To Upgrade or Not to Upgrade...


Recommended Posts

I am wondering whether upgrading my current PC is worth it for gaming as gaming with the current system specs suck as far as my graphics is concerned. I lag during gameplay.

I was considering upgrading the following parts:

Motherboard

Ram

Graphics

... or would keeping the current CPU, limiting my ability to upgrade the Ram to only DDR2 800 and adding an ATI 4000 series graphics card would defeat my purpose or waste my time and money versus getting a new AMD Dragon system consisting of AMD CPU and Graphics card along with the ability to add DDR3 Ram?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/790668-to-upgrade-or-not-to-upgrade/
Share on other sites

Going by the link to your system setup Q6600 and 3GB of Ram installed what you should be looking to upgrade is:

Graphics card

PSU

New case

Why do you suggest a Graphics upgrade, but no Motherboard upgrade as I would be limited to PCI x16 slot graphics cards which again limits me to at most a GeForce 9 series card up to a 9500 and not any Ram upgrade as wouldn't the current DDR2 667 Ram also be a limiting factor? I understand upgrading to new case as a new card would require more space as a larger graphics card would require a larger PSU, but as I stated above the Graphics card is the upgrade which you suggested I find confusing as to me I am still limited by my initial problem.

I have a 24" monitor capable of 1920x1200 and it would be nice to run games at higher resolutions than what I currently do @ 1280x720 and lower without much lag.

Why do you suggest a Graphics upgrade, but no Motherboard upgrade as I would be limited to PCI x16 slot graphics cards which again limits me to at most a GeForce 9 series card up to a 9500

You think, you know, someone told you....PCI-e 1.x @x16 can run PCI-e 2.0 cards and has more then enough bandwidth to run cards like HD 4890 or GTX 275.

...and not any Ram upgrade as wouldn't the current DDR2 667 Ram also be a limiting factor?

You think it would but really...No.

I have a 24" monitor capable of 1920x1200 and it would be nice to run games at higher resolutions than what I currently do @ 1280x720 and lower without much lag.

Your GeForce 8400GS has a lot to do with that (exaggerating by a lot... its way worse).

They are backward compatible. A friend of mine is running a 9600 gts which is pci-e 2.0 on a pci-e 1.0 motherboard.

As for suggesting a card for you we'd need to know your budget.

If you have the cash go for a gtx 295. If not a gtx 260 or 275 are solid performers. I dont know anything about ATI cards so I can't suggest any.

I've got a GTX 260 running on a PCI-E 1.x motherboard, and I can play L4D and CODWAW at 1920x1080 on a 22" HD monitor with their settings way jacked up and still get a good frame rate. Newegg had a sale a few days ago, you might want to wait if you're on a budget.

If you're in the market for a used 8800GT.. then I've got one for ya!

Oh and when you do make a graphics card purchase, make sure you've got a good enough power supply. The GTX 260 takes up 36A on a 12V rail. 8800GT takes up 22A I believe.

You think, you know, someone told you....PCI-e 1.x @x16 can run PCI-e 2.0 cards and has more then enough bandwidth to run cards like HD 4890 or GTX 275.

You think it would but really...No.

Your GeForce 8400GS has a lot to do with that (exaggerating by a lot... its way worse).

PeterUK I was unaware of this as I thought PCIe 2.0 could not run in a PCIe 1.x slot. No one told me this it was just something I thought wasn't capable.

As for the rest of the replies thank you for your suggestions and clearing/backing what PeterUK said.

If I am going to upgrade my graphics I am debating whether to go with something cheap, but still pack a punch like the ATI Radeon HD 4770 as the direct X 11 cards will be out before the new year arrives only a few short months from now. The other reason I'm liking the 4770 from ATI is its 40nm process and running cool and not a power hog.

I've watched youtube videos where people are showing off their 4770 running usually with 4gigs of ram usually DDR3 and on an AMD x3/4 and the framerates/gameplay seem real smooth and nice.

How would my setup compare with the addition of such a graphics change as compared to an AMD x3/4 and 3-4gigs of DDR3?

They are backward compatible. A friend of mine is running a 9600 gts which is pci-e 2.0 on a pci-e 1.0 motherboard.

As for suggesting a card for you we'd need to know your budget.

If you have the cash go for a gtx 295. If not a gtx 260 or 275 are solid performers. I dont know anything about ATI cards so I can't suggest any.

What he said ^ ^ ^

I think for 1920x1200 resolution, the GTX 275 or equivalent ATI card are great solutions for a medium budget. If you have the cash go with the GTX 295; you won't be disappointed.

But for these graphics cards you will need to move away from the m9040n tower case and transplant the motherboard into a new case with a new PSU; at least 600 Watts I would say; (750 watts ideal).

