Recommended Posts

Edited on Jul. 12:

WZOR announced Win7 RTM: 7600.16384.win7_rtm.090710-1945

Now, the leaking race is on. :laugh:

~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I found the later posts on the thread about 7264 had actually focused on the coming RTM, with some updates I thought we'd rather start afresh, and hope the mods would let this thread stay.

On Jul. 3 Neowin News announced that Win7 will RTM on Jul.13, furthermore it stated:

So with that said TechNet, MSDN, and a few other partner connections will also be getting the RTM build on July 13. So let the countdown begin!

Just now, WZOR made another report, I don't want to jam the post with screen-shots, here's the Google translation:

And so, on the seventh of July, we are entering the final stage of assembly and selection sborkok the final RTM release of Windows 7 and Windows Server 2008 R2.

You reasonably ask, why in the seventh, but not with the sixth of June, from 4 to 7 June in the United States holidays, Microsoft is not working, assembly rests:)

By the tenth of July determined the final candidates and will begin closed on all major vote of two engineers, Microsoft, in order to determine which of the latest WIN7_RTM assemblies will be the final RTM release. This procedure starts with the 13-14 July and will end only on July 24 posting on the RTM release Connect'e. According to our data for 10 th July will be collected and the final candidate for this assembly may receive TAPy.

Suppose that such a candidate in the final assembly will be 7268 or 7270 from a branch assembly win7_rtm (7270 has not yet been collected, as well has not yet been collected and 7269 assembly), and assume that she will be signing (sign-off), then immediately after that happens rebuild this assembly to the final RTM release, but already in another assembly line, assume it will be build 7300, and only then we can confidently say that has the final release.

But even this can be repeated after the rebuild the final RTM release, but be sure to save the final assembly, how many times would not have had it with the re.

Here briefly is what we all expect in the coming weeks.

and on 7F we also have an "enquiry and reply" with WZOR, the site name is snipped because I am not sure if it's against Neowin regulations or not:

scr_39.jpg

Now, are we going to see a RTM release on Jul. 13, or Jul. 24??

Footnote:

- The dates on the RC release were: compilation-Apr.21; MSDN release-Apr.30, i.e. 10 days difference, and was leaked on Apr. 24.

It was based on the Neowin announcement and the RC schedule that led me to think the 7300.090703 build was a possibility and decided to post about the Connect download screenshot.

- The Worldwire Partner Conference on Jul. 13, everybody expected MS will confirm win7 RTM, now there would be a difference: MS might just announce RTM, and still hold back MSDN release until Jul. 24(WZOR); but if it is presented, then it should be release-ready(Neowin).

Edited by FaiKee

I expect it to be signed-off on the 13th of July. I also expect it to be made available to MSDN/TechNet subscribers a short while after.

For future reference: It's "quote" then /quote" (with square brackets).

100% wouldn't or everyone would be getting it, definitely a no for that question.

And why not? Whats the difference from Connect/MSDN/TechNet?

As an official "beta" tester of Windows 7 it wouldn't be a surprise if Microsoft gave its top testers a free copy of Windows 7. In the pass I received Vista with my own activation key. So I don't get the "or everyone would be getting it" comment.

I'd say that Rtm probably already has been built and is just undergoing some last checks to be able to be released at that conference on 13 July. Leak will be avaiable shortly after that.

Obviously. Every build in the RTM branch was considered for the final build until something is discovered that warranted changes and another compilation. Unless you meant the build that will end up being the final build (if no blockers are found) has already been compiled, of which there's a good chance.

I expect it to be signed-off on the 13th of July. I also expect it to be made available to MSDN/TechNet subscribers a short while after.

For future reference: It's "quote" then /quote" (with square brackets).

Thanks for reminding me the correct way to do it. :yes:

I ran over the comments on the Neowin News, somebody said Vista RTM was on MSDN etc within 48 hours after RTM announce, seems a 3rd speculation??

Also, I expect to get a free Win7U for the Windows Feedback Pro., I practically have to do nothing except being stuck with 7100RC, I guess MS wouldn't let the beta testers down, they are working so hard. :blink:

I ran over the comments on the Neowin News, somebody said Vista RTM was on MSDN etc within 48 hours after RTM announce, seems a 3rd speculation??

All of these are just educated guesses based on previous releases which have been made available through these paths shortly after RTM.

Also, I expect to get a free Win7U for the Windows Feedback Pro., I practically have to do nothing except being stuck with 7100RC, I guess MS wouldn't let the beta testers down, they are working so hard. :blink:

Vista's beta was a lot more restricted compared to Windows 7's public beta and RC builds. Due to the large number of people that got involved this time I think it's unlikely that there'll be the same kind of tester rewards as Vista. [my personal opinion]

I agree, I beta tested for vista and I know that it was very restricted. The reward for us was Free Vista Ultimate. I doubt with Windows 7 having very limited beta testers and a very open public beta that the tester reward will be free Windows 7 Ultimate. Microsoft is being very strict with Ultimate this time around, not even giving users a break on pricing let alone testers getting a free copy.

Just a correction, Vista was not released to MSDN within 48 hours of the RTM announcement by Microsoft.

