Recommended Posts

Simply beautiful... One thing, the home button seems brighter than back/forward ones

...and tabs' throbber works :D

We re-made the back and forward buttons, and forgot to update home as well. I'll talk to BoneyardBrew later and see if we can come up with something.

Help.. Mine looks like this!!

Do you have any other stylish scripts enabled?

Delete all the Stylish code you had for the previous version and add the new lines that were with the download link.

You don't need to add that code at all, that just enables an alternative background style for bookmarks and tabs.

Can you list all the addons and stylish scripts you have enabled?

The only stylish script I have running is Googlebar transparent, I have disabled it and nothing changes.

I have several addons

Adblock

All glass firefox mod

download helper

fission

google toolbar

google preview

ie tab

locationbar

noscript

pdf download

print context menu

stylish

stop or reload button

B.

The only stylish script I have running is Googlebar transparent, I have disabled it and nothing changes.

I have several addons

Adblock

All glass firefox mod

download helper

fission

google toolbar

google preview

ie tab

locationbar

noscript

pdf download

print context menu

stylish

stop or reload button

B.

It seems to be locationbar, I'll see if I can fix that.

Edit: give this a shot.

#identity-box > hbox {
margin-top: -1px !important;
margin-bottom: -1px !important;
}

It seems to be locationbar, I'll see if I can fix that.

Edit: give this a shot.

#identity-box > hbox {
margin-top: -1px !important;
margin-bottom: -1px !important;
}

That fixed the problem with the url bar. I found a way to correct the https issue here is the code

#urlbar #identity-icon-label { display: none !important; }

Thanks

B.

That fixed the problem with the url bar. I found a way to correct the https issue here is the code

#urlbar #identity-icon-label { display: none !important; }

Thanks

B.

Oh I see. We intended for the name to be there on a secure site.

Somewhere on one of these threads I'm sure I saw a piece of code about giving the tab bar and bookmarks bar an alternative shading but for the life of me have forgotten this too - *looks up like a poor dog*

Thanks!

Somewhere on one of these threads I'm sure I saw a piece of code about giving the tab bar and bookmarks bar an alternative shading but for the life of me have forgotten this too - *looks up like a poor dog*

Thanks!

Here try this:

 #bookmarksBarContent{
 -moz-border-image: url("chrome://global/skin/images/extras/Bookmarks-BG.png") 0 8 0 8 / 0 8px 0 8px !important;
 margin-left: -3px !important;
 margin-right: -3px !important;
 margin-bottom: -3px !important;
 margin-top: -4px !important;}
 .tabs-container {
 -moz-border-image: url("chrome://global/skin/images/extras/Tab-BG.png") 1 8 0 8 / 0 8px 0 8px !important;}

He means in the original Firefox 4 mockups. It had a slight frost and overall wasn't like the default Aero theme.

I can tell you all that the mockups were in no way a real Firefox theme. They were put together in Photoshop using a template of a Windows 7 window. I can safely say this because of the following reasons:

- The blur behind the window is way to strong. I'm talking about three times as strong as the default aero blur, and there is no way to increase the blur in Win7 or Vista.

- The tab close buttons are off by one pixel in relation to each other, so the first tab's close button is in one place, the second tab's is one pixel off from that, and the third is another pixel off from that, so it's not consistent in any way (most likely a tiny error in spacing by the author of the mockups, not noticeable to the naked eye. But then, I have a zoom button in my Photoshop :D).

- The window edges are slightly less rounded than a normal windows 7 window.

- Some elements of the theme are going into the window edges, something that as far as I know isn't really possible (may be wrong).

