Recommended Posts

I sent my hard drive few weeks ago (WD6400AAKS) for a replacement or RMA after just 4 months of use, the HD became useless, well they sent me another one and looks to me brand new. Well when I am trying to install the OS, I tried to partition the drive but it does not let me do anything, I tried few different OS's and all failed. Guess what guys? the hard drive that they sent me was already damaged. What a ****ing company is WD? they sent me a piece a junk. I called yesterday and they will send me another one, hopefully this time will not be another junk. I am done with WD, I will never ever again going to buy another WD product.

They all have their bad batches every now and then. Quantum, Seagate, Maxtor, WD, etc....

All our dell machines att work have seagates and they have all been dying. dell has been sending us velociraptors to replace our dying seagate hdd's.

So far i hate seagate with a passion. Havent had any luck with their hdd's

I call bull on this. They wouldn't send you velociraptors, they're too expensive. There's also no need for drives that fast on workstations, and they don't work well as server drives because they use too much power and produce too much heat.

I wish I bumped into this thread prior to ordering my Seagate replacement hard drive for my 2 year old Macbook! The drive failed just last week. Looks like everyone praises WD > Seagate, damn! :p

Not me, They're really the same reliability, despite the bias people show in here, and depite me only ever having WD drives fail.

I guess it's a debate that will never be won than I suppose? I can't keep track of my hard drive failure record. It's up there.

I find that people who have an unusually high number of drives die have external factors which cause it. A bad power supply, cheap motherboard that doesn't regulate usb power well, unstable home power, knocking the computer around, especially when it's running...they're all common causes of drive failure. People just choose to bash a manufacturer rather than using their brains

I find that people who have an unusually high number of drives die have external factors which cause it. A bad power supply, cheap motherboard that doesn't regulate usb power well, unstable home power, knocking the computer around, especially when it's running...they're all common causes of drive failure. People just choose to bash a manufacturer rather than using their brains

There is too much truth in that statement. You making my heads hurts!

I find that people who have an unusually high number of drives die have external factors which cause it. A bad power supply, cheap motherboard that doesn't regulate usb power well, unstable home power, knocking the computer around, especially when it's running...they're all common causes of drive failure. People just choose to bash a manufacturer rather than using their brains

Indeed, I've noticed that as well. One of my friends has an average lifespan of 4-8 months on every drive he gets his hands on. He's just brutally irresponsible with his computer.

I've been fairly careful with my drives, I can't recall how many I've actually had die on me but I'm fairly certain I could count on one hand the actual true drive malfunctions I've had in the past 15 years. One of which was caused by my own negligence, first SATA drive that I owned... I learned very quickly some SATA connectors on certain drives weren't made very solid at all....oops. The replacement drive I got was was a slightly different model though, with much more plastic to secure the cable around the connector.

I find that people who have an unusually high number of drives die have external factors which cause it. A bad power supply, cheap motherboard that doesn't regulate usb power well, unstable home power, knocking the computer around, especially when it's running...they're all common causes of drive failure. People just choose to bash a manufacturer rather than using their brains

I also agree with this post. I have been using WD drives fro years now and have been happy so far.

Actually, i just bought two 160GB drives that i setup in a raid 0. After about a month one of them failed. I did a quick RMA with WD and got the new drive. Had a problem re-creating the raid group. Got forwarded to Level2 and got the issue resolved. It was handled with one phone call and no more than an hour of my time.

Side Note: Turns out i needed to write zero's on both drives to re-setup raid. WD has some nice basic disk utilities.

I find that people who have an unusually high number of drives die have external factors which cause it. A bad power supply, cheap motherboard that doesn't regulate usb power well, unstable home power, knocking the computer around, especially when it's running...they're all common causes of drive failure. People just choose to bash a manufacturer rather than using their brains

I agree with you, however it is not my case. The hard drive came from the factory already damaged because I tested it and was not working. I received yesterday another HD replacement and so far working like charm. It is not my fault that they sent me something non-working. I am happy now with my new HD.

I call bull on this. They wouldn't send you velociraptors, they're too expensive. There's also no need for drives that fast on workstations, and they don't work well as server drives because they use too much power and produce too much heat.

Do you want me to pull a couple of them out of our gx620's and show you ? I can get a pic of the old seagate drives and the new velociraptors dell is sending us.

