Tips for fixing a stuck pixel?


Recommended Posts

So I just bought an LCD monitor, and of course it has a stuck pixel. Warranty only covers more then 3 stuck pixels so I'm SOL.

It's stuck on magenta/pink. I've read that there are various tricks to try get them working again. I've read that you can flash colors on the spot, massage it, poke it, press it while the monitor is off then turn the monitor on.

So my question is this, has anybody actually had any success using any of these methods?

I've had horrible luck with my LCD's. My first LCD had 3 stuck pixels, but luckily the store replaced with a perfect screen. My laptop had 1 dead pixel that was in a lower corner. I had an unrelated problem with the screen so they replaced it with a new panel, but the replacement had a dead pixel smack dab in the middle of the screen. Now, I buy this new LCD and it has a really bright pink stuck pixel which is going to be extremely distracting while watching movies.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/782558-tips-for-fixing-a-stuck-pixel/
Share on other sites

So I just bought an LCD monitor, and of course it has a stuck pixel. Warranty only covers more then 3 stuck pixels so I'm SOL.

It's stuck on magenta/pink. I've read that there are various tricks to try get them working again. I've read that you can flash colors on the spot, massage it, poke it, press it while the monitor is off then turn the monitor on.

So my question is this, has anybody actually had any success using any of these methods?

Try getting a permanent marker or something and draw 2 more. Something very permanent.

I've had horrible luck with my LCD's. My first LCD had 3 stuck pixels, but luckily the store replaced with a perfect screen. My laptop had 1 dead pixel that was in a lower corner. I had an unrelated problem with the screen so they replaced it with a new panel, but the replacement had a dead pixel smack dab in the middle of the screen. Now, I buy this new LCD and it has a really bright pink stuck pixel which is going to be extremely distracting while watching movies.

Thats not bad luck, thats you doing something you shouldnt do to LCDs...

I've used the massage method myself. My Intel iMac has one pixel that if you push it carefully, it'll fix itself.

Other screens i've tried this with, didn't work. I've heard of LIMITED success with the color-flash method. Sometimes it'll create more dead pixels (this could be a good thing if you need 2 more?)

You'll need to run this virtually overnight i'm told to get any benefit though (if any).

Good luck mate!

So you're saying I shouldn't buy LCDs? Yeah, thanks for the help :huh:

Exactly.

1st, you are doing something to them that is causing these dead pixels. You RARELY hear anyone having problems with dead pixels anymore. Have you read reviews about the LCDs youve bought?

2nd, CRTs are way better than LCDs (opinion)

Exactly.

1st, you are doing something to them that is causing these dead pixels. You RARELY hear anyone having problems with dead pixels anymore. Have you read reviews about the LCDs youve bought?

2nd, CRTs are way better than LCDs (opinion)

I suggest you research what you're talking about before making a post and looking like a fool. Dead/stuck pixels are a manufacturing defect and are still very common. I didn't do anything to these LCD's, they had dead/stuck pixels from the moment I opened the box.

Yes, CRT's produce better color, but I had some trouble finding a 21.5" 16x9 1080p CRT for under $200 and that wouldn't take up all the space on my desk ;)

I suggest you research what you're talking about before making a post and looking like a fool. Dead/stuck pixels are a manufacturing defect and are still very common. I didn't do anything to these LCD's, they had dead/stuck pixels from the moment I opened the box.

Yes, CRT's produce better color, but I had some trouble finding a 21.5" 16x9 1080p CRT for under $200 and that wouldn't take up all the space on my desk ;)

They CAN be a manufacturing defect. They can also be misuse of the monitor itself.

They are not common at all. They were years ago but now...0.5

Here is a 21":

http://www.accurateit.com/details.asp?iid=774

A bit over 200 but hey.

I've had three LCD's and I've never noticed a dead pixel anywhere.

Exactly :)

They CAN be a manufacturing defect. They can also be misuse of the monitor itself.

They are not common at all. They were years ago but now...0.5

Here is a 21":

http://www.accurateit.com/details.asp?iid=774

A bit over 200 but hey.

Exactly :)

Congratulations, you've found a 20" viewable CRT, that is refurbished, 4:3 and costs $50 more than I paid for my LCD monitor. Again, thanks for your help :|

If you only just got the moitor, take it back.

I bought a monitor from some random IT store, brand new. It had 5 damaged pixles on it, so i took it straight back. The guy was quite rude and said i needed to contact the manafacture. My argument was, i bought it from him only 5 minutes earlier and its his problem. I also threateneed to come back and "take" the monitor(s) of my choice with my friends if he didnt let me swap it for working model.

He agreed then to let me swap it as a "good will gesture"...

buy with American Express. problem solved.

talk to your credit card company: they will side with you

Please remove the flaim bait from your signature. Thanks.

If you only just got the moitor, take it back.

I bought a monitor from some random IT store, brand new. It had 5 damaged pixles on it, so i took it straight back. The guy was quite rude and said i needed to contact the manafacture. My argument was, i bought it from him only 5 minutes earlier and its his problem. I also threateneed to come back and "take" the monitor(s) of my choice with my friends if he didnt let me swap it for working model.

He agreed then to let me swap it as a "good will gesture"...

Please remove the flaim bait from your signature. Thanks.

The problem is I bought it online from NCIX. Apparently they don't consider stuck pixels a defect unless you purchase their extra coverage beforehand.

I've tried all the tricks and none of them worked. Looks like I'll just have to live with it.

For what it is worth, where I used to work, each of my screens had 3 or 4 stuck pixels in bright green. They were Samsung screens and the company I worked for didn't care to RMA them for whatever reason. Anyway, during the normal course of my job which was internet work, browsers, spreadsheets, Word documents, PDF's etc, I only noticed the stuck pixels if I happened to have a black background on my screen for the wallpaper or otherwise a black backgounded web site.

