7232.0.amd64fre.winmain.090610-1900.client_en-us.ultimate.vhd


Recommended Posts

No, these builds simply originated as vhd from microsoft.

P.S. One of the posters (a reliable source) from torrents.ru has informed of a new compile added to the win7_rtm branch: 7260.0.090612-21xx

OIC....thanks for the correction. :D

7260???????????????????? :o

That would explain why we're only seeing .vhd files after 7229.

Interesting... is that one an installable .iso or also just a .vhd?

No info other than the build number and date provided by the poster.

OIC....thanks for the correction. :D

7260???????????????????? :o

Poster also wrote that the jump to 7260 signifies a milestone (in this case it seems the milestone is the first build of the win7_rtm branch).

No info other than the build number and date provided by the poster.

Poster also wrote that the jump to 7260 signifies a milestone (in this case it seems the milestone is the first build of the win7_rtm branch).

7260.0.090612-2110

but build date of the re-compiled 7232 is 090613........??

(6.1.7232.0.winmain.090613-0700) and 7:00 a.m. ??

7260.0.090612-2110

but build date of the re-compiled 7232 is 090613........??

(6.1.7232.0.winmain.090613-0700) and 7:00 a.m. ??

The recompile of the current leaked build could very well be a newer build than that first build in the win7_rtm branch. It could be that the mentioned 7260 was based on the 7232 that was leaked. I am obviously just guessing. Furthermore, it wouldn't surprise me if the only difference between the 7232 compiles and 7260 was the activation/expiration related code changes.

Wzor has also added info on the win7_rtm branch and say that all builds in this branch are rtm candidates (not surprisingly). They also added the full build tag: 6.1.7260.0.win7_rtm.090612-2110.

Edited by vask

RTM and has the beta fish wall?

I know that it could be changed by the poster but its hard if anyone has the RTM build to first change the wall to the ones Beta & RC had and then post a screenshot of the final version of Win7.

RTM and has the beta fish wall?

I know that it could be changed by the poster but its hard if anyone has the RTM build to first change the wall to the ones Beta & RC had and then post a screenshot of the final version of Win7.

Agreed.. I only noticed that after I had posted it.. I'll see if I can get some more information.

Regards,

Atari.2600

hello from Italy.

But RTM , will be very fastest aftrer RC official build???

I ask this , because official RC on my PC ( intel-core2 quad+ ati 4870+ 8 gb of ram) , is slowest from beta and it's fast same windows vista sp2.

I am very boring, I hope in win7 fastest from vista sp2 ( open applications, window explorer folders and file navigation) , but I creed that this not will be true!

hello from Italy.

But RTM , will be very fastest aftrer RC official build???

I ask this , because official RC on my PC ( intel-core2 quad+ ati 4870+ 8 gb of ram) , is slowest from beta and it's fast same windows vista sp2.

I am very boring, I hope in win7 fastest from vista sp2 ( open applications, window explorer folders and file navigation) , but I creed that this not will be true!

Windows 7 for me so far has been faster than Vista all the way. You should have no problems.

The recompile of the current leaked build could very well be a newer build than that first build in the win7_rtm branch. It could be that the mentioned 7260 was based on the 7232 that was leaked. I am obviously just guessing. Furthermore, it wouldn't surprise me if the only difference between the 7232 compiles and 7260 was the activation/expiration related code changes.

Wzor has also added info on the win7_rtm branch and say that all builds in this branch are rtm candidates (not surprisingly). They also added the full build tag: 6.1.7260.0.win7_rtm.090612-2110.

Yes, it makes sense to make a build number jump for the Rtm candidates :yes:

Looks like it won't be long anymore until final Rtm is done, which will get another small jump to 7300.

hello from Italy.

But RTM , will be very fastest aftrer RC official build???

I ask this , because official RC on my PC ( intel-core2 quad+ ati 4870+ 8 gb of ram) , is slowest from beta and it's fast same windows vista sp2.

