Barclays Premier League Season 2009/2010


Premier League 2009/2010  

437 members have voted

  1. 1. Who will win the Premier League in 2010?

    • Arsenal
      20
    • Aston Villa
      2
    • Birmingham City
      0
    • Blackburn Rovers
      0
    • Bolton Wanderers
      3
    • Burnley
      2
    • Chelsea
      52
    • Everton
      0
    • Fulham
      0
    • Hull City
      2
    • Liverpool
      18
    • Manchester City
      6
    • Manchester United
      46
    • Portsmouth
      2
    • Stoke City
      0
    • Sunderland
      0
    • Tottenham Hotspur
      6
    • West Ham United
      2
    • Wigan Athletic
      1
    • Wolverhampton Wanderers
      1
  2. 2. Who will be relegated in 2010? [Select 3]

    • Arsenal
      16
    • Aston Villa
      1
    • Birmingham City
      19
    • Blackburn Rovers
      4
    • Bolton Wanderers
      12
    • Burnley
      57
    • Chelsea
      15
    • Everton
      3
    • Fulham
      2
    • Hull City
      49
    • Liverpool
      9
    • Manchester City
      6
    • Manchester United
      13
    • Portsmouth
      56
    • Stoke City
      32
    • Sunderland
      17
    • Tottenham Hotspur
      3
    • West Ham United
      22
    • Wigan Athletic
      28
    • Wolverhampton Wanderers
      73
  3. 3. Who will be top scorer?

    • Andrei Arshavin
      4
    • Carlos Tevez
      4
    • Didier Drogba
      34
    • Dimitar Berbatov
      5
    • Emmanuel Adebayor
      6
    • Fernando Torres
      39
    • Frank Lampard
      1
    • Gabriel Agbonlahor
      2
    • Nicolas Anelka
      6
    • Robin van Persie
      3
    • Robinho
      3
    • Roque Santa Cruz
      0
    • Steven Gerrard
      4
    • Wayne Rooney
      32
    • Yakubu Aiyegbeni
      2
    • Other
      18


Recommended Posts

Didn't think we'd get anything out of the Arsenal game and we did well for the most part but Arsenal prove they are the best footballing side in the UK for entertainment. Almunia should have saved our goal but like our keeper he has problems with crosses.

Got Chelsea next and serioously not looking forward to it :(

No, best part was Ferguson fuming again! He's hilarious! :laugh:

..or ridiculous rather.

To be fair I think he has a point this time, the referee 's performance indicates that he was a closet Chelsea fan. United where hard done by no doubting it.

2-2 from a rather fortuitous penalty, and applying the pressure, there's life in this one yet :D

To be fair I think he has a point this time, the referee 's performance indicates that he was a closet Chelsea fan. United where hard done by no doubting it.

Is it your blind hate towards Chelsea or plain amnesia that is behind you forgetting Evans' foul on Drogba inside the box?

Is it your blind hate towards Chelsea or plain amnesia that is behind you forgetting Evans' foul on Drogba inside the box?

Nope, like usual Drogba dived for it. Like I stated before, Drogba spends so much time diving I think you Chelsea fans have forgotten what real injuries, and fouls are. The simple fact is, that 2 seriously poor decisions cost united a point, and I can assure you that as a Liverpool fan, times of me having any sympathy for man united are few and far between, but in this circumstance I feel they where hard done by. Debate it all you want, the goal shouldn't have been allowed to stand and that is a fact. Hell you guys where shouting loudly enough when you felt the ref 'robbed' you against Barcelona, but when that argument is turned on its head you guys simply can't accept it.

Matches aren't "lost" on the decisions on a whole, but the ones that lead to goal(s) and in that sense Man Utd were hard done by that free kick/then foul in box.

However you can't put all the blame on one/two decisions, we didn't finish our chances well.

The reason its slightly harder to take a one goal loss in this case is both teams played very evenly, and that only magnifies the decisions of the referee. If it was much more one sided it's easier to accept a defeat due to your team overall playing much poorly and not deserving anything, but I wouldn't say that was the case seeing as Chelsea have been destroying teams goal wise and Man Utd played without Vidic/Ferdinand. They held off well and gave Chelsea a good game.

It would've been much nicer to see a team finishing with a win without the drama :p

Matches aren't "lost" on the decisions on a whole, but the ones that lead to goal(s) and in that sense Man Utd were hard done by that free kick/then foul in box.

However you can't put all the blame on one/two decisions, we didn't finish our chances well.

