CA Anti-Virus does what McAfee did last week


Recommended Posts

On Saturday 7/4 reports started that McAfee Anti-virus was breaking pc?s because of an Anti-Virus update that was quarantining Windows System files as viruses.

Well it seems that someone else wasn?t paying attention. As of this morning I have received numerous reports from clients reporting that their CA Antivirus is showing Virus alerts for the W32/alalum virus and the files that were being reported appeared to be Windows systems files. CA was quarantining those files as well. When this 1st started I assumed it was an isolated issue but with the client messages concerning this coming in more and more this morning, this definitely seems to be a wide spread issue.

The issue appears to have been caused by an update the was released within the past 12 hours as CA Anti-Virus is set up to check for updates every few hours if your have the auto update feature turned on.

The biggest concern is that when these files are quarantined, if you reboot, there is a good chance that your machine will not restart. I had 2 clients so far ?brick? their pc?s because of the restart. This point is made very clear as the WFP (Windows File protection) comes up saying that ?Files that are required to run windows properly have been replaced??? So far all reports (at least) from the clients I deal with show that CA Anti-virus 2007 ? 2009 are affected.

From the CA Forums ( http://homeofficeforum.ca.com/homeofficefo...read.php?t=4837 ) you will see others also reporting the same issue. I know CA only has 3% of the A/V market so this may not be as big as McAfee but I am passing this on as a public service. Here is what I've instructed my clients to do in the mean time that seems to clear this up

1) Open CA Anti-virus by double clicking the shield looking icon in the systray (That is in the lower right corner by the clock)

2) The Security Overview window will open. Under CA Anti-Virus you will see ?Open advanced settings?. Click that link.

3) Once you are there you will see the main overview window. From here click on the left side where it says Quarantine.

4) You will then see the list of files that are quarantined. Look for any file marked infected with W32/amalum (there is an additional part to the name after amalum but will be different on most pc?s). Highlight all items that are showing infected with amalum and then click on restore. (NOTE***That if you have another file in quarantine that shows something other than amalum as the Infection then that is probably an actual virus infection). Once the files are restored you can close the CA windows

A) You will be prompted to say do you want to restore. Click on ok for each message

5) At this point with no files in quarantine you should be able to hit cancel on the WFP.

6) You will be prompted for keeping changed files click yes to this message.

7) At this point restart P

So far no clients report files getting re-quarantined after the steps and reboot

(**Your situation my be different, so review your specific issue before following this information)

post-266234-1247161395_thumb.jpg

And this is why I still use Norton...never had any false positives with it.

http://community.norton.com/norton/board/m...e.id=2797#M2797

http://forum.worldwindcentral.com/archive/...hp?t-10261.html

http://community.norton.com/norton/board/m...ding&page=1

Not to be negative....but here are 3 different issues with Norton/Symantec products concerning False positives.

So no one is perfect. Your looking at products that are coded by humans, humans screw up. So until we get to the sky lab part of the story, there will always be a chance that something could be screwed up. We just hope that the software company (whomever they are) has a QA that isnt also sleeping.

If i was Symantec, i would buy some fancy security team with real good Pro?s, and erase Norton name from future press releases.

And maybe..maybee change Symantec name itself, and maybe..maybe then, we would trust their products again.

This is pure lack of Marketing department from Symantec, maybe very old peple running it.

TechGuyPA: The first link is not "false positive"

grik: Your statement would be more plausible if you'd capitalize your "I". At least give a more logical reason to your trolling. Your opinion sounds kiddish. I have used Norton/Symantec A/V for so long and I have not yet encounter one false positive on my system. But like TechGuyPA already mention, any product that is created by man will always have flaws.

Its a Marketing statment not if the real product is bad or even good. You obviously did not ynderstand the big picture.

Norton and Symantec branding are a bad image by just having that name.

You used to use Norton back in the days where it was malware and did not catch virus? And i would never say that Norton gives false positives, the image i have on that software, only by the name, is that no false or positive alerts if you know what i mean. Again i point to the fact im talking about the credibility/image behind the Name, dont confuse with anything thing that you tried to point out.

Regards

Its a Marketing statment not if the real product is bad or even good. You obviously did not ynderstand the big picture.

Norton and Symantec branding are a bad image by just having that name.

You used to use Norton back in the days where it was malware and did not catch virus? And i would never say that Norton gives false positives, the image i have on that software, only by the name, is that no false or positive alerts if you know what i mean. Again i point to the fact im talking about the credibility/image behind the Name, dont confuse with anything thing that you tried to point out.

Regards

I apologize. As explained I understand where you were going with the comment now.