Also your board is an ASUS IPIBL-LA (decent board); it supports DDR2 800. RAM is pretty cheap, so 4 GB DDR2 800 would be good to get as well; even though if your running 32Bit OS you'll only see around 3.0 GB to (maybe) ~ 3.75 GB.

How would my setup compare with the addition of such a graphics change as compared to an AMD x3/4 and 3-4gigs of DDR3?

If anything your Q6600 & 3GB of Ram is being limited to your current graphics card a HD 4890 or GTX 275 would give it a overall balance.

You get more speed with a faster CPU then RAM but if you wanted to do that get a better Motherboard + DDR2 800 and overclock your CPU.

DDR3 is nice but I wouldn't die over it unless the CPU only supports DDR3 (like i7).

I don't see the point at this time to upgrade my graphics to any of the $200+ cards when direct X 11 is going to be here before the new year.

Wouldn't just upgrading my PSU to something more future-proof like a Corsair 750W and an ATI 4770 for the time being be fine or am I still bottle-necking my CPU?

Can these two upgrades be done without a case upgrade as the ATI 4770 doesn't look much larger than my current 8400GS?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • lots of people us facebook for stuff, threads though no
    • Can you read? I've said I'm willing to pay more for a notchless (no notch) 3:2 screen.
    • Not even an OLED display on the laptops. Also it seems that the laptop design isn't the same as the Surface Ultra model. Looks like bargain bin at high prices.
    • make your own notch - it's not that hard
    • VirtualBox 7.2.10 by Razvan Serea VirtualBox is a powerful x86 and AMD64/Intel64 virtualization product for enterprise as well as home use. Targeted at server, desktop and embedded use, it is now the only professional-quality virtualization solution that is also Open Source Software. Presently, VirtualBox runs on Windows, Linux, macOS, and Solaris hosts and supports a large number of guest operating systems including but not limited to Windows (NT 4.0, 2000, XP, Server 2003, Vista, 7, 8, Windows 10 and Windows 11), DOS/Windows 3.x, Linux (2.4, 2.6, 3.x, 4.x, 5.x and 6.x), Solaris and OpenSolaris, OS/2, OpenBSD, NetBSD and FreeBSD. Some of the features of VirtualBox are: Modularity. VirtualBox has an extremely modular design with well-defined internal programming interfaces and a client/server design. This makes it easy to control it from several interfaces at once: for example, you can start a virtual machine in a typical virtual machine GUI and then control that machine from the command line, or possibly remotely. VirtualBox also comes with a full Software Development Kit: even though it is Open Source Software, you don't have to hack the source to write a new interface for VirtualBox. Virtual machine descriptions in XML. The configuration settings of virtual machines are stored entirely in XML and are independent of the local machines. Virtual machine definitions can therefore easily be ported to other computers. VirtualBox 7.2.10 changelog: VMM: Fixed issue when CentOS 10 VM was not booting due to the message "Fatal glibc error: CPU does not support x86-64-v3" (​github:gh-642) Devices/EFI: Fixed booting issue when ARM VM had less than 1024 MiB of RAM assigned (​github:gh-679) USB: Fixed issue when it was not possible to attach USB device to headless VM on Apple Silicon/macOS 26.4.1 (​github:gh-631) Storage: Fixed issue when VIRTIO-SCSI device was not recognized as SSD device by guest system (​github:gh-634) Network: Fixed issue in E1000 emulation code which triggered debug log creation (​github:gh-645) Network: Fixed issue in E1000 emulation code which prevented OS/2 guest from booting (​github:gh-683) Linux Host: Fixed issue when VMs could not be started due to kernel oops (​github:gh-639) Linux Host and Guest: Fixed issue when kernel modules were failing to build with openSUSE 16.0 kernel Linux Host and Guest: Added initial support for kernel 7.1 Linux Host and Guest: Added extra fixes for RHEL 9.8 kernel (​github:gh-676) Linux Host and Guest: Added possibility to build source code using NASM instead of YASM as the assembler (​github:gh-520) Linux Guest Additions: Added initial support for Extended Data Control Protocol for clipboard sharing with Plasma on Wayland guests (​github:gh-33) Linux Guest Additions: Added extra fixes for preventing vboxvideo kernel module build with kernel version 7.0 and newer (​github:gh-655) OS/2 Guest Additions: Fixed issue when Shared Folders automount and clipboard sharing stopped working (​github:gh-551) Download: VirtualBox 7.2.10 | 170.0 MB (Open Source) Download: VirtualBox 7.2.10 Extension Pack | 19.1 MB View: VirtualBox Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      510
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      100
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      87
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!