have to consider the purchase.

You are correct on the loss of sale portion.

That makes no sense. Not all software is sold with physical media. A vast majority are sold online as downloads. Just because there isn't a physical copy doesn't mean they can't make money on it. Each time someone pirates software, it's a loss of what would have otherwise been a potential sale.

You said it right there. It is not loss of an actual sale, but a potential one. This is like the auto industry saying they lost billions of dollars last year because people chose to keep driving their old cars or buy a used car from someone else instead of buying a new car off the lot (neither of which makes the auto industry any money, but both were "potential sales").

Exactly, these kinds of estimates are totally random. They have no idea how many copies are downloaded and they have no idea how many of these downloads constitute a lost sale. So putting a number on it is just for the sensationalism.

+1

While I agree, as a software developer, that those who pirate software/content are potentially lost sales... what bothers me, or at least makes me wonder is how can anyone know how much is pirated? Really, what is the math on this? Did they catch 1000 pirates and quess that there are another 1000? Are they counting dollars based on who they caught? (That would be wrong too)

Does anyone have the math?

Otherwise it's just a guess.

Uhm...wrong. If it were completely impossible to pirate software, there WOULD be potential sales since anyone who would want it would have to consider the purchase.

But considering that piracy IS possible, anyone that wants something can get it for nothing and anyone that goes the piracy route would never buy it and therefore it would never have been a potential sale or a lost sale.

If someone is going to pirate something, it was never a potential sale, let alone a lost sale. And you can't lose 50 billion that you never had to begin with.

But it is a potential sale! The whole point of pirating software is to acquire it without having to pay for it. Anyone who pirates software either wants or needs it. That want or need results in a potential sale. Why? Simply because that person would have been forced to buy it if piracy didn't exist.

You said it right there. It is not loss of an actual sale, but a potential one. This is like the auto industry saying they lost billions of dollars last year because people chose to keep driving their old cars or buy a used car from someone else instead of buying a new car off the lot (neither of which makes the auto industry any money, but both were "potential sales").

Thank you!

But considering that piracy IS possible, anyone that wants something can get it for nothing and anyone that goes the piracy route would never buy it and therefore it would never have been a potential sale or a lost sale.

You're making quite the assumption there. Simply because someone pirates software doesn't mean they wouldn't buy software if piracy didn't exist. The person obviously wanted the software so the potential for that person to buy the software exists. You buy software, like any other item, because you want it (out of necessity or some other reason).

Here's an example: 50 people pirate software. Now, imagine piracy didn't exist. Out of that 50, chances are some of them will buy the software because they actually needed it. That's why it's a loss of a potential sale whenever someone pirates software.

Still not convinced? Perhaps you need to understand the definition of potential:

po-ten-tial [puh-ten-shuhl]

?adjectiveb>i>

  1. possible, as opposed to actualthe potential uses of nuclear energy. i>

http://www.tgdaily.com/content/view/42401/140/

I don't know how I feel about this article. Mostly because a pirated piece of software does not necesarily equate to a loss in sales. But, it still doesn't look good for the PC market. I'm personally more concerned about the PC gaming market, as these numbers have to put a bad taste in the mouth of most developers.

edit: Sorry, I don't know if it's required but I forgot to put "[News]" in the title.

The most pirated piece of software is Windows.

I think over 50% of pirated versions was a lost sale. Sure, there are people upgrading that may have not done so in the first place but I think that those number much less than 50%.