It seemed that since they were so minute (as pixels are), it didn't make a difference.

For a movie experience, you could always play movies in Pink. j/k

Try watching a movie or two and see if that really does make a huge difference for you or not. As for returning the screen, you are on your own there, if the manufacturer only covers 3 or more dead pixels, unless your store is understanding and liberal with their policy, which I am getting the impression that they may not be.

I have also tried the pixel flashing method as well, as hard as I tried, I just couldn't get that tiny flashing pixel to 'infect' the stuck one. Massing didn't work as well as the other techniques.

The problem is I bought it online from NCIX. Apparently they don't consider stuck pixels a defect unless you purchase their extra coverage beforehand.

I've tried all the tricks and none of them worked. Looks like I'll just have to live with it.

Oh, well that would be a bit of a problem then. Not sure what to suggest to be honest.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • It's amazing that anyone still uses this bloated trash.
    • @Sayan...I have defended you at various points as I hope you know. This headline however is utter trash...shame on you sir!
    • An actual cosmic "Eye of Sauron" had been looking straight at us all along by Sayan Sen Image by Kovin P. Vasquez via Pexels | Not representative An international team of researchers has solved a long-standing mystery surrounding a distant blazar known as PKS 1424+240, helping explain why it produces some of the brightest high-energy gamma rays and cosmic neutrinos ever observed despite appearing to have a relatively slow-moving jet. The findings were published on June 6 in Astronomy & Astrophysics Letters. The study addresses a broader challenge in astrophysics: understanding how extreme cosmic objects accelerate particles to very high energies and produce very high-energy (VHE) photons and neutrinos. PKS 1424+240 is located billions of light-years from Earth. It has attracted attention for years because it is both a powerful source of VHE gamma rays and the brightest known neutrino-emitting blazar in the sky, according to observations by the IceCube Neutrino Observatory. It is also associated with one of the strongest peaks in IceCube's nine-year neutrino sky map A blazar is a type of active galactic nucleus powered by a supermassive black hole that pulls in surrounding matter and launches jets of plasma moving close to the speed of light. What makes blazars unique is their orientation. One of their jets points almost directly toward Earth, making them appear exceptionally bright across the electromagnetic spectrum and allowing scientists to study some of the most extreme physical processes in the Universe. The scientists exclaimed it's like the 'Eye of Sauron' in deep space. Usually, the brightest gamma-ray-emitting blazars are expected to have jets that appear to move very quickly. However, radio observations of PKS 1424+240 suggested that its jet was moving much more slowly, creating a contradiction that became part of a long-running problem known as the "Doppler factor crisis." To investigate, researchers analyzed 15 years of observations from the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA), a network of 10 radio antennas spread across the continental United States, Hawaii and St. Croix. Using a technique called Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI), astronomers combine signals from widely separated radio telescopes to create a virtual Earth-sized telescope capable of revealing extremely fine details. The team combined 42 polarization-sensitive radio images collected between 2009 and 2025, creating a much deeper and more detailed view of the jet than had previously been possible. The observations were carried out as part of MOJAVE (Monitoring Of Jets in Active galactic nuclei with VLBA Experiments), a long-running program that studies the brightness, polarization and magnetic field structures of jets produced by active galaxies. The project aims to better understand how activity near supermassive black holes is linked to high-energy radiation and neutrino emission. “When we reconstructed the image, it looked absolutely stunning,” said Yuri Kovalev, lead author of the study and Principal Investigator of the European Research Council-funded MuSES project at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “We have never seen anything quite like it — a near-perfect toroidal magnetic field with a jet, pointing straight at us.” The image revealed an unusual geometry. The researchers found that Earth lies almost directly in line with the jet, with a viewing angle of less than 0.6 degrees. In simple terms, astronomers are looking almost straight down the jet. This turned out to be the key to the mystery. Because the jet is aimed almost directly at Earth, a relativistic effect called Doppler boosting dramatically increases its apparent brightness. The study found that this effect boosts the emission by a factor of about 30 while also making the jet appear slower than it actually is. “This alignment causes a boost in brightness by a factor of 30 or more,” said Jack Livingston, a co-author at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “At the same time, the jet appears to move slowly due to projection effects — a classic optical illusion.” The nearly head-on view also gave scientists a rare look at the jet's magnetic field. Using polarized radio signals, they detected a clear toroidal, or doughnut-shaped, magnetic field component. The observations suggest the jet carries an electric current and that its magnetic field helps launch, shape and stabilize the flow of plasma. Researchers believe this magnetic structure may also play a key role in accelerating particles to energies high enough to produce both gamma rays and neutrinos. “Solving this puzzle confirms that active galactic nuclei with supermassive black holes are not only powerful accelerators of electrons, but also of protons — the origin of the observed high-energy neutrinos,” Kovalev said. The research was conducted under the MuSES (Multi-messenger Studies of Energetic Sources) project, which investigates how active galactic nuclei accelerate particles and generate different cosmic signals, including light and neutrinos. Scientists say understanding how protons are accelerated and linked to neutrino production remains one of the major unanswered questions in astrophysics. The findings help explain why some blazars can appear to have slow jets while still producing extremely bright high-energy emissions. More broadly, the study strengthens the link between relativistic jets, magnetic fields, gamma rays and high-energy neutrinos. Researchers say the results provide new clues about how some of the Universe's most powerful natural particle accelerators work and offer important insights for multimessenger astronomy, which combines different types of cosmic signals to study extreme events in space. Source: European Research Council, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Gotenks98 is right... Outlook (new) is absolute trash. Doesn't Mozilla have an Enterprise Version of Firebird?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      510
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      273
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!