7232.0.amd64fre.winmain.090610-1900.client_en-us.ultimate.vhd

By FaiKee
in The Fast Ring (Insider Previews)

 Share

Recommended Posts

Veteran

FaiKee

Posted
  • Author
Posted
No, these builds simply originated as vhd from microsoft.

P.S. One of the posters (a reliable source) from torrents.ru has informed of a new compile added to the win7_rtm branch: 7260.0.090612-21xx

OIC....thanks for the correction. :D

7260???????????????????? :o

Collaborator

vask

Posted
Posted
That would explain why we're only seeing .vhd files after 7229.

Interesting... is that one an installable .iso or also just a .vhd?

No info other than the build number and date provided by the poster.

OIC....thanks for the correction. :D

7260???????????????????? :o

Poster also wrote that the jump to 7260 signifies a milestone (in this case it seems the milestone is the first build of the win7_rtm branch).

Veteran

FaiKee

Posted
  • Author
Posted
No info other than the build number and date provided by the poster.

Poster also wrote that the jump to 7260 signifies a milestone (in this case it seems the milestone is the first build of the win7_rtm branch).

7260.0.090612-2110

but build date of the re-compiled 7232 is 090613........??

(6.1.7232.0.winmain.090613-0700) and 7:00 a.m. ??

Collaborator

vask

Posted
Posted (edited)
7260.0.090612-2110

but build date of the re-compiled 7232 is 090613........??

(6.1.7232.0.winmain.090613-0700) and 7:00 a.m. ??

The recompile of the current leaked build could very well be a newer build than that first build in the win7_rtm branch. It could be that the mentioned 7260 was based on the 7232 that was leaked. I am obviously just guessing. Furthermore, it wouldn't surprise me if the only difference between the 7232 compiles and 7260 was the activation/expiration related code changes.

Wzor has also added info on the win7_rtm branch and say that all builds in this branch are rtm candidates (not surprisingly). They also added the full build tag: 6.1.7260.0.win7_rtm.090612-2110.

Edited by vask
Mentor

0nyX

Posted
Posted

RTM and has the beta fish wall?

I know that it could be changed by the poster but its hard if anyone has the RTM build to first change the wall to the ones Beta & RC had and then post a screenshot of the final version of Win7.

Rookie

Atari.2600

Posted
Posted
RTM and has the beta fish wall?

I know that it could be changed by the poster but its hard if anyone has the RTM build to first change the wall to the ones Beta & RC had and then post a screenshot of the final version of Win7.

Agreed.. I only noticed that after I had posted it.. I'll see if I can get some more information.

Regards,

Atari.2600

Apprentice

Maux76

Posted
Posted

hello from Italy.

But RTM , will be very fastest aftrer RC official build???

I ask this , because official RC on my PC ( intel-core2 quad+ ati 4870+ 8 gb of ram) , is slowest from beta and it's fast same windows vista sp2.

I am very boring, I hope in win7 fastest from vista sp2 ( open applications, window explorer folders and file navigation) , but I creed that this not will be true!

Grand Master

Max Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted
hello from Italy.

But RTM , will be very fastest aftrer RC official build???

I ask this , because official RC on my PC ( intel-core2 quad+ ati 4870+ 8 gb of ram) , is slowest from beta and it's fast same windows vista sp2.

I am very boring, I hope in win7 fastest from vista sp2 ( open applications, window explorer folders and file navigation) , but I creed that this not will be true!

Windows 7 for me so far has been faster than Vista all the way. You should have no problems.

Veteran

Lord Ba'al

Posted
Posted
The recompile of the current leaked build could very well be a newer build than that first build in the win7_rtm branch. It could be that the mentioned 7260 was based on the 7232 that was leaked. I am obviously just guessing. Furthermore, it wouldn't surprise me if the only difference between the 7232 compiles and 7260 was the activation/expiration related code changes.

Wzor has also added info on the win7_rtm branch and say that all builds in this branch are rtm candidates (not surprisingly). They also added the full build tag: 6.1.7260.0.win7_rtm.090612-2110.

Yes, it makes sense to make a build number jump for the Rtm candidates :yes:

Looks like it won't be long anymore until final Rtm is done, which will get another small jump to 7300.

Contributor

MrGriggs

Posted
Posted
hello from Italy.

But RTM , will be very fastest aftrer RC official build???

I ask this , because official RC on my PC ( intel-core2 quad+ ati 4870+ 8 gb of ram) , is slowest from beta and it's fast same windows vista sp2.

I am very boring, I hope in win7 fastest from vista sp2 ( open applications, window explorer folders and file navigation) , but I creed that this not will be true!

I am Polish old and what is this?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Posts

    • Free Software Foundation Europe pushes EU to force Google to allow AI uninstalls on Android

      By ad47uk · Posted

      UK need to do the same thing as well,
    • Hey Google, these are the Gemini features I want in 2026

      By ad47uk · Posted

      I have a Motorola, one of the lower end ones, it works fine. It is possible to get rid of the Gemini app and also to disable googles assistant , but A.i is still apps. I try to avoid all LLM A.I, is i can, I use no Ai duck duck go.
    • The official Funny Pictures thread

      By +Edouard · Posted

    • Politically funny images of the World

      By +Edouard · Posted

    • Free Software Foundation Europe pushes EU to force Google to allow AI uninstalls on Android

      By zikalify · Posted

      Free Software Foundation Europe pushes EU to force Google to allow AI uninstalls on Android by Paul Hill Credit: Pexels Users should be able to fully uninstall AI-based features from Android devices and be able to access interoperability functions, free from Google’s verification requirements, the European Commission has heard as part of an Android interoperability consultation under the Digital Markets Act. These measures were proposed by the Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE) last week when it submitted its documentation. The FSFE noted that Google had started silently installing AI models without telling users. It noted that the EU’s DMA requires companies like Google to allow users to uninstall pre-loaded software from their devices, but in the case of the AI models Google is installing, they reinstall if you delete them, contravening the DMA. To get Google back under control, the FSFE has told the European Commission that there needs to be improvements within the Android Open Source Project (AOSP). First, it said that users should be able to fully remove pre-loaded AI components from their devices, with companies being prohibited from silently reinstalling or reactivating them. Second, access to Android interoperability features should not be contingent on registration, authorization, or contractual relationships with Google. This pertains to Google’s attempt to force developers to register with Google, even to publish apps to alternative app stores like F-Droid. Discussing its submission, Lucas Lasota, FSFE Legal Programme Manager, said: Google is planning to roll out its Android Developer Certification in September 2026. This will force every Android app developer to register with Google before their software can be installed on certified Android devices, but it should affect those who have removed Google Apps from their device. The program is controversial because it entails the signing of contracts and payment of account fees to Google, as well as the handing over of the identities of developers. It said: The FSFE said that if the Commission’s draft measures remain unchanged, then Google will be allowed to make developers verify their identity. The FSFE believes that asking developers to register is contrary to the text and spirit of the law. In summary, the FSFE has told the Commission that no developer should need a Google account, a Play Store presence, or any agreement with Google to access Android’s interoperability features.

  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      519
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      72
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!