Recommended Posts

Simply beautiful... One thing, the home button seems brighter than back/forward ones

...and tabs' throbber works :D

We re-made the back and forward buttons, and forgot to update home as well. I'll talk to BoneyardBrew later and see if we can come up with something.

Help.. Mine looks like this!!

Do you have any other stylish scripts enabled?

Delete all the Stylish code you had for the previous version and add the new lines that were with the download link.

You don't need to add that code at all, that just enables an alternative background style for bookmarks and tabs.

Can you list all the addons and stylish scripts you have enabled?

The only stylish script I have running is Googlebar transparent, I have disabled it and nothing changes.

I have several addons

Adblock

All glass firefox mod

download helper

fission

google toolbar

google preview

ie tab

locationbar

noscript

pdf download

print context menu

stylish

stop or reload button

B.

The only stylish script I have running is Googlebar transparent, I have disabled it and nothing changes.

I have several addons

Adblock

All glass firefox mod

download helper

fission

google toolbar

google preview

ie tab

locationbar

noscript

pdf download

print context menu

stylish

stop or reload button

B.

It seems to be locationbar, I'll see if I can fix that.

Edit: give this a shot.

#identity-box > hbox {
margin-top: -1px !important;
margin-bottom: -1px !important;
}

It seems to be locationbar, I'll see if I can fix that.

Edit: give this a shot.

#identity-box > hbox {
margin-top: -1px !important;
margin-bottom: -1px !important;
}

That fixed the problem with the url bar. I found a way to correct the https issue here is the code

#urlbar #identity-icon-label { display: none !important; }

Thanks

B.

That fixed the problem with the url bar. I found a way to correct the https issue here is the code

#urlbar #identity-icon-label { display: none !important; }

Thanks

B.

Oh I see. We intended for the name to be there on a secure site.

Somewhere on one of these threads I'm sure I saw a piece of code about giving the tab bar and bookmarks bar an alternative shading but for the life of me have forgotten this too - *looks up like a poor dog*

Thanks!

Somewhere on one of these threads I'm sure I saw a piece of code about giving the tab bar and bookmarks bar an alternative shading but for the life of me have forgotten this too - *looks up like a poor dog*

Thanks!

Here try this:

 #bookmarksBarContent{
 -moz-border-image: url("chrome://global/skin/images/extras/Bookmarks-BG.png") 0 8 0 8 / 0 8px 0 8px !important;
 margin-left: -3px !important;
 margin-right: -3px !important;
 margin-bottom: -3px !important;
 margin-top: -4px !important;}
 .tabs-container {
 -moz-border-image: url("chrome://global/skin/images/extras/Tab-BG.png") 1 8 0 8 / 0 8px 0 8px !important;}

He means in the original Firefox 4 mockups. It had a slight frost and overall wasn't like the default Aero theme.

I can tell you all that the mockups were in no way a real Firefox theme. They were put together in Photoshop using a template of a Windows 7 window. I can safely say this because of the following reasons:

- The blur behind the window is way to strong. I'm talking about three times as strong as the default aero blur, and there is no way to increase the blur in Win7 or Vista.

- The tab close buttons are off by one pixel in relation to each other, so the first tab's close button is in one place, the second tab's is one pixel off from that, and the third is another pixel off from that, so it's not consistent in any way (most likely a tiny error in spacing by the author of the mockups, not noticeable to the naked eye. But then, I have a zoom button in my Photoshop :D).

- The window edges are slightly less rounded than a normal windows 7 window.

- Some elements of the theme are going into the window edges, something that as far as I know isn't really possible (may be wrong).

So, yeah. It's just a mockup and nothing else. ;)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The problem of course is simply that government does not always know best. My point is that agency is taken away from the EU consumer in these cases. I'm sorry, but I do not believe that governments (politicians) are inherently good, and "looking out for me." Primarily they look to themselves and their own personal desires first, foremost, and always. When the EU or the DOJ fines these companies, claiming to "represent the welfare of the consumer," how much of these billion-dollar judgments are handed to the consumers they claim to represent? Not even a dollar, as I've seen. Yet the EUC lawyers who are paid to sit around and dream up these suits make huge commissions on the fines the EUC adjudicates, which is an ironclad fact I hope everyone is aware of. It's also rank corruption, of course, but that's another topic. Last, when the EU inflicts these judgments, or the DOJ, take your pick, the costs are bundled right along in the cost of the goods and services these companies provide the consumers they are "looking out for." If you are someone who believes his government is his savior then you have my condolences. I think Apple is right here, because the whole scheme of consumer choice is that consumers pick and choose among the products companies offer. Microsoft Windows is more compatible with third party software and hardware than any desktop OS on Earth, which is my sole reason for choosing it. Just because the EUC forces companies do certain things it knows the companies do not want to do, "or else", has no bearing on consumer benefit. This Siri thing is almost idiotic it's so infantile. But this is what the EUC does when the EU in Brussels becomes cash-strapped and needs a big infusion of cash. Some people get upset by "big companies" but it's the opposite when governments dwarf the size and scope of these companies, which is so obvious it hurts.... I mean you can't honestly believe that forcing Apple to do things with Siri it has its own reasons to decline is something that "opens up" Apple, do you? Say it aint' so...
    • Looks like many years since the request was made, a directory tree view finally may be added. https://github.com/files-community/Files/pull/18537
    • There's this from last year https://gist.github.com/threat...364659a8887841aa43deca4efd9 but nothing about a buffer overflow that MS somehow can't code against. No matter what, it makes sense to take a "protected by default" approach.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      sjbousquet earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      sjbousquet earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      DragonOfMercy earned a badge
      First Post
    • First Post
      bella52 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      Techinmay earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      501
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      212
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      156
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!