I am not lying . Maybe its because we do a ton of business . we order like 20 machines at a shot.

Do you want me to pull a couple of them out of our gx620's and show you ? I can get a pic of the old seagate drives and the new velociraptors dell is sending us.

I am not lying . Maybe its because we do a ton of business . we order like 20 machines at a shot.

Umm...I do a ton of business with dell as well, and while their service is good, they have never gone overkill like that. There is NO reason to have velociraptors in those machines. The seagate drives are just fine, and I have yet to have any die in ours.

All my systems that I built have WD drives, Heck I have one from the early 90's and still runs perfectly. I can't say I have had positive experices with Toshiba, Segate or Samsung.

Do you want me to pull a couple of them out of our gx620's and show you ? I can get a pic of the old seagate drives and the new velociraptors dell is sending us.

I am not lying . Maybe its because we do a ton of business . we order like 20 machines at a shot.

LOLOLOL 20 machines per order isn't a ton of business for Dell.

I echo what some of these guys are saying. There's a bad batch of drives for all companies. Maybe except for Maxtor before they were bought by Seagate..

I agree. You will see that everyone is has a favorite and hates another or the others and everyone has their own opinion. But all of those companies have bad batches at times and that is where some people feel strongly against that brand becuase of their misfortune.

Then you also have cases like yours where you got a bad drive and then got really unlucky and got another bad drive. Now you hate WD and you will no longer buy their drive. Lets say you are now going with Seagate. Years from now you will swear Seagate is the best and that WD sucks. As for your experience Seagate will more likely be the best because you will continue to buy their products and lets say you never get a bad drive from them. Now to you Seagate is the best in the world and WD is the worst.

Everyone has experiences like this where one manufacturer is the best and one is the worst.

As for my experience. I had IBM hard drives last forever. Then I went with maxtor because they started to produce a lot of drives and a great price. I had three out of four die within two years. So then I switched to WD because they started to manufacturer more hard drives at a great price. I had 5 out of six die within the first year. During all of that time I had bought a many Hitachis and Seagates for me or family and everyone of them is still good except one Seagate that died within two years. So who do you think I think is the best, the worst and in second place?

I think Hitachi is the best and Seagate is the second best. I have no experience with Samsung and other brands. I think WD is the worst because they all died the fastest. I also steer clear of maxtor because I had so many die within two years.

But what I have learned to do is utilize the internet and see what models per brand are failing the most. Those are the bad batches. You will also see the prices fall drastically for those models and discounts offered. Those are the drives people end up buying the most.

I can gurantee that no matter what brand or model you are looking at they all have a percent of that model that fails or is dead on arrival (DOA). So I would not freak out with one bad drive. I would just realize I was unlucky just like I was recently. I bought a Hitachi and it was DOA. I am currently waiting for a replacement.

No I do not hate Hitachi. It was just my misfortune.

That is my perspective about all of this.

I can gurantee that no matter what brand or model you are looking at they all have a percent of that model that fails or is dead on arrival (DOA). So I would not freak out with one bad drive. I would just realize I was unlucky just like I was recently. I bought a Hitachi and it was DOA. I am currently waiting for a replacement.

No I do not hate Hitachi. It was just my misfortune.

That is my perspective about all of this.

