Recommended Posts

I'm hoping they'll release rain/snow as DLC...

So far the two most annoying things are

1. Dumb loading screens! I don't really care about seeing my "missions" or achievements every single time I start a race. I'm pretty sure it doesn't even take that whole time to load. It just likes to show you your status I guess.

2. "HAIRPIN TURN, LONG 60, SHORT, 40, JUST A SCRATCH, CREST...into, CREST..." :rofl: The first time it did that, I kept on trying to deactivate the voice...

for those who cant get their gamepad working with Dirt2 (menu control), download the XBOX360 Controller Emulator & put the two files in game directory.

files: xinput1_3.dll, xbox360cemu.ini

download link : http://www.tocaedit.com/IB/index.php?autom...&showfile=4

Does that work for any type of game pad? I have a logitech Rumblepad 2 and not an xbox 360 controller.

I want to do a quick little survey here. How many agree with Victor Rambo that Dirt 1 is better than Dirt 2. I'm asking because, IMO, Dirt1 sucked.. it was a huge disappointment for me. If Dirt 2 is worse than Dirt 1 there's no way in hell I'm buying it. Victor Rambo, I respect your opinion on the game and this is no way an attack. post-190930-1260471300.gif

I liked dirt 1 more coz it wasn't repetitive and had more tracks/cars. Even it had rainy weather. Also menu system was ****ing awesome. :shifty: :p

I want to do a quick little survey here. How many agree with Victor Rambo that Dirt 1 is better than Dirt 2. I'm asking because, IMO, Dirt1 sucked.. it was a huge disappointment for me. If Dirt 2 is worse than Dirt 1 there's no way in hell I'm buying it. Victor Rambo, I respect your opinion on the game and this is no way an attack. post-190930-1260471300.gif

i played dirt1 for 2-3hour max, i really didnt like it.

the control was too twitchy & the brakes were retarded.

dirt2 is a lot better compared to dirt1, but its repetitive. not many tracks & the AI audio is also repetitive.

i hope they release a patch to shorten the loading time, as i mentioned earlier, while loading, the HDD is active only for a mere 10seconds.

i timed the race & after race loading - its always 1min., for every single track.

Does that work for any type of game pad? I have a logitech Rumblepad 2 and not an xbox 360 controller.

yup, it'll work.

best thing about this game is it lets you re-map the controller to your preference :D

I liked dirt 1 more coz it wasn't repetitive and had more tracks/cars. Even it had rainy weather. Also menu system was ****ing awesome. :shifty: :p

Now I understand. Those are some good reasons why Dirt 1 would be better. Thanks.

i played dirt1 for 2-3hour max, i really didnt like it.

the control was too twitchy & the brakes were retarded.

dirt2 is a lot better compared to dirt1, but its repetitive. not many tracks & the AI audio is also repetitive.

i hope they release a patch to shorten the loading time, as i mentioned earlier, while loading, the HDD is active only for a mere 10seconds.

i timed the race & after race loading - its always 1min., for every single track.

That's just sounds aggravating. Now I dont know. I've seen a lot of vids and have the demo and it looks like they used some of the same graphics technique they used for GRID. This doesn't happen often to me, but I may be going the graphics ho route on this one. Thanks.

This video just made up my mind, definitely going G - Ho on this one:

Edited by solardog
I want to do a quick little survey here. How many agree with Victor Rambo that Dirt 1 is better than Dirt 2. I'm asking because, IMO, Dirt1 sucked.. it was a huge disappointment for me. If Dirt 2 is worse than Dirt 1 there's no way in hell I'm buying it. Victor Rambo, I respect your opinion on the game and this is no way an attack. post-190930-1260471300.gif

DiRT 2 is better than DiRT 1 in just about every way. It's been awhile since I played the latter so I don't remember the number of cars and tracks, but I did remember the weather effects and the cool-looking menus. Aside from those two things which DiRT 2 doesn't have, DiRT 1 is inferior (which makes sense). The graphics alone is a reason to play the game. The EGO game engine has come a long way since it was first introduced in 2007. Simply put, the game looks good, plays good, and runs good.

well loading times is long not because its loading the whole time.

its because of the stupid achievements and stats that show up..

they take all the time.

when i played the DEMO .. i was like they shold make the menu work faster.. but they didnt make is so fast..

I already got bored of the game, seems so many games these days focus on leaving out tons of content but then just spit-polishing what little they have left. So what they have is a decent game that works and perform excellent but have about as much content as Pacman.

I already got bored of the game, seems so many games these days focus on leaving out tons of content but then just spit-polishing what little they have left. So what they have is a decent game that works and perform excellent but have about as much content as Pacman.

I'm beginning to get bored of it. The game could use more cars and tracks. Perhaps as DLC?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Looks like the 7.1 is fake effects, can it at least do real 5.1? It says 'virtual 7.1' in all descriptions.
    • You can't, if you didn't notice, it doesn't support surround at all, it's right in the spec list.
    • Hi — I’m always interested in soundcards. Like displays, I just want to know I’m getting as much clean “sonic juice” into my brain as possible as the years take their toll. I’m not entirely sure what to take away from this review, though. It doesn’t really tell me whether the AE‑X is a good product or who it’s actually for. Most of what I’m getting is: there’s a driver to install, here’s what it looks like, and here’s what’s in the box. There’s a lot of emphasis on the SPDIF input. When you mention not needing to switch headphones between console and PC — does that mean the PC has to be powered on just to pass audio through? That seems like a fairly big waste of energy. Is this more something a streamer would use alongside a capture card? How are you testing the sound? (Also, you might want to clarify that you’re using the headphones in wired mode when you mention they’re wireless.) You mention the lack of EMI shielding — how much real‑world difference does that make compared with typical motherboard audio? On multi‑channel: what exactly isn’t supported? Does this mean Windows spatial audio (Dolby Atmos for Headphones, DTS Headphone:X, etc.) won’t work, or just that the card itself doesn’t decode surround formats? And are there any true multi‑driver “surround” headphones left that would even use that? You also highlight support for high‑impedance headphones — but what does that translate to in practice? How does it compare to driving the same headphones from a normal device, and does it make any difference for everyday, lower‑impedance models? In short, who is this card actually targeted at?
    • Yes, THIS is wordart, not the styling that can now be done. Wordart was all about those curvy words, that you could change the path of, like making words go around a circle. I don't think it can be done now, right?
    • Just saw a news report of a Waymo driving into a flooded road.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      88
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      74
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!