Recommended Posts

BOSTON, June 16 (UPI) -- A Boston father who sent his young daughter to visit her grandparents in Cleveland said airline staff put her on the wrong plane and she wound up in Newark. :huh:

Jonathan Kamens said he took his daughter Miriam, 10, through Logan Airport security and spoke to Continental Airlines agents before leaving her in their care prior to her flight, WBZ-TV, Boston, reported Tuesday.

"They seemed like they knew what they were doing. The paperwork is very specific," Kamens said. "I had no inkling anything was wrong until my father-in-law called me and said, 'where is she?'"

Kamens said the family was in a panic for 45 minutes while Continental employees scrambled to locate his daughter.

"She's off on her trip to visit her grandparents, and then she's gone, evaporated into thin air and that's scary," Kamens said.

The father said he remembered another plane had been leaving the same tarmac for Newark and suggested Continental check that plane. The girl was discovered on the Newark flight and eventually arrived in Cleveland a few hours behind schedule.

"We take very seriously our responsibility to care for unaccompanied minors on our flights," a Continental representative said in a statement. "In this case, there were two flights departing simultaneously from a single

doorway and miscommunication among staff members resulted in the child being boarded on the wrong aircraft. We are truly sorry for this error and have apologized to the family."

source

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/785808-young-girl-placed-on-wrong-flight/
Share on other sites

She shouldn't have been allowed on in the first place. She's far too young to travel on her own especially with all the weirdo's around these days.

I think our legal system has got it right by banning under 14's from travelling on their own. Some airlines go even further and won't allow under 16's on their own.

I can't believe especiialy in this day and age that any parent would send their young child on a flight on their own.

There's only so much an airline can do. They can't look after her all the time which is what someone at such a young age needs. What if some pervert pick her up and abducted her?

She shouldn't have been allowed on in the first place. She's far too young to travel on her own especially with all the weirdo's around these days.

I think our legal system has got it right by banning under 14's from travelling on their own. Some airlines go even further and won't allow under 16's on their own.

I can't believe especiialy in this day and age that any parent would send their young child on a flight on their own.

There's only so much an airline can do. They can't look after her all the time which is what someone at such a young age needs. What if some pervert pick her up and abducted her?

Im not sure there is an age limit, or it is down to the airlines own code as to the ages they allow without parents etc.

I think the airline handled the situation well to be honest. Mistakes happen, no one was hurt and she was put safely back on the correct plane after landing.

I know it COULD have gone wrong, but from my understanding, she was cared for the whole time by staff at both ends until her grandparents got her, so she was never in any danger.

She shouldn't have been allowed on in the first place. She's far too young to travel on her own especially with all the weirdo's around these days.

I think our legal system has got it right by banning under 14's from travelling on their own. Some airlines go even further and won't allow under 16's on their own.

I can't believe especiialy in this day and age that any parent would send their young child on a flight on their own.

There's only so much an airline can do. They can't look after her all the time which is what someone at such a young age needs. What if some pervert pick her up and abducted her?

Airlines offer a service they call the un-accompanied minor service, how this works is you pay extra and then come time for the flight you take your child to the airport and sign papers naming the person who is to pick them up and then you sign them over to the proper "sitter"(for lack of a better term) This "sitter" is then responsible for placing the child on the flight handing all proper papers to the next "sitter" who will watch the child during the flight. Once at the destination the person meeting them is then to show identification to validate that they are indeed the person named to pick up the child. The airline in the article is Continental Airlines here's there information page on Unaccompanied minor flights http://www.continental.com/web/en-US/conte...rs/default.aspx

So this is definitely the fault of the airline service in my opinion not doing a proper job. The father paid for a service and the airline lost his child, according to the article they didn't even think to check the other flight until he mentioned something. If this was my child I would be asking for a refund or some kind of restitution. How horrible to not know where your child is.

Edited by Mrs_Angel_D
She shouldn't have been allowed on in the first place. She's far too young to travel on her own especially with all the weirdo's around these days.

I think our legal system has got it right by banning under 14's from travelling on their own. Some airlines go even further and won't allow under 16's on their own.

I can't believe especiialy in this day and age that any parent would send their young child on a flight on their own.

There's only so much an airline can do. They can't look after her all the time which is what someone at such a young age needs. What if some pervert pick her up and abducted her?

Lol they don't just stick em on the plane and forget about them. They should have a flight attendant with the child at all times, including the handover to whoever is picking them up. (At least this is on the companies I know of, obviously if she was just on the plane by her self, then yes she is much too young.)