The reason its slightly harder to take a one goal loss in this case is both teams played very evenly, and that only magnifies the decisions of the referee. If it was much more one sided it's easier to accept a defeat due to your team overall playing much poorly and not deserving anything, but I wouldn't say that was the case seeing as Chelsea have been destorying teams goal wise and Man Utd played without Vidic/Ferdinand. They held off well and gave Chelsea a good game.

It's a worrying trend though, for me the standard of refereeing in the premier league is poor, and is something that desperately needs to be looked at.

Edited by gigapixels
Nope, like usual Drogba dived for it.
It was a crystal-clear red card for me,and although he was probably faking after the foul that doesn't make it any less than a foul.
Like I stated before, Drogba spends so much time diving
Agreed
I think you Chelsea fans have forgotten what real injuries, and fouls are.
Not really
The simple fact is, that 2 seriously poor decisions cost united a point,
And the penalty I mentioned earlier might have cost us a goal
and I can assure you that as a Liverpool fan, times of me having any sympathy for man united are few and far between, but in this circumstance I feel they where hard done by.
You've already said who you wanted to win,so your opinion on that matter is very biased.
Debate it all you want, the goal shouldn't have been allowed to stand and that is a fact.
I'm not so sure about that either,I didn't see Drogba being offside and it looked like he hauled Wes Brown down,but I think that Brown should have been stronger.
Hell you guys where shouting loudly enough when you felt the ref 'robbed' you against Barcelona, but when that argument is turned on its head you guys simply can't accept it.
You may have a point there but IMHO 3 penalties on a CL quarter final are much more important than a 2 fouls in any league game.
It was a crystal-clear red card for me,and although he was probably faking after the foul that doesn't make it any less than a foul.

Nope, but it makes Drogba a playacting scumbag

You've already said who you wanted to win,so your opinion on that matter is very biased.

I have opinions on who I want to win most games, I guess by your logic I must be biased against everyone then? Your comments have shown you to be just as biased against Liverpool anyway, so it is just another hypocritical case of pot, kettle, black.

I'm not so sure about that either,I didn't see Drogba being offside and it looked like he hauled Wes Brown down,but I think that Brown should have been stronger.You may have a point there but IMHO 3 penalties on a CL quarter final are much more important than a 2 fouls in any league game.

You are bound to say that, but the fact of the matter is that bad refereeing costing a side any form of result is unacceptable regardless of the occasion, and number of screwups, just your attempt to put a pro chelsea spin on something you really have no cogent argument against.

Nope, but it makes Drogba a playacting scumbag

What does that have to do with it being a foul or not?

I have opinions on who I want to win most games, I guess by your logic I must be biased against everyone then? Your comments have shown you to be just as biased against Liverpool anyway, so it is just another hypocritical case of pot, kettle, black.
Yes,but in 2009 we have replays:
Gerrard too injured to dive with his usual flair maybe?

N'Gog dived brilliantly to earn the penalty for Liverpool.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iL5fRE9AZ2c...layer_embedded#

Absolutely no contact

What does that have to do with it being a foul or not?

Plenty. It is called unsportsmanlike conduct and it is against the rules of the game

Yes,but in 2009 we have replays:

And that is relative to your hypocritical rant about me being biased, when you are just as biased against Liverpool how?

N'Gog dived brilliantly to earn the penalty for Liverpool.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iL5fRE9AZ2c...layer_embedded#

Absolutely no contact

Yep, that was pretty poor behaviour from N'Gog and the pen shouldn't have been given, no question about that, I just find it funny that Chelsea fans are throwing slurs at Liverpool when they have on their team one of the biggest divers in all forms of football (only one that can even touch Drogba for pathetic diving is Ronaldo). Difference is though I can be objective about it and face the fact that shouldn't have been given, some you win some you lose I guess.

You gotta give the boy some credit,he puts to shame both Ronaldo and Drogba.

Sure is. One incident against a whole career's worth (and then some in Drogba's case) for the 2 you mentioned. Seriously, you are more biased than I am, haven't you realised how hypocritical you sound yet?

Nope, but you post with this 'holier than thou' attitude constantly throwing insults of Bias against me, when you are no better, if not worse yourself.

Seriously, you are just making yourself look silly.

Anyway I don't want to drag this offtopic again, so keep the discussions about the football please, I don't want to add more people to my ignore list alongside gregb0b, I try to keep that as a last resort, but I am starting to lose patience with you, and I am also losing interest in discussing football with you.

[...]
I was about to comment on what you said,but then again..

Why don't you discuss football in a Liverpool only forum?

Or even a forum where open Chelsea supporters get their IP banned?

I agree with this quote:

Liverpool FC. A disgusting club supported by disgusting fans and employing disgusting cheating players.

