CA Anti-Virus does what McAfee did last week


Recommended Posts

On Saturday 7/4 reports started that McAfee Anti-virus was breaking pc?s because of an Anti-Virus update that was quarantining Windows System files as viruses.

Well it seems that someone else wasn?t paying attention. As of this morning I have received numerous reports from clients reporting that their CA Antivirus is showing Virus alerts for the W32/alalum virus and the files that were being reported appeared to be Windows systems files. CA was quarantining those files as well. When this 1st started I assumed it was an isolated issue but with the client messages concerning this coming in more and more this morning, this definitely seems to be a wide spread issue.

The issue appears to have been caused by an update the was released within the past 12 hours as CA Anti-Virus is set up to check for updates every few hours if your have the auto update feature turned on.

The biggest concern is that when these files are quarantined, if you reboot, there is a good chance that your machine will not restart. I had 2 clients so far ?brick? their pc?s because of the restart. This point is made very clear as the WFP (Windows File protection) comes up saying that ?Files that are required to run windows properly have been replaced??? So far all reports (at least) from the clients I deal with show that CA Anti-virus 2007 ? 2009 are affected.

From the CA Forums ( http://homeofficeforum.ca.com/homeofficefo...read.php?t=4837 ) you will see others also reporting the same issue. I know CA only has 3% of the A/V market so this may not be as big as McAfee but I am passing this on as a public service. Here is what I've instructed my clients to do in the mean time that seems to clear this up

1) Open CA Anti-virus by double clicking the shield looking icon in the systray (That is in the lower right corner by the clock)

2) The Security Overview window will open. Under CA Anti-Virus you will see ?Open advanced settings?. Click that link.

3) Once you are there you will see the main overview window. From here click on the left side where it says Quarantine.

4) You will then see the list of files that are quarantined. Look for any file marked infected with W32/amalum (there is an additional part to the name after amalum but will be different on most pc?s). Highlight all items that are showing infected with amalum and then click on restore. (NOTE***That if you have another file in quarantine that shows something other than amalum as the Infection then that is probably an actual virus infection). Once the files are restored you can close the CA windows

A) You will be prompted to say do you want to restore. Click on ok for each message

5) At this point with no files in quarantine you should be able to hit cancel on the WFP.

6) You will be prompted for keeping changed files click yes to this message.

7) At this point restart P

So far no clients report files getting re-quarantined after the steps and reboot

(**Your situation my be different, so review your specific issue before following this information)

post-266234-1247161395_thumb.jpg

And this is why I still use Norton...never had any false positives with it.

http://community.norton.com/norton/board/m...e.id=2797#M2797

http://forum.worldwindcentral.com/archive/...hp?t-10261.html

http://community.norton.com/norton/board/m...ding&page=1

Not to be negative....but here are 3 different issues with Norton/Symantec products concerning False positives.

So no one is perfect. Your looking at products that are coded by humans, humans screw up. So until we get to the sky lab part of the story, there will always be a chance that something could be screwed up. We just hope that the software company (whomever they are) has a QA that isnt also sleeping.

If i was Symantec, i would buy some fancy security team with real good Pro?s, and erase Norton name from future press releases.

And maybe..maybee change Symantec name itself, and maybe..maybe then, we would trust their products again.

This is pure lack of Marketing department from Symantec, maybe very old peple running it.

TechGuyPA: The first link is not "false positive"

grik: Your statement would be more plausible if you'd capitalize your "I". At least give a more logical reason to your trolling. Your opinion sounds kiddish. I have used Norton/Symantec A/V for so long and I have not yet encounter one false positive on my system. But like TechGuyPA already mention, any product that is created by man will always have flaws.

Its a Marketing statment not if the real product is bad or even good. You obviously did not ynderstand the big picture.

Norton and Symantec branding are a bad image by just having that name.

You used to use Norton back in the days where it was malware and did not catch virus? And i would never say that Norton gives false positives, the image i have on that software, only by the name, is that no false or positive alerts if you know what i mean. Again i point to the fact im talking about the credibility/image behind the Name, dont confuse with anything thing that you tried to point out.

Regards

Its a Marketing statment not if the real product is bad or even good. You obviously did not ynderstand the big picture.

Norton and Symantec branding are a bad image by just having that name.

You used to use Norton back in the days where it was malware and did not catch virus? And i would never say that Norton gives false positives, the image i have on that software, only by the name, is that no false or positive alerts if you know what i mean. Again i point to the fact im talking about the credibility/image behind the Name, dont confuse with anything thing that you tried to point out.

