Elemental: War of Magic


Recommended Posts

I wanted to start an "official" thread for Elemental: War of Magic since the development is really moving along.

Elemental: War of Magic

overview.jpg

Developer/Publisher: Stardock

Release Date: 2010

Beta Releases to begin this summer

Pre-orders available via Impulse - http://www.impulsedriven.com/elemental

Official site - http://www.elementalgame.com

Twitter - http://twitter.com/teamelemental

"Elemental is a fantasy strategy game set on a world filled with magic and ancient lore. Rule a fledgling kingdom and expand it across the world through a combination of magical power, military might, diplomatic skill, technological advancement and bold adventuring.

As sovereign, you begin as the only being in your kingdom still able to channel power from the shards of magic, a series of mystical artifacts left over from the cataclysm. You must decide how much of your power to imbue into your heroes as you build new cities, explore dungeons, perfect spells of ever increasing power and negotiate with friends and foes."

Screenshots:

Empire_Cloth_City_1280_thumb.jpg Empire_Fire_Shard_1280_thumb.jpg Kingdom_City_Select_1280_thumb.jpg Kingdom_Scout_influence_1280_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/791772-elemental-war-of-magic/
Share on other sites

More screens are up from a few days back. The style is still very "artistic" but it's definitely looking a lot better than the early shots.

http://forums.elementalgame.com/358044

Note: Shadowing isn?t in yet so these are not representative of what the final game (or even the beta) will look like.b>

Click for bigger versions.

Elemental_1244234779_thumb.jpg

Elemental_1244581844_thumb.jpg

Elemental_1244144182_thumb.jpg

Image from tactical battle:

Battle_lightning_Wide_thumb.jpg

Up close in battle:

Battle_Close_Up_thumb.jpg

The game looks interesting, but some of the graphics look like ****. Don't get my wrong, I am all for cell shaded graphics, but for some reason on some of the models (char, mobs, buildings) they look really bad.

Edited by Mathachew
Do not circumvent the swear filter.

I think it looks bad too. Not because it's 2D or cartoon-like, I've loved detailed 2D graphics since The Settlers aka : Life is Feudal, but this lacks color, vibrance, details, life... it's bland and uninviting.

(edit: Well actually it's obviously not 2D. :pinch: )

The gameplay could be cool though. But I'm MUCH more excited about Disciples III.

I think this game is made by the same in-house team that made Galaxy Civilizations II. They seem to be focused on turnbased games with deep gameplay, and less on the graphics side than for example some of the other Stardock games done by external studios like Demigod and Sins of a Solar Empire. That said, the graphics do look a bit too "arty", even so compared with GalCiv2 (which can look really good in some parts). I don't know if that is a good path for them to go. I will still keep an eye on this becase I like GalCiv2.

The Journals page has a small FAQ too which has some more info on their intent with the game.

http://forums.elementalgame.com/356722

Some interesting techical bits from that: They are using Havok, and the game will support native 64-bit. And "3D engines for doing very very nasty things to the game world when you have enough magic -- think Populous", looks like they will have some nice destroyable stuff on world scale.

Edited by Buio

I think Galactic Civilizations 2 looks pretty good, especially in Twilight of the Arnor. Not that it's very difficult to make a space sim look decent... but if these Elemental screenshots are in any way representative of final quality, all I have to say is :x Look at Heroes V, Age of Wonders 2, Disciples 2, they all looked gorgeous, and it's an essential of their appeal. I wouldn't be playing Disciples 2 if it wasn't for the superb landscape and animations.

They may say the screenshots are not representative of final quality, but then why put them up? Turn people away? I think the game will end up looking pretty much like what we're seeing now. I'm not hoping for a miracle.

I've no problem with it looking "arty", but it just looks bland. Those washed-out colors, lack of definition, generic textures...

Yeah hopefully they do some innovative things gameplay-wise, unfortunately I think good gameplay can't save a bad-looking game. Look at Alpha Centauri, it had much more interesting gameplay than Civ2, but it looked so bizarre that nobody cared.

Remember, these are very early screenshots. There is still a ways to go. :)
Stardock has been saying that for a year, and the game is supposedly to be released in 2010. So, they're not "very early" screenshots, we have every reason to think they are pretty close to what the game will end up looking like.

One specific issue I have with them is how it's hard to pick out the important elements from the background. On the "tactical battle" screenshot for instance:

Battle_lightning_Wide_thumb.jpg

The color palette is too drab and similar between units and the background. Also there's this omnipresent haze that doesn't seem to have any depth and randomly covers parts of the screen.

Also this:

Elemental_1244581844_thumb.jpg

First the water is entirely unconvincing, but hopefully that can be easily fixed (hint: add ripples and specular reflections!). But I'm mainly concerned about how boring the landscape is. It's sort of a pastel grassland without any interesting detail on it, as if I had taken MSPaint, choose the least attractive green color and bucket-spilled it all over the open areas. With the difference that on the screenshot there's a gradient to grayish-brown as the view gets more distant. :huh:

There's no reason to believe it'll look like that when it's done. A whole year to add shaders, change assets, and such could change the look completely.
I'd like to hope you are right, however :

1) The point of showing preview screenshots is getting people excited about what your game will look like. Hence, they are usually representative of what the final game will look like. Developers always say they're not, but that's just a safety precaution.

2) If Stardock was so unsatisfied with the current art direction I doubt they would have been showing similar screenshots for more than a year now.

3) Art direction just won't drastically change 1 year from release, it's not just about adding a few shaders here and there.

It doesn't have to be a 'drastic change' to add retouched, improved, or just plain new textures. Not to mention types of mapping have their own textures, usually.

And nobody said anything about 'a few'...considering games can have thousands of shaders, it could easily be that they aren't showing any/all of those until they're all done.

Of course it's representative of the final game, but it's not representative of the final games quality...which is a fairly important distinction in this case.

  • 1 month later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 4 months later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
    • So how did you solve the problem? Disabling Secure Boot isn’t a solution.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!