If this was my child I would be asking for a refund or some kind of restitution. How horrible to not know where your child is.

It would be thoroughly surprised if they were not offered a refund. That 45mins must have been the longest 45mins of the fathers life, I hate to imagine how he felt.

She shouldn't have been allowed on in the first place. She's far too young to travel on her own especially with all the weirdo's around these days.

I think our legal system has got it right by banning under 14's from travelling on their own. Some airlines go even further and won't allow under 16's on their own.

I can't believe especiialy in this day and age that any parent would send their young child on a flight on their own.

There's only so much an airline can do. They can't look after her all the time which is what someone at such a young age needs. What if some pervert pick her up and abducted her?

My son has flown all over the country (US) without any issues from age 6 to 16. At no time are the kids just left to where anyone can just grab or pick them up. For younger kids you have to "pay" a mandatory extra fee to the airlines to have them constantly escorted. All the airports my son has flown though with a lay-over, have a secured room (with airport security/airline employees) where the kids wait for their flights. The escort assigned takes them to the plane and cannot leave them on the plane until the child is signed for by the flight attendant. After landing the flight attendant will not release the child unless signed for by the airline employee or the parent. And for the parent picking up the kid at the destination the information has to match what was provided to the airline at the origin as to whom to release them to and they verify with photo ID and signature.

Even though in this case she was on the wrong flight she was still under constant supervision and would never have been released after landing as the mistake would have been identified at that time.

The bad part was on the airlines was letting her on the plane in the first place. To have people allowed to board an airline that they are not ticketed for is a clear security violation of unauthorized access. The flight attendant should have identified the mistake right off when looking at the girls boarding pass to see if the assigned seat was acceptable or if she should be moved to another for better monitoring. It must have been a fluke that the seat assigned didn't have someone else ticketed for it in which case it would have been obvious there was a mistake.

Airlines offer a service they call the un-accompanied minor service, how this works is you pay extra and then come time for the flight you take your child to the airport and sign papers naming the person who is to pick them up and then you sign them over to the proper "sitter"(for lack of a better term) This "sitter" is then responsible for placing the child on the flight handing all proper papers to the next "sitter" who will watch the child during the flight. Once at the destination the person meeting them is then to show identification to validate that they are indeed the person named to pick up the child. The airline in the article is Continental Airlines here's there information page on Unaccompanied minor flights http://www.continental.com/web/en-US/conte...rs/default.aspx

So this is definitely the fault of the airline service in my opinion not doing a proper job. The father paid for a service and the airline lost his child, according to the article they didn't even think to check the other flight until he mentioned something. If this was my child I would be asking for a refund or some kind of restitution. How horrible to not know where your child is.

Totally agree with you.

I flew "alone" once when I was 13 in Briths Airways. I remember I had a sitter there taking care of me most part of the time. I was flying from London UK to Lisbon Portugal.

Thank God I didn't got lost or had 2 flights taking of the same door lol

I flew alone from Toronto to Vancouver back in 1994? I was about 8 years old, and that was a fun experience. Except I was a nervous wreck, and refused to see the pilot. :p However, the experience was still fun. There was even a little convoy of kids once I got back in Toronto, where we stood in one of the lobby-type things and they announced names and stuff on the PA system. OMG, those were the days...

I flew alone from Toronto to Vancouver back in 1994? I was about 8 years old, and that was a fun experience. Except I was a nervous wreck, and refused to see the pilot. :p However, the experience was still fun. There was even a little convoy of kids once I got back in Toronto, where we stood in one of the lobby-type things and they announced names and stuff on the PA system. OMG, those were the days...

I've been to the cockpit a few times as a child. I don't remember much, and now that I think about it, it was probably just an excuse for my dad to see all the gadgets and gizmos :p Oh the good old days.

If you have a child that small...don't stick them on a plane by themselves. It's completely stupid to trust someone who DON'T KNOW to take care of your child.

My parents NEVER did this and always flew down to Tennessee with us and then flew back.