Regards

I apologize. As explained I understand where you were going with the comment now.

All I tried to say was that in these days of get it out NOW it seems that the QA departments at most major software companies seem to be asleep at the well. The products themselves are made by people, people who can make mistakes, its up to the QA staff to double check and clean up any mistakes and thats were the issue is and that isnt happening....and it isnt just MS or Symantec or CA or MCafee, it seems to be almost all of them at one point or another.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Not even an OLED display on the laptops. Also it seems that the laptop design isn't the same as the Surface Ultra model. Looks like bargain bin at high prices.
    • make your own notch - it's not that hard
    • VirtualBox 7.2.10 by Razvan Serea VirtualBox is a powerful x86 and AMD64/Intel64 virtualization product for enterprise as well as home use. Targeted at server, desktop and embedded use, it is now the only professional-quality virtualization solution that is also Open Source Software. Presently, VirtualBox runs on Windows, Linux, macOS, and Solaris hosts and supports a large number of guest operating systems including but not limited to Windows (NT 4.0, 2000, XP, Server 2003, Vista, 7, 8, Windows 10 and Windows 11), DOS/Windows 3.x, Linux (2.4, 2.6, 3.x, 4.x, 5.x and 6.x), Solaris and OpenSolaris, OS/2, OpenBSD, NetBSD and FreeBSD. Some of the features of VirtualBox are: Modularity. VirtualBox has an extremely modular design with well-defined internal programming interfaces and a client/server design. This makes it easy to control it from several interfaces at once: for example, you can start a virtual machine in a typical virtual machine GUI and then control that machine from the command line, or possibly remotely. VirtualBox also comes with a full Software Development Kit: even though it is Open Source Software, you don't have to hack the source to write a new interface for VirtualBox. Virtual machine descriptions in XML. The configuration settings of virtual machines are stored entirely in XML and are independent of the local machines. Virtual machine definitions can therefore easily be ported to other computers. VirtualBox 7.2.10 changelog: VMM: Fixed issue when CentOS 10 VM was not booting due to the message "Fatal glibc error: CPU does not support x86-64-v3" (​github:gh-642) Devices/EFI: Fixed booting issue when ARM VM had less than 1024 MiB of RAM assigned (​github:gh-679) USB: Fixed issue when it was not possible to attach USB device to headless VM on Apple Silicon/macOS 26.4.1 (​github:gh-631) Storage: Fixed issue when VIRTIO-SCSI device was not recognized as SSD device by guest system (​github:gh-634) Network: Fixed issue in E1000 emulation code which triggered debug log creation (​github:gh-645) Network: Fixed issue in E1000 emulation code which prevented OS/2 guest from booting (​github:gh-683) Linux Host: Fixed issue when VMs could not be started due to kernel oops (​github:gh-639) Linux Host and Guest: Fixed issue when kernel modules were failing to build with openSUSE 16.0 kernel Linux Host and Guest: Added initial support for kernel 7.1 Linux Host and Guest: Added extra fixes for RHEL 9.8 kernel (​github:gh-676) Linux Host and Guest: Added possibility to build source code using NASM instead of YASM as the assembler (​github:gh-520) Linux Guest Additions: Added initial support for Extended Data Control Protocol for clipboard sharing with Plasma on Wayland guests (​github:gh-33) Linux Guest Additions: Added extra fixes for preventing vboxvideo kernel module build with kernel version 7.0 and newer (​github:gh-655) OS/2 Guest Additions: Fixed issue when Shared Folders automount and clipboard sharing stopped working (​github:gh-551) Download: VirtualBox 7.2.10 | 170.0 MB (Open Source) Download: VirtualBox 7.2.10 Extension Pack | 19.1 MB View: VirtualBox Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • OK, now ask yourself how are they going to enforce that law? By requiring every single adult to prove their age and provide their legal identity documents to an UNREGULATED 3rd party company that already has a long track record of multiple data breaches. Not to mention, parliament have voted AGAINST this ban, twice, and Starmer is going ahead anyway. So, where's the democracy here, because that looks like dictatorship to me. The solution here is parental responsibility, not government control. Run some public service announcements on TV and UK social media teaching parents how to setup parental controls. That's already been proven to actually work. But the, this is not and has NEVER been about keeping kids safe. It's about control and monitoring. Watching what you're doing online and controlling what you can see and what you can say.
    • Interesting read. I knew the adware was quite controversial at the time, however never realised to the point The Guardian wrote an article about Patchou. I just said no and enjoyed his creation, I’d probably be a lot more wary of something like that today though.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      525
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      180
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      105
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      89
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!