I am very boring, I hope in win7 fastest from vista sp2 ( open applications, window explorer folders and file navigation) , but I creed that this not will be true!

I am Polish old and what is this?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Researchers claim Microsoft's quantum breakthrough is flawed by basic Python errors by Karthik Mudaliar Microsoft's aggressive roadmap to deliver a commercial quantum supercomputer by 2029 has now hit a bit of a snag, and it's not because of a complex sub-zero dilution refrigerator, but rather because of a few lines of basic Python code. A new critique published in the scientific journal Nature argues that simple software errors effectively manufactured the breakthrough that Microsoft's foundational research claimed back in 2025 into Majorana-based topological qubits. Topological quantum computing, the path that Microsoft chose for its research, relies on creating and controlling "Majorana zero modes." These are exotic quasiparticles that theoretically offer vastly superior error resistance compared to the highly sensitive superconducting qubits currently being championed by rivals like Google and IBM. However, physically proving you have created these particles requires sifting through massive amounts of complex electrical conductance data to isolate a specific "topological gap." Because of the sheer volume of data, physicists rely heavily on custom software pipelines to process the results. This is where the Python scripts come in. Now, according to the critique, Microsoft’s data processing software contained fundamental programming errors that ultimately skewed the published results. By mishandling data arrays or deploying incorrect logic within the Python script, the software supposedly discarded "noisy" or contradictory data. Which is why it only highlighted the specific electrical measurements that supported the topological-gap claim. The researchers behind the critique argued that this makes the findings invalid, suggesting the heralded "quantum leap" was actually a false positive generated by bad code and not a product of groundbreaking physics. However, Microsoft is pushing back hard against these allegations. The Redmond giant has formally rejected the criticism, saying that it's just a minor anomaly rather than a fatal flaw. According to the company, while there may have been a minor oversight in the data parsing scripts, it does not alter the fundamental reality of their physical experiment. Just weeks ago, Microsoft unveiled the Majorana 2 quantum processor, a milestone so significant that the company boldly accelerated its timeline for a commercial quantum supercomputer from 2035 down to 2029. But the new software allegations reopen an old wound. Microsoft's quantum division faced a remarkably similar crisis when a landmark 2018 paper on Majorana particles was famously retracted in 2021 after independent physicists discovered the data had been inappropriately cropped. That historical baggage makes the current Python-related allegations particularly sensitive. If the foundational math and data processing for the 2025 breakthrough are genuinely flawed, the highly anticipated 2029 commercial timeline could easily be delayed or, worse, cancelled.
    • Because of what they have done to VMware I will never buy anything Broadcom again.
    • AMD releases hotfix for driver install issues on Windows 10 PCs by Taras Buria Earlier this week, AMD released an important graphics driver update. Version 26.6.2 brought AMD FSR 4.1 support to the previous-gen Radeon lineup, the RX 7000 series, giving users better upscaling tech that was previously locked to the newest GPUs. However, the driver turned out to be a little buggy, with users reporting installation issues on systems still running Windows 10. AMD quickly acknowledged the bug and today released a hotfix to resolve the problem. The AMD 26.6.3 Hotfix update is now available for download from the official website. Given that it is a hotfix release, it has only one change in its release notes: AMD announced the update on its official X account and added that a WHQL driver update with the necessary fixes would be released next week. Meanwhile, users can apply the hotfix or roll back to the previous driver using the official AMD Cleanup Utility. You can download AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 26.6.3 Hotfix Preview Driver from the official website here. It is compatible with all currently supported graphics cards and 64-bit Windows 10 and 11. Full release notes are available on the same page.
    • With Microsoft now listening to its core audience and acting upon received feedback, fans can finally expect a much better version of Windows 11 than what was available five years ago. Here is to five more years, Windows 11! I guess we all need a good laugh now and again...
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      466
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      123
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      82
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!