All I tried to say was that in these days of get it out NOW it seems that the QA departments at most major software companies seem to be asleep at the well. The products themselves are made by people, people who can make mistakes, its up to the QA staff to double check and clean up any mistakes and thats were the issue is and that isnt happening....and it isnt just MS or Symantec or CA or MCafee, it seems to be almost all of them at one point or another.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Glad these prices are starting to come down, but that is still crazy. I bought the 2TB 9100 Pro (slightly more expensive version with PCIe 5.0) last year for $240.
    • The 2TB Samsung 990 PRO NVMe SSD hits lowest price in over three months by Sayan Sen Yesterday, we covered a really good deal wherein you can get a 4TB TeamGroup T-FORCE G50 NVMe PCIe Gen4 SSD for a low price of just $400 with a special discount coupon. That's just $100 per TB, making it a very good offer during these hard times. The deal is still live, so you can check it out in its dedicated article here if you do not want to miss out. Meanwhile, if you don't have that kind of budget but still wish to buy an SSD for a good price, the 2TB variant of the TeamGroup SSD at $280 its lowest price in over three months. Meanwhile, those seeking 2TB but faster performance can check out Samsung's 990 PRO, which has hit the lowest price also in the last quarter or so, as it's on sale for $370 (purchase links under the specs table down below). Thus, you want a faster drive, get the 990 Pro, or you want more capacity, grab the TeamGroup 4TB linked in the first para. The 990 PRO is a PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD and still one of the fastest drives available today for under $500. Speaking of fast, sequential reads and writes are rated at 7450 MB/s and 6900 MB/s, respectively. The random throughputs for reads and writes are 1400K IOPS and 1550K IOPS, respectively. The 990 PRO is based on Samsung's 7th Gen V-NAND flash, and it too is TLC. It packs 2 gigs of LPDDR4 DRAM cache, which helps the random performance. The endurance rating for this is 1200 TBW (terabytes written), which should be sufficient for most users. The Samsung 990 PRO is compatible with the PlayStation 5, but if you are going to use the 990 PRO on a PC, check out the Samsung Magician app that lets you track your drive's health, update its firmware, customize various settings, and more. The tech specs are given below: Specification TeamGroup T-FORCE G50 2TB Samsung 990 PRO 2TB Interface PCIe 4.0 x4, NVMe 1.4 PCIe Gen 4.0 x4, NVMe 2.0 Form Factor M.2 2280 M.2 2280 Controller InnoGrit Controller Samsung In-house Controller NAND Flash 3D TLC 3D TLC DRAM Cache None (HMB supported) 2GB LPDDR4 Sequential Read (Max) 5,000 MB/s 7,450 MB/s Sequential Write (Max) 4,500 MB/s 6,900 MB/s Random Read (4K) Up to 600,000 IOPS Up to 1,400,000 IOPS Random Write (4K) Up to 700,000 IOPS Up to 1,550,000 IOPS TBW (Endurance) 1,300 TBW 1,200 TBW MTBF 3,000,000 hours 1,500,000 hours Operating Temperature 0°C to 70°C 0°C to 70°C Storage Temperature -40°C to 85°C -40°C to 85°C Shock Resistance 1,500G / 0.5ms 1,500G / 0.5ms Heatsink Patented Graphene Heat Spreader No Get them at the links below: Samsung 990 PRO SSD 2TB (MZ-V9P2T0B/AM): $369.99 (Sold and Shipped by Amazon US) TEAMGROUP T-Force G50 2TB SSD (TM8FFE002T0C129): $279.99 (Sold by TeamGroup, Shipped by Amazon US) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • If you can't spell a simple word that 2nd graders learn, your entire argument is suspect.
    • And here goes the "Won't someone think of the children" brigade. Get stuffed mate. This has NOTHING to do with making the internet safe. It's about tracking adults, spying on your online activity, and sending the boys around when they don't like something you post. Also, again, parliament have voted TWICE against this, and Starmer is going ahead anyway. THAT is anti-democratic bullsh**. They will use this law to track you, they will use this law to control you, and they will use this law to punish you if they don't like what you do, even if it's legal. And your data? Say bye bye to that. It'll be on the darkweb in weeks. I'm not some rando online. I've been an IT professional for 40 years, many of it in security. I know exactly what this means and what will happen to your data. I do not consent and I will not comply.
    • "...but it may not be Microsoft's fault" seems like a reasonable way to tease what is going on without leaving the user with a false impression that an update is the problem. A title isn't a summery, it is meant to entice the user to read the article. It should not contain a misleading premise; which this title does not. You could maybe complain that the first paragraph should have included that detail. The writing style popularized over 100 years ago in newspapers will cover the most important information as soon as possible with details and nuance added later; the idea being that with each new paragraph you have less of the reader's focus.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      520
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      90
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      81
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!