quite honestly it's greed that loses them money it's not the piracy. It's the fact some companies want to go out of their way to try sell software for hundreds if not thousands which keeps it out of the hands of general people who wish to use them. It's the quantity vs quality game in a sense. If you wanna make money make a good product offer at a decent at maximum $250 or less (think of software pricing etc under the hierarchy of the OS which should cost most then everything should fall under the cost umbrella of it accordingly.) then more people will buy it at a lower price so you still get good profit and many more users happy to dish out for it if it's worth it. Quality you can make a good program full of DRM and anti piracy measures charge $1,500 a business or two might buy a single license and employee will leak it won't make bugger all profit and general software and support quality will diminish till you get to vaporware. It's the key to all piracy really.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Samsung introduces new AI classroom tools and interactive displays at ISTELive 2026 by Fiza Ali Samsung has announced several new education-focused software features and interactive displays for schools during ISTELive 2026, taking place in Orlando, Florida, from 28 June to 1 July. The focus of these updates is on making shared classroom displays easier to use for teachers while giving IT administrators more control over managing devices. One of the key additions is the Samsung Account Management Solution (AMS). In many schools, multiple teachers share the same interactive display throughout the day, which means signing in and setting everything up can become repetitive. With AMS, teachers can log in by scanning a QR code or tapping an NFC-enabled ID card. Once signed in, their personalised workspace, including wallpapers, bookmarks, app shortcuts, and files, can be instantly accessed through Home Personalisation. Samsung has also included a screen lock feature, allowing teachers to lock the display if they need to step away briefly. Furthermore, the company is also updating its Education Portal with new tools designed for school IT administrators. The portal will allow IT administrators to register teachers, enrol devices, and manage user access from a central dashboard. Administrators can also link NFC cards to teacher accounts, making sign-ins quicker across shared displays. Another addition is a Tags feature that lets schools organise displays by building or classroom. Those tags can also be used to send emergency notifications to selected Samsung Interactive Displays through compatible platforms such as InformaCast and Raptor. Moreover, the tech giant's AI Assistant is gaining several new features aimed at supporting everyday classroom tasks such as lesson planning and classroom engagement. One of the features is Circle to Search, which lets teachers circle text or images on the display to quickly find related information, videos, or web results without interrupting the lesson. The content can then be brought into Samsung Whiteboard. Another feature, Live Transcript, converts spoken lessons into real-time captions, which could be useful for students with hearing impairments or those in multilingual classrooms. The AI Assistant also introduces AI Summary and AI Quiz. The summary tool creates summaries of recorded lessons, while AI Quiz generates questions based on lesson content so teachers can quickly check how well students are following along. Teachers signed in through Samsung AMS can also return to their previous AI-generated lesson materials without logging in again. Alongside the software updates, Samsung has expanded its Android-based Interactive Display range with three new models: the WAF-S, WAFX-PS, and WAHX-M. The WAF-S and WAFX-PS ship with Android 16, bringing updates to security, accessibility, and overall usability while maintaining compatibility with Google's education services including Google Classroom and Google Drive through EDLA certification. Meanwhile, the new WAHX-M is the biggest addition to the lineup, introducing a 98-inch display for larger spaces such as lecture halls and conference rooms. It will also be available in 65-inch, 75-inch and 86-inch sizes. Samsung says the WAHX-M further includes on-device AI features such as voice commands, text-to-speech, and an AI calculator, alongside support for Samsung AMS and AI Assistant. Samsung AI Assistant has been available since April, while Samsung AMS and the updated Education Portal will begin rolling out in July.
    • It's been $24 (single) or $89 (4-pack) for many days on both Amazon and Walmart as far as I know. That isn't a big discount. If these end up like the 1st gen, the 4-pack will routinely get down around $80, give or take a dollar. I think they have even hit $69 at times.
    • Microsoft brings Claude to its own Azure infrastructure, powered by Nvidia GB300 Blackwell by Karthik Mudaliar Anthropic's Claude models are now generally available in Microsoft Foundry on Azure and are running on Nvidia's GB300 Blackwell Ultra systems. Nvidia wrote in its announcement that the models are hosted on Microsoft Azure and accelerated by GB300 Blackwell Ultra GPUs, with Quantum-X800 InfiniBand networking used to support larger agentic systems and specialized sub-agents that can operate across business domains. This is great for customers and enterprises that want to build autonomous and domain-specific AI agents using Claude without moving outside Microsoft’s cloud platform. Microsoft currently offers Claude models in Foundry in two forms: “Hosted on Azure,” which runs end-to-end on Azure infrastructure and is generally available, and “Hosted on Anthropic infrastructure,” which remains in preview. This separation is quite important for organizations that have procurement, compliance, data processing, or internal governance requirements tied to Azure. Anthropic currently has 11 Claude models listed in Microsoft Foundry, including Opus 4.8, Sonnet 4.6, and even the unavailable Mythos and Fable models. Billing is handled through Claude Consumption Units (CCUs). Microsoft says CCU is an invoicing unit for Claude models in Foundry, with token usage converted using Anthropic’s published per-model token rates. The usage is billed through Azure Marketplace just like models from other distributors and appears on the customer's Azure invoice, while eligible spend can count against a Microsoft Azure Consumption Commitment. For starters, GB300 NVL72 is a rack-scale, fully liquid-cooled system that combines 72 Blackwell Ultra GPUs and 36 Grace CPUs. Nvidia has listed 37TB of fast memory, 130TB/s of NVLink bandwidth, and FP4 Tensor Core performance of up to 1,440 petaflops with sparsity. The deal is also part of a three-way partnership between Microsoft, Nvidia, and Anthropic. Under the deal, Anthropic has committed to buying $30 billion in Azure compute capacity and contracting additional capacity up to one gigawatt. Nvidia and Microsoft also said they would invest up to $10 billion and $5 billion in Anthropic, respectively.
