7232.0.amd64fre.winmain.090610-1900.client_en-us.ultimate.vhd


Recommended Posts

No, these builds simply originated as vhd from microsoft.

P.S. One of the posters (a reliable source) from torrents.ru has informed of a new compile added to the win7_rtm branch: 7260.0.090612-21xx

OIC....thanks for the correction. :D

7260???????????????????? :o

That would explain why we're only seeing .vhd files after 7229.

Interesting... is that one an installable .iso or also just a .vhd?

No info other than the build number and date provided by the poster.

OIC....thanks for the correction. :D

7260???????????????????? :o

Poster also wrote that the jump to 7260 signifies a milestone (in this case it seems the milestone is the first build of the win7_rtm branch).

No info other than the build number and date provided by the poster.

Poster also wrote that the jump to 7260 signifies a milestone (in this case it seems the milestone is the first build of the win7_rtm branch).

7260.0.090612-2110

but build date of the re-compiled 7232 is 090613........??

(6.1.7232.0.winmain.090613-0700) and 7:00 a.m. ??

7260.0.090612-2110

but build date of the re-compiled 7232 is 090613........??

(6.1.7232.0.winmain.090613-0700) and 7:00 a.m. ??

The recompile of the current leaked build could very well be a newer build than that first build in the win7_rtm branch. It could be that the mentioned 7260 was based on the 7232 that was leaked. I am obviously just guessing. Furthermore, it wouldn't surprise me if the only difference between the 7232 compiles and 7260 was the activation/expiration related code changes.

Wzor has also added info on the win7_rtm branch and say that all builds in this branch are rtm candidates (not surprisingly). They also added the full build tag: 6.1.7260.0.win7_rtm.090612-2110.

Edited by vask

RTM and has the beta fish wall?

I know that it could be changed by the poster but its hard if anyone has the RTM build to first change the wall to the ones Beta & RC had and then post a screenshot of the final version of Win7.

RTM and has the beta fish wall?

I know that it could be changed by the poster but its hard if anyone has the RTM build to first change the wall to the ones Beta & RC had and then post a screenshot of the final version of Win7.

Agreed.. I only noticed that after I had posted it.. I'll see if I can get some more information.

Regards,

Atari.2600

hello from Italy.

But RTM , will be very fastest aftrer RC official build???

I ask this , because official RC on my PC ( intel-core2 quad+ ati 4870+ 8 gb of ram) , is slowest from beta and it's fast same windows vista sp2.

I am very boring, I hope in win7 fastest from vista sp2 ( open applications, window explorer folders and file navigation) , but I creed that this not will be true!

hello from Italy.

But RTM , will be very fastest aftrer RC official build???

I ask this , because official RC on my PC ( intel-core2 quad+ ati 4870+ 8 gb of ram) , is slowest from beta and it's fast same windows vista sp2.

I am very boring, I hope in win7 fastest from vista sp2 ( open applications, window explorer folders and file navigation) , but I creed that this not will be true!

Windows 7 for me so far has been faster than Vista all the way. You should have no problems.

The recompile of the current leaked build could very well be a newer build than that first build in the win7_rtm branch. It could be that the mentioned 7260 was based on the 7232 that was leaked. I am obviously just guessing. Furthermore, it wouldn't surprise me if the only difference between the 7232 compiles and 7260 was the activation/expiration related code changes.

Wzor has also added info on the win7_rtm branch and say that all builds in this branch are rtm candidates (not surprisingly). They also added the full build tag: 6.1.7260.0.win7_rtm.090612-2110.

Yes, it makes sense to make a build number jump for the Rtm candidates :yes:

Looks like it won't be long anymore until final Rtm is done, which will get another small jump to 7300.

hello from Italy.

But RTM , will be very fastest aftrer RC official build???

I ask this , because official RC on my PC ( intel-core2 quad+ ati 4870+ 8 gb of ram) , is slowest from beta and it's fast same windows vista sp2.

I am very boring, I hope in win7 fastest from vista sp2 ( open applications, window explorer folders and file navigation) , but I creed that this not will be true!

I am Polish old and what is this?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I think I understood the article fine. Online password managers open users up to more possibilities of getting hacked, and due to KeePass being offline and local it reduces the idea of getting hacked. If someone chooses to put their database online they're kinda missing the point. With regards to the idea of the on-prem idea, I would have two issues. I'm not sure about the first issue, but I wouldn't be surprised about them offering a cloud storage for the passwords that most wouldn't bother to switch off, regardless of if they went for on-prem or not. The second issue is that the on-prem solution for Bitwarden costs money, whereas KeePass is free and open-source (as far as I am aware). The article points out how to sync the database between devices, and I recognise that deficiency in security. But it isn't a necessity. So both services can offer a same idea, but one is free and the other isn't...choices, choices.... But to each their own.
    • AB Download Manager 1.9.2 by Razvan Serea AB Download Manager is an open-source, feature-rich download manager designed to accelerate downloads, organize files efficiently, and provide seamless control over downloads. With support for multiple connections, resume capability, and an intuitive interface, it enhances the downloading experience for users seeking speed and reliability. The software integrates with various browsers, enabling quick link grabbing and batch downloading. It supports HTTP, HTTPS, and FTP protocols, ensuring broad compatibility with different file sources. Users can schedule downloads, set speed limits, and categorize files automatically for better organization. AB Download Manager is lightweight yet powerful, making it a great alternative to proprietary download managers. Its open-source nature allows developers to contribute, customize, and improve the software as needed. Whether you're downloading large files, managing multiple downloads at once, or seeking an ad-free experience, this tool offers a practical and efficient solution. Key features of AB Download Manager: Multi-Connection Support – Accelerates downloads by splitting files into multiple segments. Resume Capability – Allows paused or interrupted downloads to be resumed without starting over. Batch Downloading – Supports downloading multiple files at once for improved efficiency. Browser Integration – Captures download links directly from browsers for seamless operation. HTTP, HTTPS, and FTP Support – Ensures compatibility with a wide range of file sources. Download Scheduling – Enables users to automate downloads at specific times. Speed Limiting – Lets users control bandwidth usage for optimized performance. File Categorization – Automatically organizes downloaded files into designated folders. User-Friendly Interface – Simple and intuitive design for easy navigation. Cross-Platform Compatibility – Works on multiple operating systems. Ad-Free Experience – No intrusive ads or tracking for a clean user experience. AB Download Manager 1.9.2 changelog: Added New Twilight theme (#1292) Optional download completion notifications on Android (#1290) Fixed Fixed a crash on some older CPUs on Windows Fixed oversized system tray icon on macOS Improved Updated translations Prevented Android devices from sleeping while downloads are active (#1291) Various UI and UX improvements Download: AB Download Manager 1.9.2 | Portable | ~80.0 MB (Open Source) Download: ARM64 | Portable ARM64 | Android Links: AB Download Manager Website | Github Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • I am not surprised because life is the product of a lot of biochemical and physical processes that releases various energies as a by-product. The only thing new here is the detection of these photon emissions. The researches noted this "glow" is not a metaphysical one. They don't even immediately end when one is dead. Things like fires, light bulbs, and on a bigger scale stars release a lot more "light" and they are hardly alive.
    • Did you not understand the concern of the article and/or what on-prem means?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      516
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      186
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!