Microsoft Denies Windows 7 Has Gone Gold


Recommended Posts

SOURCE

By Michael Muchmore

A Microsoft spokesman denied widespread reports on the Internet that Microsoft has produced an RTM version of its Windows 7 operating system and would announce it a partners event on Monday.

"Contrary to the wide reports that we have an RTM build and plan to announce it today, we will do neither," said a Microsoft representative who asked not to be named. "I'm not sure where the report of the 13th originated, but it's nothing we've confirmed and it's simply false. We will RTM before the end of the month as previously announced."

Reports have said previously that the RTM version would be announced at the Microsoft Worldwide Partner Conference in New Orleans, coming against a backdrop of two surveys that reported that most businesses would hold off purchasing Windows 7, at least initially. Microsoft also announced Office 2010, and provided PCMag.com with a copy of the code for a hands-on evaluation.

PCMag.com's reviews team, which regularly receives information about Microsoft products ahead of time, said that it had not received confirmation from Microsoft that the RTM had been already completed or that July 13th would be the date of its release. Microsoft often maintains internal builds with higher numbers that still have a way to go before release. Microsoft has said, however, the build will appear "before the end of the month."

Despite Microsoft's claims, versions claiming to be final RTM have appeared on BitTorrent bearing the build number 7600, despite the fact that version 7300 has been believed to be the final build number. Many tech enthusiast blogs have reported that the milestone has been reached, including respected blogger Long Zheng, who has created a Web site called HasWindows7RTMed.com, which already displays an all-capped "YES" and a build number of 7600 below that, based on the underground file-sharing version that materialized over the weekend.

Windows 7's official build number has not yet been established, the Microsoft spokesman stated. "The way it works is that a build is produced and then run through a series of checks before declared the official build number for a milestone," he said in an email. "For RTM, those checks are much more significant (since RTM is an industry milestone as opposed to a MSFT internal milestone). There's no way to predict the build number until the build is through all the checks and declared RTM."

sounds like spin to me, and downloading 3gb wasnt a waste for me as i dont have any limits :p

+1 no problems here either. Hopefully, these limits will go away for everyone. The internet is supposed to be open to everyone (without limitations). I sure hope they hurry up on Internet 2 because that would be very welcome. :)

Well, I'm pretty sure they are not going to say Yes even if its the real RTM

Not until just before release anyway. :) They have become a bit more secretive on exactly when things are going to happen with Windows 7. However, I can't really blame them because even they don't know what build will pass their quality standards.

Is not the first time MS denies something that later comes to be true.

Exactly. They are simply not going to confirm it until they are ready. If it is RTM, it is. If it isn't, it isn't.

Any Windows 7 build is better than Vista.

Let us know what U find.

Well it installed in twelve minutes on my machine and every single app I'm using obviously runs perfectly. It's extremely snappy, although the last build I used was 7100 x64. I really do hope this is the real RTM though, as I don't want to re-install, but I won't have too much of a problem doing it. Even my Creative sound card is working 100% perfectly. :p

Edited by Unrealistic
Read it again. They did not deny it. :laugh: They're just not confirming it today - something they will do tomorrow.

yea, I am shooting from you know where. :p

+1: I call this beating around the bush. Of course they are not going to announce that there is a leak out in the wild that may well be RTM. dooohh

I feel sorry for the folks that thought build 7600 was the final, a waste of 3GB of your precious time :laugh:

Build 7600 is likely the final, but the revision number (16384) will probably increase.

I'm unsure how many more times I'll have to repeat this.

This was what happened with Vista too. Do we really have such a short memory?

Build 7600 is likely the final, but the revision number (16384) will probably increase.

I'm unsure how many more times I'll have to repeat this.

This was what happened with Vista too. Do we really have such a short memory?

You understand that revision numbers are incremented when changes are made right? :huh:

I feel sorry for the folks that thought build 7600 was the final, a waste of 3GB of your precious time :laugh:

It would be nice if some people would pay attention to those like Tom W, who knows what he is talking about. Build 7600 will be the final build, but, as stated over and over, the build can be recompiled several times. So YES, 7600 is the final build.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Still hate Windows 11, I stuck it on my gaming machine again just for a nose to see what they had done, still as bad. Will restore Windows 10 back on it, suit MS anyway, they don't want me to run Windows 11 on it.
    • Ms did go with the you must sign into an account thing with Windows 8 for a while. The same sort of thing they are doing with Windows now and the MS account.
    • Hello, What sort of Microsoft Authenticator account login approval requests are you getting?  It is a generic authentication app and can be used with all sorts of services (Microsoft Account, Google Account, websites and services that support multi-factor authentication, etc.). Regards, Aryeh Goretsky
    • Windows 8? Nah. I found Window 8 worked well, get a third party start menu to get rid of the start screen, I used Start is back and windows 8 was pretty good. I used it even when Windows 10 came out as I found Windows 10 was iffy on my machine at the time was AMD FX Bulldozer based. It was only when I updated the innards to Ryzen that I had no choice but to go to Windows 10 as MS made it difficult to stay with Windows 8. ME, yes, that was not great, I liked the look of it, but it was not stable, shame really because Windows 98SE was the best of the dos based Windows.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      441
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      134
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!