    • WhatsApp is getting usernames, and you can reserve your preferred one now by Fiza Ali Sharing your phone number isn't always something you want to do, especially with people you've just met. Whether it's someone from a class, a local community group, or a sports team chat, handing over your number can feel like giving away more personal information than necessary. That's exactly the problem WhatsApp is trying to solve with its upcoming usernames feature. The company has announced that users can now reserve a unique WhatsApp username ahead of the feature's wider rollout later this year. Once usernames become available, they'll let people connect without revealing their phone numbers. It's a change that makes a lot of sense for group chats. Right now, everyone in the group can see your phone number. With usernames enabled, that won't necessarily be the case when someone contacts you for the first time. WhatsApp says it's opening username reservations early because more than three billion people use the app, meaning plenty of people are likely to want the same usernames. Reserving one now gives users a better chance of securing the name they actually want before the feature launches more broadly. If your preferred username is already taken, WhatsApp will also offer a built-in username generator to suggest available alternatives. The feature isn't only aimed at individual users. Creators, businesses, and organisations will be able to claim the same username they already use on Instagram or Facebook, making it easier to keep a consistent identity across Meta's apps. Furthermore, privacy is a big part of how WhatsApp is introducing usernames. There won't be a public directory where people can browse or search for usernames. Instead, people will need to know your exact username before they can start a conversation with you. Additionally, users can also choose to enable a username key, which adds another layer of control by requiring people to enter that key before sending a message. Once the feature rolls out, people who choose to use a username will no longer have their phone number shown when messaging a person or business for the first time. If you want to reserve a username, make sure you're running the latest version of WhatsApp, then head to Settings > Account > Username. The tech giant says usernames will roll out gradually over the coming months, and users will receive an in-app notification when the feature becomes available in their country.
    • When I think about a network, there are really two aspects, the hardware and the wiring. So here is what I would do for both. Wiring: Use Cat6A for the patch panel, outlets, and all structured cables (cables installed in walls). Run plenty of Wireless Access Point (WAP) cables, as a general rule, assume a signal can only pass through 2-3 walls and can't pass through a floor (that is conservative, but trust me on this if you want strong WiFi)  Cat6 patch cables are fine for now if you don't plan to run 10gig, those are easy to replace later if needed. Run OS2 single-mode fiber to anywhere you think you may have a server or sub-switch. (yes, single-mode for everything on a small network, don't mess with multimode unless you are at a scale where that minor cost and power savings will matter). If you really want to future proof, also run fiber to any high density WAP locations, it is likely that WiFi 8 and beyond WAPs will push the limits of 10g. Run 6-12 pairs of single-mode fiber between your MDF and the building's MDF, even if you only need 1 or 2 pairs now, those extra pairs will pay off down the road. Hardware: (its easy to say "get all the features incase you need them", so instead of futureproofing, I am going to take approach of suggesting areas worth investing in, and areas you can save money). Don't overspend thinking you need every feature on every port. You don't need 10g on every port, you don't need PoE on every port. Don't overspend on redundancy either, unless you are ready to buy two of everything, don't waste money buying two of some things and not others. Dual power supplies are worthwhile, but probably not HA or multi-path redundancy.  Get 1 "distribution layer" switch that your router/firewall will connect to as well as all your access layer switches below. This should be a fully managed 10g+ switch with a combination of copper and SPF ports, a few 25g uplink ports are nice for this switch. Given that you said it is a small network, I suggest also using that distribution layer switch for servers and WAPs, meaning it will need PoE. Speaking of wireless, get good professional tri-band WAPs, and either turn on the band stirring options, or limit 2.4 to an IoT only SSID. This will provide a solid WiFi capable nearly everything but the highest of bandwidth clients...you could even consider skipping wiring workstations depending on usage. Access layer switch for workstations and printers can be cheaper switches, 2.5g is a good sweet spot between price and future proofing, but even 1g is fine for most individual clients (the kind that could probably be fine on WiFi). You can consider saving a little on access layer switches by only getting 1 PoE switch for whatever needs it (remember your WAPs are connecting to the distribution switch, not here), and non-PoE for your workstations, because desk phones are falling out of favor. You can also save money here by not buying managed switches if you don't need them--but really do some soul searching there, if you go this route, then anything that isn't on your workstation VLAN would either need to be connected to the distribution switch, or its own access layer switch. Also, don't feel like you need a fancy fabric stacking switches for your access layer, that is the point of the higher-end distribution layer, to remove the need for things like that at this level. Home Hardware: I'm realizing the above assumed an office setting, if this if for your house and home lab then the above still applies, but you'll probably want everything managed and PoE, just because, but you probably also don't need multiple access layer switches. If your total port count is below 24, just skip separating distribution layer and access layer and just get one nice switch with the features you want. If you are at the point of considering a 48-port switch, I would instead get a nice high-end distribution switch for things that need it, and cheaper access layer switches with specs based on the needs of connected devices. For home use, don't worry about home running every device to the main switch, there is nothing wrong with running sub-switches for your media areas and office, those essentially become your access layer, just look for sub-switches with a 10g uplink so sharing bandwidth isn't an issue. Just make sure you always connect them to your distribution/main switch, don't daisy chain, the path should never have more steps than Client>Access>Distribution>Firewall>Internet or Client>Access>Distribution>Server if it is local.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      536
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      269
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      150
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!