7232.0.amd64fre.winmain.090610-1900.client_en-us.ultimate.vhd

By FaiKee
in The Fast Ring (Insider Previews)

 Share

Recommended Posts

Veteran

FaiKee

Posted
  • Author
Posted
No, these builds simply originated as vhd from microsoft.

P.S. One of the posters (a reliable source) from torrents.ru has informed of a new compile added to the win7_rtm branch: 7260.0.090612-21xx

OIC....thanks for the correction. :D

7260???????????????????? :o

Collaborator

vask

Posted
Posted
That would explain why we're only seeing .vhd files after 7229.

Interesting... is that one an installable .iso or also just a .vhd?

No info other than the build number and date provided by the poster.

OIC....thanks for the correction. :D

7260???????????????????? :o

Poster also wrote that the jump to 7260 signifies a milestone (in this case it seems the milestone is the first build of the win7_rtm branch).

Veteran

FaiKee

Posted
  • Author
Posted
No info other than the build number and date provided by the poster.

Poster also wrote that the jump to 7260 signifies a milestone (in this case it seems the milestone is the first build of the win7_rtm branch).

7260.0.090612-2110

but build date of the re-compiled 7232 is 090613........??

(6.1.7232.0.winmain.090613-0700) and 7:00 a.m. ??

Collaborator

vask

Posted
Posted (edited)
7260.0.090612-2110

but build date of the re-compiled 7232 is 090613........??

(6.1.7232.0.winmain.090613-0700) and 7:00 a.m. ??

The recompile of the current leaked build could very well be a newer build than that first build in the win7_rtm branch. It could be that the mentioned 7260 was based on the 7232 that was leaked. I am obviously just guessing. Furthermore, it wouldn't surprise me if the only difference between the 7232 compiles and 7260 was the activation/expiration related code changes.

Wzor has also added info on the win7_rtm branch and say that all builds in this branch are rtm candidates (not surprisingly). They also added the full build tag: 6.1.7260.0.win7_rtm.090612-2110.

Edited by vask
Mentor

0nyX

Posted
Posted

RTM and has the beta fish wall?

I know that it could be changed by the poster but its hard if anyone has the RTM build to first change the wall to the ones Beta & RC had and then post a screenshot of the final version of Win7.

Rookie

Atari.2600

Posted
Posted
RTM and has the beta fish wall?

I know that it could be changed by the poster but its hard if anyone has the RTM build to first change the wall to the ones Beta & RC had and then post a screenshot of the final version of Win7.

Agreed.. I only noticed that after I had posted it.. I'll see if I can get some more information.

Regards,

Atari.2600

Apprentice

Maux76

Posted
Posted

hello from Italy.

But RTM , will be very fastest aftrer RC official build???

I ask this , because official RC on my PC ( intel-core2 quad+ ati 4870+ 8 gb of ram) , is slowest from beta and it's fast same windows vista sp2.

I am very boring, I hope in win7 fastest from vista sp2 ( open applications, window explorer folders and file navigation) , but I creed that this not will be true!

Grand Master

Max Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted
hello from Italy.

But RTM , will be very fastest aftrer RC official build???

I ask this , because official RC on my PC ( intel-core2 quad+ ati 4870+ 8 gb of ram) , is slowest from beta and it's fast same windows vista sp2.

I am very boring, I hope in win7 fastest from vista sp2 ( open applications, window explorer folders and file navigation) , but I creed that this not will be true!

Windows 7 for me so far has been faster than Vista all the way. You should have no problems.

Veteran

Lord Ba'al

Posted
Posted
The recompile of the current leaked build could very well be a newer build than that first build in the win7_rtm branch. It could be that the mentioned 7260 was based on the 7232 that was leaked. I am obviously just guessing. Furthermore, it wouldn't surprise me if the only difference between the 7232 compiles and 7260 was the activation/expiration related code changes.

Wzor has also added info on the win7_rtm branch and say that all builds in this branch are rtm candidates (not surprisingly). They also added the full build tag: 6.1.7260.0.win7_rtm.090612-2110.

Yes, it makes sense to make a build number jump for the Rtm candidates :yes:

Looks like it won't be long anymore until final Rtm is done, which will get another small jump to 7300.

Contributor

MrGriggs

Posted
Posted
hello from Italy.

But RTM , will be very fastest aftrer RC official build???

I ask this , because official RC on my PC ( intel-core2 quad+ ati 4870+ 8 gb of ram) , is slowest from beta and it's fast same windows vista sp2.

I am very boring, I hope in win7 fastest from vista sp2 ( open applications, window explorer folders and file navigation) , but I creed that this not will be true!

I am Polish old and what is this?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Posts

    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2 to finally get one of the most requested features

      By sphbecker · Posted

      If you don't care to read what I said, then you prove my point. Maybe written media is beyond your attention span. Titles are not summaries my friend.
    • Politically funny images of the World

      By +Nik Louch · Posted

      Nobody asked... in fact, I said "I don't care about political leanings"  
    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2 to finally get one of the most requested features

      By Elliot B. · Posted

      TLDR. Here is a far better title (just a basic example): Windows 11 26H2 to allow disabling Web search results
    • Politically funny images of the World

      By Dan~ · Posted

      Restore will get my vote, only if to see if things are any different, doubt it though but Labour and Conservatives too out of touch and same thing over and over and over…, Lib Dem who?
    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2 to finally get one of the most requested features

      By sphbecker · Posted

      There is nothing wrong with this title. You have completely missed the plot when it comes to "clickbait." The issue was never that a title tries to entice you to click, that is how titles have worked for over 100 years. The issue is when the title subverts expectations, getting you to click expecting something that isn't there. The classic clickbait example is "Boyfriend caught cheating, what happens next will shock you," then what happened next is the girlfriend was upset...which is probably the least shocking outcome imaginable. If sounds like what you want is for the titles to be a collection of 10-word summaries that you can skim, get the just of the story, and only click if you want more details. That is not, never has been, and never will be what titles are. You can go all the way back to print newspapers during the great depression and see the same thing. The newspaper was locked in a vending machine, all you can see is the headline, you choose to put in 5¢ to buy the paper and read the rest if you want. Those headlines were written in a way to sell the paper, not just to provide a summery. Here are two actual headlines from that time, "Wall Street Lays an Egg," or "Stocks Hit Bottom?" Maybe you'd say something like "it was wrong then and it's still wrong now." Okay, fine opinion to have, but it isn't like Neowin is doing something unjurnalistic, they are just following the age-old standards for written media.

  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      mnsgroup earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      525
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      199
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      94
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      82
    5. 5
      neufuse
      67
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!