Recommended Posts

Everything is ok now?

The rage candle has been put out?

Not really, because now there is a problem many people are having when they go to launch the game. The "Installation is incomplete" error (2).

Apparently it's easily fixed though.

Just got done playing Dead Center campaign on advanced. So far, it looks really good. The gameplay feels much more intense than the first one. Looking forward to playing it some more in the coming days.

Good game. Shame the match making is worse than MW2 and keeps putting me in servers located in the US. 400 ping? YEAH! That and no one wants to wait around for a lobby to fill, it's worse than on the 360. ;/

Been sitting here for 5 mins waiting for a lobby to fill. Awesomesauce.

Have you played it?

Played the DEMO. Wasn't that impressed with it as a full price upgrade.

That isn't to rain on anyone's parade or anything of that sort. We are all allowed to make whatever purchase choices we want with our money :).

I'm sure I'll pick it up when it is ~$20.

Played the DEMO. Wasn't that impressed with it as a full price upgrade.

That isn't to rain on anyone's parade or anything of that sort. We are all allowed to make whatever purchase choices we want with our money :).

I'm sure I'll pick it up when it is ~$20.

The demo which gave almost no indication of what to expect from the new levels or modes?

Please post when/if you see any great deals on this game. I'm in no hurry to buy it since I just recently picked up Batman and Resident Evil 5. But I would definitely order it whenever I see the discount.

Side note, I've been reading some reviews and haven't seen any mentions of graphics. Is it the same L4D engine from the first one? Or some upgrades? Just wondering how to expect it to run on my system.

The demo which gave almost no indication of what to expect from the new levels or modes?

How did the demo not give a good indication of what to expect from the new levels? Were there not two new levels in the demo?

And it's not like the separate modes really play all that different, IMO.

How did the demo not give a good indication of what to expect from the new levels? Were there not two new levels in the demo?

And it's not like the separate modes really play all that different, IMO.

The demo was a poor indicator of how good the game is imo. I didn't find the demo that impressive, thought most of the models and stuff were from l4d1 which was dissapointing, no info about other maps or game modes. The game itself is NOTHING like the first, they've fixed pretty much every issue the first had and then some.

Realism mode is TOUGH. (1. no glow around items 2. no glow around survivors (crazy hard) 3. 1 hit kill from witch 4. No respawning 5. Headshot kills only)

The maps are so much more impressive then the first l4d, as well as the AI director.

The special infected are much smarter (aside from boomers which are still pretty dumb..lol) but I was on a rooftop playing today and i was watching a Jocky run and hide behind cars so i couldnt' shoot him until he almost completely flanked me and when i opened the door he was right outside waiting for me. The game itself feels so much harder and makes l4d 1 feel so easy. Some finale's and maps are random, meaning everything from weapons/ammo/health/switches etc as well as pick up locations are random and COULD change.

But possibly the biggest change is that there is very little room for camping, or running, which was a big problem in l4d 1. If you run, you WILL die. If you camp, you WILL die. It's almost impossible to camp at panic events because of the pace of the game and the things you are made to do.

Overall it's a complete overhaul of l4d1, totally different.

Have you guys noticed how demo versions are ALWAYS a bad indication, no matter what platform or game it never seems to represent anything decent from the games :rolleyes:

The answer always seem to be; shell out for the game, zOMG!!1 ... Demos are created to entice users, if it's a bad representation, who's to blame?

Have you guys noticed how demo versions are ALWAYS a bad indication, no matter what platform or game it never seems to represent anything decent from the games :rolleyes:

The answer always seem to be; shell out for the game, zOMG!!1 ... Demos are created to entice users, if it's a bad representation, who's to blame?

Exactly. And very rarely have I ever played a demo that doesn't represent the game well. In fact, I can't recall a single time.

Checked it out for a few today, just did a Single Player Campaign with AI help.

Did the first level, and Damn that mall part is giving me major problems when you open the door and have to get to the third level to disable the alarm.

So far no matter what path I choose to take I die. Just cannot get past that part (again SP) and it is driving me mad.

I did find a chainsaw already, good times indeed with it. :laugh:

I would say it was well worth the $40 I spent. Easily. Main reason is I had not touched my PC for gaming in a long, long time, and now I finally have a real good reason to game on my PC again.

Exactly. And very rarely have I ever played a demo that doesn't represent the game well. In fact, I can't recall a single time.

it's not that it's a bad representation of the game... but it's only 2 levels (very poor choic of levels too imo) And is missing half the weapons, only shows you about half of the type of zombies etc.. Strictly game play speaking, it's exactly like the full game, but the full game has much more to offer.

The demo which gave almost no indication of what to expect from the new levels or modes?

Not my problem. The job of the DEMO is to show me the best they've got so I'm inclined to buy the game. If they failed to deliver then they fail to get a sale. It isn't my loss ;). I can always spend my money on something else. As I did with Batman. Played the DEMO and liked what I saw and purchased the game two days later.

it's not that it's a bad representation of the game... but it's only 2 levels (very poor choic of levels too imo) And is missing half the weapons, only shows you about half of the type of zombies etc.. Strictly game play speaking, it's exactly like the full game, but the full game has much more to offer.

Of course the full game has more to offer compared to the demo :blink:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Why? Does anybody actually want this? The constant need to close all browser sessions and wait for a new version to install, just so that there’s a integrated coupon manager feels like a waste of everyone’s time
    • I remember when Louis used to just do interesting Mac/iPhone repairs, now he's boring and just launches "crusades" every week
    • A shame it don't allow people to bypass the MS account, I will stick to using Rufus.
    • Microsoft about to radically change how often your Edge browser updates by Paul Hill Microsoft has just announced that starting with Edge 152, it will be moving to a two-week release cycle for faster, smaller updates. This faster release cadence will begin on August 27. This change comes just several months after Microsoft switched Visual Studio Code to weekly updates. The company said that the Extended Stable releases will remain on an eight-week cycle and that no admin changes are needed to experience the faster release cycle on the Stable channel. The new two-week release cycle will enable the faster delivery of security updates and platform improvements, all while reducing the size and complexity of individual updates. Microsoft claims that organizations will benefit from this change as it offers predictable validation cycles. For organizations that prefer a “more deliberate pace”, the Extended Stable channel remains an option. This change will affect Edge Stable releases on Windows, macOS, Linux, and mobile. The Extended Stable channel will continue to be updated every eight weeks, or every fourth Stable release, for example: versions 152, 156, 160, and 164. The Extended Stable could be a good option for organizations that don’t want the latest updates twice a month and don’t want as much hassle constantly updating browsers. In the case of Visual Studio Code, many of the updates being pushed by Microsoft are AI-related. As we all know, Microsoft Edge has a lot of AI features, so we could see Microsoft pushing more AI, thanks to the faster cycles. On the flip side, quicker releases could mean faster security updates, which is beneficial in a world where AI systems are hunting for software exploits. What do you think? Let us know in the comments. For more updates on Edge, be sure to follow Neowin's coverage. In May alone, we reported on Edge offering in-browser pop-ups to assist users with website compatibility issues, that Edge was losing Copilot Mode, and that Microsoft had fixed a plain-text password bug in Edge. Source: Microsoft 365 Admin Center
    • not yet, because at the moment it is not a threat to MS, if and I mean if it did become a threat to MS Office, then it may be a different thing. MS don't like competition
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      davidbazooked earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      Marzoid went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Community Regular
      coch went up a rank
      Community Regular
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      514
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      185
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      159
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      83
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!