So, yeah. It's just a mockup and nothing else. ;)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Instagram now lets you manually reorder posts on your profile grid by David Uzondu Instagram is finally rolling out the ability to customize your feed layout as you see fit by letting you reorder posts on your profile grid. This feature comes several months after the app introduced a tool that lets users rearrange photos and videos within a carousel post after it has already been published. To do that, people tap the three-dot menu in the top right corner of the post, select the edit option, and reorganize their slides. Now that Instagram has expanded the feature to your profile grid, you can organize your main page without deleting old uploads. To use the new system, you simply tap any picture on your grid and select the option to reorder. This action opens up a separate screen where you can freely drag your grid items around until you get your preferred aesthetic, and then you just hit the back button to save your changes. Instagram's Threads account posted that the system would reach accounts starting this week, so you might need to wait for the automatic update to hit your phone. https://www.threads.com/@instagram/post/DZVV_fyjjSW In other Instagram news, last week, people figured out that if you ask Meta's AI support assistant to hand over any Instagram account, the bot will actually hand it over (even if the victim's account had 2FA enabled). The security exploit involved the assistant accepting prompts from users and generating password reset links for unauthorized email addresses. Meta said that the issue has now been fixed, but this came after the issue affected several high-profile accounts, including @obamawhitehouse. Last month, the company finally rolled out paid subscription tiers for WhatsApp and other Meta social platforms after months of testing. WhatsApp Plus costs $2.99 a month and gives you custom themes, while Instagram Plus and Facebook Plus cost $3.99 a month for extra profile customization and story rewatch counters. Meta's also working on Meta One, a unified subscription service that contains options for heavy users of its servers who want more reach or advanced features. For instance, Meta One Essential ($14.99/mo) comes with a verified badge and impersonation protection. If you pay for Meta One Premium ($19.99/mo), you get deeper AI reasoning tools, whereas the Meta One Advanced ($49.99/mo) tier increases your search placement (on Facebook and Instagram) and visibility.
    • Hello mysterious lamborghiniv10, I was in Australia and... now I'm in the Netherlands. 
    • EU says Meta must restore rival chatbots' access to WhatsApp by Hamid Ganji The European Commission has ordered Meta to restore third-party AI chatbots’ access to WhatsApp after the tech giant decided to block them from operating on the popular messaging platform. After Meta banned rival AI chatbots from operating on WhatsApp, the European Commission launched an antitrust investigation to determine whether the company had abused its market dominance. As a result of Meta’s decision, third-party AI chatbots, including Microsoft’s Copilot and OpenAI’s ChatGPT, were prevented from operating on WhatsApp. At the time, Meta said it wanted to reserve the WhatsApp Business API for other types of businesses and did not allow rival chatbots to use it. This effectively prevented the WhatsApp ecosystem from being used to distribute rival chatbot services. However, the European Commission has now announced an interim measures decision requiring Meta to restore access to WhatsApp for rival general-purpose AI assistants on the same terms and conditions as before October 15, 2025. The Commission has also asked Meta to maintain that access until the antitrust investigation is concluded. The Commission argues that Meta has used its dominant market position to prevent rival AI chatbots from accessing the WhatsApp Business API. While Meta allowed rival services to return to WhatsApp by paying a fee, the European Commission still considers that arrangement to be a de facto access ban. According to EU antitrust chief Teresa Ribera, the fees introduced by Meta are so high that using WhatsApp is no longer economically sustainable for competitors. “It seems that Meta expects to leverage the vast reach and likely dominance of WhatsApp to benefit its own AI assistant and to foreclose rivals,” Ribera said. “We cannot let large digital incumbents leverage their dominance of the past to dictate who in Europe gets to compete and who gets to innovate in AI.”
    • A few years ago walmart had the 512 models on clearance for $35. I bought 3 of them. I should have purchased more.
    • I'm fine with a little reasonable promotion of Edge, but the degree which they do it right now I consider extremely unreasonable. 
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Primer1st earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Experienced
      JayZJay went up a rank
      Experienced
    • Reacting Well
      Sir_Timbit earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      rubentuben8 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      ARaclen earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      512
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      229
    3. 3
      Edouard
      134
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      87
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      80
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!