I'm another one of those 'kids' that can claim the functionality of their Sitter programs, and they always did a fantastic job of it. Constantly escorting you, tons of paperwork, friendly people too, but this article got me thinking. If I can I will get everything possible into a carry-on and go like that -for obvious reasons-, then why would I trust them not to lose my child? ;)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Time to start going to the local church and play Bingo for a while.
    • NVIDIA announces 35 new AI HPC supercomputers across Europe by Fiza Ali NVIDIA has announced that 35 AI high-performance computing (HPC) supercomputers are planned to open throughout Europe this year. This marks what the company describes as the largest single-year expansion of AI infrastructure in the history of the continent. These new systems, unveiled at ISC High Performance 2026, will be placed at a number of national supercomputing centres, AI factories, and research institutes to provide advanced computing resources to more than three million researchers. Describing AI, NVIDIA founder and CEO Jensen Huang stated, "AI is the new instrument of science, and Europe is building the infrastructure to put it in the hands of millions of researchers." Built on NVIDIA's Blackwell and Hopper architectures, the new systems will support research in climate science, healthcare, clean energy, quantum computing, and other scientific fields. Among the major projects are the Barcelona Supercomputing Center's MareNostrum 5 AI upgrade, BavariaAI's Blue Swan platform in Germany, Italy's IT4LIA AI factory, Germany's HammerHAI project, and Sweden's Mimer AI Factory. The Barcelona Supercomputing Center plans to expand MareNostrum 5 with NVIDIA GB300 NVL72 and GB200 NVL4 systems. In total, the BSC expects to deliver up to 20 exaflops of AI training performance and 33 exaflops of AI inference performance. This increased computational capability will support research efforts related to climate modelling, biotechnology, energy systems, etc. Furthermore, as part of the IT4LIA project, more than 8,000 GPUs, each based on NVIDIA’s GB200 NVL4 architecture, will be used in Italy. This represents one of the largest AI factory initiatives announced to date. Additionally, the Blue Swan platform from BavariaAI will include about 1,000 GPUs to help develop multimodal AI models for use in the medical field, robotics, and various areas of scientific research. NVIDIA also emphasized in the announcement how rapidly growth of accelerated computing usage is taking place within both energy and climate-related research. The company said Siemens Energy uses NVIDIA-powered technologies to significantly accelerate the process of designing and simulating hydrogen-capable gas turbines. Using those same acceleration technologies, Siemens was able to reduce simulation time by up to 77 percent. The company also highlighted several quantum computing initiatives across Europe. CINECA, EuroHPC, and Pasqal are integrating a quantum processing unit into Italy's CINECA supercomputing centre using NVIDIA's CUDA-Q platform. Meanwhile, researchers at Germany's Julich Supercomputing Centre recently simulated a universal 50-qubit quantum computer on the JUPITER supercomputer. The announcement demonstrates Europe's continued commitment to building out its infrastructure supporting AI and supercomputing as governments, research organizations, and technology companies compete to build out their respective computing capacities and secure their positions in advanced scientific research.
    • It's about to become harder to turn off your Samsung TV, thanks to Instagram by Aditya Tiwari Meta announced that its Instagram for TV app has arrived on Samsung TVs in the US as part of its latest expansion, giving users one more way to scroll through Reels. The social media giant often comes under scrutiny for the "addictiveness" of its features, which leads people to spend excessive time on the platform. Interestingly, Instagram boss Adam Mosseri described spending 16 hours on the platform as "problematic use" but not "clinical addiction." Mosseri also compared scrolling on Instagram to binge-watching a show on Netflix. Instagram for TV is now available on Samsung TV models released in 2020 or later. The app is already available on Amazon Fire TV and Google TV in the US, which together account for the majority of connected TV devices. The company said it will test several new features to improve the living room and family experience while using Instagram on the big screen. Watching vertical videos on a big screen isn't something many would be excited about. Probably that's why Meta is testing a dedicated home for horizontal videos. Creators will get the opportunity to design content for TV screens and get more ways to reach audiences, according to Meta. If you found an interesting Reel while doomscrolling on your phone, you'll be able to cast it to your TV. The feature is available for testing on Instagram for TV on Google TV and Amazon Fire TV, and it will also support videos from the Saved tab. Instagram for TV will be testing Channels organized around user interests, across genres such as comedy and sports, as well as content from favorite creators. Moreover, you can watch Stories on your TV. While Instagram is known for short-form videos, it's knocking on more doors to keep the audience hooked. The company said it's exploring new content formats for the big screen, including long-form creator content to cover topics in detail, episodic series to build suspense across multiple episodes, and creator live sessions on TV. All of the new updates put Instagram in competition with established giants like YouTube (and Netflix), which already have a robust presence on the big screen. In recent updates, Instagram added the ability to write an individual caption for each carousel image, manually re-order posts, and a paid version of the app.
    • I know RAM and storage prices are high right now, but I think it would have been better to have 1TB as the base level storage, especially as it's supposed to be for gaming. Plus a 2.5gbe ethernet port rather than only 1gbe.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      mnsgroup earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      204
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      98
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      82
    5. 5
      neufuse
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!