If there ever comes a company with a 0.00% failure rate on their hard drives, WD, Seagate, Hitachi etc. are in a world of hurt :rofl:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft admits one of the most crucial Outlook features is currently broken by Sayan Sen Microsoft is making some decent progress when it comes to Windows 11. Recently we have confirmed reports of some rather useful improvements landing in the next version of the OS, 26H2, wherein GPU driver TDR crashes may finally be fixed, plus the company is also allowing users to disable web content on the Search. On the Outlook front though things have not been so rosy. Last month in May we reported several problems affecting basic functionalities on the app. These included a problem where documents would open blank or corrupt themselves. Following that, Quick Steps, a very useful feature, would no longer work correctly, and finally, Microsoft acknowledged a problem wherein images would fail to load up properly inside the email. Microsoft had resolved those bugs later and almost exactly a month after we reported on them, the company has now admitted a new similarly basic issue, this time on Macs. Users recently started noticing that Outlook would no longer display email threads properly as the original message itself was not displayed. An affected user Tsoumpas, C (ngmb) nicely described the problem in a forum post they made on Microsoft's site. They wrote: "Description of the issue: After updating Outlook for Mac [Version 16.110 (26061317)] on 18/6/2026, replying to any email no longer includes the original message in the reply window. Prior to the update, replies correctly contained the original email text below my response. Expected behavior: The original message should be included in the reply, as in previous Outlook versions and according to the configured reply settings. Actual behavior: The reply window contains only a blank composition area (or only my response), with none of the original email text included." Obviously this must be a highly frustrating for users as noted by several in that thread. The post, at the time of writing, has also been upvoted by more than 40 users indicating that is a fairly widespread bug. Thankfully Microsoft seems to have acknowledged the problem right around that time as it opened a new issue on its official website. In the support article, the company recommends switching to Outlook for Mac from the legacy app, where the problem appears to be happening.
    • PotPlayer 260622 by Razvan Serea PotPlayer is an extremely light-weight multimedia player for Windows. It feels like the KMPlayer, but is in active development. Supports almost every available video formats out there. PotPlayer contains internal codecs and there is no need to install codecs manually. Other key features include WebCam/Analog/Digital TV devices support, gapless video playback, DXVA, live broadcasting. Distinctive features of the player is a high quality playback, support for all modern video and audio formats and a built DXVA video codecs. A wide range of subtitles are supported and you are also able to capture audio, video, and screenshots. A comprehensive video and audio player, that also supports TV channels, subtitles and skins. Its been described on the Internet as The KMPlayer redux, and it pretty much is. Daum PotPlayer 260622 (1.7.22963) changelog: Removed Kakao TV Added pause function when navigating via the navigation bar Significantly improved internal stability Fixed an issue where colors appeared strange during RGB24 processing Improved playback for some HTTP streams Improved sync processing for the built-in audio renderer Fixed an issue where certain MP4 files behaved abnormally during playback Download: Daum PotPlayer (64-bit) | 54.7 MB (Freeware) Download: Daum PotPlayer (32-bit) | 61.1 MB View: Daum PotPlayer Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Tixati 3.44 is out.
    • Speccy 1.34.084 by Razvan Serea Speccy will give you detailed statistics on every piece of hardware in your computer. Including CPU, Motherboard, RAM, Graphics Cards, Hard Disks, Optical Drives, Audio support. Additionally Speccy adds the temperatures of your different components, so you can easily see if there's a problem! Processor brand and model Hard drive size and speed Amount of memory (RAM) Graphics card Operating system At first glance, Speccy may seem like an application for system administrators and power users. It certainly is, but Speccy can also help normal users, in everyday computing life. If you need to add more memory to your system, for example, you can check how many memory slots your computer has and what memory's already installed. Then you can go out and buy the right type of memory to add on or replace what you've already got. Download: Speccy 1.34.084 | 20.5 MB (Freeware) View: Speccy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • ImgDrive 2.2.7 by Razvan Serea ImgDrive is a CD/DVD/BD emulator - a tool that allows you to mount optical disc images by simply clicking on them in Windows Explorer. If you have downloaded an ISO image and want to use it without burning it to a blank disc, ImgDrive is the easiest way to do it. ImgDrive features: One-click mounting of iso, cue, nrg, mds/mdf, ccd, isz images Runs on 32-bit and 64-bit Windows versions Mount ape, flac, m4a, wav, wavpack, tta file as AUDIO CD (16-bit/44.1kHz) Mount a folder as DVD/BD Mount images in command line Does not require rebooting after installation Support up to 7 virtual drives at the same time Support multi session disc image (ccd/mds/nrg) A special portable version is available Translated to more than 10 languages Support File Type: .ccd - CloneCD image files .cue - Cue sheets files of ape/flac/m4a/tta/wav/wv/bin .iso - Standard ISO image files .isz - Compressed ISO image files .nrg - Nero image files .mds - Media descriptor image files ImgDrive 2.2.7 changelog: Added command line parameter to set number of drives Added AACS-Auth support for HD DVD Bumped kernel driver version to 2.2.7 Download: ImgDrive 2.2.7 | 692 KB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) Download: ImgDrive Portable 535 KB View: ImgDrive Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      mnsgroup earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      522
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      199
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      94
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      82
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!