They announced the RTM on 8th November 2006:

http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/feature...08VistaRTM.mspx

and it came to MSDN on 16th November 2006:

http://bink.nu/news/windows-vista-rtm-appears-on-msdn.aspx

I am tired of the wait, lol so I hope Neowin's [and a few others] saying it will appear on MSN on 13th, that is correct which would mean they have already compiled RTM. Keeping in view Vista's appearance on MSDN which I pointed above, Wzor's date also appears to be realistic, so nothing but wait till 13th =(

7300.0.090705-1900_x86fre_client_en-us_RTM_Ultimate-GRC1CULFRER_EN_DVD.iso

size: 2.6 GB

small exploding star, just up.

People of 7F working on it, not giving high hopes.

Also a HTTP dl, PCBeta working on both. repeat....don't give high hopes. :hmmm:

Edited by FaiKee

Thanks for posting that, The Patri0t. I hope Windows 7 RTM appears faster than Windows Vista RTM. In any case, I guess it wouldn't hurt to wait another week after the RTM build is signed-off and compiled. After all, it's still going to be made available to MSDN/TechNet subscribers much earlier than the purported release date of October 22.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • 1. Define "better". 2. It's still more expensive than equivalent PCs so... And there is not one Windows platform. This is the mistake ALL Apple oriented people make. Apple is one OEM. You could reasonably compare them to one PC OEM, say Dell or HP. But you can't compare them to ALL PC OEMs. Case in point, Apple has NO touch screen MacBooks. No tablet Macs. There are no rugged Macs. The variety of PC OEM design is insane. With Apple, you have... Apple. The problem is that you're starting with Apple as the definition of "good" then filtering out anything that isn't close to an existing Apple product, then trying to homogenise all of those left into a fictional product line and then ignore any innovations to create a minimal feature subset so you can say "See! Apple better!" PS: I was an Apple dev for 17 years and helped develop MacInTalk and disability solutions for Apple - and I have several Mac and MacBooks - so tread very carefully.
    • Major Xbox layoffs may claim South of Midnight developer Compulsion entirely by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe Microsoft has been making major changes in its gaming wing Xbox for a few months now, including the appointment of a new CEO, a large number of leadership changes, and strategy shifts. However, the company is seemingly also looking at initiating a major layoffs wave at Xbox and perhaps even a studio closure. The new report lands from Kotaku, Xbox first-party developer Compulsion Games is being shuttered soon by Microsoft. For those unfamiliar with the studio, it's the team behind Contrast (2013), We Happy Few (2018), and South of Midnight (2025). Its latest game was quite well received, even winning a Peabody Award for its writing. It even received a 9/10 in Neowin's own review, highlighting its engaging storyline, gorgeous world, and curious characters. The studio joined Xbox Game Studios in 2018, just as Microsoft announced it is acquiring Playground Games, Undead Labs, and Ninja Theory. Despite recent listings for new staff roles, according to the new report, Compulsion Games is being closed entirely, with over 90 staff being let go. Kotaku also added that the studio's leadership is in negotiations with Microsoft about this decision, but no official details have been revealed yet. The report lands just as two senior managers of Xbox leave their posts at Microsoft Gaming. Head of Xbox Game Studios Craig Duncan and chief of staff Louise O'Connor originally began their journey in Rare and have been a part of Xbox for over two decades. Dunkan has been responsible for games like Kinect Sports and Sea of Thieves, while O'Connor was primarily working on Rare's Everwild project before its cancelation. If this report about the studio shutdown is accurate, this may just be the start of a major new layoffs wave at Xbox Game Studios. There are also rumors of Arkane Studios being heavily affected. As always, take all these reports with a grain of salt until something official materializes from Microsoft or the studios.
    • The flaw with this analysis is that this laptop has a cellphone CPU in it. In the Intel world, that would be an N150 and those are everywhere, even in low end laptops. You can get an N150 based NUC with 16GB RAM and 256GB-512GB SSD... NOT soldered in... for < $500 Canadian (around US$360). The problem is two fold: tech bloggers/writers on most tech site (like this one, ironically) overvalue Apple and apparently aren't in the same earnings class as most regular people. As a result, we get breathless articles about how everyone needs a folding phone when most people just cannot afford one... or really need one. And we get Apple used as the baseline metric regardless of whether that comparison makes any sense. If Dell or HP released a retail laptop with a cellphone motherboard, you'd be all over them for doing that - but Apple does it and it's genius. I see articles suggesting what Samsung - a company that basically started the foldable phone market and has built them for eight years - needs to do to compete with Apple's unreleased, unspecced and unseen folding phone. Sorry, no - if the Neo (really creative name there BTW - still, better than the Go, the other "creative" product name everyone's using) encourages PC makers to make cellphone laptops using lower end ARM processors, we all lose. It's a step backwards and a capitulation to the fact that semiconductor makers and computer OEMs (and tech bloggers) have totally lost the plot.
    • Everyone should install this extension and ignore games that use AI. https://chromewebstore.google....nnigaaeelfkeomjcngmnh?pli=1 https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/ai-warning-for-steam/
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      ThatGuyOnline earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Jeroen Wilms earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      199
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      127
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      83
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      74
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!