To Upgrade or Not to Upgrade...


Recommended Posts

I am wondering whether upgrading my current PC is worth it for gaming as gaming with the current system specs suck as far as my graphics is concerned. I lag during gameplay.

I was considering upgrading the following parts:

Motherboard

Ram

Graphics

... or would keeping the current CPU, limiting my ability to upgrade the Ram to only DDR2 800 and adding an ATI 4000 series graphics card would defeat my purpose or waste my time and money versus getting a new AMD Dragon system consisting of AMD CPU and Graphics card along with the ability to add DDR3 Ram?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/790668-to-upgrade-or-not-to-upgrade/
Share on other sites

Going by the link to your system setup Q6600 and 3GB of Ram installed what you should be looking to upgrade is:

Graphics card

PSU

New case

Why do you suggest a Graphics upgrade, but no Motherboard upgrade as I would be limited to PCI x16 slot graphics cards which again limits me to at most a GeForce 9 series card up to a 9500 and not any Ram upgrade as wouldn't the current DDR2 667 Ram also be a limiting factor? I understand upgrading to new case as a new card would require more space as a larger graphics card would require a larger PSU, but as I stated above the Graphics card is the upgrade which you suggested I find confusing as to me I am still limited by my initial problem.

I have a 24" monitor capable of 1920x1200 and it would be nice to run games at higher resolutions than what I currently do @ 1280x720 and lower without much lag.

Why do you suggest a Graphics upgrade, but no Motherboard upgrade as I would be limited to PCI x16 slot graphics cards which again limits me to at most a GeForce 9 series card up to a 9500

You think, you know, someone told you....PCI-e 1.x @x16 can run PCI-e 2.0 cards and has more then enough bandwidth to run cards like HD 4890 or GTX 275.

...and not any Ram upgrade as wouldn't the current DDR2 667 Ram also be a limiting factor?

You think it would but really...No.

I have a 24" monitor capable of 1920x1200 and it would be nice to run games at higher resolutions than what I currently do @ 1280x720 and lower without much lag.

Your GeForce 8400GS has a lot to do with that (exaggerating by a lot... its way worse).

They are backward compatible. A friend of mine is running a 9600 gts which is pci-e 2.0 on a pci-e 1.0 motherboard.

As for suggesting a card for you we'd need to know your budget.

If you have the cash go for a gtx 295. If not a gtx 260 or 275 are solid performers. I dont know anything about ATI cards so I can't suggest any.

I've got a GTX 260 running on a PCI-E 1.x motherboard, and I can play L4D and CODWAW at 1920x1080 on a 22" HD monitor with their settings way jacked up and still get a good frame rate. Newegg had a sale a few days ago, you might want to wait if you're on a budget.

If you're in the market for a used 8800GT.. then I've got one for ya!

Oh and when you do make a graphics card purchase, make sure you've got a good enough power supply. The GTX 260 takes up 36A on a 12V rail. 8800GT takes up 22A I believe.

You think, you know, someone told you....PCI-e 1.x @x16 can run PCI-e 2.0 cards and has more then enough bandwidth to run cards like HD 4890 or GTX 275.

You think it would but really...No.

Your GeForce 8400GS has a lot to do with that (exaggerating by a lot... its way worse).

PeterUK I was unaware of this as I thought PCIe 2.0 could not run in a PCIe 1.x slot. No one told me this it was just something I thought wasn't capable.

As for the rest of the replies thank you for your suggestions and clearing/backing what PeterUK said.

If I am going to upgrade my graphics I am debating whether to go with something cheap, but still pack a punch like the ATI Radeon HD 4770 as the direct X 11 cards will be out before the new year arrives only a few short months from now. The other reason I'm liking the 4770 from ATI is its 40nm process and running cool and not a power hog.

I've watched youtube videos where people are showing off their 4770 running usually with 4gigs of ram usually DDR3 and on an AMD x3/4 and the framerates/gameplay seem real smooth and nice.

How would my setup compare with the addition of such a graphics change as compared to an AMD x3/4 and 3-4gigs of DDR3?

They are backward compatible. A friend of mine is running a 9600 gts which is pci-e 2.0 on a pci-e 1.0 motherboard.

As for suggesting a card for you we'd need to know your budget.

If you have the cash go for a gtx 295. If not a gtx 260 or 275 are solid performers. I dont know anything about ATI cards so I can't suggest any.

What he said ^ ^ ^

I think for 1920x1200 resolution, the GTX 275 or equivalent ATI card are great solutions for a medium budget. If you have the cash go with the GTX 295; you won't be disappointed.

But for these graphics cards you will need to move away from the m9040n tower case and transplant the motherboard into a new case with a new PSU; at least 600 Watts I would say; (750 watts ideal).

Also your board is an ASUS IPIBL-LA (decent board); it supports DDR2 800. RAM is pretty cheap, so 4 GB DDR2 800 would be good to get as well; even though if your running 32Bit OS you'll only see around 3.0 GB to (maybe) ~ 3.75 GB.

How would my setup compare with the addition of such a graphics change as compared to an AMD x3/4 and 3-4gigs of DDR3?

If anything your Q6600 & 3GB of Ram is being limited to your current graphics card a HD 4890 or GTX 275 would give it a overall balance.

You get more speed with a faster CPU then RAM but if you wanted to do that get a better Motherboard + DDR2 800 and overclock your CPU.

DDR3 is nice but I wouldn't die over it unless the CPU only supports DDR3 (like i7).

I don't see the point at this time to upgrade my graphics to any of the $200+ cards when direct X 11 is going to be here before the new year.

Wouldn't just upgrading my PSU to something more future-proof like a Corsair 750W and an ATI 4770 for the time being be fine or am I still bottle-necking my CPU?

Can these two upgrades be done without a case upgrade as the ATI 4770 doesn't look much larger than my current 8400GS?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
    • Cheers everyone for the replies. It's been very useful. 👍
    • Compared to the 7735HS it is around 25-30% slower in multi-threaded tasks (according to Google search) I did a review of the 7735HS Beelink SER6 Max in 2023, but thinking about it, it's not comparable to the 7730U. For the example you gave about how it will be used, the 7730U is actually an excellent choice for its power and battery efficiency.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      194
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      71
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!