And I'm sure you'd agree with something like this :

Liverpool FCChelsea FC. A disgusting club supported by disgusting fans and employing disgusting cheating players.

So why don't we just agree that we're both biased as **** and wait till your team's next humiliation?

So why don't we just agree that we're both biased as **** and wait till your team's next humiliation?

I am done debating with you, it is clearly a waste of my time as you obviously lack the intelligence to do anything apart from sitting there constantly flaming Liverpool fans. I also seriously object to your accusation that I think all Chelsea fans are scum, FYI my own mother supports Chelsea, but then I am not quiet as hate filled as you so I guess I don't really understand your position. Regardless, you are one more flame filled post away from being stuck onto my Ignore list so kindly stop the flaming please.

Edit: The ignore button has been used for the second time in less than 48 hours, time to resume talking about the football :) sorry folks

Edited by Frank Fontaine
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Good, because the nonstop chattering from the voices in her head made me quit the second game.
    • This new cabinet design lets you run AMD, Intel, and Nvidia PCs inside one case by Sayan Sen At Computex 2026 earlier this month, AMD announced a couple of new X3D processors for both sockets AM4 and AM5 as it confirmed the support extension of the latter till 2029. And although Intel didn't unveil any new desktop chips, the company's Core Ultra 200S Plus series is relatively new too. Let's say though that you want the best of both worlds simultaneously, and instead of running two different systems, you can have both running together side-by-side, or rather on top of one another. That's exactly what Thermaltake's CAPO X dual system is made for doing. While it's not exactly mandatory to run AMD with Intel, or vice versa, you get the idea. As you can see in the render above, it is essentially like a double-decker PC case that is capable of holding two microATX (mATX) motherboards. Even running just one discrete graphics card in a PC can get toasty, so you may be wondering how well the cooling is designed on the CAPO X, Thermaltake has confirmed, as is evident from the marketing promo image above, that the case supports up to two 360 mm AIO liquid coolers. 420mm is not supported. In total there is room for 13 120mm case fans. In terms of I/O (input/output) options for the two systems, there are naturally two places for those ports, one at the top and one at the very bottom of the chassis in the front panel. In terms of use cases, there are many possibilities. Thermaltake itself, for example, highlights how one system can be your main PC while the other could be the AI agent PC. Another example given is how it can be used to stream and game simultaneously with dedicated systems instead of hogging one with the entire load. Nothing regarding pricing or availability was said. Source: Thermaltake (YouTube, X)
    • There might be some passive design improvements (cooling, etc), but I doubt they'd change the core performance spec of the hardware mid-generation when they've already got a new console in development.
    • State of Decay 3 is out in 2027, reveals Plague Nests with new co-op gameplay trailer by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe A few months ago, Undead Labs broke its silence about the third entry in the State of Decay series since its announcement in 2020. Today, the studio had a brand-new trailer to reveal at the Xbox Games Showcase, finally giving players a look at the Unreal Engine 5-powered title. A broad 2027 release window is now attached to State of Decay 3 too. The studio confirmed that every scene seen in the gameplay trailer (except for the studio logo) released today is from the game with no cinematic footage. "The quality bar of the moment-to-moment experience is higher than anything we’ve achieved in Undead Labs’ history," says the studio. "State of Decay 3 is being built in Unreal Engine 5, and we’re creating better quality versions of what makes our game the survival sandbox it is, and the combat experience is really, really important to us, and I think you can see it coming through in this trailer." One new aspect of this upcoming entry is the Plague Nests. These are supposed to be dynamic, dungeon‑like enemy hubs with varied “personas” that change tactics each time one appears on a map. These areas will have the best loot in the game for players brave enough to tackle them. The combat system is being overhauled too, letting players do quick and power attacks depending on the situation. This isn't just on the player's side though, as zombies themselves now have multiple new types of behaviors depending on how fresh or decayed they are. "All of these play very differently, especially as you start getting outnumbered or when you’re making noise and running around and trying to save your rear end or the rear end of your friend next to you," adds the developer. Of course, settlement building and community management are massive parts of this third entry too. These are being further expanded with the cooperative focus, giving players much more freedom for playing together than in State of Decay 2. Players will even be able to split up and build settlements in different areas of the same map with different goals. Undead Labs confirmed that playtests are already ongoing for the title, and interested players can sign up to participate by heading over here once more slots open up ahead of the full release. State of Decay 3 is coming out on PC, Xbox Series X|S, PlayStation 5, and Xbox Game Pass sometime in 2027.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      492
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      247
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      68
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!